【龙虎榜】熊市何时结束?关注BTC低位筹码集中趋势

火必研究院Pubblicato 2022-05-17Pubblicato ultima volta 2022-05-19

Introduzione

随着BTC连续5个交易日维持反弹格局,价格在3万美元附近的横盘时间延长。

1、BTC价格:缩量反弹上涨乏力

随着BTC连续5个交易日维持反弹格局,价格在3万美元附近的横盘时间延长,但是突破迹象并不清晰。这说明,在成交量萎缩状态下,投资者的交易热情很低。目前BTC处在持续下跌后的弱势反弹阶段。考虑到5月5日以后BTC活跃地址数维持高位运行,表明低价区套牢的投资者数量较多,因此对价格反弹的压制不容忽视。

2、BTC活跃地址数高位震荡

近期BTC价格回撤到最低26656美元期间,活跃地址数维持在98万以上运行,数值为1个月内的高位。回顾2021年5月2日到5月13日,BTC活跃地址数也曾表现为高位横盘的情况,同时BTC价格从50000美元回撤到29000美元。

本次BTC活跃地址数小幅回升,在5月9日到5月16日维持在高位运行,意味着投资者在低价区大量换手BTC,持币成本集中在3万美元附近。

3、龙虎榜:

BTC短线横盘整理,为币种反弹创造了条件。尽管如此,能够表现强势的币种很少,多数币种7日跌幅扩大。7日涨幅排名靠前的币种里,MKR涨幅最高,达到了54.4%。XCN、KDA和ZEC分别以涨幅27%、24%和13%排名靠前。

涨幅榜

MKR

MKR近期价格表现强势,价格从低位1000美元回升到了1680美元附近,波段涨幅达到了68%,7天涨幅为54.4%排名首位。作为DAI稳定币的治理代币,近期受到LUNA稳定币负面影响,得到投资者关注。随着MKR维持价格强势,可继续关注MKR的低吸机会。

DAI稳定币在近期表现非常稳定,价格波动甚至要好于USDT,因此MKR的市场表现值得投资者注意。

KDA

Kadena是分布式数字化记帐本的领导者,是行业领先安全、可扩展的平台以及简单的智能合约语言,用区块链帮助各机构提高效率。Kadena同时具备公链和联盟链两套解决方案,Kadena的联盟链可以与公链网络集成,成为它的一部分,创造全新的市场用例。Kadena已获得来自SVAngel,CoinFund等机构的1500万美元融资。

消息面,KDA推出了高达1亿美元的激励计划,目的是为了激励贡献者。价格表现上,KDA连续放量下跌以后,持续了更高成交量推动的连续3个交易日的反弹走势。波段涨幅达到137%,同时7日涨幅为24.7%,可继续关注低吸机会。

ZEC、MANA

由于跌幅较大,ZEC和MANA都出现了技术性反弹走势,涨幅虽然都达到了13%,进一步上涨却缺乏成交量配合。实际上,在BTC和ETH等主流币低位运行期间,更多币种的表现都不强势。因此在选择抄底标的的时候,需要非常谨慎。

跌幅榜

跌幅较大的是LUNA和稳定币UST,其他热门币种跌幅同样较大。比如WAVES和CVX等。

Letture associate

Where Is the AI Infrastructure Industry Chain Stuck?

The AI infrastructure (AI Infra) industry chain is facing unprecedented systemic bottlenecks, despite the rapid emergence of applications like DeepSeek and Seedance 2.0. The surge in global computing demand has exposed critical constraints across multiple layers of the supply chain—from core manufacturing equipment and data center cabling to specialty materials and cleanroom facilities. Key challenges include four major "walls": - **Memory Wall**: High-bandwidth memory (HBM) and DRAM face structural shortages as AI inference demand outpaces training, with new capacity not expected until 2027. - **Bandwidth Wall**: Data transfer speeds lag behind computing power, causing multi-level bottlenecks in-chip, between chips, and across data centers. - **Compute Wall**: Advanced chip manufacturing, reliant on EUV lithography and monopolized by ASML, remains the fundamental constraint, with supply chain fragility affecting production. - **Power Wall**: While energy demand from data centers is rising, power supply is a solvable near-term challenge through diversified energy infrastructure. Expansion is further hindered by shortages in testing equipment, IC substrates (critical for GPUs and seeing price hikes over 30%), specialty materials like low-CTE glass fiber, and high-end cleanroom facilities. Connection technologies are evolving, with copper cables resurging for short-range links due to cost and latency advantages, while optical solutions dominate long-range scenarios. Innovations like hollow-core fiber and advanced PCB technologies (e.g., glass substrates, mSAP) are emerging to meet bandwidth needs. In summary, AI Infra bottlenecks are multidimensional, spanning compute, memory, bandwidth, power, and supply chain logistics. Advanced chip manufacturing remains the core constraint, while substrate, material, and equipment shortages present immediate challenges. The industry is moving toward hybrid copper-optical solutions and accelerated domestic supply chain development.

marsbit27 min fa

Where Is the AI Infrastructure Industry Chain Stuck?

marsbit27 min fa

Autonomy or Compatibility: The Choice Facing China's AI Ecosystem Behind the Delay of DeepSeek V4

DeepSeek V4's repeated delay in early 2026 has sparked global discussions on "de-CUDA-ization" in AI. The highly anticipated trillion-parameter open-source model is undergoing deep adaptation to Huawei’s Ascend chips using the CANN framework, representing China’s first systematic attempt to run a core AI model outside the CUDA ecosystem. This shift, however, comes with significant engineering challenges. While the model uses a MoE architecture to reduce computational load, it places extreme demands on memory bandwidth, chip interconnects, and system scheduling—areas where NVIDIA’s mature CUDA ecosystem currently excels. Migrating to Ascend introduces complexities in hardware topology, communication latency, and software optimization due to CANN’s relative immaturity compared to CUDA. The move highlights a broader strategic dilemma: short-term compatibility with CUDA offers practical benefits and faster adoption, as seen in CANN’s efforts to emulate CUDA interfaces. Yet, long-term over-reliance on compatibility risks inheriting CUDA’s limitations and stifling native innovation. If global AI shifts away from transformer-based architectures, strict compatibility could lead to technological obsolescence. Despite these challenges, DeepSeek V4’s eventual release could demonstrate the viability of a full domestic AI stack and accelerate CANN’s ecosystem growth. However, true technological independence will require building an original software-hardware paradigm beyond compatibility—a critical task for China’s AI ambitions in the next 3-5 years.

marsbit45 min fa

Autonomy or Compatibility: The Choice Facing China's AI Ecosystem Behind the Delay of DeepSeek V4

marsbit45 min fa

How Blockchain Fills the Identity, Payment, and Trust Gaps for AI Agents?

AI Agents are rapidly evolving into autonomous economic participants, but they face critical gaps in identity, payment, and trust infrastructure. They currently lack standardized ways to prove who they are, what they are authorized to do, and how they should be compensated across different environments. Blockchain technology is emerging as a solution to these challenges by providing a neutral coordination layer. Public ledgers offer auditable credentials, wallets enable portable identities, and stablecoins serve as a programmable settlement layer. A key bottleneck is the absence of a universal identity standard for non-human entities—akin to "Know Your Agent" (KYA)—which would allow Agents to operate with verifiable, cryptographically signed credentials. Without this, Agents remain fragmented and face barriers to interoperability. Additionally, as AI systems take on governance roles, there is a risk that centralized control over models could undermine decentralized governance in practice. Cryptographic guarantees on training data, prompts, and behavior logs are essential to ensure Agents act in users' interests. Stablecoins and crypto-native payment rails are becoming the default for Agent-to-Agent commerce, enabling seamless, low-cost transactions for AI-native services. These systems support permissionless, programmable payments without traditional merchant onboarding. Finally, as AI scales, human oversight becomes impractical. Trust must be built into system architecture through verifiable provenance, on-chain attestations, and decentralized identity systems. The future of Agent economies depends on cryptographically enforced accountability, allowing users to delegate tasks with clearly defined constraints and transparent operation logs.

marsbit1 h fa

How Blockchain Fills the Identity, Payment, and Trust Gaps for AI Agents?

marsbit1 h fa

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片