特朗普声称哈里斯使用人工智能来伪造人群是“虚假的”

币界网Pubblicato 2024-08-13Pubblicato ultima volta 2024-08-13

币界网报道:

唐纳德·特朗普指责他的总统竞争对手卡玛拉·哈里斯使用人工智能伪造参加集会的人群的图像。然而,包括《纽约时报》在内的几家媒体驳斥了这些指控,称其是虚假的,证实他们在哈里斯的活动中目睹了数千名支持者。

8月11日,特朗普在其全资拥有的社交网络Truth social上发帖称:“有人注意到卡玛拉在机场作弊了吗?飞机上没有人,她‘人工智能’了它,并展示了一大群所谓的追随者,但他们并不存在!”

哈里斯竞选团队吹嘘“摇摆州”人群

特朗普指的是一大群支持者的照片,估计有15000人,他们于8月7日在密歇根州的一个机场接待了哈里斯,当时她离开了空军二号。据媒体报道,这位前总统的说法是错误的。

《纽约时报》称,8月10日,机场有数千人,拉斯维加斯有12000人参加了活动。据《卫报》报道,一天前,亚利桑那州格伦代尔的集会有15000多名与会者,哈里斯竞选团队也质疑特朗普的说法。

“如果你忘了@realdonaldtrump:这就是摇摆州集会的样子,”该团队在回应特朗普在Truth Social上的帖子时说。民主党总统候选人哈里斯与她的竞选伙伴明尼苏达州州长蒂姆·沃尔兹一起参加了密歇根州的集会。

特朗普指控哈里斯正在将人工智能的后真相潜力武器化,以发挥其吸引人群的力量,此前他承认自己使用了这项技术来增强自己的演讲。然而,特朗普最近的表现似乎并没有过度利用人工智能的传奇道德保障。

这位前总统在椭圆形办公室的第二次机会似乎很有把握,因为他可以说赢得了与当时的对手乔·拜登的总统辩论。在上个月初的一次暗杀企图中幸存下来后,他在基于以太坊的预测平台Polymarket上赢得总统职位的几率飙升至72%。

然而,拜登出人意料地让位给哈里斯,因为民主党人因担心他是否适合担任公职而将他赶下台。突然之间,特朗普的旋风式竞选遭遇了意想不到的挫折,因为哈里斯的筹款活动达到了创纪录的数字,她的集会继续吸引了令人印象深刻的人群。在最新的民意调查中,哈里斯在关键的所谓摇摆州领先特朗普。

特朗普对对手进行了猛烈抨击

从那以后,特朗普经常对哈里斯进行抨击,包括针对参加她集会的人群的照片进行圣战。7月在纳什维尔举行的2024年比特币年会上,特朗普发表了反对哈里斯的声明,这些声明被认为在政治上是不正确的。

这位房地产大亨嘲笑哈里斯的种族身份,对她的容貌发表侮辱性言论,并给她起了一个虚构的印度绰号。8月初,他在与黑人记者坐下来时重复了同样的声明。

关于密歇根州的人群,特朗普声称哈里斯在机场被一名维修工人曝光。有趣的是,这位前总统将所谓的人工智能工作与他声称2020年选举被乔·拜登击败的说法相提并论。

“这就是民主党人通过作弊赢得选举的方式——他们在投票箱的表现更糟糕。她应该被取消资格,因为制造虚假形象是对选举的干涉。任何这样做的人都会在任何事情上作弊!”

《纽约时报》还重点报道了特朗普的说法,即他在国会大厦骚乱前臭名昭著的华盛顿特区集会人数超过了民权运动马丁·路德·金的“我有一个梦想”演讲吸引的人数。

Letture associate

Ethereum's Next Stop Glamsterdam: The Core Upgrades You Must Know

The Glamsterdam upgrade, scheduled for late 2026, is a major Ethereum hard fork combining the Amsterdam execution layer and Glasgow consensus layer updates. Its primary goal is not simply increasing throughput but restructuring Ethereum's block production, validation, and resource pricing to enable future scaling. Key technical changes include **EIP-7732 (ePBS)**, which formally enshrines proposer-builder separation into the protocol. This decouples consensus and execution tasks, extending the execution payload propagation window to ~9 seconds. This provides more time for node verification, allowing for safer increases in block capacity (Gas limit) in the future. Another core component is **EIP-7928 (Block-Level Access Lists - BAL)**. It mandates a list of all state accessed within a block, moving this feature from an optional transaction-level (EIP-2930) to a mandatory block-level requirement. This explicit access list enables client optimizations like parallel disk reads and state root computations, paving the way for parallel execution. To manage long-term state growth, **EIP-8037** increases the cost of creating new state (e.g., accounts, storage slots), separating the pricing of permanent database bloat from temporary computation. This allows execution capacity to scale more aggressively without causing state size to explode proportionally. The planned upgrade bundle includes around 10 EIPs categorized into: 1) Core protocol restructuring (ePBS, BAL), 2) Resource pricing adjustments (state costs, calldata costs), and 3) EVM/developer improvements. Several other EIPs, including those potentially improving staker exit liquidity (EIP-8061, EIP-8080), are under consideration. The technical development coincides with significant personnel changes within the Ethereum Foundation's Protocol team. The Foundation's official communications frame this as part of a broader shift towards a "coalition of organizations" working on the Ethereum roadmap, citing new entities like ethlabs and the Ethereum Economic Zone. In summary, Glamsterdam represents a foundational re-engineering of Ethereum's block pipeline and economic model—focusing on ePBS, BAL, and multi-dimensional resource pricing—to prepare the network for sustainable, high-throughput scaling in the years ahead.

Foresight News7 min fa

Ethereum's Next Stop Glamsterdam: The Core Upgrades You Must Know

Foresight News7 min fa

The Ethereum Foundation Has Split?! An In-depth Look at Ethlabs' "Bright Future"

"Ethereum Foundation Splits? Understanding Ethlabs and Its 'Bright Future'" Former Ethereum Foundation members Ansgar Dietrichs, Barnabé Monnot, Caspar Schwarz-Schilling, Josh Rudolf, and Julian Ma have announced the launch of Ethlabs, an independent non-profit research and development lab. Announced on June 22nd, the initiative comes amidst discussions about the need for new organizational structures within the Ethereum ecosystem, a point highlighted by Bankless founder David Hoffman. Ethlabs' mission is to establish Ethereum as the foundational settlement layer for the global economy. The organization positions itself as a bridge connecting frontline developers, applications, and user needs with the core protocol. It aims to translate real-world demands into protocol improvements, industry standards, and deployable products. The founding team brings significant expertise: Dietrichs and Monnot are highly cited researchers in areas like Proposer-Builder Separation (PBS) and MEV, while Schwarz-Schilling, Rudolf, and Ma contribute backgrounds in economic modeling, consensus research, and applied cryptography. Initial supporters include BitMine, a major corporate ETH treasury; Sharplink, another treasury firm; and Consensys founder Joe Lubin in a personal capacity. Community backers include figures like Uniswap's Hayden Adams and Base's Jesse Pollak. The timing coincides with internal Ethereum Foundation discussions about "spinout" projects. While Ethlabs and the Foundation share research interests like MEV mitigation, Ethlabs frames its role not as a competitor but as part of a shift from a "single-core coordination model" to a "multi-R&D entity collaboration model." It views Ethereum as a public project belonging to all builders, with Ethlabs as one node in a broader governance network. Ultimately, Ethlabs represents an organizational evolution within the maturing Ethereum ecosystem. The key question is whether multiple research bodies can collaborate effectively to advance Ethereum as a competitive global settlement infrastructure.

Odaily星球日报11 min fa

The Ethereum Foundation Has Split?! An In-depth Look at Ethlabs' "Bright Future"

Odaily星球日报11 min fa

'Bear' Doomsday Prophecy: AI 'Reaching Its Peak', U.S. Stocks to Top Out Fastest in Q3, Down 30-50%

"A Short Seller's Dire Prediction: AI Boom Fading, US Stocks to Peak by Q3 with 30-50% Decline" Prominent macro investors Jeffrey Gundlach and Felix Zulauf warn that the AI-driven market rally is nearing its end, forecasting a major US stock market correction of 30-50%, potentially beginning as early as Q3. Their analysis points to alarming parallels with historical market tops, citing extreme concentration in the top AI-related stocks within the S&P 500. Zulauf's bearish thesis hinges on unsustainable capital expenditure trends among major cloud companies, negative free cash flow emergence, and soaring semiconductor prices. Gundlach highlights dangerous parallels to the 1999 tech bubble peak. A key divergence from conventional wisdom is Gundlach's view that long-term Treasury yields will not fall meaningfully even during a recession, due to America's structurally out-of-control fiscal deficits and soaring interest costs. He warns this could force the government into yield curve control or even a sovereign debt restructuring. Both investors express severe concerns about the opaque private credit market, drawing parallels to the pre-2008 financial crisis environment. They allege widespread rating inflation, misrepresented credit quality, liquidity illusions, and fraudulent asset valuations within this sector. The analysis links the AI boom and private credit crisis through financing costs. They argue that as AI companies' cash flows weaken and they seek funding, a high and sticky long-term interest rate environment will severely stress lower-rated corporate borrowers, exposing cracks in credit markets. Finally, they predict a regime shift where the US dollar weakens and US equities underperform global markets, marking the end of their long dominance. The stage is set for a significant market reversal.

marsbit19 min fa

'Bear' Doomsday Prophecy: AI 'Reaching Its Peak', U.S. Stocks to Top Out Fastest in Q3, Down 30-50%

marsbit19 min fa

Why Does No One Buy DeFi Insurance?

**Title: Why Isn't DeFi Insurance Being Bought?** DeFi insurance, which promised automated, unbiased payouts via smart contracts, has failed to gain traction. The core issue is economic: high premiums severely erode the yields that attract users to DeFi in the first place. For example, insuring a USDC deposit on Aave V3 could cost 1.5–2.5% of the annual yield, leaving a net return barely above a savings account. For riskier platforms like Maple Finance or Ethena, premiums can even turn net yields negative. Consequently, users often forgo insurance, as it nullifies their profit motive. The market also suffers from structural flaws. First, DeFi risks are highly correlated (e.g., an oracle failure can impact multiple protocols simultaneously), unlike the independent risks in traditional insurance. This makes large-scale events potentially catastrophic for insurers. Second, the total capital in DeFi insurance pools (e.g., Nexus Mutual's ~$81.5M) is minuscule compared to the hundreds of billions in total value locked (TVL), creating a massive capacity gap. A single major hack could drain the entire industry's reserves. Furthermore, the governance model where tokenholders vote on claims creates a conflict of interest, incentivizing them to deny payouts to protect their own funds. As a result, the sector is shrinking. While pioneers like Nexus Mutual are pivoting to preventative measures (bug bounties) and seeking external capital via reinsurance, the fundamental problems remain. DeFi insurance represents a public good—its stability benefits the entire ecosystem—but without a mechanism to share costs, a "tragedy of the commons" ensues where no one is willing to pay, leaving the system vulnerable.

marsbit33 min fa

Why Does No One Buy DeFi Insurance?

marsbit33 min fa

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片