特朗普枪击事件后,聪明钱是如何斩获百倍收益的?

Odaily星球日报Pubblicato 2024-07-16Pubblicato ultima volta 2024-07-16

Introduzione

特朗普meme概念暴涨,TRUMP在1小时内暴涨近70% ,MAGA在1小时内暴涨33% 。

原文作者:Luccy、Joyce

7 月 14 日,特朗普在一场竞选集会中演讲时耳部中枪,在被安保掩护的过程中还高举右拳。之后,特朗普 meme 概念暴涨,TRUMP 在 1 小时内暴涨近 70% ,MAGA 在 1 小时内暴涨 33% 。另外,Solana 上还出现了数个相关 meme 币,其中 FIGHT、EAR 等上线后涨幅均超百倍。

昨日晚间,特朗普于北京时间 11 点 51 分发布新社交邮件动态,配文「不要害怕(FEAR NOT),我是特朗普,我将带领美国再次伟大!」。之后,Solana 出现了「FEAR NOT」为名的 meme 代币,两小时涨幅 33 倍。

爆炸性新闻事件之后,总会快速出现一系列相关 meme 代币,币,跑出几个涨幅超百倍、盈利空间巨大的标的,这些「金狗」是如何诞生的?吃到高倍盈利的聪明钱又有着怎样的特征?

新闻后 15 分钟,老币拉盘,新币入场

特朗普遭遇枪击事件的相关报道最早见于彭博社记者,Walter 于 14 日早 6: 15 通告特朗普被枪击, 15 分钟后,特朗普概念币开始拉盘。

特朗普枪击事件后,聪明钱是如何斩获百倍收益的?

此前特朗普概念龙头 TRUMP 领涨。14 日上午 6:22,TRUMP 用了 40 分钟上涨 70%,早 7 时左右开始下跌,交易量 601 万美元。随后,MAGA 于 6:28 也开始暴涨,上涨也持续了 40 分钟,涨幅完成 46% 之后,7 时 10 分开始下跌,交易量 337 万美元。

特朗普枪击事件后,聪明钱是如何斩获百倍收益的?

但除了老 meme 外,本次突发事件还出现了很多相关概念币,比如 EAR、Fight、SURVIVOR、FIST、MISSED 和 HERO 等,以及围绕这几个词的衍生词句也有对应的 meme,如 EAR IS FINE、EARWIF 等。

对于 meme 炒作来说,事件发酵、发币、拉盘已成基本程序。上述这些名称所代表的代币不仅 1 个,在任何 dex 上搜索其中任何一个词,都可以搜索到几十个同名代币。据 gmgn 数据,名为「Fight」的代币在 Solana 上有 24 个,在以太坊上有 23 个,而 EAR 在 Solana 上有 11 个,在以太坊上有 5 个。

特朗普枪击事件后,聪明钱是如何斩获百倍收益的?

由于难以追踪到大部分 meme 诞生的时间节点,BlockBeats 查看了较为热门的几枚代币诞生时间,其中仅 FIGHT 和 EAR 实现较大涨幅,且其发布时间恰巧为新闻发布 15 分钟后。

据 dexscreener 数据,涨的最多的 FIGHT 发布于 14 号上午 6:50,目前仍在上涨,其走势呈现 3 次上升高点。第一次高点出现于 14 日上午 11:45,价格在 0.004 美元附近维持了近 1 小时后开始回落。6 小时后,价格在 0.002 美元触底反弹,晚上 10:30 前后,FIGHT 涨至 0.013 美元局部高点。随后卖单增加,FIGHT 再次出现大幅回落,并于今日早在此回升。

EAR 是继 FIGHT 后存活时间较长的 meme,其发布于 14 号上午 6:37,下午 1:15 涨至最高点 0.032 美元,7 小时内涨幅超 60 倍。下午 3:30,EAR 价格在 0.025 美元左右开始呈下滑趋势,截止撰稿时价格为 0.0035 美元,市值 370 万美元,交易量达 4310 万美元。

特朗普枪击事件后,聪明钱是如何斩获百倍收益的?

而热度次高的 FIST 和 SURVIVOR 发布时间则较晚,FIST 发布于 14 日早上 8: 21 ,而 SURVIVOR 则发布于 15 日凌晨 1: 05 ,目前均已归零。

聪明钱如何实现百倍 meme?

据 gmgn.ai 数据,除了 FIGHT 和 EAR 外,在早上 6 点半前后也有大量相关 meme 诞生,但或许是缺乏喊单并没引起过多注意。而在这几十甚至上百个相关 meme 中,聪明钱是如何精准挑选出那个百倍 meme 的?BlockBeats 追踪了早期买入上述 EAR、FIGHT 两枚 meme 的聪明钱地址。

运气占主要成分

在 FIGHT 上盈利最多的幸运儿为 LCJFe 开头的地址,其在开盘 23 分钟后以 0.00017 美元的平均成本买入,在价格翻倍后卖出本金,目前浮盈 57.59 万美元,涨幅超百倍。

特朗普枪击事件后,聪明钱是如何斩获百倍收益的?

另一以 CLegS 开头地址专攻名人代币,在其所有持币种类中,名人代币超过总量的一半,但几乎全军覆没。从总体战绩上看,由于这次兴起的川普概念币让其总利润仍为正。

在此次特朗普枪击案中,他买入了 FIGHT、EAR、FIST、SURVIVOR 和 MAGA 五个相关代币,除 MAGA 亏损外,其余四个 meme 已共为他实现了超 47 万美元的利润,目前未实现利润还有约 23.36 万美元。

BS4gh 开头地址则属于「热点型」选手,除了 FIGHT 外,其持有代币还包括 BOME、WIF 和 MOTHER,虽然后三者均是 meme 圈备受热议的百倍币,但由于买入时机过晚,目前仅浮盈 82 美元。

而在 EAR 上盈利最多的 Qwerty(81RYq 开头地址),买入成本共计 224 美元,最终盈利超 22 万美元,获得了 1309 倍收益。他的策略是广撒网,一天以 100-300 美元的成本价买入 15 至 30 个左右的 meme 币,最终等到了 EAR 这个彩票。

特朗普枪击事件后,聪明钱是如何斩获百倍收益的?

KOL 都能赚,但并不能卖在山顶

KOL 地址动向与喊单情况对 meme 币的价格走势有着重要的影响。

在 EAR 出现的 36 分钟后,一个显示为推特粉丝数超 90 K 的 KOL「0x Sun」的地址以 0.0015 和 0.0019 美元分两笔买入共 2700 多美元的 EAR。这时 EAR 的市值还不到 200 万美元,在之后的 8 小时里,EAR 最高突破 3200 万美元。但 0x Sun 并没有卖在高点,如果按高点计算,0x Sun 最高盈利可达 16 倍。但在这波行情中,0x Sun 的实际收益率为 1.36 倍。

特朗普枪击事件后,聪明钱是如何斩获百倍收益的?

而在 FIGHT 上,粉丝量超 30K 的 Neso 在代币上线两小时后以 434 美元的成本买入,并在买入之后的半小时左右发布了一条喊单推文。之后 FIGHT 持续走高,在盈利达 6 倍后,Neso 陆续出货,最后一笔卖在了阶段性高点处,并留下了余仓。随着 FIGHT 突破历史新高,Neso 在其上的未实现盈利达 1.7 万美元。

特朗普枪击事件后,聪明钱是如何斩获百倍收益的?

不完全「慧眼识币」指南

总结这些幸运聪明钱后,会发现并不是只有在代币上线的几十分钟内买入才能获得高倍盈利。这些金狗在突发新闻报道后的 20 分钟就被推出,「生产速度」极快,但「升级成金狗」的过程则需要数个小时,即使在开盘 2 小时后买入仍有达百倍的盈利空间。

BlockBeats 总结了一些抓住 meme 币的通用技巧。

首先,紧跟热点新闻并判断其潜在影响力是至关重要的。需要对突发事件保持敏锐的 meme 币嗅觉,及时筛选出与事件相关的概念币,并密切关注其走势。

此外,关注聪明钱和有信誉的 KOL 地址也是有效策略之一。聪明钱和 KOL 往往拥有更丰富的市场经验和更敏锐的市场嗅觉,跟随他们的动向可以增加成功的概率。同时,分散投资也是降低风险的重要策略。正如一些聪明钱所采取的行动,广撒网、多点布局,虽然不是每一个投资都能带来巨额回报,但总有一些能够脱颖而出,实现百倍甚至千倍的收益。

最后,及时出本也是关键策略之一。在市场波动剧烈的情况下,及时收回初始投资成本,确保自己在任何情况下都不会亏损,是保护投资收益的重要手段。保持理性和冷静,避免因一时的波动而盲目跟风,要有自己的判断和策略。这样,即使在动荡的市场中,也能稳步前行,抓住下一次突发事件带来的 meme 币机遇。

总之,抓住突发事件的 meme 币不仅需要运气,也需要敏锐的市场洞察力和科学的投资策略。但 meme 币波动剧烈,BlockBeats 提醒读者注意甄别风险。

原文链接

Letture associate

U.S. Bonds, AI, Inflation: You Can't Have All Three – What's Bitcoin Betting On?

Title: U.S. Treasury Bonds, AI, and Inflation: A Trilemma Facing Washington, and Where BTC Fits In Core Thesis: The U.S. government faces a trilemma: stabilizing the Treasury market, sustaining the AI investment cycle, and controlling inflation. The likely political choice is to prioritize the first two, accepting higher inflation for longer. This creates a sustained tailwind for both gold and Bitcoin by injecting liquidity and shifting duration risk away from the private sector. Key Pressures on Treasuries: * Long-term yields (e.g., 10-year ~4.70%) are near multi-decade highs due to persistent inflation risks, high fiscal supply, weaker demand for long duration, and new competition from AI infrastructure financing. * AI investment, requiring massive capital (estimated ~$300B in investment-grade bond issuance), is now competing directly with the Treasury in long-duration debt markets. * Geopolitical tensions (e.g., Iran conflict) add upward pressure on oil prices and defense spending. Policy Response: The Treasury, under Secretary Besant, is focusing on market stability through measures like supporting the Yen (to prevent forced Japanese Treasury sales), increasing repo operations for long-dated bonds, and potentially shifting issuance toward the short end. This "aggressive Treasury issuance" can function like "stealth QE," easing financial conditions. Impact on Assets: * **Gold** has already benefited (up ~90% from Aug 2024 to Aug 2026), driven by declining trust in the USD, inflation fears, and a "monetary debasement" narrative. * **Bitcoin** is now showing stronger correlation with this theme. Recent outperformance vs. gold (BTC +22.2% vs. Gold +5.9% in late Aug) coincided with Treasury's enhanced repo actions, suggesting the market may be pricing it as a liquidity/ debasement hedge, not just a speculative tech asset. Conclusion: If high inflation, large deficits, and AI capital demands persist, the cost of stabilizing bonds and growth will be shorter debt maturity, constant liquidity support, and tolerance for higher inflation—a favorable environment for gold and BTC. This view would be challenged only by a return to ~2% inflation, credible fiscal consolidation, or AI becoming self-funding.

marsbit16 min fa

U.S. Bonds, AI, Inflation: You Can't Have All Three – What's Bitcoin Betting On?

marsbit16 min fa

HBM is Being Redefined

HBM is being redefined as AI-driven demand for computing power shifts the performance bottleneck from processing units to memory bandwidth, making High Bandwidth Memory the critical component for advanced AI hardware. At HotChips 2026, Samsung and SK Hynix unveiled new technical roadmaps for HBM4, moving away from the traditional approach of simply increasing DRAM speed and stacking layers. The focus for HBM4 has shifted from DRAM optimization to a comprehensive system-level redesign of the Base Die. Key innovations include upgrading the Base Die to advanced logic processes (e.g., Samsung's 4nm), adopting hybrid bonding for 3D stacking, and exploring heterogeneous packaging solutions like Intel's EMIB alongside the established CoWoS. This marks HBM's evolution from a simple memory component into an integrated system involving "memory + logic + packaging + IP + EDA." This transition brings benefits like better signal integrity, higher I/O bandwidth (up to 2048-bit), and potential for in-memory computing. However, it also introduces significant complexity. DRAM manufacturers now must deeply collaborate with logic foundries, extending design cycles and increasing supply chain challenges. Furthermore, the industry is moving towards multiple advanced packaging paths, with EMIB emerging as an alternative to CoWoS to alleviate capacity constraints, while hybrid bonding is being developed for future ultra-high (16+ layer) stacks. New core barriers have emerged beyond manufacturing. High-speed PHY/SERDES IP, crucial for HBM4's higher data rates, is concentrated among a few established players, creating an entry barrier for smaller firms. Similarly, the industry lacks mature 3D heterogeneous EDA toolchains capable of co-simulating the coupled electrical, thermal, and mechanical effects across the logic base, memory stacks, and interposer. These "soft" capabilities in IP and EDA are now critical determinants of HBM4's performance and yield. In summary, the HBM industry is entering a new era of systemic competition. The standardized approach is giving way to divergent vendor roadmaps, with multiple technologies coexisting. Success will depend on integrated architecture, packaging, process, and ecosystem capabilities, fundamentally reshaping the competitive landscape for AI memory.

marsbit21 min fa

HBM is Being Redefined

marsbit21 min fa

The Era of Earning 200,000 from a 3,000 Investment Is Over; AI Comic Dramas Are Not a Get-Rich-Quick Trend

The era of turning 3,000 yuan into 200,000 yuan is over. AI-generated comic dramas are no longer a low-barrier gold rush. A wave of sudden account suspensions has hit creators in AI comic dramas, AI art, and AI tutorials, primarily triggered by new content and copyright compliance rules implemented by Tomato Novel on August 17. This "last straw" exposed the underlying issues: tightening platform rules, rising copyright requirements, increasing costs, and severe content homogenization. The business model was fundamentally unsustainable for most creators. One creator detailed the math: producing five minutes of content daily cost around 510 yuan in AI computing and editing, while a video with 60,000 views might only earn 45 yuan. While a few early viral hits like "Huo Qubing" and "Zombie Cleaner" achieved high returns with minimal investment, they were exceptions. The reality for most solo creators was barely covering costs or operating at a loss. The new regulations mandate formal authorization from original authors for adaptations, limit video length and the amount of原著 content used, and ban terms like "Episode 1" in titles. This directly dismantled the previous "produce first, authorize later" model. Faced with the inability to afford版权 costs and the threat of penalty, many creators chose to halt updates. While some fans expressed frustration, the rules protect original authors who often faced侵权 with little recourse. The shutdowns signal not the failure of AI technology, but an inevitable industry shift from wild growth to regulated refinement. The previous model prioritized quick cash over quality content, leading to formulaic, "AI-face" saturated dramas that audiences grew tired of. The future belongs to creators who use AI as a tool to serve solid storytelling, not replace it. Some are now seeking formal licenses, a slower but necessary process. Upcoming national regulations further underscore this move towards standardization, weeding out those seeking only fast money and making space for genuine creators.

marsbit22 min fa

The Era of Earning 200,000 from a 3,000 Investment Is Over; AI Comic Dramas Are Not a Get-Rich-Quick Trend

marsbit22 min fa

Trading

Spot
活动图片