加密货币开发商创造了3000万美元的名人模因币:Bubblemaps

币界网Pubblicato 2024-08-15Pubblicato ultima volta 2024-08-15

币界网报道:

区块链数据提供商Bubblemaps发布了一份关于连续模因硬币发射器和开发商Sahil Arora的调查报告。据报道,Sahil通过在Solana上推出名人代币获得了超过3000万美元的收入。然而,链上调查员ZachXBT不同意报告中的数据。

根据Bubblemaps的一份调查报告,Sahil已经为几位名人推出了代币,其中大部分代币都归零。据报道,目前居住在印度的Sahil利用他的粉丝群将名人加入加密货币。

他发行代币的一些著名名人包括弗洛伊德·梅威瑟、凯特琳·詹纳、Iggy Azalea、Jason Derulo、Amber Rose、Lil Pump、Davido、Sunny Leon、Bobbi Althoff、Trippie Redd等。

Bubblemaps:推特上线后,Sahil立即抛售了代币

据报道,Sahil利用pump.fun和他在Instagram上的数百万粉丝,向名人发出大额付款的要约,并要求他们在推特上发布代币的合同地址。

根据Bubblemaps的说法,Sahil在推特上线后就遵循了倾销的模式,因为他几乎拥有所有的代币供应。Sahil利用名人观众作为他的退出流动性。

来源:Sahil Arora在Instagram上与Derulo的对话(Bubblemaps)

Bubblemaps已经确定了40多个与Sahil相关的加密地址。有趣的是,他在一个地址持有25-40%的供应量,并在代币出售后将SOL发送到主地址。

2024年对Sahil来说是非常有利可图的,因为到8月为止,开发商已经获得了2640万美元的收入。在1月、2月、3月、4月、5月、6月、7月和8月,Sahil分别赚了300万美元、180万美元、320万美元、250万美元、480万美元、2500万美元、7月200万美元和8月660万美元。

Bubblemaps还发现,Sahil每天都在Pumpfun上推出代币,在那里他以10 SOL的价格购买代币,并在他的Telegram频道上抛售后迅速抛售。

ZachXBT不同意Bubblemaps的报道

链上侦探ZachXBT很快在报告下方发布了一条推文,不同意Bubblemaps分享的利润数字。ZachXBT表示:“很抱歉,这个数字似乎不正确,Sahil不可能通过检查这些硬币的流动性获得2600万美元。”。

ZachXBT还分享了一项估计,Sahil的收入将不到500万美元,很可能是200万至300万美元。链上侦探指出,Bubblemaps在调查中犯了一个错误,将Poloniex的热钱包地址算作Sahil的。

ZachXBT还呼吁Bubblemaps即使在被证明完全错误后也没有对他们的帖子进行任何更正。

该报告发布之际,2024年名人模因币越来越受欢迎。随着基于Solana的模因币越来越受欢迎,名人模因币也在上升,其中大多数最终都变成了垃圾桶。

Letture associate

a16z: AI's 'Amnesia', Can Continuous Learning Cure It?

The article "a16z: AI's 'Amnesia' – Can Continual Learning Cure It?" explores the limitations of current large language models (LLMs), which, like the protagonist in the film *Memento*, are trapped in a perpetual present—unable to form new memories after training. While methods like in-context learning (ICL), retrieval-augmented generation (RAG), and external scaffolding (e.g., chat history, prompts) provide temporary solutions, they fail to enable true internalization of new knowledge. The authors argue that compression—the core of learning during training—is halted at deployment, preventing models from generalizing, discovering novel solutions (e.g., mathematical proofs), or handling adversarial scenarios. The piece introduces *continual learning* as a critical research direction to address this, categorizing approaches into three paths: 1. **Context**: Scaling external memory via longer context windows, multi-agent systems, and smarter retrieval. 2. **Modules**: Using pluggable adapters or external memory layers for specialization without full retraining. 3. **Weights**: Enabling parameter updates through sparse training, test-time training, meta-learning, distillation, and reinforcement learning from feedback. Challenges include catastrophic forgetting, safety risks, and auditability, but overcoming these could unlock models that learn iteratively from experience. The conclusion emphasizes that while context-based methods are effective, true breakthroughs require models to compress new information into weights post-deployment, moving from mere retrieval to genuine learning.

marsbit2 h fa

a16z: AI's 'Amnesia', Can Continuous Learning Cure It?

marsbit2 h fa

Can a Hair Dryer Earn $34,000? Deciphering the Reflexivity Paradox in Prediction Markets

An individual manipulated a weather sensor at Paris Charles de Gaulle Airport with a portable heat source, causing a Polymarket weather market to settle at 22°C and earning $34,000. This incident highlights a fundamental issue in prediction markets: when a market aims to reflect reality, it also incentivizes participants to influence that reality. Prediction markets operate on two layers: platform rules (what outcome counts as a win) and data sources (what actually happened). While most focus on rules, the real vulnerability lies in the data source. If reality is recorded through a specific source, influencing that source directly affects market settlement. The article categorizes markets by their vulnerability: 1. **Single-point physical data sources** (e.g., weather stations): Easily manipulated through physical interference. 2. **Insider information markets** (e.g., MrBeast video details): Insiders like team members use non-public information to trade. Kalshi fined a剪辑师 $20,000 for insider trading. 3. **Actor-manipulated markets** (e.g., Andrew Tate’s tweet counts): The subject of the market can control the outcome. Evidence suggests Tate’sociated accounts coordinated to profit. 4. **Individual-action markets** (e.g., WNBA disruptions): A single person can execute an event to profit from their pre-placed bets. Kalshi and Polymarket handle these issues differently. Kalshi enforces strict KYC, publicly penalizes insider trading, and reports to regulators. Polymarket, with its anonymous wallet-based system, has historically been more permissive, arguing that insider information improves market accuracy. However, it cooperated with authorities in the "Van Dyke case," where a user traded on classified government information. The core paradox is reflexivity: prediction markets are designed to discover truth, but their financial incentives can distort reality. The more valuable a prediction becomes, the more likely participants are to influence the event itself. The market ceases to be a mirror of reality and instead shapes it.

marsbit3 h fa

Can a Hair Dryer Earn $34,000? Deciphering the Reflexivity Paradox in Prediction Markets

marsbit3 h fa

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片