加密市场情绪研究报告(2024.07.05–07.12):CPI走低主流币价格冲高回落

Odaily星球日报Pubblicato 2024-07-13Pubblicato ultima volta 2024-07-13

Introduzione

在过去一周,比特币和以太坊的价格在低位放量后震荡上升,同时这两种加密货币的波动率和成交量在7月5日的下跌到低点时达到了最高水平。比特币和以太坊的未平仓合约量都在下降。此外,比特币与以太坊的隐含波动率也同步下降。比特币的资金费率维持在低水平,这可能反映出市场参与者对比特币的杠杆情绪持续低迷。市场宽度指标显示大部分加密货币持续下跌趋势,表明整个市场在过去一周中维持疲软的走势。CPI数据走低,数据公布时主流币价格冲高回落。

CPI 数据走低主流币价格冲高回落

加密市场情绪研究报告(2024.07.05–07.12):CPI走低主流币价格冲高回落

数据来源: https://hk.investing.com/economic-calendar/cpi-733

年内降息预期大幅升温, 9 月首次降息的可能性回升至 80% , 7 月降息概率重现。比特币与以太坊价格在 CPI 数据公布前持续上涨,数据公布后冲高回落。美国劳工部公布的数据显示, 6 月份美国消费者价格指数(CPI)同比增速由 5 月的 3.3% 放缓至 3% ,为去年 6 月以来最低增速;环比由 5 月的持平,转为 6 月的下降 0.1% ,增速较上月回落 0.1 个百分点,为 2020 年 5 月以来的首次负增长,显示出通胀继续放缓的迹象。

距离下一次美联储议息会议(2024.08.01)还有约 17 天

https://hk.investing.com/economic-calendar/interest-rate-decision-168

市场技术与情绪环境分析

加密市场情绪研究报告(2024.07.05–07.12):CPI走低主流币价格冲高回落

加密市场情绪研究报告(2024.07.05–07.12):CPI走低主流币价格冲高回落

情绪分析组成

加密市场情绪研究报告(2024.07.05–07.12):CPI走低主流币价格冲高回落

技术指标

价格走势

过去一周 BTC 价格上涨 0.51% ,ETH 价格上涨 1.3% 。

加密市场情绪研究报告(2024.07.05–07.12):CPI走低主流币价格冲高回落

上图是 BTC 过去一周的价格图

加密市场情绪研究报告(2024.07.05–07.12):CPI走低主流币价格冲高回落

上图是 ETH 过去一周的价格图

加密市场情绪研究报告(2024.07.05–07.12):CPI走低主流币价格冲高回落

表格显示过去一个周的价格变化率

价量分布图(支撑阻力)

过去一周 BTC 与 ETH 在低位放量形成新的密集成交区后震荡上行。

加密市场情绪研究报告(2024.07.05–07.12):CPI走低主流币价格冲高回落

上图是 BTC 过去一周的密集成交区分布图

加密市场情绪研究报告(2024.07.05–07.12):CPI走低主流币价格冲高回落

上图是 ETH 过去一周的密集成交区分布图

加密市场情绪研究报告(2024.07.05–07.12):CPI走低主流币价格冲高回落

表格显示 BTC 与 ETH 过去一周中每周的密集成交区间

成交量与未平仓量

过去一周 BTC 与 ETH 在 7 月 5 日下跌时成交量最大;未平仓量 BTC 与 ETH 都持续下降。

加密市场情绪研究报告(2024.07.05–07.12):CPI走低主流币价格冲高回落

上图最上方 BTC 的价格走势,中间是成交量、最下方是未平仓量、浅蓝色是 1 天均值,橘色是 7 天均值。其中 K 线的颜色代表当前的状态,绿色是价格上升有成交量支持,红色是在平仓,黄色是在缓慢累积仓位,黑色是拥挤状态。

加密市场情绪研究报告(2024.07.05–07.12):CPI走低主流币价格冲高回落

上图最上方 ETH 的价格走势,中间是成交量、最下方是未平仓量、浅蓝色是 1 天均值,橘色是 7 天均值。其中 K 线的颜色代表当前的状态,绿色是价格上升有成交量支持,红色是在平仓,黄色是在缓慢累积仓位,黑色是拥挤状态。

历史波动率与隐含波动率

过去一周历史波动率 BTC 与 ETH 在 7.5 下跌时最高;隐含波动率 BTC 与 ETH 同步下降。

加密市场情绪研究报告(2024.07.05–07.12):CPI走低主流币价格冲高回落

黄色线为历史波动率,蓝色线为隐含波动率,红点是其 7 日平均

加密市场情绪研究报告(2024.07.05–07.12):CPI走低主流币价格冲高回落

事件驱动

过去一周比特币与以太坊价格在 CPI 数据公布前持续上涨,数据公布后冲高回落。

情绪指标

动量情绪

过去一周比特币/黄金/纳指/恒指/沪深 300 中,黄金最强势,而表现最差为恒指。

加密市场情绪研究报告(2024.07.05–07.12):CPI走低主流币价格冲高回落

上图为不同资产过去一周的走势

加密市场情绪研究报告(2024.07.05–07.12):CPI走低主流币价格冲高回落

放贷利率_借贷情绪

过去一周 USD 放贷年化收益平均为 12% ,短期利率下降至 3.8% 。

加密市场情绪研究报告(2024.07.05–07.12):CPI走低主流币价格冲高回落

黄色线为 USD 利率的最高价,蓝色线为最高价的 75% ,红色线为最高价的 75% 的 7 天平均值

加密市场情绪研究报告(2024.07.05–07.12):CPI走低主流币价格冲高回落

表格显示 USD 利率过去不同持有天数的平均收益

资金费率_合约杠杆情绪

过去一周 BTC 资费平均年化收益为 8.8% ,合约杠杆情绪维持较低水平。

加密市场情绪研究报告(2024.07.05–07.12):CPI走低主流币价格冲高回落

蓝色线为币安上 BTC 的资金费率,红色线为其 7 日平均

加密市场情绪研究报告(2024.07.05–07.12):CPI走低主流币价格冲高回落

表格显示 BTC 的资费过去不同持有天数的平均收益

市场相关性_一致性情绪

过去一周选中的 129 个币中相关性维持在 0.73 左右,不同品种间的一致性从高处回落。

加密市场情绪研究报告(2024.07.05–07.12):CPI走低主流币价格冲高回落

上图蓝色先为比特币价格,绿色线为['1000 floki', '1000 lunc', '1000 pepe', '1000 shib', '100 0x ec', '1inch', 'aave', 'ada', 'agix', 'algo', 'ankr', 'ant', 'ape', 'apt', 'arb', 'ar', 'astr', 'atom', 'audio', 'avax', 'axs', 'bal', 'band', 'bat', 'bch', 'bigtime', 'blur', 'bnb', 'btc', 'celo', 'cfx', 'chz', 'ckb', 'comp', 'crv', 'cvx', 'cyber', 'dash', 'doge', 'dot', 'dydx', 'egld', 'enj', 'ens', 'eos','etc', 'eth', 'fet', 'fil', 'flow', 'ftm', 'fxs', 'gala', 'gmt', 'gmx', 'grt', 'hbar', 'hot', 'icp', 'icx', 'imx', 'inj', 'iost', 'iotx', 'jasmy', 'kava', 'klay', 'ksm', 'ldo', 'link', 'loom', 'lpt', 'lqty', 'lrc', 'ltc', 'luna 2', 'magic', 'mana', 'matic', 'meme', 'mina', 'mkr', 'near', 'neo', 'ocean', 'one', 'ont', 'op', 'pendle', 'qnt', 'qtum', 'rndr', 'rose', 'rune', 'rvn', 'sand', 'sei', 'sfp', 'skl', 'snx', 'sol', 'ssv', 'stg', 'storj', 'stx', 'sui', 'sushi', 'sxp', 'theta', 'tia', 'trx', 't', 'uma', 'uni', 'vet', 'waves', 'wld', 'woo', 'xem', 'xlm', 'xmr', 'xrp', 'xtz', 'yfi', 'zec', 'zen', 'zil', 'zrx’]整体的相关性

市场宽度_整体情绪

过去一周选中的 129 个币,价格在 30 日均线上方的占比为 9.4% ,相对 BTC 价格在 30 日均线上方占比为 33.8% ,距离过去 30 天最低价大于 20% 的占比为 5.5% ,距离过去 30 天最高价小于 10% 的占比为 10% ,过去一周市场宽度指标显示整体市场大部分币持续处于下跌态势。

加密市场情绪研究报告(2024.07.05–07.12):CPI走低主流币价格冲高回落

上图为['bnb', 'btc', 'sol', 'eth', '1000 floki', '1000 lunc', '1000 pepe', '1000 sats', '1000 shib', '100 0x ec', '1inch', 'aave', 'ada', 'agix', 'ai', 'algo', 'alt', 'ankr', 'ape', 'apt', 'arb', 'ar', 'astr', 'atom',  'avax', 'axs', 'bal', 'band', 'bat', 'bch', 'bigtime', 'blur', 'cake', 'celo', 'cfx', 'chz', 'ckb', 'comp', 'crv', 'cvx', 'cyber', 'dash', 'doge', 'dot', 'dydx', 'egld', 'enj', 'ens', 'eos','etc', 'fet', 'fil', 'flow', 'ftm', 'fxs', 'gala', 'gmt', 'gmx', 'grt', 'hbar', 'hot', 'icp', 'icx', 'idu', 'imx', 'inj', 'iost', 'iotx', 'jasmy', 'jto', 'jup', 'kava', 'klay', 'ksm', 'ldo', 'link', 'loom', 'lpt', 'lqty', 'lrc', 'ltc', 'luna 2', 'magic', 'mana', 'manta', 'mask', 'matic', 'meme', 'mina', 'mkr', 'near', 'neo', 'nfp', 'ocean', 'one', 'ont', 'op', 'ordi', 'pendle', 'pyth', 'qnt', 'qtum', 'rndr', 'robin', 'rose', 'rune', 'rvn', 'sand', 'sei', 'sfp', 'skl', 'snx', 'ssv', 'stg', 'storj', 'stx', 'sui', 'sushi', 'sxp', 'theta', 'tia', 'trx', 't', 'uma', 'uni', 'vet', 'waves', 'wif', 'wld', 'woo','xai', 'xem', 'xlm', 'xmr', 'xrp', 'xtz', 'yfi', 'zec', 'zen', 'zil', 'zrx' ] 30 日的各宽度指标占比

加密市场情绪研究报告(2024.07.05–07.12):CPI走低主流币价格冲高回落

总结

在过去一周,比特币(BTC)和以太坊(ETH)的价格在低位放量后震荡上升,同时这两种加密货币的波动率和成交量在 7 月 5 日的下跌到低点时达到了最高水平。比特币和以太坊的未平仓合约量都在下降。此外,比特币与以太坊的隐含波动率也同步下降。比特币的资金费率维持在低水平,这可能反映出市场参与者对比特币的杠杆情绪持续低迷。市场宽度指标显示大部分加密货币持续下跌趋势,表明整个市场在过去一周中维持疲软的走势。CPI 数据走低,数据公布时主流币价格冲高回落。

Twitter: @https://x.com/CTA_ChannelCmt

Website: channelcmt.com

Letture associate

Glue Finance Founder: ETH Has Entered a Phase of Non-Consensus, an Inflection Point Is Coming

"Glue Finance founder argues Ethereum's current price underperformance stems from its 'unfinished machine' status. Despite record usage and settlement value in 2026, ETH remains below its 2021 peak because the protocol's continued development creates a dependency on the Ethereum Foundation for guidance and fixes. Key issues include centralized L2 sequencers, governance-based freezes (as seen with Arbitrum), state bloat, a vulnerable public mempool, and looming quantum computing threats. This 'dependency discount' prevents ETH from accruing the 'ossification premium' that markets award to immutable, trustless systems like Bitcoin. The author, a self-described Ethereum maximalist, rejects two flawed escape paths: a 'war mode' shift towards centralization for speed (which would sacrifice Ethereum's core value), or simply replacing the EF with another governing body. The only solution is the 'Manhattan Plan' or 'Lean Ethereum': a concerted, accelerated effort to complete and then *freeze* the protocol's neutral core. This involves finalizing critical upgrades in consensus (Lean Consensus), scaling (targeting 1 trillion gas/sec), quantum resistance (leanXMSS signatures), and full ZK-provable execution. The goal is to pass the 'walk-away test'—where Ethereum could run forever, neutrally, without the EF. Success would transform Ethereum into the first programmable, quantum-resistant, immutable global settlement layer, flipping its current discount into a unique 'eternity premium' that surpasses Bitcoin's. Failure—stagnation or trading neutrality for speed—would relegate it to being a slower, less trustworthy competitor."

marsbit25 min fa

Glue Finance Founder: ETH Has Entered a Phase of Non-Consensus, an Inflection Point Is Coming

marsbit25 min fa

Glue Finance Founder: ETH Has Entered a Phase of Non-Consensus, an Inflection Point Is Approaching

Glue Finance founder argues that Ethereum's current price underperformance, despite high on-chain activity, stems from its incomplete state and lingering dependency on central stewards like the Ethereum Foundation. The core thesis is that the market is discounting ETH not for lack of use, but because the protocol remains a "machine under construction." Key unresolved issues include centralized L2 sequencers with limited escape hatches, state bloat, vulnerable public mempools, and the looming quantum computing threat. This perpetual "work-in-progress" status forces reliance on a small group of maintainers, undermining the network's promise of credible neutrality and immutability. The author, a self-described Ethereum maximalist, rejects two flawed paths: a "wartime mode" of centralizing for speed (surrendering Ethereum's unique value) or merely replacing the Foundation with another governing entity. The only solution is to complete and then "freeze" the protocol's neutral core through a focused "Manhattan Project" dubbed "Lean Ethereum." This project aims to bundle critical upgrades—consensus layer overhaul, massive scaling via ZK-proofs, quantum resistance, and statelessness—into a decisive push to finalize the base layer. Once the core rules are cryptographically solidified and beyond anyone's control (passing the "walk-away test"), Ethereum would shed its dependency discount and earn a "rigidity premium" for its credible neutrality and programmability, potentially surpassing Bitcoin's valuation. The race is between completing this hardening and the risks of protocol capture or stagnation.

链捕手26 min fa

Glue Finance Founder: ETH Has Entered a Phase of Non-Consensus, an Inflection Point Is Approaching

链捕手26 min fa

Hackers Steal Nearly $17 Million in 40 Days as 'Zombie Contracts' Become Their ATMs

According to an analysis published by ZeroDrift on June 22, 2026, attackers have stolen approximately $16.9 million over 40 days from five deprecated but still operational smart contracts across various blockchains. The primary issue is not a specific vulnerability but the incomplete decommissioning of legacy contracts. These "zombie contracts" often retain economic value, operational permissions, and callable functions, making them prime targets long after teams cease active development. The most significant loss occurred at DxSale, where an old locker contract lost about $7.3 million due to a forgotten control path becoming accessible again. Other affected projects include TrustedVolumes (~$5.87M), Raydium's legacy AMM pool (~$1.34M), Aztec Connect (~$2.28M), and Huma Finance V1 pool (~$101k). These incidents involved diverse systems—RFQ settlement, credit pools, liquidity lockers, AMMs—demonstrating the widespread nature of the risk. The analysis highlights that automated tools are lowering the cost for attackers to systematically scan for these long-tail targets, which have public code and weaker monitoring. In contrast, defensive practices for contract retirement remain underdeveloped. While the DeFi industry has mature audit processes for new deployments, it lacks strict protocols for securely sunsetting old contracts, which only become truly "retired" after all funds, permissions, authorizations, and trust assumptions are removed.

marsbit1 h fa

Hackers Steal Nearly $17 Million in 40 Days as 'Zombie Contracts' Become Their ATMs

marsbit1 h fa

Valuation Rout of Old Titans: The Demise of a Generation's Asset Valuation Framework

"The Old Titans' Valuation Collapse: The Death of an Era's Valuation Framework" Between Alibaba's 2014 NYSE debut at $93.89 and its 2026 price of ~$95, twelve years have passed with zero price appreciation. This stagnation symbolizes a wholesale valuation reset for an entire generation of Chinese internet assets. Companies like Tencent, Pinduoduo, Meituan, Bilibili, and Kuaishou have seen catastrophic declines of 80-98% from their peaks. The core question arises: what framework now prices these companies, or has the framework itself expired? The valuation logic for Chinese internet stocks followed a clear "anchor-setting and anchor-removing" process. From 2014-2017, the dominant narrative was "US comparable discounting" – applying a growth premium and governance discount to US peers' multiples. This anchor loosened with the 2018 US-China trade war and the VIE structure risk, then was violently uprooted by the 2020-2021 regulatory crackdowns (Ant Group, Didi, anti-monopoly fines). The 2022 delisting panic and subsequent 2025-2026 geopolitical shocks (US military lists, AI espionage accusations) completed the demolition. The old "US对标打折" model is dead. However, this is not solely a China story. A structural mirror exists in US "old titan" stocks ("老登股"). In 2026, even Microsoft – with robust fundamentals – saw its PE compress from a 34x median to 22x, its worst performer status among the "Magnificent Seven" driven by a $190 billion annual AI capex crushing free cash flow. The core dilemma is universal: legacy platform giants, whether Alibaba or Microsoft, are spending colossal sums to chase an AI paradigm that may颠覆 their own high-margin, user/subscription-based business models. They have shifted from "companies defining the future" to "companies needing to prove they won't be淘汰ed by the future." This phenomenon of a dying valuation坐标系 has a historical precedent: post-1989 Japan. After its bubble burst, the "Japan premium" narrative ("most efficient manufacturing + perpetual growth") collapsed. A 25-year valuation vacuum ensued until Warren Buffett provided a new language in the 2010s: "low valuation + high dividend + governance reform." China's internet sector is now in a similar vacuum six years into its reset. While different from Japan's deflationary context, the parallel is clear: the old macro assumption of "deep integration with global capital" is falsified, but a new pricing framework is absent. Potential "new languages" for Chinese internet valuations are contradictory. AI transformation requires gutting profitable core businesses (e.g., Alibaba's ad-driven e-commerce) for an unproven consumption-based model, risking a Microsoft-like cash flow crunch. Alternatively, shareholder returns (buybacks/dividends) could build a floor, following Buffett's Japanese playbook, but current scales are insufficient to form a standalone anchor. The current state mirrors mid-1990s Japan: the old framework is dead, the new one unborn. The market waits in a vacuum for a重新定义ing force – a person, event, or proven business model shift – to answer "why buy." This may only be the middle phase of a prolonged re-rating.

marsbit1 h fa

Valuation Rout of Old Titans: The Demise of a Generation's Asset Valuation Framework

marsbit1 h fa

Trading

Spot
活动图片