AMF在MiCA之前开始接受加密资产服务提供商的申请

币界网Pubblicato 2024-08-02Pubblicato ultima volta 2024-08-02

币界网报道:

距离欧洲MiCA法规关于加密资产服务的规定生效还有六个月的时间,金融市场管理局(AMF)已经开始接受作为加密资产服务提供商运营的授权申请。自2024年7月1日起,将需要此授权。

MiCA法规需要授权

《欧洲MiCA条例》将于2024年12月30日生效,要求所有希望在欧盟境内提供加密资产服务的市场参与者事先获得授权。

该规定涵盖了十项具体服务:为客户管理和保护加密资产;运行加密资产交易平台;将加密资产转换为资金;将加密资产交换为其他加密资产;为客户执行加密资产订单;促进加密资产的放置;为客户处理和传输加密资产订单;就加密资产提供咨询;管理加密资产组合;以及为客户转移加密资产。

提供商需要遵守MiCA下的几项常见规则,包括反洗钱洗钱洗钱是一个笼统的术语,用来描述犯罪分子通过使犯罪行为的原始所有权和收益看起来来自合法来源来掩盖这些收益的过程。洗钱是一个涉及无数行业和部门的问题,其中包括金融服务领域。虽然犯罪资金可以在没有金融部门协助的情况下成功洗钱,但价值数十亿美元的犯罪所得资金被洗钱。洗钱是一个笼统的术语,用来描述犯罪分子通过使犯罪所得看起来来自合法来源来掩盖犯罪行为的原始所有权和收益的过程。洗钱是一个涉及无数行业和部门的问题,其中包括金融服务领域。尽管犯罪资金可以在没有金融部门协助的情况下成功洗钱,但价值数十亿美元的犯罪所得资金仍会被启动。阅读本术语措施、网络安全要求和行为标准。具体义务将根据所提供服务的类型而有所不同。

MiCA过渡期

MiCA将从2024年12月30日起取代法国现有的PACTE制度,以吸引新的市场参与者。根据PACTE法,已经在“简单”或“增强”注册或可选DASP授权下运营的提供商将在2026年6月30日之前获得MiCA授权。

这一过渡期允许他们继续开展活动,直到2026年7月1日。然而,在此过渡期间,拥有“简单”或“增强”注册或可选授权的提供商将无法从欧洲护照中受益。在此期间,他们需要确保其服务符合其他成员国的法规。

MiCA的授权要求比法国对“增强”和“简单”DASP注册的规定更为严格。

AMF建议有关各方尽早开始准备,以遵守新的欧洲框架。有关MiCA监管条例的详细信息,与任何其他高净值行业一样,金融服务业受到严格监管,以帮助遏制非法行为和操纵。每种资产类别都有自己的一套协议,以打击各自形式的滥用。在外汇领域,监管由多个司法管辖区的当局承担,尽管最终缺乏具有约束力的国际秩序。谁是行业领先的监管机构?监管机构,如英国金融行为监管局(与任何其他高净值行业一样,金融服务业受到严格监管,以帮助遏制非法行为和操纵。每种资产类别都有自己的一套协议,以打击各自形式的滥用行为。在外汇领域,监管由多个司法管辖区的当局承担,尽管最终缺乏具有约束力的国际秩序。该行业的主要监管机构是谁?英国金融行为管理局等监管机构(阅读本条款和申请程序指南,AMF在其网站上发布了一份新的深度报告。

Letture associate

Giants Wage the Context War, Reconstructing AI Moats

The article "Giants Launch the Context War, Reconstructing AI's Moat" discusses how leading AI companies—OpenAI, Anthropic, and Google—are shifting their competitive focus from model size to acquiring, managing, and utilizing user context (Context). Initially, Context referred to the length of text a model could process, leading to a "arms race" for longer context windows. However, the competition has evolved through three key phases: expanding text capacity (long context windows), enabling memory across sessions, and finally, integrating AI into real user environments like browsers and desktops to capture dynamic task states. Each company is pursuing a distinct strategy. OpenAI is building Context around the ChatGPT account, turning it into a central hub that accumulates user understanding across various integrated applications and tools. Anthropic, lacking a major user base, focuses on high-value verticals like coding, empowering its Claude model to actively gather Context through GUI interaction (Computer Use) and system connections (MCP protocol). Google, with vast existing user data from products like Search and Gmail, faces the challenge of restructuring this data into actionable, AI-understandable Context for its Gemini model within its ecosystem. The core argument is that the nature of competitive advantage in AI is changing. The internet era prized network effects—connecting more users. The AI era values "individual depth": the ability to build deep, task-specific understanding of a user. This creates a new moat through 1) the compounding value of accumulated Context, 2) deep integration with user tools and permissions, and 3) the establishment of trust for complex tasks. Therefore, the battle for Context is fundamentally about capturing "task entry points" and converting existing digital ecosystems into environments where AI can effectively understand and act, rather than merely scaling user numbers.

marsbit17 min fa

Giants Wage the Context War, Reconstructing AI Moats

marsbit17 min fa

Foundation Steps Back, Ethlabs Steps Forward: Ethereum Undergoes Its Largest Restructuring in History

On June 23rd, the Ethereum ecosystem witnessed two major shifts, signaling a significant governance realignment. First, former Ethereum Foundation researchers established Ethlabs, a new independent non-profit. Backed by major ETH holders like Bitmine and SharpLink, Ethlabs aims to address practical needs for institutional adoption, including faster settlement, native asset issuance, cross-chain transactions, and mainnet scaling. Secondly, the Ethereum Foundation announced a major restructuring, laying off 54 employees (20% of its staff) to become a leaner entity focused on protocol governance and maintenance rather than being the primary builder. This move represents a pivotal correction. Criticisms had mounted over the Foundation's perceived slowness, lack of clear strategy, and over-reliance on Vitalik Buterin's influence. Ethlabs emerges as a more execution-oriented, "industrialized" layer focused on market adoption—bridging the gap between research and real-world use. Notably, Vitalik Buterin is absent from its list of supporters, interpreted as an intentional step to avoid excessive personal endorsement and allow the organization to build independent credibility. The Ethereum Foundation's downsizing and redefinition mark a retreat from its former central coordinating role. It now aims to share the "privilege of stewarding Ethereum" with other emerging groups like Ethlabs, the Ethereum Applications Guild, and The Ethereum Economic Zone. Analysts frame this dual shift as the Foundation ensuring Ethereum remains "correct" (credibly neutral), while Ethlabs must prove it remains "effective" (competitive and attractive for capital and adoption). This addresses community "shareholder-like anxiety" about ETH's market performance. While risks exist—such as concerns over shifting from Foundation centrality to large-holder influence—the consensus is that the greater risk for Ethereum was inaction, caught between technical idealism and organizational inertia. These steps aim to create a more multi-stakeholder, execution-driven future for the network.

链捕手7 h fa

Foundation Steps Back, Ethlabs Steps Forward: Ethereum Undergoes Its Largest Restructuring in History

链捕手7 h fa

Second Half of U.S. Crypto Policy: The Clarity Act Aims for 60 Votes, CFTC's "One-Person Commission" Becomes Biggest Variable

In a pivotal year for US crypto policy, the "CLARITY Act" is advancing in the Senate but faces a high hurdle, needing 60 votes to pass. Key challenges include bridging partisan divides on ethics and swaying undecided Republican senators within a tight legislative calendar of only about 40 working days. The policy "second half" involves intense negotiations on a broader framework for Web3 and DeFi, including crypto tax reforms and the Blockchain Regulatory Certainty Act. A significant uncertainty is the understaffed CFTC, operating with four commissioner vacancies, which complicates regulatory clarity. Meanwhile, the departure of key "crypto champions"—SEC Commissioner Hester Peirce and Senator Cynthia Lummis—will impact ongoing policy efforts. Industry experts are cautiously optimistic but realistic. Sara K. Weed notes that while progress is being made, CLARITY is unlikely to pass this Congress, pushing agencies like the SEC and CFTC to provide more guidance. Sulolit Mukherjee suggests meaningful crypto tax legislation is more likely to be attached to larger must-pass bills. Rashan Colbert discusses the jurisdictional debate over prediction markets, emphasizing the need for a regulatory framework that fosters their development as financial tools rather than treating them broadly as gambling. The clock is ticking, but opportunities remain for substantive progress through continued bipartisan dialogue and pragmatic efforts.

marsbit10 h fa

Second Half of U.S. Crypto Policy: The Clarity Act Aims for 60 Votes, CFTC's "One-Person Commission" Becomes Biggest Variable

marsbit10 h fa

Dan Koe's New Essay: Escaping the Fate of the Wage Slave, How to Survive the AI Replacement Wave?

Dan Koe argues that the true threat in the AI era isn't technology itself, but a reliance on others for one's livelihood and happiness. The core problem is "wage slavery"—spending life on unfulfilling work. To survive and thrive, one must escape this by building their own enterprise. The key is developing five elements: Agency (initiative), Taste (discernment), Persuasion, Persistence, and Iteration. These boil down to problem-solving skills and experiential knowledge, which cannot be learned passively but only through doing your own projects. The solution is to become "unemployable" by shifting your identity. This requires: 1) Radically changing your environment to force growth, 2) Choosing a medium (like content creation) that provides real feedback through trial and error, and 3) Mastering either code or, preferably, media (content). Content creation is more valuable because its subjective nature and need for human perspective create a durable advantage over generic AI output. To start, define your life's work by answering foundational questions about your innate knowledge, unique abilities, and contrarian beliefs. Then, immediately act by publishing your first piece of content. The cycle of creating, receiving feedback, and iterating is the essential path to developing the skills needed for an independent, meaningful career and financial resilience.

marsbit11 h fa

Dan Koe's New Essay: Escaping the Fate of the Wage Slave, How to Survive the AI Replacement Wave?

marsbit11 h fa

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片