Galaxy:10张图解读RWA、DeFi和以太坊生态的活力

Odaily星球日报Pubblicato 2024-02-29Pubblicato ultima volta 2024-02-29

Introduzione

L2 生态系统仍然充满活力,交易数量逼近历史新高。

原文作者:Zack Pokorny,Galaxy

原文编译:邓通,金色财经

现在距离 2024 开年已经过去 50 天了,我们看到链上代币化 RWA 的市值创下历史新高,一些主要 L1 和 L2 参与 DeFi 的地址数量创下两年新高,以太坊的 L2 生态系统始终保持活力。 本报告通过链上数据的视角重点介绍了行业中正在出现的一些主要趋势。

  • RWA 代币总市值于 2 月 2 日创下约 27, 740 亿美元的历史新高,代币化金融资产(即国债和债券、私人信贷和房地产)市场于 2 月 8 日创下 16, 140 亿美元的新高。随着 RWA 代币市值达到这一里程碑,加密原生资产正在 DeFi 关键领域相对于 RWA 获得市场份额。

  • 主要 L1 和 L2 中与 DeFi 交互的地址数量接近两年高点,达到 445, 000 个地址。 Dex 是用户首次使用 DeFi 时最常见的 DeFi 应用类型之一。

  • 在以太坊生态系统(L1 和主要 L2)中,每日活跃地址数量已达到历史新高,每日交易数量继续推高。 L2 收入在上个月也出现了大幅增长。

RWA

2024 年 2 月 2 日,代币化现实世界资产的市值创下历史新高,达到 27, 740 亿美元。值得注意的是,包括国债和其他债券、私人信贷和房地产在内的金融资产在 2024 年 2 月 8 日创下了 16.14 亿美元的历史新高。请注意,这些数值仅考虑公共区块链上 RWA 代币本身的价值,例如 Ondo 的 OUSG 和 Tether 的 XAUT,不包括稳定币或发行者代币,例如 ONDO 和 CFG。 金融资产 RWA 国库券 / 债券的主导地位为 58.1% ,较截至 2024 年 2 月 26 日的历史高点下降约 110 个基点。

Galaxy:10张图解读RWA、DeFi和以太坊生态的活力

尽管 RWA 代币的链上代币市值再创新高,但 RWA 在链上产品中的主导地位和使用量一直在下降。 这在 DAI 的抵押中最为明显,自 2023 年 10 月下旬以来,RWA 的使用一直在稳步下降。这是一个关键迹象,突显出人们越来越倾向于使用加密原生资产而不是链上的 RWA,并且反过来,对加密货币的需求也普遍增加。 最近 LST 支持的稳定币的增长只会增加这一概念,并表明趋势很强劲。

Galaxy:10张图解读RWA、DeFi和以太坊生态的活力

此外,加密原生资产的生产力在几个方面已经超过了 RWA。 我们在 12 月 1 日的时事通讯中以 Maker 和 DAI 为例介绍了这一点,其中加密货币支持的贷款比 RWA 获得了更高的稳定费。 随着 MakerDAO 投票增加其一些链上金库的稳定费,这种动态仍然存在,并且再次增长。 最值得注意的是,它将通过其 stETH 金库铸造 DAI 的费用提高了 191 个基点。 它也存在于主要稳定币相对于国库券收益率的供应年化收益率中。 下图采用了 Aave v2/v3 和 Compound v2/v3 中 USDT、USDC、DAI 和 FRAX 借入金额的加权平均供应 APY。 自 2023 年 10 月下旬 /2023 年 11 月初(就在 DAI RWA 抵押品开始下跌之前)以来,稳定币收益率一直超过 3 个月期国库券的收益率。

Galaxy:10张图解读RWA、DeFi和以太坊生态的活力

DeFi 用户和保留

根据 7 天 SMA 数据, 2 月 1 日,主要 L1 和 L2 中使用 DeFi 的每日活跃地址(DAA)数量创下了 2 年新高,达到 57.6 万个地址。 Solana 一直保持着每日最活跃的 DeFi 地址,在 2024 年 2 月 1 日(Jupiter 空投后的第二天)达到 33 万的高点后,截至 2024 年 2 月 20 日达到 19.6 万。 另一方面,以太坊在过去一年中 DeFi 用户不断流失(较 2023 年 2 月 20 日的 12 万个地址下降了 24% )。 下一节将介绍有关以太坊活动和用户数量的更多信息。

Galaxy:10张图解读RWA、DeFi和以太坊生态的活力

Dexe 已成为用户在上述七条链上加入 DeFi 的关键组成部分。 作为参考,在下图中,金融应用程序类别包括借贷平台和收益聚合器等应用程序。 自 2023 年 9 月以来,在这 7 个链上参与 DeFi 的所有新用户中,近 60% 都是从 DEX 开始的。这与过去六个多月围绕 DeFi 的空投和投机浪潮一致。 另外,请注意过去三个月 NFT 在吸引新用户进入 DeFi 方面的重要性日益突出。

Galaxy:10张图解读RWA、DeFi和以太坊生态的活力

在截至 1 月份的三个月内,DEX 用户的保留率明显强劲。 在过去五个月观察到的链中,Solana 的 DEX 用户保留率最高,这可以归功于 Jupiter 的空投活动。 下图跟踪了 Solana、Arbitrum 和 Optimism(上述链中 DEX 留存率排名前三的链)中 DEX 用户的月留存率(在 x 月加入并在 x + 1 月仍在交易的用户留存率)多于。 这些用户的月度留存率在 2024 年 1 月下降之前,已连续四个月呈上升趋势(Solana 为 6 个月)。加权平均留存率基于每月新增 DEX 用户。

Galaxy:10张图解读RWA、DeFi和以太坊生态的活力

以太坊与 Layer 2 

以太坊因用户数量和加密推特上的总体活动下降而受到批评。 虽然每日活跃地址数量和活动指标(如交易数量)在过去两年的大部分时间里确实持平甚至略有下降,但对以 rollup 为中心的未来的承诺使得仅通过 L1 来衡量以太坊是不公平的。 当考虑到一些顶级 L2 时,用户增长和活动正逼近历史最高水平。

下图显示了以太坊 L1 及其一些领先的 L2 的全网络每日活跃地址的总和。 截至 2 月 21 日,这些网络日活跃地址总数超过 120 万个,其中以太坊 L1 仅占用 36 万个地址。 请注意,此图表仅包含所有以太坊 L2 的一部分。

Galaxy:10张图解读RWA、DeFi和以太坊生态的活力

以太坊和相同 L2 上的交易计数显示出相似的高点。 尽管以太坊 L1 交易低迷,但在截至 2024 年 2 月 26 日的 30 天内,其 L2 生态系统平均每天有 314 万笔交易。

Galaxy:10张图解读RWA、DeFi和以太坊生态的活力

与强劲的交易数量相一致的是收入的增长。 截至 2024 年 2 月 26 日,Arbitrum、Optimism、Base、Scroll、Zora 和 zkSync 使用 7 天 SMA 每天产生 150 万美元的收入(这些是用户向汇总排序器支付的费用)。 2024 年 2 月 26 日也创下了观察到的连锁店每日综合收入第二高的日期。

Galaxy:10张图解读RWA、DeFi和以太坊生态的活力

在截至 2024 年 2 月 26 日的 30 天内,这些 L2 还向以太坊 L1 支付了超过 2160 万美元的数据成本。这个数字将变得越来越重要,因为以前在以太坊 L1 上执行的活动是在 rollup 上进行的。

Galaxy:10张图解读RWA、DeFi和以太坊生态的活力

总结

以下是上述数据提供的一些关键信号:

  • DeFi 中对加密原生资产取代 RWA 的需求持续存在。

  • 尽管大规模空投已经结束,用户仍继续涌向 DeFi,但 1 月份 DEX 的保留率有所下降。 这表明 DeFi 这一领域的用户出现了一些流失或投降。

  • 尽管人们注意到以太坊的活动和用户数量有所下降,但其 L2 生态系统仍然充满活力,交易数量逼近历史新高。

Letture associate

Soaring Export Data for Memory Chips, Market Is Redefining the Valuation Anchor for Memory Stocks

Korean storage export data for the first 20 days of June shows substantial year-on-year increases in both value and price-per-kilogram for categories like DRAM, NAND, and SSDs. This signals a potential shift beyond simple demand recovery, indicating rising prices and a product mix shift towards higher-value items, possibly influenced by AI infrastructure needs. A key point is that the surge in price-per-kilogram is not simply a uniform chip price hike. It reflects a combination of actual price increases and, more importantly, an export structure increasingly dominated by high-value-density products like HBM (High-Bandwidth Memory) and advanced DRAM, which are critical for AI servers. This suggests AI-driven demand may be spilling over from just HBM into broader memory markets. SK Hynix stands to benefit directly due to its leading HBM position. For Samsung and Micron, the implication is potential for greater margin elasticity if the tightness in high-end memory spreads to enterprise SSD and NAND prices. However, the storage sector remains cyclical. Risks include supply expansion, inventory changes, and potential slowdowns in broader AI capital expenditure. Ultimately, while the strong export data supports upward revisions for storage company earnings and fuels discussion of an "AI infrastructure bottleneck premium," a definitive valuation shift from a cyclical to a structural story depends on upcoming quarterly reports. Investors need confirmation from SK Hynix, Samsung, and Micron that improvements in average selling prices, product mix, and, crucially,毛利率 are sustained over multiple quarters.

marsbit1 h fa

Soaring Export Data for Memory Chips, Market Is Redefining the Valuation Anchor for Memory Stocks

marsbit1 h fa

Why Does SpaceX Have Such a High Valuation Ceiling? The Answer Lies in Musk's Business Blueprint

SpaceX achieved a record-breaking IPO on June 12, 2026, with its market cap surging past $2.1 trillion. This valuation reflects its central role within Elon Musk's expansive, interconnected technological ecosystem. The article details how four core components form a synergistic closed-loop system: 1) **The "Brain" (xAI & Orbital Compute):** xAI provides AI models and massive ground/space-based supercomputing for simulation and decision-making across the system. 2) **The "Neural Logistics Core" (Starlink & Starship):** Starlink's low-latency satellite network enables global data transmission, while Starship's low-cost, reusable launch capacity aims to make large-scale space deployment economically viable. 3) **The "Physical Body" (Tesla & Optimus):** Tesla's manufacturing prowess and energy products support hardware production and power, pivoting toward mass-producing the Optimus humanoid robot for terrestrial and potential space-based labor. 4) **The "Human Interface" (Neuralink & X):** Neuralink seeks direct brain-computer communication, and the X platform provides real-time societal data. Together, these elements create three reinforcing "flywheels": manufacturing/logistics, data-driven iteration, and energy/compute/network synergy. This integrated approach promises lower costs, faster innovation cycles, and potential infrastructure-as-a-service offerings. However, it also concentrates technical, regulatory, and corporate governance risks. Ultimately, SpaceX's high valuation stems from its position as the indispensable infrastructural backbone—handling space transport, global communications, and future orbital computing—tying together Musk's entire vision for a self-reinforcing technological empire.

marsbit1 h fa

Why Does SpaceX Have Such a High Valuation Ceiling? The Answer Lies in Musk's Business Blueprint

marsbit1 h fa

Snap, Unprofitable for Nine Years, and a Decade-Long AR Obsession Without Return

Snap's AR Obsession: A Decade of Betting Against the Odds On June 16, Snap CEO Evan Spiegel unveiled the new AR glasses, Specs, priced at $2,195, causing the company's stock (SNAP) to plummet nearly 10%. The launch was met with intense criticism online, with investors questioning why a consistently unprofitable company would stake its future on an expensive product its core young user base can't afford. Snapchat, known for pioneering features like ephemeral Stories and popular AR lenses (like the iconic dog filter), has a history of innovation often copied by rivals like Instagram and Meta. Despite this, it has struggled to translate first-mover advantage into commercial success. Since its 2017 IPO, Snap has reported annual net losses, with a Q1 2026 loss of $89 million. Its stock is down 94% from its 2021 peak, hampered by iOS privacy changes, competition, and a young demographic less attractive to major advertisers. In this challenging context, Spiegel is doubling down on AR. He calls 2026 a "crucible moment," having recently laid off 16% of staff while reportedly investing over $3.5 billion cumulatively in its AR glasses line over nearly a decade. The new Specs represent a significant leap from the 2016 camera-focused Spectacles, offering true AR overlays, gesture control, and standalone operation. However, at $2,195, it faces tough comparisons. While more advanced than Meta's $799 Ray-Ban smart glasses, critics point to its heavier weight, short battery life, and features largely replicable by a smartphone. Facing pressure from investors to cut losses on the Specs project, Spiegel has refused, framing it as essential to Snap's long-term vision. The company finds itself in a paradoxical position: cutting costs while heavily funding a decade-long, unproven bet. Some see Specs as an awkward but necessary step in AR's evolution, akin to early mobile phones. Whether Spiegel is a visionary outlier or a gambler destined to fail remains an open question, highlighting the tension between long-term ambition and short-term market demands.

marsbit1 h fa

Snap, Unprofitable for Nine Years, and a Decade-Long AR Obsession Without Return

marsbit1 h fa

Annualized Revenue Exceeds $20 Billion, Kalshi Aims to Become the First Prediction Platform IPO?

Kalshi, a leading U.S. prediction markets platform, is reportedly in early, informal discussions for an Initial Public Offering (IPO). The company's annualized revenue now exceeds $2 billion, fueled by its dominance of over 90% of the domestic prediction market activity. This growth stems from a surge in trading volume—reaching a total of $52.7 billion—and an increase in fee rates, largely driven by sports event contracts like the NBA playoffs and the 2026 FIFA World Cup. Monthly active users are approximately 2 million. Kalshi recently raised $1 billion in a funding round led by Coatue Management, valuing the company at $22 billion. It has also expanded its offerings to include Bitcoin perpetual contracts and plans to launch a dedicated trading platform, Kalshi Pro. However, Kalshi's path to an IPO faces significant regulatory hurdles. The core risk involves jurisdictional conflicts, as multiple U.S. states are challenging its operations under local gambling laws. For instance, Arizona has filed criminal charges against the platform, while states like Kentucky have filed lawsuits. Kalshi and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) argue that its event contracts fall under exclusive federal jurisdiction as "swaps." The outcomes of these ongoing legal battles could critically impact Kalshi's core revenue and its IPO timeline. Analysts suggest that while an IPO could theoretically occur by late 2026, a more likely timeframe is late 2027 or 2028, contingent on resolving legal issues and favorable market conditions. If successful, its fundraising could significantly exceed $1 billion, given its current valuation and revenue multiple.

Foresight News2 h fa

Annualized Revenue Exceeds $20 Billion, Kalshi Aims to Become the First Prediction Platform IPO?

Foresight News2 h fa

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片