联合国报告恐怖组织利用门罗币募捐,监管的“紧箍咒”或更紧?

链捕手Pubblicato 2024-08-06Pubblicato ultima volta 2024-08-06

原标题:《Terror Groups seek Crypto donations using Monero: Alarming UN report》

作者:Jahnu Jagtap,Cryptotimes

编译:Felix,PANews

 

随着恐怖组织适应日益数字化的世界,寻找新的筹集和转移资金的方式,全球反恐斗争正面临新的挑战。根据联合国安理会监察小组最近的调查结果,臭名昭著的恐怖组织 ISIL 从其长期信任的「哈瓦拉」(注:指一种非正式的资金流动方式,一般通过非授权经销商进行交易。此类交易不在印度中央银行的监管范围内,因此无法追溯资金源头)「迁移」到加密货币。

该报告指出,像 ISIL 和基地组织这样的恐怖组织正放弃传统的募资方式,如哈瓦拉、绑架和勒索,现在更倾向于使用「匿名性更强」的加密货币(以门罗币为代表),并在其宣传的电子杂志中嵌入二维码募捐。

这些组织甚至设置了「清真规范」(清真在伊斯兰教的社会中被译为合法),以推广其意识形态和运作。报告称,这些组织在 Telegram messenger 应用程序上设置了两个专门的加密频道,分别为 CryptoHalal 和 Umma Crypto,指导支持者获取和使用特定的数字货币,并接受根据「初步伊斯兰教法评估」批准的加密捐款。

例如,ISIL-K 利用隐私币的匿名性,使用链接到门罗币钱包的二维码发起募捐活动。尽管一些加密交易所将门罗币下架,但恐怖组织对门罗币的使用仍在增加,这使得当局很难追踪资金流向。

2020 年 8 月,美国政府查封了 300 多个加密账户、多个网站及 Facebook 页面,据称这些账户属于基地组织、ISIS 和哈马斯军事组织的成员。

值得注意的是,ISIL 对数字平台的使用范围不断扩大,引起了会员国的日益担忧。各种加密货币交易所、游戏平台、电子钱包和稳定币都用于筹集和转移资金。一个会员国指出,虽然使用现金快递和哈瓦拉汇款是资金转移到冲突地区的首选,但 ISIL 已有意转向加密货币和在线支付系统。随着电子钱包、预付手机卡销售和加密货币等数字方式的日益普及,预计此现象将变得更加普遍和重要。

由于能够混淆交易细节,门罗币等隐私币已成为恐怖主义融资的首选媒介。联合国报告强调了监控这些交易的难度,因为它们提供了传统金融系统无法比拟的匿名性。ISIL 及其分支利用这些特征进行筹款活动,确保他们的金融活动不被当局发现。

报告还强调了恐怖主义融资网络的复杂性。ISIL 的附属机构,特别是在非洲的附属机构,为该组织的资金募集做了重大贡献。这些附属机构通常依赖非正式渠道,使其不易受到干扰。例如,ISIL-K 在 2023 年募集了 250 万美元,其中一些可能与特定袭击有关,突显了这些组织构成的持续威胁。

联合国安理会监察小组的这份措辞严厉的报告,势必会让包括美国、英国、欧洲和印度在内的几个国家重视。近日,美国财政部金融犯罪执法网络(FinCEN)发出警告,敦促金融机构监控可能与恐怖组织哈马斯有关的加密货币交易。

此外,这份报告的影响也将波及加密行业。因为鹰派安全机构可能会加强与可疑活动有关资产流动监控。

Letture associate

A Company Once on the Brink of Bankruptcy Just Surpassed Bitcoin in Market Cap

On June 22nd, driven by rising stock prices, SK Hynix’s market capitalization reached $1.35 trillion, surpassing Bitcoin's total market cap of approximately $1.29 trillion. This temporarily made it South Korea's highest-valued company. The core driver of this surge is HBM (High Bandwidth Memory), for which SK Hynix is the primary supplier to NVIDIA, holding over 60% market share. AI's demand for high memory bandwidth has translated into immense profitability, with SK Hynix reporting a 72% operating profit margin in Q1. The company's success follows a 13-year bet on HBM technology, beginning in 2009. It nearly failed after the 2001 dot-com bubble, was acquired by SK Group in 2012, and was subsequently recapitalized to continue its long-term HBM development. The article contrasts this with the Crypto AI narrative. Capital currently favors AI infrastructure players like SK Hynix due to "real orders, physical barriers, and quantifiable profit margins." In comparison, Crypto AI projects, promising decentralized compute and data markets, remain largely conceptual with limited tangible progress. Examples include Bittensor, whose core mechanisms are still under development, and Bitcoin miners transitioning to AI, who face significant funding gaps and execution challenges. The piece cites analysis suggesting the AI sector has absorbed nearly all new market liquidity since 2022, leaving little for crypto. It concludes that the current AI infrastructure红利 is captured by entities with proven technical barriers and supply capabilities, while crypto networks still need to define their concrete role in the value chain.

链捕手37 min fa

A Company Once on the Brink of Bankruptcy Just Surpassed Bitcoin in Market Cap

链捕手37 min fa

Bittensor Moves Towards Ultimate Decentralization: The Critical 18 Months for the TAO Ecosystem is Here?

Bittensor, a decentralized AI protocol, is accelerating its transition to full decentralization over the next 18 months, as outlined in a recent post by co-founder Const. The project currently operates in a "semi-decentralized" state: ownership and network participation are open and permissionless, with TAO distribution based on competitive contribution. However, protocol upgrades and governance have remained under core team control to enable rapid iteration in the fast-evolving AI sector. This strategic shift comes as the ecosystem matures, boasting 128 subnets and a large community. Const argues that continued centralization now poses risks, including single points of failure and regulatory scrutiny. The upcoming decentralization roadmap includes optimizing validator competition, opening liquidity pools, introducing governance rights for Alpha holders, and refining economic models. The move could fundamentally reshape TAO's value proposition, adding governance premiums to its existing valuation based on AI narrative and scarcity. It also signals a potential maturation of the AI crypto sector, where competition may shift from hype to sustainable protocol design and real economic activity. Bittensor positions itself not just as another AI token, but as foundational infrastructure aiming to decentralize intelligence production—analogous to Bitcoin's role in decentralizing money—with the goal of creating a resilient "Millennium Intelligence Federation."

marsbit49 min fa

Bittensor Moves Towards Ultimate Decentralization: The Critical 18 Months for the TAO Ecosystem is Here?

marsbit49 min fa

Japan's AI Dark Horse Emerges: How a 7B Small Model Challenges Fable and Mythos?

In June 2026, Sakana AI's new model Fugu caused a stir in the AI community. Its Fugu Ultra variant achieved scores of 73.7 on SWE-Bench Pro and 82.1 on TerminalBench 2.1, surpassing GPT-5.5 and Claude Opus 4.8, and was claimed to be comparable to export-restricted models like Fable 5 and Mythos Preview. Remarkably, the core of this high-performance system is not a massive model, but a small 7B-parameter RL Conductor model. Fugu operates as a multi-agent orchestrator: the 7B model acts as a "foreman," dynamically analyzing user tasks and delegating subtasks to a pool of top-tier global models (e.g., GPT-5, Gemini 3.1 Pro). It then synthesizes and verifies their outputs. This architecture represents a paradigm shift from monolithic models to an expert-team approach. It enhances performance in complex, multi-step engineering tasks like code review and security testing by enabling cross-validation from specialized models, improving long-session stability and token efficiency. However, Fugu's strengths come with trade-offs: it faces inherent latency due to multiple API calls, relies heavily on underlying US model APIs (creating dependency risks), and its benchmark comparisons with Fable/Mythos are based on reported scores, not head-to-head testing. For Japan's AI ecosystem, which lacks the massive compute and data resources of the US or China, Fugu exemplifies an "asymmetric breakthrough" strategy. Instead of competing directly in parameter scale, it focuses on intelligent orchestration of existing global models, offering a degree of AI sovereignty and resilience. While a significant system-level innovation, its ultimate capability is still bounded by the underlying models it coordinates.

marsbit50 min fa

Japan's AI Dark Horse Emerges: How a 7B Small Model Challenges Fable and Mythos?

marsbit50 min fa

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片