2026 Airdrop Outlook: These Sectors and Projects Deserve Continuous Attention

marsbitPubblicato 2026-01-23Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-01-23

Introduzione

2026 Airdrop Outlook: Key Sectors and Projects to Watch As the new cycle approaches, the crypto community is actively discussing potential airdrop opportunities. This analysis, based on a framework evaluating token necessity, project sustainability, and airdrop fairness, highlights promising projects across several sectors. Key sectors and notable projects include: - **Prediction Markets**: Polymarket (high maturity, confirmed airdrop plans), Kalshi, Myriad Markets, Predictfully, Melee Markets. - **Trading & Liquidity Protocols**: Titan Exchange, Backpack, Jupiter, Paradex, Bulk Trade (on Solana and other ecosystems). - **AI & Decentralized Compute**: Abstract Chain, RitualNet, Inference Labs, OpenMind AGI, PrismaXai (focusing on infrastructure and AI agents). - **Solana Ecosystem**: Hylo, Loopscale, Exponent Finance, DeFi Tuna (gaining traction as Solana activity increases). - **Privacy & Scaling Infrastructure**: Fairblock Network, 0xMiden, Umi Network, Inco Network (ZK-based and modular solutions). - **Real World Assets (RWA) & Payments**: KAST Card, Phygitals, MultipliFi, Tria (bridging crypto with real-world applications). - **Social & Information Protocols**: Kaito AI, Base, Xeet AI, Cookiedot.fun (exploring SocialFi and information value capture). Projects are increasingly prioritizing genuine user engagement—product usage, community discussion, and feedback—over mere transactional interactions. Airdrops serve as a means to connect with early supporters, and the gre...

Author: 137Labs

At the end of each year and the beginning of the next, the crypto space is always flooded with various airdrop prediction lists. Some claim that the airdrop红利 (dividends/benefits) are exhausted, but every cycle sees new projects breaking this assertion with substantial returns.

I have梳理 (sorted through) numerous active ecosystem projects and compiled an observation list based on dimensions such as product maturity, team background, and community activity. It should be noted that not all of these projects are guaranteed to have airdrops, but most are in critical stages of development and are worth investing time to understand and even participate in.

My Evaluation Framework: Three-Dimensional Scoring Method

I look at projects through three core dimensions:

Necessity: Does this project really need a token?

Sustainability: Can the product survive through cycles?

Fairness: Does the airdrop mechanism reward genuine contributions?

Below is a specific project analysis categorized by sector.

Key Sectors and Project Overview

Prediction Markets

Prediction markets typically rely on continuous user participation and liquidity provision, exhibiting strong user stickiness characteristics.

Polymarket: Large user base, high product maturity, has clearly announced airdrop-related arrangements.

·Kalshi: A prediction market platform operating within a regulatory framework.

·Myriad Markets: User-friendly interface and mobile experience, frequent community interaction.

·Predictfully: Prediction platform within the Avalanche ecosystem, active recent updates.

·Melee Markets: In the early stages, product mechanisms are still being tested.

Trading & Liquidity Protocols

Trading protocols are always a core part of on-chain activity, with newer generation products emphasizing efficiency and integration capabilities.

·Titan Exchange: Aggregated trading platform on Solana.

·Backpack: Comprehensive platform encompassing trading and asset management functions.

·Jupiter: Major liquidity gateway on Solana.

·Paradex: Trading protocol focused on perpetual contracts.

·Bulk Trade: Emerging derivatives platform on Solana, currently in testnet phase.

AI & Decentralized Computing

The integration of AI and blockchain is gradually moving from conceptual exploration to the infrastructure layer.

·Abstract Chain: Layer1 network targeting AI agent execution scenarios.

·RitualNet: Project related to decentralized AI computing, active community technical discussions.

·Inference Labs: Focuses on AI inference infrastructure.

·OpenMind AGI: Direction of AI and robotics application layer, frequent product iterations.

·PrismaXai: Early-stage project combining AI and robotics.

Solana Ecosystem Projects

·As Solana's activity recovers, some protocols are gradually becoming part of the ecosystem's infrastructure.

·Hylo: Built around stablecoins and yield strategies.

·Loopscale: Provides lending and loop lending mechanisms.

·Exponent Finance: Yield and liquidity management platform.

·DeFi Tuna: AMM tool for advanced LP users.

Privacy & Scaling Infrastructure

·Privacy and scalability remain long-term focus areas for infrastructure.

·Fairblock Network: Underlying protocol with a focus on privacy.

·0xMiden: Layer2 project based on ZK technology.

·Umi Network: ZK Rollup infrastructure, currently in testing phase.

·Inco Network: Exploratory project in the direction of a modular trust layer.

Real World Assets (RWA) & Payments

·RWA and payment projects are gradually extending into practical use cases.

·KAST Card: Crypto payment card project.

·Phygitals: Platform for tokenizing physical assets.

·MultipliFi: RWA trading marketplace.

·Tria: User experience-oriented crypto payment application.

Social & Information Protocols

·Information value capture and social relationship chains are emerging directions in recent years.

·Kaito AI: Information analysis and discussion platform.

·Base: SocialFi application focusing on daily interaction.

·Xeet AI: Project related to the information ecosystem.

·Cookiedot.fun: Collaborative participation platform.

Observations on Participation Methods

As the industry develops, project teams are increasingly inclined to identify genuine usage behavior rather than just the number of interactions. Product usage, community discussion, feedback, and collaboration are becoming more common forms of participation. At the same time, participation itself is more like a process of understanding new products and models, rather than a purely result-oriented action.

Conclusion

Airdrops are merely a way for projects to connect with early supporters, not an end in themselves. For participants, what is more important is perhaps: in a changing cycle, to continuously observe, understand, and experience the projects that truly drive the ecosystem forward.

The opportunities in 2026 may be more dispersed, but in certain specific sectors and among projects undergoing long-term development, they are still worth maintaining attention and patience for.

Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute any investment advice. The crypto market is extremely high risk. Before participating in any airdrop or making any investment decision, please be sure to conduct your own research and make decisions cautiously.

Domande pertinenti

QWhat are the three core dimensions of the evaluation framework mentioned in the article for assessing potential airdrop projects?

AThe three core dimensions are: 1. Necessity - Does the project really need a token? 2. Sustainability - Can the product survive market cycles? 3. Fairness - Does the airdrop mechanism reward genuine contribution?

QName two prediction market projects highlighted in the article that are noted for their user base and regulatory compliance, respectively.

APolymarket is noted for its large user base and high product maturity, while Kalshi is noted for operating within a regulatory framework.

QWhich ecosystem has seen a resurgence in activity, leading to increased attention on its infrastructure projects according to the article?

AThe Solana ecosystem has seen a resurgence in activity, with protocols like Hylo, Loopscale, Exponent Finance, and DeFi Tuna becoming part of its infrastructure.

QWhat shift in user screening for airdrops is the article observing among project teams?

AProject teams are increasingly shifting towards identifying genuine usage behaviors, such as product use, community discussion, and providing feedback, rather than just the number of on-chain interactions.

QBeyond airdrops, what does the article suggest is the more important goal for participants in the crypto space?

AThe more important goal is to continuously observe, understand, and experience the ones that are genuinely driving the ecosystem forward, viewing airdrops as just one form of connection between a project and its early supporters, not the end goal itself.

Letture associate

Near Returns to the AI Stage: Transformation into a Public Chain Due to 'Payroll Difficulties,' Agent and Privacy Emerge as New Growth Narratives

NEAR Returns to AI Origins: From Payroll Struggles to Blockchain, Now Focusing on AI Agents and Privacy NEAR Protocol's journey began not with grand blockchain ambitions, but from a practical hurdle: its AI startup founders, including Transformer paper co-author Illia Polosukhin, couldn't efficiently pay international developers in 2017. This led them to pivot and build a high-performance, scalable blockchain. After years navigating various crypto narratives like sharding and cross-chain interoperability, NEAR is now leveraging its AI roots to re-enter the AI arena. A key driver is its "NEAR Intents" layer, which abstracts complex cross-chain transactions. Users simply state their goal (e.g., swap BTC for ETH), and a solver network finds the optimal route. This system has processed over $20B in cross-chain volume, generating significant fee revenue. A major growth area is private transactions via "Confidential Intents/Swaps," which hide trade details until settlement to protect against MEV and front-running. Remarkably, private swaps recently accounted for over 40% of NEAR's transaction volume, highlighting strong demand but also potential regulatory scrutiny. With its AI-founder pedigree, NEAR is positioning itself at the intersection of blockchain, AI agents, and privacy, aiming to become infrastructure for the emerging agent economy while navigating the challenges of its rapid adoption.

marsbit2 h fa

Near Returns to the AI Stage: Transformation into a Public Chain Due to 'Payroll Difficulties,' Agent and Privacy Emerge as New Growth Narratives

marsbit2 h fa

From Ethereum to AI's 'CROPS': What Exactly is This Set of 'Slow Variables' That Vitalik Repeatedly Emphasizes?

In recent discussions, Vitalik Buterin has frequently emphasized the concept of "CROPS," a framework defining core values for Ethereum's development. CROPS stands for Censorship Resistance, Capture Resistance, Open Source, Privacy, and Security. Initially outlined in the Ethereum Foundation's "EF Mandate," it represents a commitment to user sovereignty, ensuring that the network resists external control, remains open, protects privacy, and prioritizes security. The relevance of CROPS extends beyond Ethereum's foundational principles, becoming crucial in the context of AI integration. As AI agents begin handling wallet operations and automated transactions, the risk increases that users may cede control over their digital assets, privacy, and intentions to centralized AI service providers. A "CROPS AI" would therefore emphasize local execution where possible, privacy-preserving remote model calls (e.g., using zero-knowledge proofs), and transparent, verifiable processes to maintain user agency. Vitalik highlights a significant convergence between "CROPS Ethereum access layer" and "CROPS AI." Both address the same fundamental challenge: how users can access powerful services—be it blockchain data via RPCs or AI models—without exposing sensitive information or relinquishing ultimate control. This intersection points toward a future digital entry point that is more private, secure, and user-controlled. Ultimately, CROPS is not merely an abstract ideal but a practical guidepost. It steers development—from protocol resilience and wallet design to AI agent safety—towards a future where users retain self-sovereignty even as digital systems grow more complex and powerful. In an era of accelerating AI adoption, these "slow variables" of censorship resistance, openness, privacy, and security may define Ethereum's enduring value.

marsbit2 h fa

From Ethereum to AI's 'CROPS': What Exactly is This Set of 'Slow Variables' That Vitalik Repeatedly Emphasizes?

marsbit2 h fa

Silicon Valley 'Startup Guru' Steve Hoffman: Web3 + AI Could Be a Trap

Silicon Valley investor and "Godfather of Startups" Steve Hoffman warns that combining Web3 with AI is likely a trap, not a promising venture. In an interview, Hoffman argues that while AI is a foundational technology touching all industries, Web3 adds complexity, friction, and regulatory risk without solving mainstream consumer or business needs. He advises founders to focus on deep, specialized applications where startups can out-iterate giants, rather than on generic features easily replicated by large tech companies. Hoffman observes that Silicon Valley will lead foundational AI research, while China excels at rapid, large-scale application and commercialization, particularly in robotics. He stresses that AI-driven autonomous agents capable of collaborative, multi-step tasks are 2-4 years away, which will cause significant job displacement. The solution is not to slow AI but to redesign business models around human-AI collaboration and reform social systems like education and retraining. For startups, Hoffman recommends focusing on vertical, expertise-heavy domains to build defensibility. He sees major opportunities in AI fraud detection and cybersecurity. Key founder mindsets include systemic thinking over feature-focus, relentless customer centricity, building adaptive teams, and deeply understanding AI's capabilities and limits. Hoffman is also leading a non-profit initiative to establish university centers aimed at training future leaders in responsible, human-value-aligned AI innovation.

marsbit3 h fa

Silicon Valley 'Startup Guru' Steve Hoffman: Web3 + AI Could Be a Trap

marsbit3 h fa

Token Inefficient, Economy Tokenless

The article "Tokens Aren't Economical, Economics Aren't Tokenized" analyzes a pivotal shift in the AI industry from a technology-driven narrative to one dominated by capital efficiency. It highlights two concurrent trends: a severe capital shortage due to the exorbitant and recurring costs of compute (e.g., OpenAI's high burn rate) and a wave of corporate spin-offs where major tech companies are separating their AI units (like Kuaishou's Kling and Baidu's Kunlunxin). The core argument is that AI's "anti-internet" business model, where user growth increases costs rather than profits, has created a disconnect between high valuations and actual cash flow. Spin-offs address this by allowing AI assets to be valued independently. Within a parent company, they are seen as cost centers, but as standalone entities, they are priced based on their growth potential and scarcity in the primary market, leading to massive valuation premiums (e.g., Kling's estimated value tripling post-spin-off). The industry is at an inflection point, moving from "model worship" to "value realization." The competition is evolving from a pure compute (GPU) race to a broader focus on systemic efficiency and full-stack engineering (involving CPUs and orchestration) to achieve viable commercialization. The year 2026 is framed as a critical moment where the industry must definitively answer how to economically translate AI capability into tangible business value, reshaping the sector's future power structure.

marsbit3 h fa

Token Inefficient, Economy Tokenless

marsbit3 h fa

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片