LD Capital:厚积薄发的新公链Sui

Odaily星球日报Pubblicato 2024-01-17Pubblicato ultima volta 2024-01-17

Introduzione

Sui使用的MOVE语言具有高拓展性,可编程性佳,速度快费用低等优势,生态蓬勃发展,热点项目涌现。团队技术能力扎实,投资背景较好,具有良好的基本面基础。

原文作者: Alfred,LD Capital

LD Capital:厚积薄发的新公链Sui

一、基本面概况

2019 年 6 月,Facebook(现在的 Meta)宣布计划构建一个许可型区块链和一个数字钱包,用于支撑全球支付网络,并为此建立起 Libra 协会(后更名为 Diem)负责构建区块链,子公司 Calibra(后更名为 Novi Finance)负责开发数字钱包。但这两个项目最终都没有完全实现,在 2022 年 Diem 与 Novi 终止。后来,基于 Diem 和 Novi 的研究诞生了两个独立的区块链:Aptos 和 Sui,Aptos 继承了 Diem 的遗产,在该项目开发的技术基础上进行迭代,而 Mysten Labs 打造了全新的 Sui。

Sui 是一条全新公链,是首个自下而上设计的 Layer 1 区块链和智能合约平台,旨在使数字资产所有权快速、私密、安全,并且每个人都可以访问。Sui 的名字灵感来源日本哲学的水元素,水的力量来源于它的流动性 — — 能够轻松适应和改变任何环境。

1、Sui 的特点与优势

(1)可拓展性强,速度快,具有大规模Web3使用实现的可能性:

Sui Move 编程语言:在现今主流的 Solidity 语言的设计下,资产是一个数值,通过在钱包中加或减完成资产转移,而非资产真正的移动。Move 是把资产视为一个资源,存放在模块中,该模块类似于智能合约,其中资源是不能复制或者删除,只能移动和储存,且资源在合约上是透明的,但对合约外的调用是不透明的。简单来说就是 Move 通过将资产独立出来,并通过其移动来改变所有权,这也是 Move 名字的由来。

Sui 在 Move 的基础上进行了新的改进形成 Sui Move 语言,主要差异在于以对象为中心的全局存储、地址表示对象 ID、对象具有全局唯一 ID 等方面,构成了 Sui 其他技术创新的底层基础。

(2)以对象为中心的数据模型:

在 Sui 上,资产是类型对象,所有对象都有稳定的、全局唯一的 ID 的特性,每个对象都可以在不与智能合约交互的情况下转移给其他对象,甚至可以与在你的资产上运行的不同智能合约进行交互。Sui 中,所有得交易都将对象作为输入,生成新的或修改后的对象作为输出,通过观察所有活动对象,可以确定全局状态。

对象是可变的资产,对象可以拥有其他对象,开发人员可以改变、组合和创建层次结构,这使 Sui 具有很强的可组合性。资产可组合性对于可拓展性至关重要,比如游戏中你具有石头,木头,水泥等资产,合约允许这些资产进行房子组合。大部分区块链的数据模型对资产所有权的建模很差。他们具有限制性,使得有状态(例如游戏,社交)应用程序难以使用它们,Sui 的以对象为中心的数据模型解决了这些可用性和可编程性的问题。

(3)双重共识机制:

Sui 的系统设计突破消除了许多区块链中的一个关键瓶颈:需要就总有序交易列表达成全球共识。鉴于许多事务不与其他事务争用相同的资源,这种计算是浪费的。Sui 通过在因果独立的事务上启用并行协议,将交易分为复杂交易和简单交易两种类型去处理,在可扩展性方面取得突破。

复杂交易:涉及共享对象的复杂交易通过 Sui 的 Narwhal 和 Bullshark 协议进行排序和共识。Narwhal 内存池维持提交的交易数据的可用性,并提供一条有向无环图形式的结构化路径以遍历(选择顺序)这些数据。Bullshark 共识通过就一个特定的有向无环图遍历(基于 DAG 结构的排序)达成共识,来选择这些结构化数据的特定顺序。

复杂交易在达到最终确认之前需要经过五个步骤:

1. 交易从各自的用户 / 客户端广播到节点。

2. 验证者节点接收到消息后,根据他们的权益规模,对消息的有效性进行投票。

3. 用户 / 客户端收集到抗拜占庭多数票后,生成一份记录证书,并将证书广播回验证者。

4. 交易证书通过 Narwhal 和 Bullshark 进行排序,以便抗拜占庭抗的多数验证者就交易数据的排序达成一致。

5. 验证者进行最后一次响应,而用户收集一个「影响」证书,这是状态改变的证明,并确保交易的最终性。

简单交易:只涉及非共享对象的简单交易不需要通过 Narwhal 和 Bullshark 进行排序。也就是说,简单交易可以跳过上述交易处理流程中的第 4 步。简单交易仅受到拜占庭一致广播的轻量级算法的约束,该算法比拜占庭共识的强度要低,可扩展性更强。广播确保所有节点都收到来自用户 / 客户端的相同消息;它不要求节点就网络状态达成一致。因此,如果多个交易之间没有关联(不涉及同一个对象),那么这些交易可以按任意顺序并行处理,所有简单交易都绕过复杂的共识。

2、团队背景

Sui 的团队有着丰富的行业经验和较强的技术实力,Evan Cheng 是 Sui/Mysten Labs 的联合创始人兼 CEO,曾是 Novi Financial 研发总。在苹果公司有 10 年的开发经验,后在 Facebook 与 Novi Financial 分别任职 2 – 3 年时间,于 2021 年 9 月创立 Mysten Labs。

LD Capital:厚积薄发的新公链Sui

LD Capital:厚积薄发的新公链Sui

来源:Linkedin

Sam Blackshear 是 Sui/Mysten Labs 的联合创始人兼 CTO,曾是 Novi Financial 首席工程师。在 Meta 的 Libra/Diem 有 6 年的工作经验,深度参与 MOVE 语言的创建。

LD Capital:厚积薄发的新公链Sui

来源:Linkedin

3、融资情况

Sui 的投资背景极佳,在 2021 – 12 – 06, A 轮融资中筹集了 3600 万美元,投资方有包括A16Z,Coinbase Ventrues 等在内的明星投资机构。2022 – 09 – 08 ,B 轮融资中筹集了 3 亿美元,投资机构包括 Jump Crypto, Binance Labs, Circle Ventrues 等。

LD Capital:厚积薄发的新公链Sui

来源:Rootdata

二、近期生态发展

Sui 的是 TVL 增长最快的公链之一,近一个月以来 TVL 几近翻倍,根据 DefiLlama 上的数据, 12 月 7 日突破 1.75 亿美元, 12 月 26 日突破 2 亿美元, 1 月 14 日突破 3 亿美元,当前接近 3.5 亿美元。

LD Capital:厚积薄发的新公链Sui

来源:DefiLlama

Sui 生态从最初乏善可陈至今变得蓬勃发展,且不断涌现出热门赛道与热点项目,有良好的生态发展潜力:

(1)Karrier one(Depin): 2024 年 1 月 11 日,Sui Foundation 建立战略合作伙伴关系并进行投资 Karrier One。Karrier One 是一个 Depin 项目,旨在构建一个去中心化的移动网络和电信服务,目标是创建一个社区拥有的运营商级 5 G 网络,提供更高的可访问性、速度、成本效益和安全性。目前正在进行 NFT Mint。

(2)E 4 C(GameFi): 2024 年 1 月 4 日,E 4 C 宣布登陆 Sui 提供移动原生 MOBA 游戏、可持续的游戏内资产所有权以及无缝的资产交易体验。E 4 C 的创始人是被称为亚洲电竞教父的 Johnson Yeh,他自 2015 年起,担任 Riot Games 中国区电子竞技业务负责人,将 LOL 打造中国最大体育项目。后他成为 Riot Games(中国、日本和东南亚)的总经理。还孵化了《英雄联盟手游》、《英雄联盟团战战术手游》、《LPL 电竞经理人》等,后他将 MOBA 游戏带入Web3便诞生了 E 4 C: Final Salvation。

(3)MRC 20-MOVE(智能铭文):在铭文市场火热的时候,MRC 20-MOVE 在 2024 年 1 月 1 日发行,易拓展易组合可燃烧退款的智能铭文概念突然爆火,三天时间内 100 亿个$MOVE 被全部打完,锁仓量超过 100 万 SUI,铸造地址近 5 万。

(4)Solend Protocol-Suilend Protocol(借贷):几周前 Sui 宣布 Solana 上最大的借贷协议 Solend Protocol 将登陆 Sui(同时支持 Solana 和 Sui),称为 Suilend Protocol。Solend Protocol 的创始人认为 Sui 的技术基础对开发者非常友好,围绕 Move 的开发者体验比 Solan 提高了 10 倍。

三、代币情况

1、分配与解锁

Sui 的总供应量为 100 亿枚, 48% 为生态系统储备、 20% 私人投资者、 20% 团队、 9% 基金会、币安 Launchpool 占 3% 。当前流通主要为生态系统,基金会与 Launchpool,流通率为 11% 。

LD Capital:厚积薄发的新公链Sui

来源:Cryptorank

当前市值为 15.15 亿美元,FDV 为 137.59 亿美元, 24 小时交易量为 7.45 亿美元,主要交易场所在币安(25.72% ),Upbit(20.68% ),OKX(12.41% )。在 LD Capital Research 于 1 月 12 日发布的《Sei 的加速发展:并行 EVM 新叙事叠加积极运营》中曾比较新公链之间的数据,Sui 的市值低于 Aptos 与 Sei ,在 Defi 应用的 TVL 上,Sui 高于 Aptos,远高于 Sei。

SUI 近期每月解锁 6600 万枚(9217 万美元),第一次大额投资人解锁在 2024 年 5 月 3 日,将有超过 8 亿枚代币的大量解锁, 6 月开始每月常规解锁 1 亿枚左右的代币。

LD Capital:厚积薄发的新公链Sui

来源:Cryptorank

SUI 代币用例主要有五类:

(1)Sui 平台的原生资产

(2)Gas 费:对所有网络操作收取 Gas 费,用于奖励权益证明机制的参与者并防止垃圾邮件和拒绝服务攻击

(3)存储基金:Sui 存储基金用于跨时间转移权益奖励,并补偿未来验证者先前存储的链上数据的存储成本。

(4)权益证明:委托权益证明机制用于选择、激励和奖励 Sui 验证者以及与其权益相关的 SUI 所有者的诚实行为。

(5)投票链上投票用于治理和协议升级。

2、期现货数据

SUI 的价格自 2023 年 5 月 1 日上币(收盘价 1.2431)至 10 月一直处在下跌状态,自 11 月代币价格开始缓慢拉升, 2024 年 1 月 8 日开始加速上涨,从 0.8 拉升至 1.2506 ,回到 23 年上币价格。从近日的 15 min 线观察到价格在 1.35 – 1.45 区间进行盘整,以 30 日 EMA 为支撑,各技术指标良好,或盘整后进一步上涨。

LD Capital:厚积薄发的新公链Sui

LD Capital:厚积薄发的新公链Sui

来源:Binance

一小时现货挂单情况中, 1.35 左右的买单相对较多,有一定的短期支撑,上方密集卖单为 1.42 , 1.5 左右。

LD Capital:厚积薄发的新公链Sui

来源:MobChart

期货数据上, 30 分钟合约持仓量自高点有一定的下降,多空持仓人数比为 1.06 ,大户持仓多空比 1.33 ,主动买卖笔数有所增加,但买卖额差值变化不大,整体符合盘积蓄力量状态。

LD Capital:厚积薄发的新公链Sui

来源:Coinglass

四、总结

1、Sui 使用的 MOVE 语言具有高拓展性,可编程性佳,速度快费用低等优势,生态蓬勃发展,热点项目涌现。团队技术能力扎实,投资背景较好,具有良好的基本面基础。

2、代币近 3 个月无大额解锁, 5 月份第一次投资人解锁,新公链数据对比有优势。

3、代币价格刚回到 23 年上币价格水平不久,期现货交易量活跃,当前处于盘整或进一步向上突破的趋势里。

Letture associate

NVIDIA CPU Advances, China's RISC-V Responds: Semiconductor Deep Dive - Part Four

NVIDIA is set to launch its new Vera AI data center CPU in China as early as August, with high pricing. While this move offers a new option, it highlights China's continued dependence on foreign-controlled Arm architecture. In response, the Chinese semiconductor industry is increasingly turning to RISC-V as a strategic alternative for achieving high-performance computing autonomy. The article explores the concept of the "impossible triangle" in CPU development—balancing prosperity, control, and autonomy—and posits that RISC-V's open-source, modular nature offers a unique path to achieving all three. While RISC-V is already dominant in embedded systems, the focus is now shifting to data centers and AI workloads. China has become a global hotspot for RISC-V development, driven by AI-driven compute demand, supply chain concerns from export controls, cost benefits of open-source, and strong policy support. Multiple Chinese companies have reportedly crossed the key performance threshold of 15 SPECint per GHz, a benchmark for entering the high-performance CPU club. Progress extends beyond single-core benchmarks. Companies are developing complete computing subsystems, including commercial-grade coherent network-on-chip (NoC) technology and server processors with up to 40 cores that strictly adhere to the RVA23 standard to ensure software compatibility. Real-world applications are emerging in areas like video transcoding and edge AI. However, significant challenges remain. The RISC-V ecosystem faces fragmentation, immature toolchains and verification processes, and gaps in single-core performance and energy efficiency compared to mature x86 and Arm architectures. The formidable software moat, epitomized by NVIDIA's CUDA, is a long-term hurdle. In conclusion, while RISC-V cannot immediately replace offerings like NVIDIA's Vera, it represents a viable long-term path for China to develop a self-sufficient, high-performance CPU ecosystem. The journey is acknowledged to be long and arduous, requiring sustained effort to overcome technical and ecosystem challenges.

marsbit2 h fa

NVIDIA CPU Advances, China's RISC-V Responds: Semiconductor Deep Dive - Part Four

marsbit2 h fa

My Coding Betting Dashboard is Profiting, but Polymarket is Truly Not a Good Place for 'Arbitrage'

The author built a custom monitoring dashboard for Polymarket, a prediction market platform, and tested it with $1,600, achieving over 30% returns. However, the core argument is that Polymarket is not a good venue for traditional arbitrage. The dashboard has two main sections: a "Portfolio Dashboard" for tracking active positions with key metrics like total capital, P&L, and a risk-control module using a tier system (T1, T2, T3), and an "Opportunity Watchlist" for monitoring markets. The article details a critical structural trap in binary markets: a bet with a high perceived probability of success still carries a 100% loss risk if wrong. The author's T1/T2/T3 system is designed to manage this by limiting position sizes based on conviction and time horizon, emphasizing that high confidence should not equal high concentration. A key insight is the danger of "pseudo-diversification"—betting on different markets driven by the same underlying variable. The author concludes that Polymarket offers few true low-risk, arbitrage opportunities. It is instead a high-risk environment where wins can create a false sense of mastery, leading to large losses. The platform is better viewed as a training ground for honing judgment through disciplined, framework-driven betting rather than a reliable income source. The tools help transform intuition into structured, rule-based decisions to mitigate the risk of catastrophic errors.

marsbit5 h fa

My Coding Betting Dashboard is Profiting, but Polymarket is Truly Not a Good Place for 'Arbitrage'

marsbit5 h fa

WeChat AI Card Hands-On Guide: Has the AI Shopping Era Arrived?

**"WeChat AI Card" Practical Test Guide: Has the Era of AI Shopping Arrived?** WeChat has officially launched the "AI Exclusive Card," a feature integrated into its Workbuddy AI assistant. This card is designed to handle payments for AI-initiated purchases. Our hands-on test reveals it's not yet a tool for fully autonomous AI shopping, but rather a controlled payment layer for AI agents. The AI Card functions as an isolated sub-wallet within WeChat Pay. Users must bind the card and transfer funds into it from their main wallet. Crucially, every transaction requires explicit user confirmation via smartphone scan; AI cannot spend autonomously. Currently accessible through the Workbuddy agent, the card targets specific digital consumption scenarios: purchasing paid content (reports, data), calling paid APIs/tools, and subscribing to services. Its design prioritizes security and control by separating funds and mandating approval for each payment. We tested a real-world scenario: ordering bubble tea via Workbuddy using a "Meituan Life Assistant" skill. The process encountered multiple hurdles: high "skill" usage costs (exceeding daily free credits), and most importantly, while a payment was successfully initiated, the AI purchased an incorrect product (a mismatched group-buy coupon instead of the desired drink). This highlights the current limitation: the **AI Card only solves the payment step**. The broader challenge lies in the **AI agent's execution chain**—accurately understanding intent, navigating third-party platforms, selecting the right product, and ensuring proper fulfillment. The payment succeeded, but the purchase failed to meet the user's need. In conclusion, the WeChat AI Exclusive Card is a cautious, early-step experiment in AI commerce. It provides a secure, user-controlled payment method for agent interactions but is not yet capable of reliable, end-to-end complex purchases. For now, it's best used for low-value, low-risk digital services with careful user verification at each step. The vision of AI handling complete shopping tasks remains a work in progress.

marsbit8 h fa

WeChat AI Card Hands-On Guide: Has the AI Shopping Era Arrived?

marsbit8 h fa

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片