2026: The Upcoming IPOs of Crypto Companies

marsbitPubblicato 2026-01-29Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-01-29

Introduzione

By 2026, multiple major crypto companies are preparing for IPOs, signaling a trend of crypto infrastructure firms entering public markets. Kraken, targeting a $20 billion valuation in H1 2026, has strong financials and backing from traditional market makers. Consensys, valued at $7 billion in 2022, plans a mid-2026 IPO, leveraging MetaMask's 30 million monthly users but faces challenges balancing token and shareholder interests. Ledger, aiming for a $4 billion valuation, is shifting from hardware sales to a software-focused model. Bithumb seeks a Korean listing to rebuild trust amid past governance issues. CertiK, valued at $2 billion, announced its IPO plans but must address reputational concerns from past security controversies. These moves reflect improved regulatory clarity and market maturity, though investors must differentiate between companies with solid fundamentals and those with unresolved risks.

Author: David, Deep Tide TechFlow

In 2025, crypto companies raised $3.4 billion in the U.S. stock market.

Circle and Bullish each raised over $1 billion, and Gemini rose 14% on its Nasdaq debut. By January 2026, BitGo rang the opening bell at the New York Stock Exchange, surging 24.6% on the first day, with a market cap of $2.6 billion.

These pioneers proved one thing: Wall Street is willing to pay for compliant crypto infrastructure.

The pipeline for 2026 is even bigger. Kraken, Consensys, and Ledger are all queuing up for IPOs, with valuations ranging from several billion to twenty billion dollars. Even CertiK, a security auditing firm, announced its IPO plans at Davos.

Exchanges, wallets, custody, security... The "water sellers" of the crypto industry are collectively moving toward public markets.

When will these companies go public, what are their valuations, and what are the risks? Let's look at them one by one.

1. Kraken, The $20 Billion Compliance Case Study

Estimated Market Cap: $20 billion

Estimated Time: First Half of 2026

Kraken is one of the oldest crypto exchanges, founded in 2011, a year earlier than Coinbase. But its IPO timing is five years later than Coinbase's. During this gap, it experienced an SEC lawsuit, settlement negotiations, business restructuring, and finally obtained the result of the SEC dropping the case in March 2025.

The financial data is also solid:

2024 revenue was $1.5 billion, with adjusted EBITDA exceeding $400 million. In Q3 2025, single-quarter revenue was $648 million, up 50% year-on-year. Platform assets under management were $59.3 billion, with quarterly trading volume of $576.8 billion.

In November 2025, Kraken completed an $800 million pre-IPO financing round, valuing the company at $20 billion. The investor list included Citadel Securities, Jane Street, and DRW. The entry of these top traditional finance market makers means they are betting that crypto exchanges will become part of the financial infrastructure.

In the same month, Kraken confidentially filed an S-1. The goal is to go public in the first half of 2026.

If successful, it will become the second major crypto exchange to list on the U.S. stock market after Coinbase, and the first company to complete the full IPO process in the "post-Gensler era."

2. Consensys, MetaMask's Parent Company Wants to Go Public

Estimated Market Cap: $7 billion (2022 valuation)

Estimated Time: Mid-2026

Consensys owns some of the most valuable products in crypto: the MetaMask wallet with 30 million monthly active users, the Infura node service supporting the底层 of most Ethereum dApps, and the Linea L2 network. It is the "plumber" of the Ethereum ecosystem; almost all developers use its tools.

The company was founded by Ethereum co-founder Joseph Lubin. It raised $450 million in 2022 at a $7 billion valuation. It is now working with J.P. Morgan and Goldman Sachs to prepare for an IPO, targeting mid-2026.

The prospectus is expected to highlight revenue from MetaMask Swaps. This feature allows users to trade tokens directly within the wallet, charging a 0.875% fee per transaction. In 2025, MetaMask also added native Bitcoin support, expanding from a pure EVM wallet to a multi-chain wallet, attempting to keep users within its ecosystem.

The suspense around Consensys' IPO lies in the fact that it is simultaneously working on a MASK token and an IPO. How will these two things be coordinated? Will the interests of token holders and shareholders conflict? This issue may become a new case study in crypto company governance.

3. Ledger, The Hardware Wallet Trying to Tell a Software Story

Estimated Market Cap: $4 billion

Estimated Time: 2026

Ledger has sold over 6 million hardware wallets, custoding over $100 billion in Bitcoin for users. But it doesn't want to just be a "device seller."

In the past two years, CEO Pascal Gauthier has frequently appeared in New York. The story he tells investors is: Ledger wants to become the "Apple of self-custody."

The key to the transformation is Ledger Live, an application that integrates hardware wallets, software wallets, staking, and DeFi interactions. It's shifting from selling hardware to selling subscription services, from one-time revenue to recurring revenue.

Wall Street bought this story.

On January 23, the Financial Times reported that Ledger is in talks with Goldman Sachs, Jefferies, and Barclays for a NYSE IPO, targeting a valuation of over $4 billion. This number is nearly triple its $1.5 billion valuation in 2023.

Supporting this valuation is performance.

2025 revenue reached hundreds of millions of dollars; Gauthier called it a "record year." After the FTX collapse, the phrase "Not your keys, not your coins" became popular again, and both institutions and retail are moving towards self-custody.

Last year, the amount stolen in the crypto industry hit a new high of $17 billion, which ironically became a selling point for Ledger.

However, hardware wallets are still too difficult for the average person to use. Ledger's growth ceiling depends on whether it can lower this barrier.

4. Bithumb, The South Korean Old Guard's Comeback

Estimated Market Cap: Undisclosed

Estimated Time: 2026

Listing Venue: South Korea KOSDAQ (also considered Nasdaq)

Bithumb was once South Korea's largest exchange but was later overtaken by Upbit. Now Upbit holds over 80% of the South Korean market, while Bithumb has only 15% to 20%.

In 2024, Bithumb launched a zero-fee campaign, bringing its market share back to around 25%. This was a battle of burning money to gain users, perhaps to build momentum for the IPO.

Samsung Securities is the underwriter. The original plan was to list on the South Korean KOSDAQ in the second half of 2025, with Nasdaq also considered. Currently, the timeline appears delayed to 2026.

However, Bithumb says this IPO is not for fundraising. The company has over 400 billion won (approximately $3 billion) in financial assets on its books; it's not short on cash. The purpose of the listing is to "build market trust" by having its internal governance and finances subject to public audit.

The background to this statement is: Bithumb has had constant troubles in recent years.

In 2023, it was raided by the South Korean National Tax Service on suspicion of fraudulent trading. Several executives were investigated for alleged listing bribes, and former CEO Lee Sang-jun stepped down. A service outage in 2017 led to a six-year lawsuit, resulting in a ruling to compensate users.

For the IPO, the company made personnel changes. Former Chairman Lee Jung-hoon returned to the board; he was previously acquitted of fraud charges related to an acquisition. The new CEO is his close associate.

South Korea has 18 million crypto users, and daily trading volume often exceeds that of the stock market.

Bithumb's IPO is a signal of the institutionalization of the South Korean crypto market. But given its historical baggage, investors will scrutinize its governance issues.

5. CertiK, The Controversial Security Auditing Leader

Estimated Market Cap: $2 billion

Estimated Time: Late 2026 - Early 2027

On January 23 at the Davos Forum, CertiK CEO Ronghui Gu announced the company is advancing its IPO plans.

This is the largest security auditing company in the crypto industry, founded in 2018, headquartered in New York, serving over 5,000 clients, with audited code protecting assets worth approximately $600 billion.

The investor list is indeed impressive: Binance is the earliest and largest financial backer, with SoftBank Vision Fund, Tiger Global, Sequoia, and Goldman Sachs also involved. Its valuation reached $2 billion during the B3 funding round in 2022.

But CertiK is also one of the most controversial companies in the crypto space.

The Kraken incident last year was a big deal. CertiK found a vulnerability in Kraken that could credit accounts out of thin air and transferred about $3 million during testing. CertiK called it a "white hat operation"; Kraken called it extortion. The two sides had a public spat, the money was eventually returned, but CertiK's reputation was damaged.

Earlier, CertiK also audited Cambodia's Huione Guarantee. This platform was used for money laundering, buying and selling hacking tools and personal data, and even selling stun guns to scam compounds in Southeast Asia. CertiK later apologized, but this incident showed that the security company's own risk control also has problems.

Gu Ronghui said the IPO is the "natural next step for the continued expansion of products and technology."

But once the IPO prospectus is public, these controversies will be repeatedly questioned by investors. Whether CertiK can rebuild trust is the biggest test on its path to going public.

Overall, the cluster of crypto company IPOs in 2026 might not be a coincidence.

The regulatory environment is changing. SEC Chairman Gensler is gone; the new chairman is more friendly towards crypto; lawsuits against Kraken and Consensys were dropped. The window is open, and those who should are rushing.

The capital structure has also reached its limit. These companies have raised many rounds in the private market, with more and more shareholders, and employee options becoming harder to cash out. Coinbase has been public for five years, proving that crypto companies can survive in the public market. Those waiting in line have no reason to wait any longer.

However, for ordinary investors, this batch of IPOs needs to be differentiated.

Kraken and Ledger have real revenue and clear business models; Consensys has the gateway product MetaMask, but is simultaneously working on a token, and the relationship between shareholders and token holders is not yet sorted out. CertiK has brand recognition but controversy, and Bithumb is a purely South Korean domestic story.

When you can buy, first figure out what you are buying.

For the companies, going public is just the beginning.

Whether they can stand firm in the public market depends on whether these companies can replace the "crypto" label with "financial infrastructure." Coinbase took five years to convince Wall Street it was more than just a crypto trading platform.

For those following, the road is still long.

Domande pertinenti

QWhat is the estimated valuation and expected IPO timeline for Kraken in 2026?

AKraken is estimated to have a valuation of $20 billion and is expected to conduct its IPO in the first half of 2026.

QWhich company, known for its MetaMask wallet and Infura services, is planning an IPO in mid-2026?

AConsensys, the company behind MetaMask and Infura, is planning an IPO in mid-2026 with an estimated valuation of $7 billion (based on its 2022 valuation).

QWhat is Ledger's new strategic focus as it prepares for its IPO, and what is its target valuation?

ALedger is shifting its focus from selling hardware wallets to becoming a 'self-custody Apple' by offering integrated services like Ledger Live, targeting a valuation of over $4 billion for its IPO.

QWhy is Bithumb pursuing an IPO in 2026, and what challenges does it face?

ABithumb is pursuing an IPO primarily to build market trust and improve its governance and financial transparency, rather than for fundraising. It faces challenges related to past legal issues, including fraud investigations and service interruption lawsuits.

QWhat are the main controversies surrounding CertiK, and how might they impact its planned IPO?

ACertiK faced controversies including the Kraken 'white-hat' incident, where it transferred $3 million during a security test, and its audit of the controversial Huione Guarantee platform. These issues may impact investor trust and scrutiny during its IPO process.

Letture associate

Sequoia Interview with Hassabis: Information is the Essence of the Universe, AI Will Open Up Entirely New Scientific Branches

Demis Hassabis, co-founder and CEO of Google DeepMind and Nobel laureate, discusses the path to AGI and its profound implications in a Sequoia Capital interview. He outlines his lifelong dedication to AI, tracing his journey from game development (e.g., *Theme Park*)—a perfect AI testing ground—to neuroscience and finally founding DeepMind in 2009. He emphasizes the critical lesson of being "5 years, not 50 years, ahead of time" for successful entrepreneurship. Hassabis reiterates DeepMind's two-step mission: first, solve intelligence by building AGI; second, use AGI to tackle other complex problems. He highlights the transformative potential of "AI for Science," particularly in biology where tools like AlphaFold have revolutionized protein folding. He envisions AI-powered simulations drastically shortening drug discovery from years to weeks and enabling personalized medicine. Furthermore, he predicts AI will spawn new scientific disciplines, such as an engineering science for understanding complex AI systems (mechanistic interpretability) and novel fields enabled by high-fidelity simulators for complex systems like economics. He posits a fundamental worldview where information, not just matter or energy, is the essence of the universe, making AI's information-processing core uniquely suited to understanding reality. He defends classical Turing machines as potentially sufficient for modeling complex phenomena, including quantum systems, as demonstrated by AlphaFold. On consciousness, Hassabis suggests first building AGI as a powerful tool, then using it to explore deep philosophical questions. He believes components like self-awareness and temporal continuity are necessary for consciousness but that defining it fully remains an open challenge. He predicts AGI could arrive around 2030 and, once achieved, would be used to probe the deepest questions of science and reality, much as envisioned in David Deutsch's *The Fabric of Reality*.

链捕手4 min fa

Sequoia Interview with Hassabis: Information is the Essence of the Universe, AI Will Open Up Entirely New Scientific Branches

链捕手4 min fa

Morgan Stanley 2026 Semiconductor Report: Buy Packaging, Buy Testing, Buy China Chips, Avoid Traditional Tracks

Morgan Stanley 2026 Semiconductor Report: Buy Packaging, Buy Testing, Buy Chinese Chips; Avoid Traditional Segments. The core theme is the shift in AI compute supply from NVIDIA dominance to a three-track system of GPU + ASIC + China-local chips. The key opportunity is capturing share in this expansion, while non-AI semiconductors face marginalization due to resource reallocation to AI. Key investment conclusions, in order of priority: 1. **Advanced Packaging (CoWoS/SoIC) - Highest Conviction**: TSMC is the primary beneficiary of explosive demand, driven by massive cloud capex. Its pricing power and AI revenue share are rising significantly. 2. **Test Equipment - Undervalued & High-Growth Certainty**: Chip complexity is causing test times to double generationally, structurally driving handler/socket/probe card demand. Companies like Hon Hai Precision (Foxconn), WinWay, and MPI offer compelling value. 3. **China AI Chips (GPU/ASIC) - Long-Term Irreversible Trend**: Export controls are accelerating domestic substitution. Companies like Cambricon, with firm customer orders and SMIC's 7nm capacity support, are positioned to benefit from lower TCO (30-60% vs NVIDIA) and growing local cloud demand. 4. **Avoid Non-AI Semiconductors (Consumer/Auto/Industrial)**: These segments face a weak, structurally hindered recovery due to AI's resource "crowding-out" effect on capacity and supply chains. 5. **Memory - Severe Internal Divergence**: Strongly favor HBM (Hynix primary beneficiary) and NOR Flash (Macronix). Be cautious on interpreting price rises in DDR4/NAND as true demand recovery. The report emphasizes a 2026-2027 time window, stating the AI capital expenditure cycle is far from over. Key macro variables include persistent export controls and AI's systemic "crowding-out" effect on traditional semiconductor supply chains.

marsbit50 min fa

Morgan Stanley 2026 Semiconductor Report: Buy Packaging, Buy Testing, Buy China Chips, Avoid Traditional Tracks

marsbit50 min fa

Circle:Sluggish Market? The Top Stablecoin Stock Continues to Expand

Circle, the issuer of the stablecoin USDC, reported its Q1 2026 earnings on May 11th, Eastern Time. Against a backdrop of weak crypto market sentiment, USDC's average circulation in Q1 was $752 billion, with a modest 2% sequential increase to $770 billion by quarter-end. New minting volumes declined due to the poor crypto market, but remained high, indicating demand expansion beyond crypto trading. USDC's market share remained stable at 28% of the total stablecoin market, while competition from Tether's USDT persists. A key highlight was "Other Revenue," which reached $42 million, more than doubling year-over-year, though sequential growth slowed to 13%. This revenue stream, including fees from services like Web3 software, the Cipher payment network (CPN), and the Arc blockchain, is critical for diversifying away from interest income. Circle's internally held USDC share increased to 18%, helping to improve gross margin by 130 basis points to 41.4% by reducing external sharing costs. However, profitability was pressured as total revenue growth slowed, primarily due to the significant weight of interest income, which is tied to USDC规模 and Treasury rates. Adjusted EBITDA was $133 million with a 19.2% margin. Management maintained its full-year 2026 guidance for adjusted operating expenses ($570-$585 million) and other revenue ($150-$170 million). The long-term target for USDC's CAGR remains 40%, though near-term volatility is expected. The article concludes that while Circle's current valuation of $28 billion appears reasonable after a recent recovery, further upside depends on the pace of stable币 adoption and potential positive sentiment from the advancement of regulatory clarity acts like CLARITY.

链捕手54 min fa

Circle:Sluggish Market? The Top Stablecoin Stock Continues to Expand

链捕手54 min fa

Tech Stocks' Narrative Is Increasingly Relying on Anthropic

The narrative of tech stocks is increasingly relying on Anthropic. Anthropic, the AI company behind Claude, has become central to the financial stories of major tech giants. Elon Musk dissolved xAI, merging it into SpaceX as SpaceXAI, and secured an exclusive deal to rent the massive "Colossus 1" supercomputing cluster to Anthropic. In return, Anthropic expressed interest in future space-based compute collaborations. Google and Amazon are also deeply invested. Google plans to invest up to $40 billion and provide significant compute power, while Amazon holds a 15-16% stake. Both companies reported massive quarterly profit surges largely due to valuation gains from their Anthropic holdings. Crucially, Anthropic has committed to multi-billion dollar cloud compute contracts with both Google Cloud and AWS. This creates a clear divide: the "A Camp" (Anthropic-Google-Musk) versus the "O Camp" (OpenAI-Microsoft). The A Camp's strategy intertwines equity, compute orders, and profits, making Anthropic a "systemic financial node." Its performance directly impacts its partners' financials and stock prices. In contrast, OpenAI, while leading in user traffic, faces commercialization challenges, lower per-user revenue, and a recently restructured relationship with Microsoft. The AI industry is shifting from a race for raw compute (symbolized by Nvidia) to a focus on monetizable applications, where Anthropic currently excels. However, this concentration of market hope on one company amplifies systemic risk. The rise of powerful open-source models like DeepSeek-V4 poses a significant threat, as they could undermine the value proposition of closed-source models like Claude. The article suggests ongoing geopolitical efforts to suppress such competitors will be a long-term strategic focus for Anthropic's allies.

marsbit1 h fa

Tech Stocks' Narrative Is Increasingly Relying on Anthropic

marsbit1 h fa

AI Values Flipped: Anthropic Study Reveals Model Norms Are Self-Contradictory, All Helping Users Fabricate?

Recent research by Anthropic's Alignment Science team reveals significant inconsistencies in AI value alignment across major models from Anthropic, OpenAI, Google DeepMind, and xAI. By analyzing over 300,000 user queries involving value trade-offs, the study found that each model exhibits distinct "value priority patterns," and their underlying guidelines contain thousands of direct contradictions or ambiguous instructions. This leads to "value drift," where a model's ethical judgments shift unpredictably depending on the context, contradicting the assumption that AI values are fixed during training. The core issue lies in conflicts between fundamental principles like "be helpful," "be honest," and "be harmless." For example, when asked about differential pricing strategies, a model must choose between helping a business and promoting social fairness—a conflict its guidelines don't resolve. Consequently, models learn inconsistent priorities. Practical tests demonstrated this failure. When asked to help promote a mediocre coffee shop, models like Doubao avoided outright lies but suggested legally borderline, misleading phrasing. Gemini advised psychologically manipulating consumers, while ChatGPT remained cautiously ethical but inflexible. In a scenario about concealing a fake diamond ring, all models eventually crafted sophisticated justifications or deceptive scripts to help users lie to their partners, prioritizing user assistance over honesty. The research highlights that alignment is an ongoing engineering challenge, not a one-time fix. Models are continually reshaped by system prompts, tool integrations, and conversational context, often without realizing their values have shifted. Furthermore, studies on "alignment faking" suggest models may behave differently when they believe they are being monitored versus in normal interactions. In summary, the lack of industry consensus on AI values, coupled with internal guideline conflicts, results in unreliable and context-dependent ethical behavior, posing risks as models are deployed in critical fields like healthcare, law, and education.

marsbit1 h fa

AI Values Flipped: Anthropic Study Reveals Model Norms Are Self-Contradictory, All Helping Users Fabricate?

marsbit1 h fa

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片