黎明前的黑暗,还需要盘整多久?

marsbitPubblicato 2024-08-02Pubblicato ultima volta 2024-08-02

编者注:
此文是《When Will The Chop End?》续篇,想阅读第一部分译文的小伙伴请点击《黎明前的黑暗,还需要盘整多长时间才能重见曙光?

盘整何时结束?(第二部分)

BTC

尽管普遍存在悲观情绪,但 BTC仅比其高点低 15%。著名交易员@BobLoukas带来希望:“到 9 月中旬,$BTC将达到历史最高水平,到 12 月将达到 10 万美元, $SOL 将成为最强的山寨币?”以下是他总结的关键见解:

大胆预测:Bob 认为 9 月中旬是$BTC突破历史最高价的可能时间点。他根据 4 年周期理论大胆预测,到 2024 年 12 月,$BTC将达到 10 万美元。他的基本预测表明 2025 年将达到顶峰。

BTC

看好$BTC:Bob 非常看好$BTC,认为这是 4 年周期中的黄金时段。他认为我们正处于中期再积累阶段。Bob 认为,支持加密货币的美国政权的长期影响仍未得到充分重视。

BTC

看好$SOL:Bob 非常看好$SOL。SOL /BTC 图表是本周期山寨币市场中的佼佼者。他认为这种趋势没有理由改变。

BTC

宏观上升趋势:许多人只见树木不见森林。Bob 建议,如果有疑问,就缩小视野。做到这一点的最佳方法之一是查看$BTC的 6 个月条形图。它自成立以来一直呈现宏观上升趋势。

BTC

逆转在即?经过几个月的艰难时期,鲍勃认为我们正处于震荡阶段。他最近增加了 /ES 多头仓位,认为未来周期仓位前景看好。

BTC

对$ETH持乐观态度:尽管$ETH表现不佳,但 Bob 预测最终将迎来$ETH旺季。早期的投机和$BTC ETF 需要转移注意力。但$ETH ETF、代币化兴趣和有利的监管可能会使$ETH受益。

BTC

$BTC的韧性:Bob 强调,$BTC的表现并不依赖于政治支持。它在多届政府的领导下都蓬勃发展。

$BTC在真空中运作——没有第二好的选择。

BTC

$BTC的真实市值:Bob 将$BTC的真实 MC 估值为 8500 亿美元,并注意到 400 万以上$BTC已丢失,而 Satoshi 持有 110 万美元。

尽管法定货币过剩、债务高企以及$BTC采用率不断增长,MC 仍保持稳定。

许多人被“为时已晚”的观念误导,在山寨币上承担了不必要的风险。

鲍勃认为,在此牛市周期中, 53,000 美元$BTC不会再次受到考验。

月线图看起来很棒。他坚定地持有 2022 年底最后一次购买的$BTC 。

BTC

本文纯粹是教育性的,不是财务建议。

Letture associate

Giants Wage the Context War, Reconstructing AI Moats

The article "Giants Launch the Context War, Reconstructing AI's Moat" discusses how leading AI companies—OpenAI, Anthropic, and Google—are shifting their competitive focus from model size to acquiring, managing, and utilizing user context (Context). Initially, Context referred to the length of text a model could process, leading to a "arms race" for longer context windows. However, the competition has evolved through three key phases: expanding text capacity (long context windows), enabling memory across sessions, and finally, integrating AI into real user environments like browsers and desktops to capture dynamic task states. Each company is pursuing a distinct strategy. OpenAI is building Context around the ChatGPT account, turning it into a central hub that accumulates user understanding across various integrated applications and tools. Anthropic, lacking a major user base, focuses on high-value verticals like coding, empowering its Claude model to actively gather Context through GUI interaction (Computer Use) and system connections (MCP protocol). Google, with vast existing user data from products like Search and Gmail, faces the challenge of restructuring this data into actionable, AI-understandable Context for its Gemini model within its ecosystem. The core argument is that the nature of competitive advantage in AI is changing. The internet era prized network effects—connecting more users. The AI era values "individual depth": the ability to build deep, task-specific understanding of a user. This creates a new moat through 1) the compounding value of accumulated Context, 2) deep integration with user tools and permissions, and 3) the establishment of trust for complex tasks. Therefore, the battle for Context is fundamentally about capturing "task entry points" and converting existing digital ecosystems into environments where AI can effectively understand and act, rather than merely scaling user numbers.

marsbit13 min fa

Giants Wage the Context War, Reconstructing AI Moats

marsbit13 min fa

Foundation Steps Back, Ethlabs Steps Forward: Ethereum Undergoes Its Largest Restructuring in History

On June 23rd, the Ethereum ecosystem witnessed two major shifts, signaling a significant governance realignment. First, former Ethereum Foundation researchers established Ethlabs, a new independent non-profit. Backed by major ETH holders like Bitmine and SharpLink, Ethlabs aims to address practical needs for institutional adoption, including faster settlement, native asset issuance, cross-chain transactions, and mainnet scaling. Secondly, the Ethereum Foundation announced a major restructuring, laying off 54 employees (20% of its staff) to become a leaner entity focused on protocol governance and maintenance rather than being the primary builder. This move represents a pivotal correction. Criticisms had mounted over the Foundation's perceived slowness, lack of clear strategy, and over-reliance on Vitalik Buterin's influence. Ethlabs emerges as a more execution-oriented, "industrialized" layer focused on market adoption—bridging the gap between research and real-world use. Notably, Vitalik Buterin is absent from its list of supporters, interpreted as an intentional step to avoid excessive personal endorsement and allow the organization to build independent credibility. The Ethereum Foundation's downsizing and redefinition mark a retreat from its former central coordinating role. It now aims to share the "privilege of stewarding Ethereum" with other emerging groups like Ethlabs, the Ethereum Applications Guild, and The Ethereum Economic Zone. Analysts frame this dual shift as the Foundation ensuring Ethereum remains "correct" (credibly neutral), while Ethlabs must prove it remains "effective" (competitive and attractive for capital and adoption). This addresses community "shareholder-like anxiety" about ETH's market performance. While risks exist—such as concerns over shifting from Foundation centrality to large-holder influence—the consensus is that the greater risk for Ethereum was inaction, caught between technical idealism and organizational inertia. These steps aim to create a more multi-stakeholder, execution-driven future for the network.

链捕手7 h fa

Foundation Steps Back, Ethlabs Steps Forward: Ethereum Undergoes Its Largest Restructuring in History

链捕手7 h fa

Second Half of U.S. Crypto Policy: The Clarity Act Aims for 60 Votes, CFTC's "One-Person Commission" Becomes Biggest Variable

In a pivotal year for US crypto policy, the "CLARITY Act" is advancing in the Senate but faces a high hurdle, needing 60 votes to pass. Key challenges include bridging partisan divides on ethics and swaying undecided Republican senators within a tight legislative calendar of only about 40 working days. The policy "second half" involves intense negotiations on a broader framework for Web3 and DeFi, including crypto tax reforms and the Blockchain Regulatory Certainty Act. A significant uncertainty is the understaffed CFTC, operating with four commissioner vacancies, which complicates regulatory clarity. Meanwhile, the departure of key "crypto champions"—SEC Commissioner Hester Peirce and Senator Cynthia Lummis—will impact ongoing policy efforts. Industry experts are cautiously optimistic but realistic. Sara K. Weed notes that while progress is being made, CLARITY is unlikely to pass this Congress, pushing agencies like the SEC and CFTC to provide more guidance. Sulolit Mukherjee suggests meaningful crypto tax legislation is more likely to be attached to larger must-pass bills. Rashan Colbert discusses the jurisdictional debate over prediction markets, emphasizing the need for a regulatory framework that fosters their development as financial tools rather than treating them broadly as gambling. The clock is ticking, but opportunities remain for substantive progress through continued bipartisan dialogue and pragmatic efforts.

marsbit10 h fa

Second Half of U.S. Crypto Policy: The Clarity Act Aims for 60 Votes, CFTC's "One-Person Commission" Becomes Biggest Variable

marsbit10 h fa

Dan Koe's New Essay: Escaping the Fate of the Wage Slave, How to Survive the AI Replacement Wave?

Dan Koe argues that the true threat in the AI era isn't technology itself, but a reliance on others for one's livelihood and happiness. The core problem is "wage slavery"—spending life on unfulfilling work. To survive and thrive, one must escape this by building their own enterprise. The key is developing five elements: Agency (initiative), Taste (discernment), Persuasion, Persistence, and Iteration. These boil down to problem-solving skills and experiential knowledge, which cannot be learned passively but only through doing your own projects. The solution is to become "unemployable" by shifting your identity. This requires: 1) Radically changing your environment to force growth, 2) Choosing a medium (like content creation) that provides real feedback through trial and error, and 3) Mastering either code or, preferably, media (content). Content creation is more valuable because its subjective nature and need for human perspective create a durable advantage over generic AI output. To start, define your life's work by answering foundational questions about your innate knowledge, unique abilities, and contrarian beliefs. Then, immediately act by publishing your first piece of content. The cycle of creating, receiving feedback, and iterating is the essential path to developing the skills needed for an independent, meaningful career and financial resilience.

marsbit11 h fa

Dan Koe's New Essay: Escaping the Fate of the Wage Slave, How to Survive the AI Replacement Wave?

marsbit11 h fa

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片