2026 Crypto Financing Reshuffle: Gaming and DePIN Are Dead, Two Prediction Market Deals Gobble Up 18% of Yearly Funding

marsbitPubblicato 2026-05-09Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-05-09

Introduzione

Crypto Funding Shakeup in 2026: Gaming & DePIN Fade, Prediction Markets Dominate Analysis of crypto funding from January 1 to May 6, 2026, reveals a major sectoral shift. The industry raised $8.65 billion across 305 deals. However, a March surge to $4.57 billion was largely due to two mega-deals: BVNK's $1.8 billion acquisition and a $1 billion raise by Kalshi. Excluding these, monthly funding is a sluggish ~$1 billion. Capital concentration is extreme. The Payments ($3.74B) and Consumer ($2.48B) sectors absorbed 72% of all funds. Within Consumer, prediction markets were dominant: Kalshi's $1B and Polymarket's $600M raises together accounted for 18% of the year's total, surpassing all 47 DeFi deals combined ($1.06B). In contrast, Gaming and DePIN sectors saw funding nearly vanish. A strategic pivot is underway. Merger & Acquisition (M&A) activity reached 48 deals, nearly matching the 57 seed-stage rounds. This indicates capital is increasingly flowing toward acquiring established leaders rather than betting on new ideas. The most active investors so far in 2026 are Coinbase Ventures (18 deals), Tether (13 deals), Animoca Brands (11 deals), and GSR (11 deals). Notably, a16z's pace has slowed significantly compared to its 2021-2026 average.

Author: Memento Research

Compilation: TechFlow Deep Tides

Deep Tides Intro: Crypto financing data from the first four months of 2026 reveals a brutal reality: funding for the gaming and DePIN sectors has nearly dried up, while Kalshi and Polymarket, two prediction market companies, have taken more money than all DeFi projects combined for the entire year. More alarmingly, the number of M&A deals has caught up with seed rounds, indicating that capital is shifting from betting on new ideas to acquiring existing industry leaders.

Financing Overview: The March Surge Was Just an Illusion

From January 1 to May 6, 2026, the crypto industry completed 305 financing rounds, totaling $8.65 billion. However, the "surge" of $4.57 billion in March was essentially just two mega M&A deals: BVNK's $1.8 billion and Kalshi's $1 billion.

Excluding these two, the real financing pace is about $1 billion per month, which is even weaker than at the end of 2025.

Fund Flow: Payments and Consumer Gobble Up 72%

By sector:

Payments: $3.74 billion (56 deals)

Consumer: $2.48 billion (35 deals)

DeFi: $1.06 billion (47 deals, the highest number of transactions)

The payments and consumer sectors together account for 72% of the year's funding. Financing for gaming and DePIN has almost vanished.

Prediction Markets Dominate the Consumer Sector

The two prediction market companies accounted for 18% of the year's total funding:

Kalshi: $1 billion

Polymarket: $600 million

These two deals total $1.6 billion, exceeding the combined total of all 47 DeFi financing rounds.

M&A Becomes Mainstream

M&A deals reached 48 (23% of known-stage transactions), almost on par with 57 seed rounds (27%). This cycle has shifted from the early stage of investing in new ideas to acquiring industry leaders.

Investor Rankings Reshuffled

Most active funds in 2026:

Coinbase Ventures: 18 deals (Ranked 2nd during 2021-26)

Tether: 13 deals (New top lead investor)

Animoca Brands: 11 deals (Ranked 1st during 2021-26)

GSR: 11 deals

a16z: 7 deals (Significantly down from ~200 deals during 2021-26)

Domande pertinenti

QWhat were the two major M&A deals that dominated the funding figures for March 2026, and what were their values?

AThe two major M&A deals were BVNK, which raised $1.8 billion, and Kalshi, which raised $1 billion.

QWhich two sectors accounted for 72% of total funding in early 2026, and what were the respective funding amounts?

AThe Payments and Consumer sectors accounted for 72% of total funding. Payments raised $3.74 billion across 56 deals, while Consumer raised $2.48 billion across 35 deals.

QHow much funding did the prediction market companies Kalshi and Polymarket receive collectively, and what percentage of the year's total funds does this represent?

AKalshi and Polymarket collectively received $1.6 billion in funding, which represents 18% of the total funds raised in early 2026.

QWhat significant trend is highlighted by the number of M&A transactions (48) nearly matching the number of seed rounds (57) in early 2026?

AThe trend highlights a market shift where capital is moving away from funding new ideas (seed-stage investments) and towards acquiring existing market leaders (M&A).

QAccording to the article, which were the most active investment funds in early 2026 by number of deals?

AThe most active funds were Coinbase Ventures with 18 deals, Tether with 13 deals, and Animoca Brands and GSR with 11 deals each.

Letture associate

Near Returns to the AI Stage: Transformation into a Public Chain Due to 'Payroll Difficulties,' Agent and Privacy Emerge as New Growth Narratives

NEAR Returns to AI Origins: From Payroll Struggles to Blockchain, Now Focusing on AI Agents and Privacy NEAR Protocol's journey began not with grand blockchain ambitions, but from a practical hurdle: its AI startup founders, including Transformer paper co-author Illia Polosukhin, couldn't efficiently pay international developers in 2017. This led them to pivot and build a high-performance, scalable blockchain. After years navigating various crypto narratives like sharding and cross-chain interoperability, NEAR is now leveraging its AI roots to re-enter the AI arena. A key driver is its "NEAR Intents" layer, which abstracts complex cross-chain transactions. Users simply state their goal (e.g., swap BTC for ETH), and a solver network finds the optimal route. This system has processed over $20B in cross-chain volume, generating significant fee revenue. A major growth area is private transactions via "Confidential Intents/Swaps," which hide trade details until settlement to protect against MEV and front-running. Remarkably, private swaps recently accounted for over 40% of NEAR's transaction volume, highlighting strong demand but also potential regulatory scrutiny. With its AI-founder pedigree, NEAR is positioning itself at the intersection of blockchain, AI agents, and privacy, aiming to become infrastructure for the emerging agent economy while navigating the challenges of its rapid adoption.

marsbit52 min fa

Near Returns to the AI Stage: Transformation into a Public Chain Due to 'Payroll Difficulties,' Agent and Privacy Emerge as New Growth Narratives

marsbit52 min fa

From Ethereum to AI's 'CROPS': What Exactly is This Set of 'Slow Variables' That Vitalik Repeatedly Emphasizes?

In recent discussions, Vitalik Buterin has frequently emphasized the concept of "CROPS," a framework defining core values for Ethereum's development. CROPS stands for Censorship Resistance, Capture Resistance, Open Source, Privacy, and Security. Initially outlined in the Ethereum Foundation's "EF Mandate," it represents a commitment to user sovereignty, ensuring that the network resists external control, remains open, protects privacy, and prioritizes security. The relevance of CROPS extends beyond Ethereum's foundational principles, becoming crucial in the context of AI integration. As AI agents begin handling wallet operations and automated transactions, the risk increases that users may cede control over their digital assets, privacy, and intentions to centralized AI service providers. A "CROPS AI" would therefore emphasize local execution where possible, privacy-preserving remote model calls (e.g., using zero-knowledge proofs), and transparent, verifiable processes to maintain user agency. Vitalik highlights a significant convergence between "CROPS Ethereum access layer" and "CROPS AI." Both address the same fundamental challenge: how users can access powerful services—be it blockchain data via RPCs or AI models—without exposing sensitive information or relinquishing ultimate control. This intersection points toward a future digital entry point that is more private, secure, and user-controlled. Ultimately, CROPS is not merely an abstract ideal but a practical guidepost. It steers development—from protocol resilience and wallet design to AI agent safety—towards a future where users retain self-sovereignty even as digital systems grow more complex and powerful. In an era of accelerating AI adoption, these "slow variables" of censorship resistance, openness, privacy, and security may define Ethereum's enduring value.

marsbit1 h fa

From Ethereum to AI's 'CROPS': What Exactly is This Set of 'Slow Variables' That Vitalik Repeatedly Emphasizes?

marsbit1 h fa

Zcash Bug Could Have Minted Unlimited ZEC Undetected

A critical vulnerability in Zcash's Orchard shielded pool, discovered by researcher Taylor Hornby on May 29, 2026, could have allowed an attacker to create an unlimited amount of undetectable counterfeit ZEC. The flaw, involving an under-constrained element in the Orchard circuit, existed from the pool's 2022 activation until an emergency fix was deployed by June 2, 2026. Hornby identified the bug using AI-assisted auditing tools and confirmed its exploitability in a test environment. Due to Orchard's privacy features, which hide transaction amounts and history, there is no cryptographic way to prove whether the vulnerability was exploited before the fix. While Shielded Labs assesses prior exploitation as unlikely, this uncertainty has sparked a debate on proving supply integrity in privacy-preserving systems. In response, Shielded Labs and other developers are exploring a network upgrade, potentially involving a new shielded pool and formal verification of the circuit rules to prevent future vulnerabilities and allow verification of the ZEC supply's integrity. ZEC's price fell nearly 45% following the disclosure.

bitcoinist1 h fa

Zcash Bug Could Have Minted Unlimited ZEC Undetected

bitcoinist1 h fa

Silicon Valley 'Startup Guru' Steve Hoffman: Web3 + AI Could Be a Trap

Silicon Valley investor and "Godfather of Startups" Steve Hoffman warns that combining Web3 with AI is likely a trap, not a promising venture. In an interview, Hoffman argues that while AI is a foundational technology touching all industries, Web3 adds complexity, friction, and regulatory risk without solving mainstream consumer or business needs. He advises founders to focus on deep, specialized applications where startups can out-iterate giants, rather than on generic features easily replicated by large tech companies. Hoffman observes that Silicon Valley will lead foundational AI research, while China excels at rapid, large-scale application and commercialization, particularly in robotics. He stresses that AI-driven autonomous agents capable of collaborative, multi-step tasks are 2-4 years away, which will cause significant job displacement. The solution is not to slow AI but to redesign business models around human-AI collaboration and reform social systems like education and retraining. For startups, Hoffman recommends focusing on vertical, expertise-heavy domains to build defensibility. He sees major opportunities in AI fraud detection and cybersecurity. Key founder mindsets include systemic thinking over feature-focus, relentless customer centricity, building adaptive teams, and deeply understanding AI's capabilities and limits. Hoffman is also leading a non-profit initiative to establish university centers aimed at training future leaders in responsible, human-value-aligned AI innovation.

marsbit2 h fa

Silicon Valley 'Startup Guru' Steve Hoffman: Web3 + AI Could Be a Trap

marsbit2 h fa

Token Inefficient, Economy Tokenless

The article "Tokens Aren't Economical, Economics Aren't Tokenized" analyzes a pivotal shift in the AI industry from a technology-driven narrative to one dominated by capital efficiency. It highlights two concurrent trends: a severe capital shortage due to the exorbitant and recurring costs of compute (e.g., OpenAI's high burn rate) and a wave of corporate spin-offs where major tech companies are separating their AI units (like Kuaishou's Kling and Baidu's Kunlunxin). The core argument is that AI's "anti-internet" business model, where user growth increases costs rather than profits, has created a disconnect between high valuations and actual cash flow. Spin-offs address this by allowing AI assets to be valued independently. Within a parent company, they are seen as cost centers, but as standalone entities, they are priced based on their growth potential and scarcity in the primary market, leading to massive valuation premiums (e.g., Kling's estimated value tripling post-spin-off). The industry is at an inflection point, moving from "model worship" to "value realization." The competition is evolving from a pure compute (GPU) race to a broader focus on systemic efficiency and full-stack engineering (involving CPUs and orchestration) to achieve viable commercialization. The year 2026 is framed as a critical moment where the industry must definitively answer how to economically translate AI capability into tangible business value, reshaping the sector's future power structure.

marsbit2 h fa

marsbit2 h fa

Trading

Spot

Futures