回顾PlusToken案 加密市场如何再次被其牵动敏感神经

币界网Pubblicato 2024-08-09Pubblicato ultima volta 2024-08-09

币界网报道:

作者:Revc,

一、前言

加密市场情绪还未在8月6日的暴跌中恢复,而8月7日一则关于Plustoken消息,再次牵动加密市场的敏感神经。

据Lookonchain的监测,数百个已经休眠了3.3年的钱包开始转移大批量的以太坊(ETH),可能涉及789,533枚ETH,约合20亿美元。链上追踪显示,这些资金来自一个名为“Plus Token Ponzi 2”的钱包。该钱包在2020年将789,533枚ETH分散到数千个钱包中,此后自2021年4月以来一直未有任何动静。

据链上分析师余烬监测,Plustoken相关钱包大部分已在2021年被出售,目前归集的仅有25,757枚 ETH。随机市场情绪获得安抚。

随后Arkham在X平台表示,Plustoken钱包与数十个钱包相关联,仅在过去12小时内就转移了4.647亿美元的ETH。

二、Plustoken事件梳理

案件背景

PlusToken 于2018年5月推出,声称是一个多功能跨链去中心化钱包和“智能狗搬砖”套利平台。通过宣传“币王”、“千倍币”、“8个月上涨82倍”等吸引眼球的口号,迅速吸引了大量投资者加入。该平台利用传销模式,通过推荐码邀请新会员,并要求缴纳至少500美元的加密货币作为门槛,以获取平台收益。

发展过程

2018年5月:PlusToken 推出

平台以“区块链钱包”和“智能搬砖”为幌子,吸引大量投资者。仅一年时间,注册会员数达到270万,最大层级达到3293层。

2019年6月27日:提现问题暴露,运营停滞

PlusToken 开始无法正常提现,引发了投资者的恐慌。尽管平台官方未对此作出解释,部分投资者依然选择相信平台,导致更多资金继续涌入。在平台停止运营后,Plustoken 账户仍然收到价值1.5亿人民币的加密货币,

2020年11月26日:二审宣判

2020年11月26日,江苏省盐城市中级人民法院对PlusToken案进行了二审判决,裁定没收该案中扣押的加密货币,并将所得资金及收益依法上缴国库。

三、资金去向

PlusToken通过庞氏骗局骗取了全球投资者20亿至29亿美元的加密货币。该平台主要依赖场外交易(OTC)渠道进行大规模的资金进出,并通过复杂的链上资产转移和混币服务来规避追踪。部分资金被用于购置房产和豪车,而其他部分则通过OTC市场变现。

2020年6月,78.95万枚以太坊(ETH),当时价值约1.919亿美元,从一个PlusToken钱包中被转移,并通过数百个中介钱包进行分散转移。

在2021年6月至9月期间,大部分Plustoken钱包中的以太坊(ETH)通过多个地址被转入了Bidesk交易所(该交易所于2021年底倒闭)。随后,这些ETH又从Bidesk交易所被转移至火币交易所。仅通过四个Bidesk存款地址转入的ETH数量就达到了268,843枚。

资金收缴国库

Plustoken涉及的加密货币总价值超过150亿元人民币。根据裁定书,执法部门共查获了194,775枚比特币、833,083枚以太坊、140万枚莱特币、2760万枚柚子币(EOS)、74,167枚达世币(DASH)、4.87亿枚瑞波币(XRP)、60亿枚狗狗币(DOGE)、79,581枚比特现金(BCH)和213,724枚泰达币(USDT)。最终,涉案组织者因传销诈骗被判刑,平台资金被依法没收。

小结

Plustoken相钱包的活动继续牵动投资者的敏感神经,并影响了近期ETH的走势。根据链上数据分析,这次钱包转移可能来自案件中已刑满释放人员操作。除了对市场行情的影响外,人们更为关注的是投资者在事件中遭受的巨大损失。自案件爆发以来,加密货币的价格已经上涨了数十倍。然而,在加密行业的早期阶段,许多投资者未能守住自己的财富。如果将当前的加密行业比作北美的淘金时代,它正释放出广阔的发展与财富增长空间。投资者需要确保资产安全,避免陷入庞氏骗局,从而享受时代发展的红利。

Letture associate

NVIDIA CPU Advances, China's RISC-V Responds: Semiconductor Deep Dive - Part Four

NVIDIA is set to launch its new Vera AI data center CPU in China as early as August, with high pricing. While this move offers a new option, it highlights China's continued dependence on foreign-controlled Arm architecture. In response, the Chinese semiconductor industry is increasingly turning to RISC-V as a strategic alternative for achieving high-performance computing autonomy. The article explores the concept of the "impossible triangle" in CPU development—balancing prosperity, control, and autonomy—and posits that RISC-V's open-source, modular nature offers a unique path to achieving all three. While RISC-V is already dominant in embedded systems, the focus is now shifting to data centers and AI workloads. China has become a global hotspot for RISC-V development, driven by AI-driven compute demand, supply chain concerns from export controls, cost benefits of open-source, and strong policy support. Multiple Chinese companies have reportedly crossed the key performance threshold of 15 SPECint per GHz, a benchmark for entering the high-performance CPU club. Progress extends beyond single-core benchmarks. Companies are developing complete computing subsystems, including commercial-grade coherent network-on-chip (NoC) technology and server processors with up to 40 cores that strictly adhere to the RVA23 standard to ensure software compatibility. Real-world applications are emerging in areas like video transcoding and edge AI. However, significant challenges remain. The RISC-V ecosystem faces fragmentation, immature toolchains and verification processes, and gaps in single-core performance and energy efficiency compared to mature x86 and Arm architectures. The formidable software moat, epitomized by NVIDIA's CUDA, is a long-term hurdle. In conclusion, while RISC-V cannot immediately replace offerings like NVIDIA's Vera, it represents a viable long-term path for China to develop a self-sufficient, high-performance CPU ecosystem. The journey is acknowledged to be long and arduous, requiring sustained effort to overcome technical and ecosystem challenges.

marsbit34 min fa

NVIDIA CPU Advances, China's RISC-V Responds: Semiconductor Deep Dive - Part Four

marsbit34 min fa

My Coding Betting Dashboard is Profiting, but Polymarket is Truly Not a Good Place for 'Arbitrage'

The author built a custom monitoring dashboard for Polymarket, a prediction market platform, and tested it with $1,600, achieving over 30% returns. However, the core argument is that Polymarket is not a good venue for traditional arbitrage. The dashboard has two main sections: a "Portfolio Dashboard" for tracking active positions with key metrics like total capital, P&L, and a risk-control module using a tier system (T1, T2, T3), and an "Opportunity Watchlist" for monitoring markets. The article details a critical structural trap in binary markets: a bet with a high perceived probability of success still carries a 100% loss risk if wrong. The author's T1/T2/T3 system is designed to manage this by limiting position sizes based on conviction and time horizon, emphasizing that high confidence should not equal high concentration. A key insight is the danger of "pseudo-diversification"—betting on different markets driven by the same underlying variable. The author concludes that Polymarket offers few true low-risk, arbitrage opportunities. It is instead a high-risk environment where wins can create a false sense of mastery, leading to large losses. The platform is better viewed as a training ground for honing judgment through disciplined, framework-driven betting rather than a reliable income source. The tools help transform intuition into structured, rule-based decisions to mitigate the risk of catastrophic errors.

marsbit3 h fa

My Coding Betting Dashboard is Profiting, but Polymarket is Truly Not a Good Place for 'Arbitrage'

marsbit3 h fa

WeChat AI Card Hands-On Guide: Has the AI Shopping Era Arrived?

**"WeChat AI Card" Practical Test Guide: Has the Era of AI Shopping Arrived?** WeChat has officially launched the "AI Exclusive Card," a feature integrated into its Workbuddy AI assistant. This card is designed to handle payments for AI-initiated purchases. Our hands-on test reveals it's not yet a tool for fully autonomous AI shopping, but rather a controlled payment layer for AI agents. The AI Card functions as an isolated sub-wallet within WeChat Pay. Users must bind the card and transfer funds into it from their main wallet. Crucially, every transaction requires explicit user confirmation via smartphone scan; AI cannot spend autonomously. Currently accessible through the Workbuddy agent, the card targets specific digital consumption scenarios: purchasing paid content (reports, data), calling paid APIs/tools, and subscribing to services. Its design prioritizes security and control by separating funds and mandating approval for each payment. We tested a real-world scenario: ordering bubble tea via Workbuddy using a "Meituan Life Assistant" skill. The process encountered multiple hurdles: high "skill" usage costs (exceeding daily free credits), and most importantly, while a payment was successfully initiated, the AI purchased an incorrect product (a mismatched group-buy coupon instead of the desired drink). This highlights the current limitation: the **AI Card only solves the payment step**. The broader challenge lies in the **AI agent's execution chain**—accurately understanding intent, navigating third-party platforms, selecting the right product, and ensuring proper fulfillment. The payment succeeded, but the purchase failed to meet the user's need. In conclusion, the WeChat AI Exclusive Card is a cautious, early-step experiment in AI commerce. It provides a secure, user-controlled payment method for agent interactions but is not yet capable of reliable, end-to-end complex purchases. For now, it's best used for low-value, low-risk digital services with careful user verification at each step. The vision of AI handling complete shopping tasks remains a work in progress.

marsbit6 h fa

WeChat AI Card Hands-On Guide: Has the AI Shopping Era Arrived?

marsbit6 h fa

Deconstructing Notion's Growth: From a Note-taking Tool to 100 Million Users—How Notion Built a Triple Growth Flywheel Through Product, Templates, and Community

Notion's growth from a niche note-taking tool to a platform with 100 million users is powered by three interconnected flywheels: Product-Led Growth (PLG), a Template Economy, and Community-Driven Growth. First, Notion's PLG strategy relies on a highly flexible, "plastic" product that users can adapt to countless personal and team workflows. Its freemium model lowers the barrier to entry, while features like page sharing and collaboration drive organic, usage-based viral growth as users naturally invite others. Second, the Template Economy solves the "blank page" problem. Templates, created by both Notion and its community, transform abstract product capabilities into concrete, copyable solutions for specific scenarios (e.g., project management, content calendars). This dramatically lowers activation costs for new users and fuels SEO-driven discovery. Third, a vibrant Community acts as a distributed growth engine. Users and official Ambassadors create tutorials, share use cases, and host local events. This community not only educates users but also fosters a sense of identity around pursuing "better ways of working," strengthening loyalty and enabling global, low-cost expansion. Together, these flywheels create a self-reinforcing ecosystem: a great product attracts users who create templates and community content, which in turn attracts more users and deepens engagement. This system allowed Notion to scale from individuals to teams and enterprises through a bottom-up adoption path. Looking ahead, AI integration promises to accelerate these flywheels further by making templates smarter and the platform a potential AI-native work operating system. Ultimately, Notion's defensible advantage is not just its features, but this deeply entrenched network of user assets, creators, and community trust.

marsbit6 h fa

Deconstructing Notion's Growth: From a Note-taking Tool to 100 Million Users—How Notion Built a Triple Growth Flywheel Through Product, Templates, and Community

marsbit6 h fa

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片