美国人认为卡玛拉比特朗普对经济更有利

币界网Pubblicato 2024-08-11Pubblicato ultima volta 2024-08-11

币界网报道:

美国人开始认为卡玛拉·哈里斯比唐纳德·特朗普更适合处理经济问题。一项新的民意调查显示,选民的意见发生了很大变化。

近一年来,越来越多的选民在经济问题上更喜欢卡玛拉而不是特朗普。这种情绪的变化是在乔·拜登退出竞选之后发生的,这似乎给了他的副总统一个动力。

根据民意调查,42%的美国人认为卡玛拉会更好地管理经济,而41%的人仍然更信任特朗普。

这对卡玛拉来说是一个显著的增长,特别是考虑到拜登上个月的数字下降了7%。密歇根大学教授埃里克·戈登指出

“选民对卡玛拉比对拜登更积极的事实充分说明了拜登的糟糕表现。”

即使有良好的经济增长和稳定的就业数据,拜登也很难让选民觉得他们从他的任何政策中受益。

通胀担忧和卡玛拉的优势

通货膨胀仍然是大多数美国人在11月大选前最关心的问题。尽管经济指标强劲,但只有19%的选民现在感觉比拜登2021年上任时好。

民意调查还显示,60%的选民认为卡玛拉应该脱离拜登的经济政策,或者做出重大改变。

这很重要,因为卡玛拉的成功可能取决于她能与拜登的经济记录保持多大的距离。

乔·拜登

卡玛拉的支持率也高于拜登,46%的登记选民支持她作为副总统所做的工作,而41%的选民仍然支持拜登。

这种差异可能会给她带来优势,但这并不意味着她是清白的。民意调查显示,经济担忧仍然是一个主要问题,这些担忧可能对特朗普有利。

在最近的一次电视新闻发布会上,特朗普批评了拜登政府对通货膨胀的处理,这可能会引起一些在过去四年中一直在挣扎的选民的共鸣。

特朗普的经济优势

虽然卡玛拉正在取得进展,但特朗普在某些领域仍然处于领先地位,特别是在贸易方面。

民意调查显示,43%的选民更信任特朗普来管理与中国的经济关系,而只有39%的人认为卡玛拉会做得更好。

特朗普一直是保护主义贸易政策的坚定倡导者,尤其是在与北京打交道时。他甚至威胁说,如果再执政四年,他将提高汽车和其他消费品的关税。

唐纳德·特朗普

这种对贸易的强硬立场可能是为什么一些选民仍然认为他是处理这些具体经济问题的更好候选人。

但并非所有事情都朝着特朗普的方向发展。同一项民意调查显示,只有25%的登记选民将当前的经济状况评为“优秀”或“良好”

42%的选民表示,如果特朗普再次执政,他们会过得更好,而33%的选民认为,在卡玛拉总统任期内,他们会更好。

Letture associate

Citi Research Report Analysis: U.S. Proposed Ban on Chinese Optical Modules Has No Substantial Progress, Short-term Enforcement Faces Supply Constraints

Citi Report Analysis: U.S. Proposed Ban on Chinese Optical Modules Lacks Substantive Progress, Faces Supply Bottlenecks in Short Term. Reuters reported on August 4th that the U.S. government and FCC are considering a ban on Chinese optical modules. Citi's August 9th report clarifies that optical modules are not listed on any effective FCC ban. The FCC's Order 26-50 established two restricted list mechanisms (based on manufacturer and production location), but optical modules were only mentioned once, as an example in a disclosure requirement, not as a restricted product. The reported ban remains at a proposal stage. Citi estimates Chinese suppliers provide 60-70% of high-speed optical modules for U.S. hyperscalers. Non-Chinese suppliers cannot fill this gap in the short term, making the immediate implementation of a genuine ban unlikely. Future regulatory paths could be manufacturer-based (least likely), location-based covering all offshore production (strictest), or location-based covering only China (more feasible but with unresolved definitions). A ban would pressure U.S. AI infrastructure, conflicting with stated policy goals. Citi sees low near-term implementation probability, with the issue potentially becoming a negotiation chip in bilateral talks. U.S. domestic capacity build-out is a key long-term variable. Among Chinese companies, XSENS and Dongshan Precision have the highest U.S. exposure, while Tianfu Communication, as a passive component supplier, is relatively insulated. Citi maintains Buy ratings on all three with respective price targets. The conclusion is that Chinese modules are currently irreplaceable in the U.S. AI supply chain, creating a longer timeline for potential restrictions than the market may expect.

marsbit20 min fa

Citi Research Report Analysis: U.S. Proposed Ban on Chinese Optical Modules Has No Substantial Progress, Short-term Enforcement Faces Supply Constraints

marsbit20 min fa

Lead Analyst Claims Bitcoin is at a Critical Stage: 'We are at the Bear Market Bottom, What Happens Next…'

Renowned cryptocurrency analyst Benjamin Cowen, in his latest analysis video, examined recent events and historical cycles in the Bitcoin market. Noting Bitcoin's trading range of $64,000 to $65,000, Cowen stated that market dynamics and investor interest show similarities to past cycles, suggesting the upcoming period marks a critical turning point. Cowen observed a significant decline in public interest and investor enthusiasm for the crypto market, with social risk metrics falling to 0.2, far below levels seen four years ago. He added that market volatility has notably decreased, and a sense of distrust prevails among investors, drawing parallels to the ends of bear markets in 2018 and 2022. Historical data indicates Bitcoin markets typically bottom in summer months, followed by a period of stagnation with low volatility, implying a major move could occur in the year's final quarter. However, Cowen noted on-chain indicators like the MVRV Z-Score have not yet signaled a definitive bottom. Cowen believes an event in the coming weeks could shake the market, potentially triggering a final sell-off wave. Such an event, he argues, would bring investors back and pave the way for a new bull cycle. He predicts October as the most likely bottoming period, while acknowledging September or November are also possible, advising crypto users to remain cautious and prepared for a decisive market moment.

cryptonews.ru28 min fa

Lead Analyst Claims Bitcoin is at a Critical Stage: 'We are at the Bear Market Bottom, What Happens Next…'

cryptonews.ru28 min fa

Bitcoin Community in Uproar: Deciphering the New Scaling War Sparked by BIP-110

On August 10, Luke Dashjr, a long-time Bitcoin Improvement Proposal (BIP) editor and co-founder of Ocean mining pool, was removed from the BIP editing team for bypassing discussion protocols and preemptively assigning a number to BIP-110, a controversial soft fork proposal he helped draft. The conflict stems from Bitcoin Core's version 30 release in October 2025, which removed the default 83-byte limit on OP_RETURN, a field used for embedding non-transaction data. In response, BIP-110 aimed to enforce this limit as a consensus rule. It controversially lowered the activation threshold for miners to 55% and included a mandatory activation clause, causing significant community backlash. Major mining pools like Foundry USA and AntPool did not support it, with public criticism from figures like F2Pool's Wang Chun and Michael Saylor, who argued it compromised Bitcoin's neutrality. On August 8, at block height 961,632, nodes running the BIP-110 patch rejected the main chain block, causing a chain split. The minority chain, supported by only about 2.53% of the network's hash rate, produced just one additional block before stalling. The main chain quickly outpaced it by over 240 blocks. No major exchanges have supported the minority chain. The event highlighted Bitcoin's governance reality: while rules can be proposed by a few, ultimate authority lies with the economic majority—miners willing to expend hash power and users/exchanges recognizing a chain's validity. Following the failed split, BIP-110 proponents, including Luke Dashjr, have begun discussing a change to the proof-of-work algorithm to create a separate coin, though this remains in early discussion stages.

marsbit50 min fa

Bitcoin Community in Uproar: Deciphering the New Scaling War Sparked by BIP-110

marsbit50 min fa

Trading

Spot
活动图片