美国人认为卡玛拉比特朗普对经济更有利

币界网Pubblicato 2024-08-11Pubblicato ultima volta 2024-08-11

币界网报道:

美国人开始认为卡玛拉·哈里斯比唐纳德·特朗普更适合处理经济问题。一项新的民意调查显示,选民的意见发生了很大变化。

近一年来,越来越多的选民在经济问题上更喜欢卡玛拉而不是特朗普。这种情绪的变化是在乔·拜登退出竞选之后发生的,这似乎给了他的副总统一个动力。

根据民意调查,42%的美国人认为卡玛拉会更好地管理经济,而41%的人仍然更信任特朗普。

这对卡玛拉来说是一个显著的增长,特别是考虑到拜登上个月的数字下降了7%。密歇根大学教授埃里克·戈登指出

“选民对卡玛拉比对拜登更积极的事实充分说明了拜登的糟糕表现。”

即使有良好的经济增长和稳定的就业数据,拜登也很难让选民觉得他们从他的任何政策中受益。

通胀担忧和卡玛拉的优势

通货膨胀仍然是大多数美国人在11月大选前最关心的问题。尽管经济指标强劲,但只有19%的选民现在感觉比拜登2021年上任时好。

民意调查还显示,60%的选民认为卡玛拉应该脱离拜登的经济政策,或者做出重大改变。

这很重要,因为卡玛拉的成功可能取决于她能与拜登的经济记录保持多大的距离。

乔·拜登

卡玛拉的支持率也高于拜登,46%的登记选民支持她作为副总统所做的工作,而41%的选民仍然支持拜登。

这种差异可能会给她带来优势,但这并不意味着她是清白的。民意调查显示,经济担忧仍然是一个主要问题,这些担忧可能对特朗普有利。

在最近的一次电视新闻发布会上,特朗普批评了拜登政府对通货膨胀的处理,这可能会引起一些在过去四年中一直在挣扎的选民的共鸣。

特朗普的经济优势

虽然卡玛拉正在取得进展,但特朗普在某些领域仍然处于领先地位,特别是在贸易方面。

民意调查显示,43%的选民更信任特朗普来管理与中国的经济关系,而只有39%的人认为卡玛拉会做得更好。

特朗普一直是保护主义贸易政策的坚定倡导者,尤其是在与北京打交道时。他甚至威胁说,如果再执政四年,他将提高汽车和其他消费品的关税。

唐纳德·特朗普

这种对贸易的强硬立场可能是为什么一些选民仍然认为他是处理这些具体经济问题的更好候选人。

但并非所有事情都朝着特朗普的方向发展。同一项民意调查显示,只有25%的登记选民将当前的经济状况评为“优秀”或“良好”

42%的选民表示,如果特朗普再次执政,他们会过得更好,而33%的选民认为,在卡玛拉总统任期内,他们会更好。

Letture associate

Vitalik's Algorithmic Stablecoin Vision: Interpreting the Mechanism and Challenges from an Options Perspective

Vitalik Buterin's recent algorithmic stablecoin proposal envisions using an option-like mechanism to create a stablecoin without the liquidation risks inherent in traditional collateralized debt position (CDP) models. The design splits one unit of ETH into two components: a 'stable' leg (P) that maintains value up to a certain strike price, and an 'upside' leg (N) that captures any appreciation above that price. Together, they always sum to one ETH, eliminating the need for debt or liquidation mechanisms. From an options perspective, the stable leg essentially functions as a synthetic, covered call position. However, significant challenges exist. For the stable asset to maintain its peg, it must continuously roll deep in-the-money call options, leading to potential rollover slippage, predictable trading paths vulnerable to front-running, and liquidity issues. Crucially, the system's scalability depends on a constant demand for the upside leg—a form of leveraged ETH long position without funding rates or liquidation risk. It's unclear if such persistent, specific demand will materialize from speculators or market makers who have simpler alternatives like perpetual swaps. The author, drawing from experience with Rysk, argues that DeFi options have struggled as standalone trading products due to complexity and fragmented liquidity. Their potential lies instead as foundational infrastructure underpinning more complex financial primitives like stablecoins, structured yields, or index products—transforming from a direct product into a core pricing and risk distribution engine for the next generation of on-chain finance.

marsbit1 h fa

Vitalik's Algorithmic Stablecoin Vision: Interpreting the Mechanism and Challenges from an Options Perspective

marsbit1 h fa

GPT-5.6 Countdown: Abandon the Illusion of a Single API, Computational Iteration Can't Outpace a Single Page of Compliance

In mid-June, three seemingly independent industry events—the compliance-driven throttling of Fable 5, the open-sourcing of GLM-5.2, and the leaked release timeline for GPT-5.6—are pushing the global AI industry toward a watershed moment. These shifts signal a fundamental restructuring of the industry's underlying logic. First, **"usability" has substantially overtaken "advanced capabilities"** as the primary weight, pushing the global large language model (LLM) supply chain into a "dual-track" phase of controlled closed-source and local open-source coexistence. Second, **the competitive moats of closed-source giants are shifting**. Their technical focus is moving from "language intelligence" toward "spatial intelligence (world models)"—a domain heavily reliant on computing power. Third, faced with常态化 transnational compliance risks, **a "model-agnostic" decoupled design has become a survival necessity for application-layer developers to maintain business continuity.** The article details how Anthropic's Fable 5, despite its advanced engineering feats, was restricted for non-U.S. citizens within 72 hours of launch, highlighting how geopolitical compliance can instantly limit even the most advanced models. In response, the open-source camp, exemplified by Zhipu AI's MIT-licensed GLM-5.2, is gaining market share by offering stable performance improvements and significant cost advantages (up to 70% savings for enterprises), while achieving full adaptation with domestic semiconductor platforms. Meanwhile, closed-source leaders like OpenAI are pivoting. The anticipated GPT-5.6 reportedly shifts focus from language to spatial intelligence and world models, aiming to rebuild a generational gap in areas like 3D understanding, simulation, and industrial design that demand immense compute. The core conclusion is that the LLM supply chain's logic has changed. Enterprises must now evaluate infrastructure based on a composite of technical performance and policy compliance. For developers, complete reliance on a single closed-source API poses unacceptable risk. Implementing a truly model-agnostic architecture—enabling swift switches to compliant, locally deployable open-source alternatives—is no longer just good practice but a fundamental baseline for business continuity.

marsbit4 h fa

GPT-5.6 Countdown: Abandon the Illusion of a Single API, Computational Iteration Can't Outpace a Single Page of Compliance

marsbit4 h fa

Is the 'Token Subsidy War' Among AI Giants Almost Over?

The article discusses the ongoing "token subsidy war" among AI giants like OpenAI and Anthropic, questioning whether it's nearing its end. It reveals that current AI subscription prices are heavily subsidized, with some plans offering tokens at up to 70 times the actual cost to attract and retain heavy users, especially developers and enterprises. This strategy mirrors past internet-era subsidy battles, but with a key difference: AI tokens lack "lock-in" effects. Unlike ride-hailing or food delivery apps, users can easily switch between AI providers as APIs become standardized, making it difficult for companies to raise prices post-subsidy. The piece highlights a structural asymmetry in the competition. Giants like Google, with massive advertising revenue, can afford to subsidize tokens indefinitely, akin to using "tokens as a weapon." In contrast, venture-backed companies like OpenAI and Anthropic face pressure to become profitable, especially as they approach IPO. The article cites Google Ventures founder Bill Maris, who suggests Google could slash token prices by 80%, putting immense pressure on competitors. Two potential endgames are presented: the "internet service" model (subsidize, monopolize, then raise prices) and the "utility" model (tokens become a standardized, low-margin commodity like electricity). Given the low switching costs, the latter seems more likely. The competition may not have a single winner but could instead accelerate AI's evolution into a foundational, infrastructure-level technology, akin to a public utility. For now, users continue to benefit from heavily subsidized token costs.

marsbit4 h fa

Is the 'Token Subsidy War' Among AI Giants Almost Over?

marsbit4 h fa

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片