随着需求扩大和协议升级,POKT Network有望实现1万亿次中继目标

Odaily星球日报Pubblicato 2024-01-17Pubblicato ultima volta 2024-01-17

Introduzione

预计到 2024 年第二季度末将有多达 10 个业务接入。

随着需求扩大和协议升级,POKT Network有望实现1万亿次中继目标

POKT 网络(又名 Pocket Network)已经通过分布在 22 个国家/地区的数千个节点为近 7000 亿个中继提供服务,目标是在下一轮创新周期中达到 1 万亿次 RPC 中继。

 POKT Network (POKT) 于 2017 年开始构建其去中心化物理基础设施网络(DePIN)协议,并于 2020 年部署到主网,比 DePIN 一词的出现还要早两年。 POKT Network (POKT) 提供了一种激励和协作层,可以实现区块链数据在任何应用程序之间进行去中心化传输。

这种架构方式的优势是:

  • 无可比拟的成本优势: POKT Network 的协议费用比中心化替代方案的 RPC 服务成本低 80% 以上;

  • 无与伦比的可扩展性: POKT Network 支持访问 50 多个链,而市场领导者 Alchemy 只支持 8 个链;

  • 强大的基础设施: POKT Network 比中心化提供商更具韧性和稳健性。

随着需求扩大和协议升级,POKT Network有望实现1万亿次中继目标

经过 3 年主网运营积累的经验,实现了今天(POKT Network)所能提供的性能: 99.99% 的正常运行时间、 99.7% 的中继准确性和小于 50 毫秒的延迟。

所有这些都被纳入一个重大的协议升级中,即以信息论之父 Claude Shannon 的名字命名为「Shannon 升级」,目标是利用 Celestia 模块化区块链技术的最新发展,在 2024 年第二季度末进入主网。

这是建立在 2023 年实现的里程碑的基础上的,随着 POKT Network (POKT)  进入了一个新的成熟阶段,引入了协议收入,将通胀率控制在 5% 以下,关闭了不可持续的需求,并启动了为网络提供新接入点(“网关”)的战略。

这种“网关”策略将在 2024 年进行扩展,使更多的 RPC 业务能够在 POKT Network (POKT)  的 RPC 基础层之上构建,预计到 2024 年第二季度末将有多达 10 个业务接入。这些业务中的每一项都将推动对底层网络的需求,增加协议收入并缩短与 1 万亿次中继目标的距离。

“网关”还支持跨网络的创新。一个网关正在努力引入“webhooks”,这可能会使目前价值 10 亿美元的 RPC 机会增加约 10% ,并且已经在进行升级,使 POKT Network 能够为与任何开源 AI LLM(大型语言模型)交互的应用程序提供数据,这是一个价值 100 亿美元的市场。

“ POKT Network (POKT) 率先扩展了 DePIN 供应侧基础设施和治理的扩展,接下来我们将开启 DePIN 增长新策略。”  POKT Network (POKT)  基金会董事 Dermot O’Riordan 表示。

关于  POKT Network (POKT) 

POKT Network (POKT) (也称为 Pocket Network)是一家领先的 DePIN(去中心化物理基础设施网络),能够以最低的成本、最长的正常运行时间和高度的可扩展性为应用程序提供数据连接。 如今,这些数据连接涉及对分布式远程过程调用 (RPC) 基础设施的多链访问,但未来可能会扩展到服务其他类型的数据连接,包括支持主流社交媒体和开源 AI LLM(大型语言模型)的开源数据库。

POKT DAO 是一个价值驱动、协作、开源社区,负责构建和治理该项目。我们重要的数字基础设施是由用户构建和管理的。

POKT Network 基金会是 POKT DAO 授权的实体,负责执行 POKT Network 的战略愿景。

更多详情可以访问 https://www.pokt.network/ 官网查看。

Letture associate

NVIDIA CPU Advances, China's RISC-V Responds: Semiconductor Deep Dive - Part Four

NVIDIA is set to launch its new Vera AI data center CPU in China as early as August, with high pricing. While this move offers a new option, it highlights China's continued dependence on foreign-controlled Arm architecture. In response, the Chinese semiconductor industry is increasingly turning to RISC-V as a strategic alternative for achieving high-performance computing autonomy. The article explores the concept of the "impossible triangle" in CPU development—balancing prosperity, control, and autonomy—and posits that RISC-V's open-source, modular nature offers a unique path to achieving all three. While RISC-V is already dominant in embedded systems, the focus is now shifting to data centers and AI workloads. China has become a global hotspot for RISC-V development, driven by AI-driven compute demand, supply chain concerns from export controls, cost benefits of open-source, and strong policy support. Multiple Chinese companies have reportedly crossed the key performance threshold of 15 SPECint per GHz, a benchmark for entering the high-performance CPU club. Progress extends beyond single-core benchmarks. Companies are developing complete computing subsystems, including commercial-grade coherent network-on-chip (NoC) technology and server processors with up to 40 cores that strictly adhere to the RVA23 standard to ensure software compatibility. Real-world applications are emerging in areas like video transcoding and edge AI. However, significant challenges remain. The RISC-V ecosystem faces fragmentation, immature toolchains and verification processes, and gaps in single-core performance and energy efficiency compared to mature x86 and Arm architectures. The formidable software moat, epitomized by NVIDIA's CUDA, is a long-term hurdle. In conclusion, while RISC-V cannot immediately replace offerings like NVIDIA's Vera, it represents a viable long-term path for China to develop a self-sufficient, high-performance CPU ecosystem. The journey is acknowledged to be long and arduous, requiring sustained effort to overcome technical and ecosystem challenges.

marsbit2 h fa

NVIDIA CPU Advances, China's RISC-V Responds: Semiconductor Deep Dive - Part Four

marsbit2 h fa

My Coding Betting Dashboard is Profiting, but Polymarket is Truly Not a Good Place for 'Arbitrage'

The author built a custom monitoring dashboard for Polymarket, a prediction market platform, and tested it with $1,600, achieving over 30% returns. However, the core argument is that Polymarket is not a good venue for traditional arbitrage. The dashboard has two main sections: a "Portfolio Dashboard" for tracking active positions with key metrics like total capital, P&L, and a risk-control module using a tier system (T1, T2, T3), and an "Opportunity Watchlist" for monitoring markets. The article details a critical structural trap in binary markets: a bet with a high perceived probability of success still carries a 100% loss risk if wrong. The author's T1/T2/T3 system is designed to manage this by limiting position sizes based on conviction and time horizon, emphasizing that high confidence should not equal high concentration. A key insight is the danger of "pseudo-diversification"—betting on different markets driven by the same underlying variable. The author concludes that Polymarket offers few true low-risk, arbitrage opportunities. It is instead a high-risk environment where wins can create a false sense of mastery, leading to large losses. The platform is better viewed as a training ground for honing judgment through disciplined, framework-driven betting rather than a reliable income source. The tools help transform intuition into structured, rule-based decisions to mitigate the risk of catastrophic errors.

marsbit5 h fa

My Coding Betting Dashboard is Profiting, but Polymarket is Truly Not a Good Place for 'Arbitrage'

marsbit5 h fa

WeChat AI Card Hands-On Guide: Has the AI Shopping Era Arrived?

**"WeChat AI Card" Practical Test Guide: Has the Era of AI Shopping Arrived?** WeChat has officially launched the "AI Exclusive Card," a feature integrated into its Workbuddy AI assistant. This card is designed to handle payments for AI-initiated purchases. Our hands-on test reveals it's not yet a tool for fully autonomous AI shopping, but rather a controlled payment layer for AI agents. The AI Card functions as an isolated sub-wallet within WeChat Pay. Users must bind the card and transfer funds into it from their main wallet. Crucially, every transaction requires explicit user confirmation via smartphone scan; AI cannot spend autonomously. Currently accessible through the Workbuddy agent, the card targets specific digital consumption scenarios: purchasing paid content (reports, data), calling paid APIs/tools, and subscribing to services. Its design prioritizes security and control by separating funds and mandating approval for each payment. We tested a real-world scenario: ordering bubble tea via Workbuddy using a "Meituan Life Assistant" skill. The process encountered multiple hurdles: high "skill" usage costs (exceeding daily free credits), and most importantly, while a payment was successfully initiated, the AI purchased an incorrect product (a mismatched group-buy coupon instead of the desired drink). This highlights the current limitation: the **AI Card only solves the payment step**. The broader challenge lies in the **AI agent's execution chain**—accurately understanding intent, navigating third-party platforms, selecting the right product, and ensuring proper fulfillment. The payment succeeded, but the purchase failed to meet the user's need. In conclusion, the WeChat AI Exclusive Card is a cautious, early-step experiment in AI commerce. It provides a secure, user-controlled payment method for agent interactions but is not yet capable of reliable, end-to-end complex purchases. For now, it's best used for low-value, low-risk digital services with careful user verification at each step. The vision of AI handling complete shopping tasks remains a work in progress.

marsbit8 h fa

WeChat AI Card Hands-On Guide: Has the AI Shopping Era Arrived?

marsbit8 h fa

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片