美联储对加密货币友好的客户银行实施限制

币界网Pubblicato 2024-08-11Pubblicato ultima volta 2024-08-11

币界网报道:

美联储正在打击以加密货币友好方式而闻名的Customers Bancorp银行,迫使其在继续迎合加密货币行业之前跳过新的障碍。

作为美国为数不多的愿意参与数字资产交易的银行之一,Customers Bancorp现在必须提前30天向美联储报告,然后才能与加密货币公司建立任何新的关系。

该银行甚至运营着一个即时支付平台,允许企业使用区块链技术进行代币化支付。但美联储对此并不满意。

Fed enforces restrictions on crypto-friendly Customers Bank

费城联邦储备银行最近的检查显示,Customers Bancorp在管理风险方面存在重大缺陷,特别是在遵守反洗钱(AML)法律和《银行保密法》(BSA)方面。

美联储的回应?让银行的生活更加艰难,直到它成形。

董事会监督和风险管理

美联储已命令Customers Bancorp董事会加大力度,控制银行的运营,特别是在加密货币活动方面。

在60天内,董事会必须制定一项加强监督的计划。该计划需要明确说明他们将如何保持对银行主要业务的控制,并确保管理层遵守规则。

董事会还必须确保负责银行遵守BSA/AML和OFAC法规的人员知道他们在做什么,并拥有所需的资源。

如果该银行的董事会不监督政策和法律的遵守情况,包括该银行如何处理其加密货币战略,美联储表示,他们将陷入困境。

风险管理是美联储正在采取行动的另一个领域。客户Bancorp有60天的时间提交一份符合美联储标准的新风险管理计划。

该计划需要包括加强的政策、程序和标准,以识别、评估和管理风险。美联储希望看到明确的角色和责任、充足的资源以及定期更新风险敞口。

美联储华盛顿特区总部。

美联储还要求该行对其美元代币活动建立强有力的控制。董事会需要能够识别和监督出现的任何风险,他们需要确保银行以安全稳健的方式运营。

BSA/AML合规计划和客户尽职调查

美联储并没有止步于风险管理。他们还严厉要求客户银行遵守《银行保密法》和反洗钱法规。

该银行有60天的时间推出符合美联储标准的修订后的BSA/AML合规计划。

该计划必须包括一个内部控制系统,旨在使银行遵守法律,特别是在客户尽职调查、受益所有权和可疑活动监控方面。

美联储也坚持进行全面的风险评估。该评估需要查看银行的所有产品和服务、他们所处理的客户类型以及这些客户的位置。

银行的BSA/AML合规官必须胜任这项任务,拥有适当的资源和培训,以维持符合银行规模和风险状况的合规计划。

如果出现任何问题,需要有一个机制来跟踪、升级和审查银行最高层的合规失败。

除此之外,Customers Bancorp还必须彻底改革其客户尽职调查计划。银行需要制定严格的政策和程序来收集、分析和保存所有客户的准确信息。

这包括核实他们的身份,了解他们的财富来源,并知道他们应该期待什么样的交易。

该银行还必须弥补其现有客户尽职调查中的任何差距,并且需要一种可靠的方法,根据客户类型、交易量和地点等因素为每个客户分配风险评级。

Letture associate

Vitalik's Algorithmic Stablecoin Vision: Interpreting the Mechanism and Challenges from an Options Perspective

Vitalik Buterin's recent algorithmic stablecoin proposal envisions using an option-like mechanism to create a stablecoin without the liquidation risks inherent in traditional collateralized debt position (CDP) models. The design splits one unit of ETH into two components: a 'stable' leg (P) that maintains value up to a certain strike price, and an 'upside' leg (N) that captures any appreciation above that price. Together, they always sum to one ETH, eliminating the need for debt or liquidation mechanisms. From an options perspective, the stable leg essentially functions as a synthetic, covered call position. However, significant challenges exist. For the stable asset to maintain its peg, it must continuously roll deep in-the-money call options, leading to potential rollover slippage, predictable trading paths vulnerable to front-running, and liquidity issues. Crucially, the system's scalability depends on a constant demand for the upside leg—a form of leveraged ETH long position without funding rates or liquidation risk. It's unclear if such persistent, specific demand will materialize from speculators or market makers who have simpler alternatives like perpetual swaps. The author, drawing from experience with Rysk, argues that DeFi options have struggled as standalone trading products due to complexity and fragmented liquidity. Their potential lies instead as foundational infrastructure underpinning more complex financial primitives like stablecoins, structured yields, or index products—transforming from a direct product into a core pricing and risk distribution engine for the next generation of on-chain finance.

marsbit1 h fa

Vitalik's Algorithmic Stablecoin Vision: Interpreting the Mechanism and Challenges from an Options Perspective

marsbit1 h fa

GPT-5.6 Countdown: Abandon the Illusion of a Single API, Computational Iteration Can't Outpace a Single Page of Compliance

In mid-June, three seemingly independent industry events—the compliance-driven throttling of Fable 5, the open-sourcing of GLM-5.2, and the leaked release timeline for GPT-5.6—are pushing the global AI industry toward a watershed moment. These shifts signal a fundamental restructuring of the industry's underlying logic. First, **"usability" has substantially overtaken "advanced capabilities"** as the primary weight, pushing the global large language model (LLM) supply chain into a "dual-track" phase of controlled closed-source and local open-source coexistence. Second, **the competitive moats of closed-source giants are shifting**. Their technical focus is moving from "language intelligence" toward "spatial intelligence (world models)"—a domain heavily reliant on computing power. Third, faced with常态化 transnational compliance risks, **a "model-agnostic" decoupled design has become a survival necessity for application-layer developers to maintain business continuity.** The article details how Anthropic's Fable 5, despite its advanced engineering feats, was restricted for non-U.S. citizens within 72 hours of launch, highlighting how geopolitical compliance can instantly limit even the most advanced models. In response, the open-source camp, exemplified by Zhipu AI's MIT-licensed GLM-5.2, is gaining market share by offering stable performance improvements and significant cost advantages (up to 70% savings for enterprises), while achieving full adaptation with domestic semiconductor platforms. Meanwhile, closed-source leaders like OpenAI are pivoting. The anticipated GPT-5.6 reportedly shifts focus from language to spatial intelligence and world models, aiming to rebuild a generational gap in areas like 3D understanding, simulation, and industrial design that demand immense compute. The core conclusion is that the LLM supply chain's logic has changed. Enterprises must now evaluate infrastructure based on a composite of technical performance and policy compliance. For developers, complete reliance on a single closed-source API poses unacceptable risk. Implementing a truly model-agnostic architecture—enabling swift switches to compliant, locally deployable open-source alternatives—is no longer just good practice but a fundamental baseline for business continuity.

marsbit4 h fa

GPT-5.6 Countdown: Abandon the Illusion of a Single API, Computational Iteration Can't Outpace a Single Page of Compliance

marsbit4 h fa

Is the 'Token Subsidy War' Among AI Giants Almost Over?

The article discusses the ongoing "token subsidy war" among AI giants like OpenAI and Anthropic, questioning whether it's nearing its end. It reveals that current AI subscription prices are heavily subsidized, with some plans offering tokens at up to 70 times the actual cost to attract and retain heavy users, especially developers and enterprises. This strategy mirrors past internet-era subsidy battles, but with a key difference: AI tokens lack "lock-in" effects. Unlike ride-hailing or food delivery apps, users can easily switch between AI providers as APIs become standardized, making it difficult for companies to raise prices post-subsidy. The piece highlights a structural asymmetry in the competition. Giants like Google, with massive advertising revenue, can afford to subsidize tokens indefinitely, akin to using "tokens as a weapon." In contrast, venture-backed companies like OpenAI and Anthropic face pressure to become profitable, especially as they approach IPO. The article cites Google Ventures founder Bill Maris, who suggests Google could slash token prices by 80%, putting immense pressure on competitors. Two potential endgames are presented: the "internet service" model (subsidize, monopolize, then raise prices) and the "utility" model (tokens become a standardized, low-margin commodity like electricity). Given the low switching costs, the latter seems more likely. The competition may not have a single winner but could instead accelerate AI's evolution into a foundational, infrastructure-level technology, akin to a public utility. For now, users continue to benefit from heavily subsidized token costs.

marsbit4 h fa

Is the 'Token Subsidy War' Among AI Giants Almost Over?

marsbit4 h fa

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片