friend.tech意欲出走Base：被社区排挤还是发展受限？

Odaily星球日报Pubblicato 2024-05-27Pubblicato ultima volta 2024-05-27

Introduzione

在什么链上发展并不关键，如何匹配生态特有文化和用户人群，落地社交代币的概念才是friend.tech后续发展的关键。

原创 | Odaily星球日报

作者 | 南枳

friend.tech意欲出走Base：被社区排挤还是发展受限？

今日凌晨，friend.tech 协议的联合创始人 Racer 于 X 平台发文表示：“发个系统设计悬赏：如果你能找到一种方法将 friend.tech 从 Base 迁移出去，而不会给用户带来重大问题，并且它运行得足够好，我们决定使用它，并将支付你 20 万美元。”

friend.tech意欲出走Base：被社区排挤还是发展受限？

凌晨 0 点 FRIEND 价格约为 1.25 USDT，消息发出后最低插针至 0.948 USDT，今日最低点为 0.9 USDT，最大跌幅 28% ，目前回升至 1 USDT 附近。此外 friend.tech 当前 TVL 为 1114 万美元，单日降幅为 8.96% ，过去一个月下降 67.3% 。

发生了什么？

为何 Racer 意欲出走 Base？Racer 在另一篇帖子中解释道：“friend.tech 团队与 Base 的关系一直不稳定（has been rocky），Farcaster 的投资者在我们推出时疯狂抹黑（smearing）我们，因为他们误解了我们在做什么。他们对团队和用户施加了很大的压力，从那时起，我们的关系就开始走下坡路，我们被‘Base 社区’所排斥。”

Base 负责人 Jesse Pollak 发文回应并释放善意：“对此我的想法是：我喜欢@0x RacerAlt和@friendtech，他们不断在@base的极限上进行创新，为行业指明了方向。他们的产品在早期被更广泛生态系统的某些部分（包括 Base 和以太坊）错误地贴上了“负面投机”的文化标签。这理所当然地让他们很早就感到相当孤立和脱节。我积极观察了这种情况，认为这很糟糕，并且也知道我可以做得更多。从第一天起我就一直是用户，看到团队不断地迭代、试验和尝试新事物。从用他们的钱包用户体验改变游戏，到他们最新的产品迭代（正在起效），再到他们的代币经济模型（100 ％为用户所有）。他们确实是先驱者。 我希望看到更广泛的以太坊/Base 生态系统与 friend.tech 之间的关系得到修复。如果团队决定离开 Base，我会感到难过，但我也尊重并支持他们选择的任何道路。“

Base 经历过数次现象级增长，第一轮来自 Meme 币 BALD，第二轮便是 friend.tech，ft 对 Base 具有不可磨灭的贡献。虽然高昂税收、RUG 频发等特征确实也长期为社区所诟病，或许即是 Jesse 所指的“负面投机”标签所在。据部分社区成员表示，相较一些“亲儿子”项目，ft 受到冷落并格格不入，但事情真相如何目前仍不得而知。截至发文时暂无 Racer 个人做出的进一步回应，但经 Odaily 调查，friend.tech 官方 X 账号点赞了上述 Jesse 所发推文，或已在私下进行沟通。

社区反应

X 平台大 V Ansem 发文支持 friend.tech 向 Solana 迁移：“friend.tech 将在本周期达到 100 亿美元的原因是，每个人都已经看到了 Memecoin 的可能性，并且最终会想利用自己的社会资本来推出某种币。我们已经见过名人 NFT 和加密货币推广。

当前平台可能仍需进行一些调整，如果能移植到 Solana 上，可能会进行更彻底地减少摩擦并提高普通用户的可访问性。但如果社交代币的概念得到正确执行，其最低市值也将达到 100 亿美元以上。”

此外还有来自向 Blast 迁移的呼声，甚至一些开发者已认真地为 friend.tech 设计了非常详尽的迁移技术路线和方案。

friend.tech意欲出走Base：被社区排挤还是发展受限？

当前也有不少看衰的声音，一些用户认为 Racer 本人即是 friend.tech 的最大问题。@rogeravax 表示，Racer 要么是磕嗨了，要么就是在准备一盘大棋。

friend.tech意欲出走Base：被社区排挤还是发展受限？

结论

自代币上线以来，FRIEND 除了开盘后有一轮上涨外，目前仍处于下行趋势。例如黄立成已在 FRIEND 上浮亏约 750 万美元。而从发展路线上来看，Social 项目方面人们开始涌向 Farcaster，影响力经济和 Meme 代币方面有 pump.fun 和它的一系列仿盘，代币激励结束后的 friend.tech 在什么链上发展从技术上来说并不重要，如 Ansem 所提到的如何进一步贯彻社交代币的概念，与每个链独有的文化特性和用户匹配，实现有竞争力和护城河的发展才是根本。

Letture associate

The Full Story of How Crypto Unicorn Blockstream Is Mired in Serious Fraud Allegations

This article details serious allegations of fraud against Bitcoin infrastructure company Blockstream, founded by Bitcoin pioneer Adam Back. In June 2024, investigative account NatInfoSec published a report accusing Blockstream's mining note (BMN) program of potentially operating a multi-billion dollar scheme with Ponzi-like characteristics. The core allegations focus on Blockstream Mining Notes (BMNs), which offer investors fixed annual yields up to approximately 20% from Bitcoin mining. NatInfoSec's investigation raises several key issues: 1. **Suspicious Hashrate & Payout Capacity**: The analysis suggests Blockstream would need 20-45 EH/s of mining power to cover its BMN obligations, but its public dashboard shows only around 15 EH/s. Furthermore, no verifiable public evidence (e.g., grid connection records, import data) was found to support the massive mining operation required. 2. **Questionable Payout Source**: The BMN contract allows Blockstream to use Bitcoin from *any source* (Substitute Performance BTC) to fulfill investor payouts, raising concerns that payouts may not come from actual mining revenue. 3. **High-Risk, Fixed Returns**: Offering ~20% fixed yields in the volatile, cyclical Bitcoin mining industry is viewed as highly unusual and requires clear explanation. 4. **Undisclosed Criminal Record of Key Figure**: Christopher William Cook, a key figure in Blockstream's mining operations and CEO of spin-off Exacore, was found to have a federal felony conviction for mail fraud in 2008, a fact not disclosed in BMN offering documents. His background was also allegedly embellished. 5. **Potential Contagion to BSTR SPAC**: Questions were raised about whether these liabilities and Cook's record should have been disclosed in the SEC filings for Bitcoin Standard Treasury Company (BSTR), a separate Adam Back-associated firm planning a SPAC merger. The crypto community is divided. BitMEX Research validated Cook's criminal record and expressed concern over the high yields but found other evidence lacking or misleading, noting the legal separation between BMN, Blockstream, and BSTR. Blockstream defenders, like Samson Mow, argue the mining is real. Critics, however, emphasize the lack of independent, verifiable proof of the mining operation's scale and the true source of investor payouts. The article concludes that BMN remains shrouded in key unanswered questions regarding its actual size, the verifiability of its underlying mining assets and payouts, the source of its high yields, and the full role and disclosure concerning Chris Cook. Blockstream had not issued a comprehensive response at the time of writing.

marsbit3 h fa

The Full Story of How Crypto Unicorn Blockstream Is Mired in Serious Fraud Allegations

marsbit3 h fa

South Korea Targets 40 Unregistered Crypto Operators in Regulatory Crackdown

South Korea's Financial Intelligence Unit has referred around 40 unregistered virtual asset service providers to the police as part of a regulatory crackdown. Under local law, all crypto exchanges must obtain ISMS certification and FIU registration before operating, yet only 28 entities are currently registered. The FIU identified methods used by offshore platforms to attract Korean users, including advertising on local messaging apps and using private money changers to convert stablecoins. Officials stressed that unregistered platforms are not protected by Korean law. This action aligns with South Korea's push for stricter global crypto compliance through FATF measures. FIU Director Lee Hyung-joo recently urged FATF members to remove transaction thresholds for the "Travel Rule," as South Korea plans to mandate identity checks for all crypto transactions starting in August, expanding from the current 1 million won (≈$730) minimum. Regulatory enforcement has intensified in 2026, with authorities pursuing criminal cases against market manipulation schemes and enhancing cooperation with financial institutions to curb cross-border illegal transactions.

TheNewsCrypto4 h fa

South Korea Targets 40 Unregistered Crypto Operators in Regulatory Crackdown

TheNewsCrypto4 h fa

The Full Story Behind Encryption Unicorn Blockstream's Deep Entanglement in Serious Fraud Allegations

This article details allegations of serious fraud surrounding the crypto company Blockstream, founded by Bitcoin pioneer Adam Back. Investigation account NatInfoSec accuses Blockstream of raising billions through its Blockstream Mining Note (BMN) products, which offer high fixed yields of up to 20% from purported mining revenue. The core allegations are: 1) Blockstream's public mining hash rate (15 EH/s) appears insufficient to cover the massive payout obligations from sold BMN notes, raising questions about the true source of investor payouts. 2) Key executive Christopher William Cook, central to the mining operations, has a prior federal conviction for mail fraud, a fact not disclosed to investors. Cook's background and lavish lifestyle are highlighted as red flags. 3) The structure allows payouts from any source of BTC, not necessarily mining revenue, which critics argue gives it Ponzi-like characteristics. The controversy also touches on Bitcoin Standard Treasury Company (BSTR), a related entity planning a SPAC上市. Critics question whether BMN's liabilities and Cook's record should be disclosed in BSTR's filings. BitMEX Research offered a tempered analysis, confirming Cook's criminal record is likely true and the high yields concerning, but found other claims like insufficient抵押证据 less substantiated. Community debate centers on the need for verifiable proof of Blockstream's mining output and revenue. The article concludes that while fraud is not proven, BMN presents significant, unresolved questions regarding its actual scale, the source of its high fixed returns, the verifiability of its mining operations and payouts, and the full disclosure of associated risks and personnel backgrounds. Blockstream has not yet issued a formal response.

链捕手4 h fa

The Full Story Behind Encryption Unicorn Blockstream's Deep Entanglement in Serious Fraud Allegations

链捕手4 h fa

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片