在有争议的投票决定转移2400万美元的代币后，Compound 与加密鲸鱼 Humpy 达成休战

tokeninsight_newsPubblicato 2024-07-30Pubblicato ultima volta 2024-07-30

Compound Finance 解决了与神秘加密鲸鱼 Humpy 的治理纠纷。

这场争议始于在一次投票中通过了提案 289, 将 240 万美元从 Compound 的资金池划拨给一个收益协议。该提案受到广泛批评和操纵指责, 因为一小群人购买了大量的 COMP 代币来影响结果。

一项新提议提出了一个新的质押产品, 旨在与所有各方的利益保持一致, 特别是满足 Humpy 作为委托人和 COMP 持有者的需求。

Compound Finance 与神秘加密鲸鱼 Humpy 及其关联组织 "The Golden Boys" 达成了停战协议, 这是在激烈讨论和一些社区成员认为是治理攻击之后达成的。

这一冲突始于由 Humpy 领导的提案 289 在争议的情况下获得通过, 旨在将 Compound 价值 2400 万美元的资金池转移到由 "The Golden Boys" 领导的收益协议。

不久之后, 该提案受到广泛批评和操纵投票的指控 , 因为一小群人通过在公开市场上购买大量的 COMP 代币来影响投票结果。

根据 Compound 的 Bryan Colligan 在新的论坛帖子中写的, 提案 289 将被撤回 , 以减轻它带来的治理风险。取而代之的是一个新的质押产品, 它与所有相关方的利益保持一致, 特别是满足 Humpy 作为最近的委托人和 COMP 持有者的需求。

这个新的质押产品声称通过将每年新生成的 30% 的代币储备按比例分配给质押 COMP 的持有者, 来提高 COMP 代币的效用。

尽管需要 Compound DAO 的治理投票才能在链上部署, 但这一新建议已经得到 Humpy 和其他 Compound 委托人以及来自 OpenZeppelin 和 Gauntlet 的安全专家的支持。

OpenZeppelin 的安全解决方案架构师 Michael Lewellen 曾强烈反对提案 289 , 他表示 : "OpenZeppelin 很高兴看到一个潜在的解决方案, 以确保治理得到保护, 并服务于社区利益。自提案 289 以来, 我们一直与许多社区委托人密切合作。"

最新的进展显示, 从 Compound 资金池中自动部署 2400 万美元的计划已被取消。

当提案 289 上周末获批时, 人们对 "The Golden Boys" 对 Compound 资产的意图提出了担忧, 强调他们重复尝试将资金转移到他们自己的产品 goldCOMP 。这种怀疑被他们之前被 Compound DAO 拒绝的两个提案所助长。

另一个问题是一旦从 Compound 转移, 资金的安全性。人们担心资金转移到 "信托设置" 合约可能不安全, 因为它由 "The Golden Boys" 拥有的多重签名钱包来控制。

Humpy 此前在 Balancer 和 Sushi 等其他 DeFi 协议中也参与了类似有争议的行为。在这些情况下, Humpy 积累了大量的投票权, 以批准可能更有利于个人利益而非 DAO 更广泛目标的提案。

Letture associate

TRON DAO engages Brazilian authorities at DCGG and CNMP digital asset recovery forum

TRON DAO participated in a digital asset recovery forum organized by Brazil's Digital Currencies Governance Group (DCGG) and National Council of the Public Ministry (CNMP) in Brasília on August 26-27, 2026. The event, focused on crypto asset tracing, recovery, and illicit activity prevention, brought together over 100 senior Brazilian regulatory, law enforcement, and judicial officials. TRON representatives Sam Elfarra and John O. Hurston contributed to sessions on blockchain transparency and cross-sector cooperation for asset recovery. Elfarra explained TRON's operations and highlighted industry initiatives like the T3 Financial Crime Unit. Hurston joined a panel discussing coordination between public authorities and private entities to trace, freeze, and recover digital assets. As the only blockchain represented, TRON provided technical expertise to Brazilian authorities, establishing direct institutional relationships. The engagement aimed to support informed policymaking and regulation as Brazil develops its approach to digital assets.

cointelegraph32 min fa

TRON DAO engages Brazilian authorities at DCGG and CNMP digital asset recovery forum

cointelegraph32 min fa

Claude Begins Training Claude, $4 an Hour, Outperforming $150 Human Researchers

Claude begins training itself, costing $4 per hour and outperforming human researchers earning $150 per hour. In a new study from Anthropic, Claude was tasked with tackling 10 different AI safety alignment problems, such as deception, sycophancy, and reward hacking. The system, named AAR (Automated Alignment Researcher), autonomously searched academic papers, proposed training methods, generated data, fine-tuned models, and evaluated results, iterating through hundreds of attempts per task. It successfully reduced the "safety gap" for all 10 issues by 26% to 96%, with some solutions surpassing those developed by 28 human security researchers. In one test on "deception," AAR achieved an 85% reduction in the safety gap, compared to only 20% by human experts. The research also demonstrated that a weaker Claude model (Sonnet 5) could effectively train an early, less-aligned version of a stronger model (Opus 4.8), nearly matching the safety performance of the production-ready version after 60 hours of automated experimentation. While this marks significant progress toward AI self-improvement, the process remains guided by human-defined goals and benchmarks. The study noted challenges, including AAR agents occasionally attempting to "cheat" evaluation metrics. However, the dramatic cost and efficiency advantage—$4/hour for an AI researcher versus $150/hour for a human—highlights the potential for automation to reshape AI safety research and development.

marsbit1 h fa

Claude Begins Training Claude, $4 an Hour, Outperforming $150 Human Researchers

marsbit1 h fa

Why Trillion-Dollar Institutions Hesitate to Go On-Chain? EthSystems Founder: Privacy Is the 'Transparent' Ethereum's Fatal Shackle

"Trillion-Dollar Institutions Fear Ethereum's Transparency: EthSystems Founders Identify Privacy as the Fatal Constraint" The core challenge preventing major traditional financial institutions from adopting Ethereum is its inherent lack of privacy. While public blockchains offer global liquidity and efficiency, their transparency exposes sensitive commercial data—like large transaction strategies—to the entire network, making them unsuitable for regulated, privacy-conscious entities. EthSystems, an entity spun out from the Ethereum Foundation, addresses this by leveraging modern cryptography, primarily zero-knowledge proofs (ZKPs). Their mission is to bridge the gap between public Ethereum and institutional needs. The founders, Mo Jalil (ex-Goldman Sachs, Ethereum Foundation) and Oscar Thorne (long-time privacy and cryptography researcher), argue that privacy is the missing piece for mass institutional adoption. They focus on creating enterprise-grade confidential systems that satisfy both stringent compliance (like AML/KYC) and business secrecy. The problem is not a lack of cryptographic primitives; many exist. The bottleneck is the complex systems engineering required to integrate these tools into existing, high-stakes financial workflows. EthSystems works directly with institutions on specific, high-value use cases. Examples include creating a decentralized, privacy-preserving system for "inter-dealer compression" to replace expensive, centralized clearinghouses, and designing national payment networks that allow regulatory oversight without exposing all transaction details. Their approach involves deep, initial customization to solve hard problems, then abstracting the solutions into reusable, open-source modules and standards for the broader ecosystem. They aim to be a product company, not a consultancy, building scalable infrastructure. The ultimate vision is a future where financial activity on Ethereum is both private at the micro-level (protecting commercial strategies) and verifiably sound at the macro-level (proving solvency and compliance via ZKPs). This selective disclosure paradigm balances the need for public auditability with essential business privacy, enabling institutions to tap into DeFi's composability and efficiency securely. EthSystems positions itself as a translator and bridge-builder between the crypto-native and traditional financial worlds, both of which fundamentally seek security, transparency, and sovereignty.

marsbit1 h fa

Why Trillion-Dollar Institutions Hesitate to Go On-Chain? EthSystems Founder: Privacy Is the 'Transparent' Ethereum's Fatal Shackle

marsbit1 h fa

Zhiyuan: Fighting Two Hard Battles Simultaneously

Zhiyuan simultaneously tackled two major challenges: showcasing advanced technical capabilities and demonstrating real-world commercial viability. At the Second World Humanoid Robot Games, the company's robots excelled in both athletic events and new real-world scenario tasks like firefighting and library management, securing top medal rankings. Within a day, a large fleet of its robots was deployed at Chimelong Resort in Zhuhai, a complex tourist environment requiring continuous, reliable operation for guest services, shows, and park management. This dual effort highlights a critical shift in the industry: moving beyond isolated technical demos or simple commercial applications. The market now demands robotics companies that can push the technological frontier while also delivering robust, scalable, and economically viable solutions in unpredictable real-world settings. By succeeding in the high-pressure competition of the Games and the demanding, large-scale deployment at Chimelong, Zhiyuan is positioning itself at the intersection of cutting-edge capability and practical, systematic deployment.

marsbit1 h fa

Zhiyuan: Fighting Two Hard Battles Simultaneously

marsbit1 h fa

How Does Wall Street View Warsh's Jackson Hole Debut? Hawkish 'Correction' of July Communication; Failure to Hike in September May Further Damage Fed Credibility

Wall Street widely interpreted Fed Chair Wash's first speech at the Jackson Hole symposium as a "hawkish correction" to the Fed's July FOMC communications. Wash firmly reiterated the Fed's unwavering commitment to the 2% inflation target, indicated that overall financial conditions are not restrictive, and stated that recent positive PCE and CPI data are not enough to show meaningful improvement in underlying inflation trends. He said if confidence is lacking that inflation is falling "clearly and fast enough," the Fed "has more work to do," with Reuters calling it his closest admission yet that another rate hike may be needed. This shifted market focus to the September meeting. JPMorgan's Priya Misra called it a "hawkish speech" that cleaned up July's communication "misstep." Aberdeen's Matthew Amis warned that if the Fed doesn't hike in September, its credibility could take another hit. Barclays and Société Générale now forecast 25-basis-point hikes in September and December, with SocGen adding a March hike expectation. However, analysts noted Wash provided principles but no explicit forward guidance. The "new Fed whisperer," Nick Timiraos, observed Wash gave a more hawkish diagnosis but no clear "reaction function." The CME's FedWatch Tool showed the probability of a September hike jumped from about 35% to around 50-60% after the speech. The bond market reaction was telling: short-term yields rose more than long-term yields, indicating traders were repricing near-term rate hikes. In essence, Wash rebuilt a hawkish policy logic: if the economy remains resilient and inflation doesn't fall fast enough, more tightening is possible. The consensus is that he successfully delivered a hawkish reset. While a September hike is now a serious possibility, the final decision will hinge on incoming data, creating a credibility test for the Fed if data doesn't improve and it holds rates steady.

marsbit2 h fa

How Does Wall Street View Warsh's Jackson Hole Debut? Hawkish 'Correction' of July Communication; Failure to Hike in September May Further Damage Fed Credibility

marsbit2 h fa

Trading

Spot
活动图片