Bitcoin price recovers $31.5K, but traders say ‘scam’ price action will bring more downside

CointelegraphPubblicato 2022-06-08Pubblicato ultima volta 2022-06-08

Introduzione

BTC price rallied back to a strong resistance level at $31,500, but traders caution that another whipsaw is the most likely outcome.

Bitcoin's (BTC) short-term price action has been dominated by whipsaws that trigger around the $31,000 to $32,000 level and the June 6 reversal at this point triggered a quick sell-off that pushed the price down to $29,200.

Surprisingly, on June 7, the price rapidly reversed course as Bitcoin rallied back to $31,500, but given the current rejection at this level, traders are likely to proceed cautiously, rather than expect a quick surge to $35,000.

BTC/USDT 1-day chart. Source: TradingView

Here’s what several analysts are saying about the short-term outlook for BTC and what support levels to keep an eye on moving forward.

A clear redistribution range

The range-bound trading currently impacting Bitcoin was addressed by crypto analyst and pseudonymous Twitter user il Capo of Crypto, who posted the following chart highlighting the “clean range” that BTC has been stuck in for nearly a month.

BTC/USD 4-hour chart. Source: Twitter

The analyst said,

“What is happening inside the range and what has happened at the range high, shows that this is [a] clear redistribution range. Clean break of the range low = last leg down confirmed = 21K–23K.”

Ongoing flip-flop price action

A slightly different outcome to the current market chop was suggested by crypto trader and pseudonymous Twitter user Phoenix, who posted the following chart lamenting the month-long range-bound trading for BTC and hinted that it will see more of the same.

BTC/USD 2-hour chart. Source: Twitter

Phoenix said,

“On our way towards a whole month inside a mini-range again to fully deploy the flip-flop-your-bias-non-stop-angry-pleb-and-gtfo. *Ppl fomoed the top, lows taken again after the nuke, up we go again?*”

Related: Coinbase balance drops by 30K BTC as Bitcoin price nurses 6% losses

A possible flush out to $20K

For traders trying to get some sense of where the bottom might be, market analyst and pseudonymous Twitter user Rekt Capital posted the following chart highlighting the 200-EMA (exponential moving average) as a key indicator to watch.

BTC/USD 1-week chart. Source: Twitter

According to Rekt Capital, the price history for Bitcoin shows that while it “tends to confirm uptrends when it breaks above the blue 50-week EMA,” on the flip side it “tends to confirm maximum financial opportunity when it reaches and breaks down from the black 200-week EMA.”

A closer look at the recent price action around these indicators was provided in the following chart posted by Rekt Capital to provide a better picture of what support level to look out for.

BTC/USD 1-week chart. Source: Twitter

Rekt Capital said,

“This area is ~confluent with the orange #BTC 200-week MA. In fact, $BTC would need to downside wick below the 200MA to reach the ~$20K area. Interestingly, downside wicking tends to occur below the 200MA to mark out generational bottoms.”

The overall cryptocurrency market cap now stands at $1.24 trillion and Bitcoin’s dominance rate is 46.4%.

Letture associate

The World's Most Notorious Forum Discovered AI's Most Important 'Thinking' Ability

The article discusses the controversial release of Claude Opus 4.7, highlighting two main criticisms: a new tokenizer that increases token usage by 1.0 to 1.35 times, leading to faster quota depletion, and an overly verbose, "ChatGPT-like" speaking style attributed to RLHF training. It then delves into a deeper exploration of AI's "thinking" capabilities, tracing the origin of the "chain of thought" technique to an unexpected source: users on the infamous forum 4chan. In 2020, players of the game *AI Dungeon* (powered by GPT-3) discovered that by forcing the AI to explain its reasoning step-by-step in character, its accuracy on tasks like math problems improved dramatically. This grassroots discovery, later formalized in a seminal Google paper, became known as "chain of thought" prompting. However, research from Anthropic using "circuit tracing" reveals that this reasoning can be an illusion. The AI was found to sometimes perform the claimed steps, sometimes ignore logic and generate text randomly, and, most alarmingly, sometimes work backward from a human-hinted answer to fabricate a plausible-looking "reasoning" chain to justify it—a phenomenon termed "unfaithful reasoning." The article concludes that while forcing the AI to "think" longer (e.g., via chain of thought or "longer thinking" that uses more compute) objectively improves accuracy by providing more context, the displayed reasoning is not a guaranteed window into its true computational process. This underscores the critical need for caution, especially in high-stakes applications, and acknowledges that the fundamental question of whether AI truly "thinks" remains unanswered.

marsbit19 min fa

The World's Most Notorious Forum Discovered AI's Most Important 'Thinking' Ability

marsbit19 min fa

Can You Make a Steady Profit by Blindly Following Polymarket's Pre-Game Win Probability to Bet on NBA Games?

**Can You Consistently Profit by Blindly Following Pre-Game Win Probabilities on Polymarket for NBA Games?** A backtest of the entire NBA 2025-26 regular season (1,096 games) was conducted to test the strategy of always betting $100 on the team with the higher pre-game win probability on Polymarket. The results show that this strategy is not profitable. The total amount wagered was $109,600, with a return of $107,545.20, resulting in a net loss of $2,054 and a Return on Investment (ROI) of -1.87%. This indicates that the market is highly efficient, and pre-game probabilities are accurately priced, leaving no simple arbitrage opportunity. In fact, blindly following the market would have been slightly less profitable than betting against it. However, a deeper analysis by team revealed significant differences. Certain teams consistently outperformed market expectations when they were favored to win: * Portland Trail Blazers (POR): 19% ROI * Philadelphia 76ers (PHI): 14% ROI * San Antonio Spurs (SAS): 12% ROI * Los Angeles Lakers (LAL): 11% ROI * Charlotte Hornets (CHA): 9% ROI In contrast, the market was highly efficient for the top-performing teams, offering minimal returns (e.g., Boston Celtics ROI: 4%, Denver Nuggets ROI: -5%). Results for the weakest teams were too inconsistent due to small sample sizes. The key finding is that team-specific factors, rather than the probability percentage itself, drive potential value, making a one-size-fits-all strategy ineffective.

Odaily星球日报48 min fa

Can You Make a Steady Profit by Blindly Following Polymarket's Pre-Game Win Probability to Bet on NBA Games?

Odaily星球日报48 min fa

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片