SignalPlus波动率专栏(20240227)：BTC暴涨10%达到56000美元

Odaily星球日报Pubblicato 2024-02-27Pubblicato ultima volta 2024-02-27

Introduzione

BTC的拉盘行情推动Vol Curve走平上行，整体水平达到55%-60%左右，与ETH的差距明显缩小，但观察到Vol Skew除了在Weekly内有所抬升以外并没有其他显著变化。

昨日（26 FEB）美国 2 月份公司发债规模达到 1530 亿美元，超过了去年 2 月份创下的 1509 亿美元的纪录，这或是一个让交易员在美联储降息之前能够抢购高收益票据的机会。十年期美债收益率一度走高至 4.3% 以后回落，现报 4.271% ，两年期报 4.691% 。美股方面，三大股指微跌，数字货币概念股大涨，Coinbase 和 MicroStrategy 皆收涨 16% 左右，主要成因来自 MicroStrategy 宣布增持 1.5 亿美元 BTC 的举措再次提振了数字货币市场的信心，使得 BTC 暴涨至 56027.26 （+ 9% ），顺带推动 ETH 站上 3200 关口（日内+ 4% ）。

SignalPlus波动率专栏(20240227)：BTC暴涨10%达到56000美元

Source: SignalPlus, Economic Calendar

SignalPlus波动率专栏(20240227)：BTC暴涨10%达到56000美元

Source: Binance & TradingView，BTC 大涨至 56000

期权方面，BTC 的拉盘行情推动 Vol Curve 走平上行，整体水平达到 55% -60% 左右，与 ETH 的差距明显缩小，但观察到 Vol Skew 除了在 Weekly 内有所抬升以外并没有其他显著变化，从成交上解释， 1 MAR 上 54000/52500/52000 Put 被大量卖出，同时还有大量止盈的看涨 ITM 订单，共同压低了那一侧的 Vol Premium；中远期成交以 29 MAR 为代表，两侧的 Wing 上皆有大量的 OTM 期权被买入，因此在抬高整体波动率的同时并未对 Vol Skew 造成影响。

ETH 方面，三月底出现以 Sell 3000/3100 Buy 3400 Call 为代表的滚仓策略，还有一组行权价间隔较宽的 3200 vs 2500 PutSpread 被卖出（4000 ETH），彰显了交易员对此轮由大资金注入预期引导的市场上涨的信心；除此之外，三月其他期限上整体表现出 Buy Ratio Call Spread 和 Buy Put 的 Flow，使得 ETH 的 Vol Skew 在这段到期日内反而有所下降。

SignalPlus波动率专栏(20240227)：BTC暴涨10%达到56000美元

Source: Deribit （截至 27 FEB 16: 00 UTC+ 8）

SignalPlus波动率专栏(20240227)：BTC暴涨10%达到56000美元

Source: SignalPlus，BTC 暴涨推动 IV 走平上行

SignalPlus波动率专栏(20240227)：BTC暴涨10%达到56000美元

Source: SignalPlus，过去 24 小时 Vol Skew 的变化

SignalPlus波动率专栏(20240227)：BTC暴涨10%达到56000美元

Data Source: Deribit，BTC 成交分布

SignalPlus波动率专栏(20240227)：BTC暴涨10%达到56000美元

Data Source: Deribit，ETH 成交分布

SignalPlus波动率专栏(20240227)：BTC暴涨10%达到56000美元

Source: Deribit Block Trade

SignalPlus波动率专栏(20240227)：BTC暴涨10%达到56000美元

Source: Deribit Block Trade

SignalPlus波动率专栏(20240227)：BTC暴涨10%达到56000美元您可在 ChatGPT 4.0 的 Plugin Store 搜索 SignalPlus ，获取实时加密资讯。如果想即时收到我们的更新，欢迎关注我们的推特账号@SignalPlus_Web3 ，或者加入我们的微信群（添加小助手微信：SignalPlus 123）、Telegram 群以及 Discord 社群，和更多朋友一起交流互动。

SignalPlus Official Website：https://www.signalplus.com

Letture associate

Soaring Export Data for Memory Chips, Market Is Redefining the Valuation Anchor for Memory Stocks

Korean storage export data for the first 20 days of June shows substantial year-on-year increases in both value and price-per-kilogram for categories like DRAM, NAND, and SSDs. This signals a potential shift beyond simple demand recovery, indicating rising prices and a product mix shift towards higher-value items, possibly influenced by AI infrastructure needs. A key point is that the surge in price-per-kilogram is not simply a uniform chip price hike. It reflects a combination of actual price increases and, more importantly, an export structure increasingly dominated by high-value-density products like HBM (High-Bandwidth Memory) and advanced DRAM, which are critical for AI servers. This suggests AI-driven demand may be spilling over from just HBM into broader memory markets. SK Hynix stands to benefit directly due to its leading HBM position. For Samsung and Micron, the implication is potential for greater margin elasticity if the tightness in high-end memory spreads to enterprise SSD and NAND prices. However, the storage sector remains cyclical. Risks include supply expansion, inventory changes, and potential slowdowns in broader AI capital expenditure. Ultimately, while the strong export data supports upward revisions for storage company earnings and fuels discussion of an "AI infrastructure bottleneck premium," a definitive valuation shift from a cyclical to a structural story depends on upcoming quarterly reports. Investors need confirmation from SK Hynix, Samsung, and Micron that improvements in average selling prices, product mix, and, crucially,毛利率 are sustained over multiple quarters.

marsbit3 min fa

Soaring Export Data for Memory Chips, Market Is Redefining the Valuation Anchor for Memory Stocks

marsbit3 min fa

Why Does SpaceX Have Such a High Valuation Ceiling? The Answer Lies in Musk's Business Blueprint

SpaceX achieved a record-breaking IPO on June 12, 2026, with its market cap surging past $2.1 trillion. This valuation reflects its central role within Elon Musk's expansive, interconnected technological ecosystem. The article details how four core components form a synergistic closed-loop system: 1) **The "Brain" (xAI & Orbital Compute):** xAI provides AI models and massive ground/space-based supercomputing for simulation and decision-making across the system. 2) **The "Neural Logistics Core" (Starlink & Starship):** Starlink's low-latency satellite network enables global data transmission, while Starship's low-cost, reusable launch capacity aims to make large-scale space deployment economically viable. 3) **The "Physical Body" (Tesla & Optimus):** Tesla's manufacturing prowess and energy products support hardware production and power, pivoting toward mass-producing the Optimus humanoid robot for terrestrial and potential space-based labor. 4) **The "Human Interface" (Neuralink & X):** Neuralink seeks direct brain-computer communication, and the X platform provides real-time societal data. Together, these elements create three reinforcing "flywheels": manufacturing/logistics, data-driven iteration, and energy/compute/network synergy. This integrated approach promises lower costs, faster innovation cycles, and potential infrastructure-as-a-service offerings. However, it also concentrates technical, regulatory, and corporate governance risks. Ultimately, SpaceX's high valuation stems from its position as the indispensable infrastructural backbone—handling space transport, global communications, and future orbital computing—tying together Musk's entire vision for a self-reinforcing technological empire.

marsbit8 min fa

Why Does SpaceX Have Such a High Valuation Ceiling? The Answer Lies in Musk's Business Blueprint

marsbit8 min fa

Snap, Unprofitable for Nine Years, and a Decade-Long AR Obsession Without Return

Snap's AR Obsession: A Decade of Betting Against the Odds On June 16, Snap CEO Evan Spiegel unveiled the new AR glasses, Specs, priced at $2,195, causing the company's stock (SNAP) to plummet nearly 10%. The launch was met with intense criticism online, with investors questioning why a consistently unprofitable company would stake its future on an expensive product its core young user base can't afford. Snapchat, known for pioneering features like ephemeral Stories and popular AR lenses (like the iconic dog filter), has a history of innovation often copied by rivals like Instagram and Meta. Despite this, it has struggled to translate first-mover advantage into commercial success. Since its 2017 IPO, Snap has reported annual net losses, with a Q1 2026 loss of $89 million. Its stock is down 94% from its 2021 peak, hampered by iOS privacy changes, competition, and a young demographic less attractive to major advertisers. In this challenging context, Spiegel is doubling down on AR. He calls 2026 a "crucible moment," having recently laid off 16% of staff while reportedly investing over $3.5 billion cumulatively in its AR glasses line over nearly a decade. The new Specs represent a significant leap from the 2016 camera-focused Spectacles, offering true AR overlays, gesture control, and standalone operation. However, at $2,195, it faces tough comparisons. While more advanced than Meta's $799 Ray-Ban smart glasses, critics point to its heavier weight, short battery life, and features largely replicable by a smartphone. Facing pressure from investors to cut losses on the Specs project, Spiegel has refused, framing it as essential to Snap's long-term vision. The company finds itself in a paradoxical position: cutting costs while heavily funding a decade-long, unproven bet. Some see Specs as an awkward but necessary step in AR's evolution, akin to early mobile phones. Whether Spiegel is a visionary outlier or a gambler destined to fail remains an open question, highlighting the tension between long-term ambition and short-term market demands.

marsbit29 min fa

Snap, Unprofitable for Nine Years, and a Decade-Long AR Obsession Without Return

marsbit29 min fa

Annualized Revenue Exceeds $20 Billion, Kalshi Aims to Become the First Prediction Platform IPO?

Kalshi, a leading U.S. prediction markets platform, is reportedly in early, informal discussions for an Initial Public Offering (IPO). The company's annualized revenue now exceeds $2 billion, fueled by its dominance of over 90% of the domestic prediction market activity. This growth stems from a surge in trading volume—reaching a total of $52.7 billion—and an increase in fee rates, largely driven by sports event contracts like the NBA playoffs and the 2026 FIFA World Cup. Monthly active users are approximately 2 million. Kalshi recently raised $1 billion in a funding round led by Coatue Management, valuing the company at $22 billion. It has also expanded its offerings to include Bitcoin perpetual contracts and plans to launch a dedicated trading platform, Kalshi Pro. However, Kalshi's path to an IPO faces significant regulatory hurdles. The core risk involves jurisdictional conflicts, as multiple U.S. states are challenging its operations under local gambling laws. For instance, Arizona has filed criminal charges against the platform, while states like Kentucky have filed lawsuits. Kalshi and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) argue that its event contracts fall under exclusive federal jurisdiction as "swaps." The outcomes of these ongoing legal battles could critically impact Kalshi's core revenue and its IPO timeline. Analysts suggest that while an IPO could theoretically occur by late 2026, a more likely timeframe is late 2027 or 2028, contingent on resolving legal issues and favorable market conditions. If successful, its fundraising could significantly exceed $1 billion, given its current valuation and revenue multiple.

Foresight News47 min fa

Annualized Revenue Exceeds $20 Billion, Kalshi Aims to Become the First Prediction Platform IPO?

Foresight News47 min fa

Don't Care if You Know Football or Not, Buying the Draw Is the Best Strategy for This World Cup?

The article analyzes the 2026 FIFA World Cup group stage and argues that betting on a draw has been a surprisingly profitable strategy. Based on data from the prediction market Polymarket, a strategy of betting $1000 on a draw for each of the first 40 matches would have yielded a return of over 100%, despite only 13 matches ending in a draw. The core of the strategy is not the frequency of wins, but the high payout when low-probability draws occur, such as Spain's 0-0 draw with Cape Verde, where pre-match odds for a draw were only 5.5%. The article identifies common draw scores, like 1-1, which provide stability, and high-value 0-0 stalemates, where favorites fail to break down resilient defenses. It highlights Group G as an example, where 3 of the first 4 matches ended in draws, illustrating that draws are a tactical part of group stage calculus as teams often prioritize not losing. In conclusion, while strong teams remain favorites on the pitch, the article claims that for traders, betting on draws has so far produced the most significant profits.

Odaily星球日报57 min fa

Don't Care if You Know Football or Not, Buying the Draw Is the Best Strategy for This World Cup?

Odaily星球日报57 min fa

Trading

Spot

Futures