特朗普与加密货币:一场危险的政治游戏

深潮Pubblicato 2024-08-06Pubblicato ultima volta 2024-08-06

如果美国政府给予比特币和其他加密资产认可,许多加密货币从业者肯定会受益,但该行业的主要目标是将加密资产纳入主流投资世界,同时保持尽可能少的监管。

撰文:John Cassidy,The New Yorker

编译:比推 BitpushNews Scott Liu

政治上,短短一个月就可能意味着巨大的变化。随着平淡无奇的民主党总统竞选变成了「卡马拉·哈里斯秀」,唐纳德·特朗普的连任竞选则演变成了「加密货币秀」。在风险投资家和加密货币支持者 J.D.万斯成为竞选搭档后,特朗普出现在纳什维尔的比特币大会上,承诺建立战略比特币储备,并使美国成为全球比特币超级大国。他还承诺解雇证券交易委员会(SEC)主席,加密货币坚定的反对者,曾批评加密行业有「失败、欺诈和破产的记录」的加里·根斯勒 (Gary Gensler)。

特朗普这一举动颇具讽刺意味,2019 年他还曾表示比特币的价值虚无缥缈。据 CNBC 报道,在纳什维尔的活动上,包括文克莱沃斯兄弟 (Winklevoss twins) 和 Kid Rock 在内的数十位加密货币支持者每人支付了 50 万美元与前总统进行私人圆桌会议。几天后,特朗普拥有的一家公司在网上列出了限量版印有比特币和「TRUMP CRYPTO PRESIDENT」字样的金色运动鞋,每双售价 500 美元。(据报道,这些鞋子随后在 eBay 上的价格高达 25,000 美元,其中一个标价甚至高达 69,999 美元。)

近年来,加密货币行业面临危机。2022 年 12 月,加密货币交易所 FTX 的创始人萨姆·班克曼 - 弗里德因欺诈 FTX 客户超过 17 亿美元被捕,随后被判处 25 年监禁。2023 年 11 月,全球最大加密货币交易所币安的创始人兼 CEO 赵长鹏因未能打击洗钱行为而认罪,并被判处四个月监禁。

对加密货币行业来说,更大的威胁来自根斯勒和他对许多加密资产作为投资证券的监管要求,这将使它们受到严格的投资者保护法律和政府监督的约束。加密货币行业长期以来辩称,投资加密货币更像是购买商品,如贵金属和牛腩,这些商品应由商品期货交易委员会(CFTC)监管,而不是由更大的 SEC 监管。

2022 年 9 月,根斯勒在华盛顿的一次演讲中表示,他认为「绝大多数」加密货币代币都是证券,并引用了该机构首任负责人约瑟夫·肯尼迪的话:「SEC 会让没有诚信业务的企业害怕。」在接下来的几个月里,SEC 起诉了一些领先的加密货币公司,包括币安和美国最大的加密货币交易所 Coinbase,指控它们经营未注册的证券交易所和其他违规行为。虽然被告的公司否认了任何不当行为,并试图在审判前驳回案件。但今年 3 月,纽约的一名联邦法官裁定 Coinbase 的大部分案件可以继续进行。6 月,华盛顿特区的一名法官也表示币安的大部分案件可以继续进行。去年 12 月,纽约的一名联邦法官认定韩国加密货币公司 Terraform Labs 出售的四种加密货币代币是证券。

SEC 在这个关键问题上也遭遇了挫折。2023 年 7 月,加利福尼亚州的一家联邦法院裁定,由旧金山加密货币公司 Ripple Labs 创建的 XRP 代币在公开销售时不是证券。今年 6 月,SEC 结束了对以太坊的调查,这个仅次于比特币的区块链网络。但总体上,SEC 在还是取得了进展。公众利益组织 Better Markets 的总裁丹尼斯·凯勒赫 (Dennis Kelleher) 说:「加密货币行业的人在加倍贡献政治捐款。加密货币行业最大的诉求是通过国会判定数字资产不是证券,从而让 SEC 没有管辖权」。

加密货币行业的捐款规模令人震惊。据彭博社报道,包括最大的 Fairshake 在内的三个加密货币政治行动委员会(PAC)从 Coinbase、Ripple 以及风投公司 Andreessen Horowitz 等捐赠者那里筹集了一亿七千万美元。这些加密货币资金不仅流向了特朗普的总统竞选,还流向了众议院和参议院的竞选。而且,大部分资金似乎是为了击败那些批评加密货币的民主党人,包括俄亥俄州的参议员谢罗德·布朗和蒙大拿州的参议员约翰·特斯特,一部分资金也流向了其他民主党人。

在上周亚利桑那州第三选区的初选中,凤凰城市议会的民主党成员 Yassamin Ansari 在一个由 PAC 资助的广告帮助下,击败了州民主党前主席 Raquel Teran。考虑到大量加密货币资金的涌入,最近有超过十几名众议院民主党人联名写信给民主党全国委员会主席 Jaime Harrison,要求委员会「采取面向未来的态度对待数字资产和区块链技术」。然而,事实仍然是,加密货币行业最大的政治支持者是共和党人。

在特朗普出席了最近的比特币大会之后,怀俄明州参议员辛西娅 - 卢米斯宣布,她将提议立法建立一个由大约一百万比特币组成的「比特币战略储备」。( 另一位加密货币的支持者小罗伯特 - 肯尼迪也在为此欢呼。) 黑色幽默的是,加密货币中的许多人都自诩为自由主义者,他们经常争辩说,比特币的一大优点就是独立于政府。而现在,一位共和党参议员提议花费纳税人 600 多亿美元(考虑到比特币目前的价格)来收购加密货币全部存量的约 5%。

特朗普则有个更为温和的提议,即美国政府只需持有执法机构没收的所有比特币。持有这些比特币有什么经济好处呢?乔治城大学的金融经济学家詹姆斯 - 安吉尔(James Angel)说:「最大的好处是,它会让比特币最大用户投票给特朗普。」

如果美国政府给予比特币和其他加密资产认可,许多加密货币从业者肯定会受益,但该行业的主要目标是将加密资产纳入主流投资世界,同时保持尽可能少的监管。Kelleher 说,我们已经看到了这个故事的发展。2000 年,美国国会通过了《商品期货现代化法案》,有效地将某些金融衍生品免于监管,这些合同的价值与基础资产的价格挂钩。在随后的几年里,抵押贷款衍生品的发行,如信用违约互换,大幅增加。许多大银行最终在财务上的崩溃就源于这些衍生品。当房地产市场崩溃时,基础抵押证券的价值崩溃,整个金融体系倒塌,最终导致使用纳税人的钱救助。

而加密货币对潜在风险最有力的反驳可能是:数字资产价格崩溃,对更广泛的金融体系影响不大。(在 2021 年和 2022 年,比特币的价值下跌了三分之二以上。)但正如 Kelleher 指出的那样,那次崩溃发生在监管机构坚持将加密货币和加密资产与金融体系隔离的环境中。Kelleher 说:「想象一下,如果崩溃发生在加密货币被放松管制并且完全融入和连接到银行系统的情况下,会有无数的衍生品,其价值与比特币价格挂钩,这些负债将遍布银行的资产负债表上。然后我们就会回到 2008 年的情景。」

这可能是最糟糕的情况,但更大的问题是:我们已经看到了宽松金融监管的危险。抵押贷款证券至少服务于更大的社会群体,例如扩大住房拥有权。即便有人发掘出了加密资产对社会显著的帮助,这些人也会选择一直隐而不发。不过,别想把这些话告诉这位 Mar-a-Lago 的加密货币的相信者。他还要为竞选活动募集资金,还要卖运动鞋。

Letture associate

Critical Game Week: BTC Retracement Confirmation vs. HYPE Support Battle | Guest Analysis

This weekly analysis outlines a critical juncture for BTC and HYPE markets, focusing on key price level confirmations. **BTC Analysis:** BTC is at a pivotal point after a five-wave rally from the June 5th low of $59,100. The price has broken below a short-term rising channel's lower boundary, with the current move seen as a pullback to test this breakdown. Failure to reclaim this level could lead to a retest of the $59,000-$60,000 support zone. The core scenario hinges on this channel retest outcome. * **Key Levels:** Resistance at $64,500-$65,000 (channel boundary) and $69,500-$70,500. Support at $59,000-$60,000 and $55,000. * **Strategy:** A core bearish stance is maintained (20% short from last week), with short-term plans for tactical trades. Three detailed contingency plans (A/B/C) are provided for short positions on resistance tests or breakdowns, emphasizing strict stop-loss discipline. **HYPE Analysis:** HYPE shows strong momentum but is currently in a corrective phase after hitting a new high of $76.94. The price is retesting the crucial $64-$66 support area. * **Key Levels:** Resistance near $77 and $80-$82. Support at $64-$66 and $52-$54. * **Strategy:** The short-term approach is "buy on dips, avoid chasing rallies." A long position is considered only if clear stabilization signals appear at the $64-$66 or deeper $52-$54 support zones, with tight risk controls. **General Risk Management:** A standardized trailing stop-loss protocol is emphasized: set initial stop, breakeven at +1% profit, then trail stops upward to lock in gains. *Disclaimer: All analysis is presented as a personal trading framework, not investment advice. Market conditions are complex and require dynamic adjustment.*

marsbit8 min fa

Critical Game Week: BTC Retracement Confirmation vs. HYPE Support Battle | Guest Analysis

marsbit8 min fa

Research Report Interpretation: Citi Attends AWS Summit, Bullish on Cloud Business Acceleration but Data Governance Remains Key Variable

Citi analyst Tyler Radke's team attended the AWS New York Summit (June 17-18), engaging with over 10 clients and partners. In a June 19 report, they highlighted the summit's focus on scaling agent AI for enterprise deployment. Citi maintains a "Buy" rating on Amazon, forecasting AWS revenue growth to accelerate to 37% in FY27 from 30% in FY26, noting this estimate may be conservative. Key takeaways: 1. **AWS Strategy Shift:** AWS is moving from proof-of-concepts to scalable deployment. New offerings like AWS Context (building enterprise knowledge graphs), Amazon Quick (cross-application AI assistant), and security tool Continuum address core enterprise pain points for AI adoption. 2. **Data Infrastructure Beneficiaries:** Data infrastructure companies like Snowflake, Elastic, Oracle, and ClickHouse are seen as direct beneficiaries of scaling AI workloads, as evidenced by strong growth and use cases presented. 3. **Critical Role of Data Governance:** As AI agents scale from hundreds to thousands, effective data governance becomes the key variable for deploying AI in core business processes. AWS Context represents AWS's strategic extension from providing compute/models to offering a data governance infrastructure layer. The report emphasizes that without solving data governance, AI will remain confined to pilot projects. The investment thesis focuses on AWS revenue acceleration and data infrastructure vendors' growth, while monitoring signals like AWS's quarterly revenue growth, Bedrock AgentCore task volume, and pricing impacts on companies like Elastic.

marsbit14 min fa

Research Report Interpretation: Citi Attends AWS Summit, Bullish on Cloud Business Acceleration but Data Governance Remains Key Variable

marsbit14 min fa

Crucial Week of Contention: BTC Tests Support and HYPE's Key Level Battle | Special Analysis

**Market Enters Critical Week: Bitcoin Pullback Test and HYPE Support Battle** The market enters a crucial phase of contention this week. The marginal shifts in Federal Reserve policy expectations continue to dictate the pricing rhythm for risk assets. Meanwhile, in the crypto market, following a period of sideways consolidation, the divergence between bulls and bears is becoming concentrated at key price levels. **Bitcoin (BTC) Analysis & Strategy** * **Technical View:** The 4-hour chart suggests BTC is in a five-wave structure since the June 5th low near $59,100. Price action shows a short-term rising channel. The recent drop below this channel's lower boundary is now being followed by a pullback attempt (wave 40-41). The outcome of this retest is critical. * **This Week's Outlook:** The core focus is whether BTC can reclaim and hold above the channel's lower boundary. * **Bullish Scenario:** A successful hold could lead to a continued rebound, potentially challenging the $69,500 - $70,500 resistance zone. * **Bearish Scenario:** Failure to hold may trigger a renewed test of the $59,000 - $60,000 core support area, with $55,000 as a deeper support level. * **Operational Strategy:** The author maintains a 20% mid-term short position initiated last week near $64,500, based on a model signaling a shift to a bearish structure. Short-term tactics involve using 30% capital for potential "spread" trades, with three contingency plans (A, B, C) outlined for reacting to resistance tests, breakouts, or support breakdowns. **HYPE Analysis & Strategy** * **Technical View:** On the 4-hour chart, HYPE shows strong momentum, having recently broken to a new high since January. The current pullback presents a clear three-wave correction structure, bringing the price back to the critical $64 - $66 support zone. * **This Week's Outlook:** The focus is on the battle for the $64 - $66 support area. * **Bullish Scenario:** Holding this support could signal a continuation of the uptrend from the June 10th low, leading to new highs. * **Bearish Scenario:** A breakdown could extend the correction, potentially testing the deeper $52 - $54 support band. * **Operational Strategy:** The recommended short-term approach is "buy on dips, avoid chasing rallies." A light long position (under 30% capital) could be considered if HYPE shows stabilization signals at the $64-$66 or $52-$54 support zones, confirmed by model signals. Strict stop-loss discipline is emphasized. **General Risk Management:** A strict trailing stop-loss protocol is advised: set an initial stop; move to breakeven at +1% profit; lock in profits progressively thereafter. *Disclaimer: All analysis is presented as the author's personal technical perspective and trading log, not as investment advice. Markets are complex and dynamic; risk control is paramount.*

Odaily星球日报15 min fa

Crucial Week of Contention: BTC Tests Support and HYPE's Key Level Battle | Special Analysis

Odaily星球日报15 min fa

AI Agents Also Need 'Credit Checks': ERC-8126 is Filling the Gap in On-chain Trust

The article discusses ERC-8126, a proposed standard designed to address the lack of trust and verification for AI Agents operating on-chain. While ERC-8004 provides AI Agents with a basic on-chain identity (answering "Who are you?"), it does not guarantee trustworthiness. ERC-8126 aims to fill this gap by establishing a verification layer (answering "Are you reliable?"). It standardizes how independent verification providers can assess an agent's associated risks across five key areas: Token/Contract Verification (ETV), Media Content Verification (MCV), Solidity Code Verification (SCV), Web Application Verification (WAV), and Wallet Verification (WV). These providers generate a standardized risk score (0-100) and proofs based on their checks, without acting as a single authoritative certifier. This allows wallets, marketplaces, dApps, and other agents to consume these risk signals—for example, to display warnings, filter listings, or make interaction decisions. The standard also incorporates concepts like Private Data Verification (PDV) and Zero-Knowledge Proofs (ZKP) to allow verification without exposing sensitive underlying data. Positioned alongside ERC-8004 (Identity) and ERC-8183 (Commerce for agents), ERC-8126 represents a step toward building a verifiable and accountable infrastructure for the emerging on-chain AI Agent economy, shifting trust assessment from purely user-based judgment to standardized, consumable signals.

marsbit33 min fa

AI Agents Also Need 'Credit Checks': ERC-8126 is Filling the Gap in On-chain Trust

marsbit33 min fa

Rented Conviction: How Much Real Money Is Behind the Bitcoin ETF Flows

Borrowed Belief: How much of Bitcoin ETF flows are real money? Weekly Bitcoin ETF flows, often interpreted as a measure of institutional conviction, are heavily influenced by a hidden arbitrage trade rather than genuine directional buying. A cash-and-carry arbitrage, where traders buy the ETF while simultaneously shorting Bitcoin futures on the CME to lock in a basis spread (the price difference between futures and spot), drives roughly half of the week-to-week flow volatility. This delta-neutral activity appears as ETF inflows but is unrelated to price views. Data shows a strong correlation (0.70) between weekly ETF inflows and increases in hedge fund short positions on CME futures, while Bitcoin’s weekly price returns have almost no explanatory power. However, this arbitrage activity dominates short-term *fluctuations*, not the cumulative *stock* of investments. Of the total ~$55 billion in net ETF inflows since launch, only about $1 billion currently represents net arbitrage exposure. The vast majority consists of steady, directional buying averaging around $400 million per week. The arbitrage trade has been unwinding for two years, with hedge fund short positions peaking near $14 billion in late 2024 and declining to ~$4.5 billion. Recent ETF outflows partly reflect this ongoing unwind as the basis compresses, not a loss of faith in Bitcoin. Thus, ETF flows overstate the *volatility* of belief, not its *level*. The headline number is more a gauge of arbitrage desk activity than conviction. For accurate interpretation, monitor the CME basis relative to Treasury yields and hedge fund net shorts—these reveal how much of the reported “demand” is truly directional.

marsbit35 min fa

Rented Conviction: How Much Real Money Is Behind the Bitcoin ETF Flows

marsbit35 min fa

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片