专访Pandora联创:故事起源于一次损失惨重的Rug

Odaily星球日报Pubblicato 2024-02-07Pubblicato ultima volta 2024-02-07

Introduzione

关于ERC404和Pandora,你想知道的都在这里。

受访人:Pandora 联创 Ctrl

采访&编译:Karen,Foresight News

ERC 404 代币标准被认为是 NFT 的范式创新。在昨日发布的《Pandora 飙升背后的 ERC 404 ,还有何机会?》一文中,我们介绍了本月备受瞩目的 Pandora 和 ERC 404 标准背景、介绍和潜在机遇。

今天,Foresight News 采访到了 Pandora 联合创始人 Ctrl,就 ERC 404 命名为 404 的原因、Pandora 的经济模型、未来计划以及 ERC 404 在哪些领域具有潜力等细分问题进行了进一步的探讨。

专访Pandora联创:故事起源于一次损失惨重的Rug

问题:Pandora 和 ERC 404 是同一个团队吗,团队有多少人?

Pandora 和 ERC 404 是同一个团队。我们的团队每天都在壮大,核心团队包括我自己、Coinbase 前软件工程师 @0x acme 和 Searn 在内的共 4 个人。后面也有许多程序员自愿加入我们,一起构建和完善代码。ERC 404 V1 代码是由 Acme 独立完成的,目前团队正在进行完善。

问题:做这个项目受到了什么启发?有没有一些背后的故事可以分享?

这是一个有颇具戏剧性的故事。简单来说,之前一个名为 Emerald 的项目 Rug 了,该项目声称具有类似的功能。我们认为这个概念具有很大潜力,所以投入了大量资金,然而结果却付出了比较大的代价。在深入研究后,我们逐渐发现该项目不仅合约设计漏洞百出,而且实施起来也问题重重。我们曾尝试向开发者阐明我们的愿景,希望他能够完善这个项目,但遗憾的是,他未能理解我们的期望,也并未采取任何补救措施。我们不想让我们的想法白白浪费,所以就自己来实现。

问题:ERC 404 为用 404 数字命名?

404 是一个常见的错误消息,表示在应用程序或网站上「未找到」。我们认为 404 非常合适,因为整个项目非常具有实验性。ERC 404 混合了 ERC 721 和 ERC 20 的功能。

问题:对于团队来说,更愿意把 Pandora 定义成 NFT 还是 Token?

我们将这两个部分视为一个整体的两个独立部分,称之为 SFTs。如果你让我必须选择其中一个,也许我会说 NFT。但从技术上来说,它们是「半可替代代币」。

问题:ERC 404 能解决什么关键问题?能给 NFT 市场或者说整个加密市场带来什么新的想象空间?

有很多,最明显的是原生流动性和对 NFT 碎片化。

问题:ERC 404 还能够衍生出哪些创新和玩法?

用例很多,但我们尤其看好在游戏领域中的潜力。Ticketing 也是潜力比较大的一个领域。

问题:所谓「解决 NFT 流动性」这个痛点,之前有一些碎片化协议为代表的 NFTFi 做过很多尝试但是结果都无疾而终,失败的根源在哪?ERC 404 提出的新方案有什么质的不同?

究其根源,这些方案往往存在摩擦过多、操作复杂等问题,导致用户体验不佳。更关键的是,这些方案通常需要对原始 NFT 进行封装处理,这自然引起了收藏家的反感,进而限制了这些解决方案的广泛采用。相比之下,ERC 404 默认具有这些功能,并不依赖于令人困惑的第三方协议和解决方案。

问题:对于那些已经跌了很多的 NFT 项目,新的协议能提供什么帮助?

老实说,现实情况是,过于关注不可变性,这是区块链技术面临的挑战之一。新项目受益于新技术,而旧项目通常由于实施不足而变得停滞不前或销声匿迹。从现实的角度来看,如果我们封装旧的 ERC 721 集合,它们将面临与我们上面概述的采用问题相同的问题。我们认为,在未来可预见的时间内,重点将放在新的 ERC 404 项目上,这些项目将从这个创新中获益最多。

问题:能否详细介绍下 Pandora 的销毁机制?如果一个人买 0.1 枚 Pandora 代币,那对应的 NFT 会如何销毁转移?

如果有人购买 0.1 个代币,则不会发生转移。如果钱包的余额超过 1 个代币,将向其钱包铸造 NFT。如果从另一个用户的钱包转移代币,也将转移 NFT。

问题:Pandora 刚开始是按什么价格发行的?

在团队注入流动性池后,Pandora 的初始价格约为 200 美元。

问题:Pandora 的经济模型是怎样的?

总共有 10000 个,目前,只有 7% 被分配给团队和早期贡献者。团队持有的其余供应量大部分尚未分配,可用于注入额外流动性以满足需求。预计一些将提供给我们的做市商以及集成 ERC 404 感兴趣的交易所,其中许多已经与我们取得联系。

LBank 是首家上线 Pandora 的 CEX,在 2 月 6 日上线了 Pandora。此外,Web3 钱包 Bitget Wallet 也于今日新增支持 ERC-404 代币和 NFT 交易,支持 PANDORA 等 ERC-404 代币的 Swap 交易、K 线行情查看,以及在 NFT 市场挂单交易 Pandora 等 ERC-404 NFT 合集。

问题:Pandora 团队在上线初期从市场买走 5000 枚,后期将如何分配?

我们计划谨慎限制流通供应量,以与采用规模相匹配。这是 ERC 404 带来的另一个独特可能性。通常,项目方必须在启动时限制其供应量,以确保如果他们没有大量的社区用户,可以都铸造出来。如果后续发展壮大之后,供应量就不能再改变了。使用 ERC 404 ,团队可以简单地保留代币以满足需求并扩展,从 3000 个供应量集合扩展到 1 万甚至更多。

问题:在你看来,ERC 404 之后会迭代到什么样子?

我相信,一旦我们提交正式的 EIP,ERC 404 将很快被更多的项目和协议所接受,并在其上构建。这些项目和协议将用于各种新颖的、实用的用例。

问题:未来想做到什么目标?可以分享下在计划中的事项吗?

计划很多,我们知道如何抓住机会。目前我们最大的目标是在协议层面上构建 DApps 和工具,支持 ERC 404 ,并利用这些产品为 Pandora 持有者创造价值。

问题:普通用户还有哪些机会?

就像所有的技术一样,我认为普通用户可以享受开发人员和创作者因这种新代币标准而提供的好处和改进的用户体验。毕竟,光是流动性和碎片化特点就能使普通用户受益更多,这很平等。

Letture associate

GPT-5.6 Countdown: Abandon the Illusion of a Single API, Computational Iteration Can't Outpace a Single Page of Compliance

In mid-June, three seemingly independent industry events—the compliance-driven throttling of Fable 5, the open-sourcing of GLM-5.2, and the leaked release timeline for GPT-5.6—are pushing the global AI industry toward a watershed moment. These shifts signal a fundamental restructuring of the industry's underlying logic. First, **"usability" has substantially overtaken "advanced capabilities"** as the primary weight, pushing the global large language model (LLM) supply chain into a "dual-track" phase of controlled closed-source and local open-source coexistence. Second, **the competitive moats of closed-source giants are shifting**. Their technical focus is moving from "language intelligence" toward "spatial intelligence (world models)"—a domain heavily reliant on computing power. Third, faced with常态化 transnational compliance risks, **a "model-agnostic" decoupled design has become a survival necessity for application-layer developers to maintain business continuity.** The article details how Anthropic's Fable 5, despite its advanced engineering feats, was restricted for non-U.S. citizens within 72 hours of launch, highlighting how geopolitical compliance can instantly limit even the most advanced models. In response, the open-source camp, exemplified by Zhipu AI's MIT-licensed GLM-5.2, is gaining market share by offering stable performance improvements and significant cost advantages (up to 70% savings for enterprises), while achieving full adaptation with domestic semiconductor platforms. Meanwhile, closed-source leaders like OpenAI are pivoting. The anticipated GPT-5.6 reportedly shifts focus from language to spatial intelligence and world models, aiming to rebuild a generational gap in areas like 3D understanding, simulation, and industrial design that demand immense compute. The core conclusion is that the LLM supply chain's logic has changed. Enterprises must now evaluate infrastructure based on a composite of technical performance and policy compliance. For developers, complete reliance on a single closed-source API poses unacceptable risk. Implementing a truly model-agnostic architecture—enabling swift switches to compliant, locally deployable open-source alternatives—is no longer just good practice but a fundamental baseline for business continuity.

marsbit22 min fa

GPT-5.6 Countdown: Abandon the Illusion of a Single API, Computational Iteration Can't Outpace a Single Page of Compliance

marsbit22 min fa

Is the 'Token Subsidy War' Among AI Giants Almost Over?

The article discusses the ongoing "token subsidy war" among AI giants like OpenAI and Anthropic, questioning whether it's nearing its end. It reveals that current AI subscription prices are heavily subsidized, with some plans offering tokens at up to 70 times the actual cost to attract and retain heavy users, especially developers and enterprises. This strategy mirrors past internet-era subsidy battles, but with a key difference: AI tokens lack "lock-in" effects. Unlike ride-hailing or food delivery apps, users can easily switch between AI providers as APIs become standardized, making it difficult for companies to raise prices post-subsidy. The piece highlights a structural asymmetry in the competition. Giants like Google, with massive advertising revenue, can afford to subsidize tokens indefinitely, akin to using "tokens as a weapon." In contrast, venture-backed companies like OpenAI and Anthropic face pressure to become profitable, especially as they approach IPO. The article cites Google Ventures founder Bill Maris, who suggests Google could slash token prices by 80%, putting immense pressure on competitors. Two potential endgames are presented: the "internet service" model (subsidize, monopolize, then raise prices) and the "utility" model (tokens become a standardized, low-margin commodity like electricity). Given the low switching costs, the latter seems more likely. The competition may not have a single winner but could instead accelerate AI's evolution into a foundational, infrastructure-level technology, akin to a public utility. For now, users continue to benefit from heavily subsidized token costs.

marsbit39 min fa

Is the 'Token Subsidy War' Among AI Giants Almost Over?

marsbit39 min fa

Beyond the Stadium: The Profitable Games Surrounding the World Cup

"Beyond the Pitch: The Profit Game Around the World Cup" The FIFA World Cup transcends being a sporting spectacle, evolving into a massive global arena for speculation and profit-seeking. The 2026 tournament has amplified this dynamic, creating a multi-layered ecosystem of financial opportunism alongside the football. **Prediction markets** have surged into the mainstream. Platforms like Polymarket and Kalshi saw trading volumes for World Cup contracts soar, attracting new users with their financial trading model and high-profile, chain-based wealth stories that overshadow traditional sports betting in terms of growth and narrative. However, **traditional sportsbooks** remain the dominant force, leveraging established user habits, legal markets, and comprehensive product offerings to handle the vast majority of speculative wagers, with projections suggesting record-breaking betting volumes. Capital markets also react. **"Concept stocks"** in countries like South Korea and Japan experience volatile price swings based on team performance and anticipated fan spending on items like chicken, beer, and viewing parties, effectively becoming a stock market reflecting fan sentiment. The **ticket resale market** has become a sophisticated arena for arbitrage. Prices fluctuate wildly based on team draws and star power, with sellers sometimes listing tickets they don't yet own in a practice akin to short-selling, while FIFA's own "Right to Buy" tokens add another layer of speculative trading. **Collectibles and merchandise** offer another avenue. Panini sticker albums, with their inherent scarcity and nostalgic value, can become high-value collectibles. Limited-edition or locally themed jerseys command significant premiums on secondary markets, and even counterfeit vendors profit from fans' desire for affordable match-day identity. The **cryptocurrency** space has seen a frenzy of speculative, unauthorized World Cup-themed meme coins on chains like Solana. These tokens, often exploiting team names and player imagery, experience extreme pump-and-dump cycles, creating stories of massive gains for a few early entrants and steep losses for many others. Finally, an entire industry thrives on **providing information and tools** to other speculators. Developers create platforms like SeatSidekick to track ticket inventory and prices, while paid Telegram groups and subscriptions sell betting tips and predictions, monetizing the widespread desire for an informational edge. In essence, the World Cup has become a compressed, global laboratory for speculation. While the games determine champions on the field, a parallel, complex network of financial transactions—spanning prediction contracts, bets, stocks, tickets, collectibles, crypto, and information services—settles its own scores in the global market.

marsbit1 h fa

Beyond the Stadium: The Profitable Games Surrounding the World Cup

marsbit1 h fa

How Does Codex Use a Computer? Three Entry Points and Permission Boundaries

This article explains the three primary methods for Codex to interact with a computer, each with distinct use cases, permission boundaries, and trust levels. **1. Computer Use:** This offers the broadest access, allowing Codex to visually control and interact with the graphical user interface of authorized macOS/Windows apps, system settings, and even iOS simulators. It's ideal for tasks lacking APIs or structured tools, such as operating legacy software or multi-app workflows. However, it's the slowest method and has the widest permission scope, requiring careful supervision for sensitive actions. **2. Chrome Extension:** This grants Codex access to the user's logged-in Chrome browser state, including cookies, profiles, and open tabs. It's best for tasks requiring user identity across websites like Gmail, LinkedIn, Salesforce, or internal dashboards. Its key advantage is multi-tab control for complex workflows. While more powerful for browser-based tasks than Computer Use, it carries higher sensitivity as actions are performed under the user's identity. **3. In-App Browser:** This is a browser isolated within the Codex thread, separate from the user's personal browsing data. It excels in web development and debugging scenarios—previewing local servers, testing responsive layouts, or annotating designs directly on the page. Its isolation is a strength for development but a limitation for tasks requiring login sessions. The core principle is to choose the narrowest, safest, and most structured interface for the task. Use plugins or MCPs first, resort to visual control (Computer Use) only for GUI-dependent tasks, employ the Chrome extension for identity-reliant browser work, and prefer the In-App Browser for isolated development. **Appshots** are clarified as a fourth, complementary tool for *inputting* context—capturing a screenshot of a window to point Codex to something—rather than a method for Codex to *act*. Together, this layered approach highlights a key to AI agent productization: not granting unlimited permissions, but constraining them within clear boundaries for specific tasks while preserving user oversight.

marsbit2 h fa

How Does Codex Use a Computer? Three Entry Points and Permission Boundaries

marsbit2 h fa

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片