INTO“激励即治理”开启用户参与新变革

Odaily星球日报Pubblicato 2024-05-23Pubblicato ultima volta 2024-05-23

Introduzione

INTO 正在重塑社交平台的权力格局和生态架构

当Web3的大潮席卷而来,一个个项目如雨后春笋般涌现。在这场激烈的角逐中,如何激发社区活力,凝聚多方共识,成为项目制胜的关键。而在众多选手中,全球知名的Web3社交应用 INTO 正以其独特的激励机制设计而闪耀夺目。INTO 似乎找到了一把打开用户心锁的钥匙,不断刷新着行业对激励的认知。

INTO“激励即治理”开启用户参与新变革


一、数字经济呼唤“利益共享”新范式

在Web2时代,社交平台的运营逻辑基本一致:平台提供服务,用户贡献内容和注意力,平台通过广告等方式变现。在这个过程中,用户虽然是内容的创造者,但平台才是最大的受益者。这种模式导致了两个问题:一是用户缺乏参与平台治理的动力,二是平台容易偏离用户利益而做出决策。

Web3的出现,为解决这一问题提供了新的可能。通过区块链技术,Web3平台可以将用户的贡献量化为代币,赋予用户平台治理权,实现真正意义上的“用户即股东”。这种“代币激励+用户治理”的模式,被称为“激励即治理”。它让用户不仅是内容的创造者,也是平台的所有者和治理者。

激励机制为何如此重要?这要从数字经济时代的本质说起。在这个时代,用户不再是被动的消费者,而是内容的创造者、产品的塑造者、生态的建设者。平台的成功,越来越依赖于激发每一个参与者的主动性和创造力。

然而,传统的激励模式已经难以适应这一变革。简单的经济激励,如代币奖励,虽然能在短期内引来大量用户,但难以形成长久的粘性。用户来去匆匆,社区建设缺乏内驱力。而单一的治理激励,如赋予用户投票权,又难以调动起广泛参与的热情。

Web3时代呼唤一种全新的激励范式。这种范式应该尊重每个参与者的贡献,让其在创造价值的同时分享价值;应该因人而异、因时而变,为不同用户提供个性化的成长路径;应该激发起社区的内生动力,将个人利益与集体利益绑定,实现可持续发展。这,就是“利益共享”的内核所在。

二、灵活而严谨的“组合拳”

正是基于对“利益共享”理念的深刻理解,INTO 打造了一套独具匠心的激励机制。这个机制就像一个魔方,看似简单,却暗藏玄机,每一次转动都能激发出社区的澎湃动力。

INTO 将激励分解为三个维度:引流、共识、成长。每个维度都有针对性的激励工具,共同构成一套立体的组合拳。

在引流维度,INTO 推出了“社交赚取”活动。通过 TOX 奖励和创世空投,快速聚集种子用户,产生裂变式传播。这一招可谓激励即营销,用最小的成本撬动最大的流量。

在共识维度,INTO 近期更是祭出了“极致销毁”利器,推出了史诗级销毁机制,彻底让利于社区用户。通过不断销毁大部分代币,INTO 将价值不断回馈给社区,使代币持有者利益与平台利益深度绑定。同时,销毁本身也是一种共识游戏,让每个人都成为项目的信仰者和布道者。这一招可谓激励即共识,用经济手段凝聚人心。

在成长维度,INTO 为不同用户提供个性化激励。内容创作者可获得流量倾斜和创作奖励,社区建设者可获得治理权和决策权,开发者可获得生态基金和技术扶持。这套差异化激励,让每个人都能找到最适合自己的位置和成长路径。这一招可谓激励即成长,用温度调动每个人的积极性。

并且在不同的阶段,INTO 始终坚持敏捷创新的思路。通过持续不断的数据反馈和社区互动,INTO 时刻洞察用户需求的变化,优化激励的节奏和力度。比如,根据社区活跃度的变化,动态调整 TOX 释放曲线;根据用户创作热情的高低,灵活调整奖励政策。这种及时响应,让激励真正做到“因时而变,因地制宜”。

三、INTO 如何实现“激励即治理”

INTO 的“激励即治理”,主要通过两大核心机制实现:一是 TOX 代币经济,二是 DAO 治理结构。

在代币经济方面,TOX 不仅是一种激励手段,也是一种治理工具。持有 TOX,不仅意味着你可以分享平台的增长红利,也意味着你拥有了参与平台治理的权力。INTO 通过精心设计的 TOX 分配和释放曲线,确保代币在激励和治理中达到平衡。同时,INTO 还设置了 TOX 的使用场景,如抵押获取资源、参与重大决策投票等,让 TOX 成为连接用户与平台的纽带。

在 DAO 治理方面,INTO 正在逐步建立一个“去中心化自治组织”。通过 DAO,INTO 将重大决策权交给社区,由 TOX 持有者通过提案和投票的方式,决定平台的发展方向。这种“用户即管理者”的模式,让每一个参与者都有了真正的主人翁意识。同时,INTO 还引入了“代表制”的理念,通过选举产生社区代表,让决策更加高效和专业。

当然,实现“激励即治理”并非一蹴而就。INTO 还在不断完善相关的基础设施,如建立透明的链上治理机制、开发便捷的 DAO 工具、优化提案和投票流程等。可以预见,随着 INTO 生态的不断发展,其“激励即治理”的实践也将不断深化,为行业提供更多借鉴和启示。

综合来看,INTO 的“激励即治理”实践,为Web3社交开创了一种全新的可能性。它不仅仅是一种激励用户的手段,更是一种赋能用户的哲学。通过将用户转变为平台的所有者和治理者,INTO 正在重塑社交平台的权力格局和生态架构。

这种变革的意义,不仅在于给了用户更多的回报和权力,更在于塑造了一种新的社区文化——一种自治、共建、共享的文化。在这种文化中,每个人都是生态的参与者和建设者,都有机会发挥自己的影响力,都能分享生态发展的成果。

 

 

Letture associate

The Full Story of How Crypto Unicorn Blockstream Is Mired in Serious Fraud Allegations

This article details serious allegations of fraud against Bitcoin infrastructure company Blockstream, founded by Bitcoin pioneer Adam Back. In June 2024, investigative account NatInfoSec published a report accusing Blockstream's mining note (BMN) program of potentially operating a multi-billion dollar scheme with Ponzi-like characteristics. The core allegations focus on Blockstream Mining Notes (BMNs), which offer investors fixed annual yields up to approximately 20% from Bitcoin mining. NatInfoSec's investigation raises several key issues: 1. **Suspicious Hashrate & Payout Capacity**: The analysis suggests Blockstream would need 20-45 EH/s of mining power to cover its BMN obligations, but its public dashboard shows only around 15 EH/s. Furthermore, no verifiable public evidence (e.g., grid connection records, import data) was found to support the massive mining operation required. 2. **Questionable Payout Source**: The BMN contract allows Blockstream to use Bitcoin from *any source* (Substitute Performance BTC) to fulfill investor payouts, raising concerns that payouts may not come from actual mining revenue. 3. **High-Risk, Fixed Returns**: Offering ~20% fixed yields in the volatile, cyclical Bitcoin mining industry is viewed as highly unusual and requires clear explanation. 4. **Undisclosed Criminal Record of Key Figure**: Christopher William Cook, a key figure in Blockstream's mining operations and CEO of spin-off Exacore, was found to have a federal felony conviction for mail fraud in 2008, a fact not disclosed in BMN offering documents. His background was also allegedly embellished. 5. **Potential Contagion to BSTR SPAC**: Questions were raised about whether these liabilities and Cook's record should have been disclosed in the SEC filings for Bitcoin Standard Treasury Company (BSTR), a separate Adam Back-associated firm planning a SPAC merger. The crypto community is divided. BitMEX Research validated Cook's criminal record and expressed concern over the high yields but found other evidence lacking or misleading, noting the legal separation between BMN, Blockstream, and BSTR. Blockstream defenders, like Samson Mow, argue the mining is real. Critics, however, emphasize the lack of independent, verifiable proof of the mining operation's scale and the true source of investor payouts. The article concludes that BMN remains shrouded in key unanswered questions regarding its actual size, the verifiability of its underlying mining assets and payouts, the source of its high yields, and the full role and disclosure concerning Chris Cook. Blockstream had not issued a comprehensive response at the time of writing.

marsbit1 h fa

The Full Story of How Crypto Unicorn Blockstream Is Mired in Serious Fraud Allegations

marsbit1 h fa

The Full Story Behind Encryption Unicorn Blockstream's Deep Entanglement in Serious Fraud Allegations

This article details allegations of serious fraud surrounding the crypto company Blockstream, founded by Bitcoin pioneer Adam Back. Investigation account NatInfoSec accuses Blockstream of raising billions through its Blockstream Mining Note (BMN) products, which offer high fixed yields of up to 20% from purported mining revenue. The core allegations are: 1) Blockstream's public mining hash rate (15 EH/s) appears insufficient to cover the massive payout obligations from sold BMN notes, raising questions about the true source of investor payouts. 2) Key executive Christopher William Cook, central to the mining operations, has a prior federal conviction for mail fraud, a fact not disclosed to investors. Cook's background and lavish lifestyle are highlighted as red flags. 3) The structure allows payouts from any source of BTC, not necessarily mining revenue, which critics argue gives it Ponzi-like characteristics. The controversy also touches on Bitcoin Standard Treasury Company (BSTR), a related entity planning a SPAC上市. Critics question whether BMN's liabilities and Cook's record should be disclosed in BSTR's filings. BitMEX Research offered a tempered analysis, confirming Cook's criminal record is likely true and the high yields concerning, but found other claims like insufficient抵押证据 less substantiated. Community debate centers on the need for verifiable proof of Blockstream's mining output and revenue. The article concludes that while fraud is not proven, BMN presents significant, unresolved questions regarding its actual scale, the source of its high fixed returns, the verifiability of its mining operations and payouts, and the full disclosure of associated risks and personnel backgrounds. Blockstream has not yet issued a formal response.

链捕手2 h fa

The Full Story Behind Encryption Unicorn Blockstream's Deep Entanglement in Serious Fraud Allegations

链捕手2 h fa

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片