India's Digital Rupee Crossed a Million Transactions in 1 Day With Some Help From Banks

CoinDeskPolicyPubblicato 2024-01-03Pubblicato ultima volta 2024-01-04

Introduzione

The retail CBDC pilot is active in more than 15 cities with more than a dozen banks participating.

India's central bank digital currency, the digital rupee, crossed a million transactions in a day on Dec. 27, 2023 – but with at least a little help from retail banks' own employees.

CoinDesk has viewed a letter dated Dec. 29 by the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) Governor Shaktikanta Das to staff that said the usage of the e-rupee (CBDC) "exceeded the milestone of 1 million transactions in a day on Dec. 27, 2023." A separate letter from one of the banks participating in the e-rupee pilot said it had been encouraged it to deposit employee funds and benefits using the CBDC, rather than use the existing fiat currency.

10

The usage of the word "day" reflects this was a one-time milestone and it is not a daily occurrence yet. However, the stated original target was 1 million transactions per day by the end of 2023. It isn't clear whether usage has hit a daily transaction volume of more than 1 million.

Advertisement
Advertisement

The RBI is running both retail and wholesale CBDC pilots. The retail CBDC pilot is active in more than 15 cities with more than a dozen banks participating. The pilot began on Dec. 1, 2022 but the RBI has not announced a timeline for rolling out a full-scale retail CBDC. India already has a ubiquitous cashless movement: the Unified Payments Interface (UPI). As a result, the digital rupee has struggled to reach high transaction volumes, averaging only around 25,000 a day. The RBI has been trying to increase its transaction volumes for the past few months, a source told CoinDesk previously.

The 1 million transactions milestone for one day was achieved after some government-owned and private sector banks deposited the salaries and benefits of their employees into their CBDC wallets last month, according to Reuters. The report named HDFC Bank, Kotak Mahindra Bank, Axis Bank, Canara Bank and IDFC First Bank.

Another report said one of those banks was also Union Bank of India, a government-owned entity.

Advertisement
Advertisement

“With an aim to promote CBDC wallet transactions, banks have been advised to encourage all staff members to transact using the digital currency and ensure 100% staff registration on digital rupee app,” the bank said in a communication to employees on December 26.

Bank management had decided to credit newspaper allowance directly to the CBDC wallet as a start. The bank advised all its employees to register on the bank’s digital rupee app.

The report also stated that the All India Union Bank Employees Federation – a trade union for bank employees – is unhappy with the move, saying that the management cannot compel employees to use the wallet. The body didn't immediately respond to a CoinDesk request for comment.

A representative from a separate group, the All India Union Bank Employees Association, struck a different tone in an interview with CoinDesk. The Association's general Secretary, N. Shankar, said the federation was a "minority" body.

"If a bank offers CBDC services to customers why wouldn’t it offer to its employees? There is no issue at all. It is not an inconvenience," he said. "The RBI and the government want to increase wallet account transactions. One way of increasing the transactions is habituating your own staff members’ wallet accounts. That is one way of doing it. There is nothing wrong in that."

Advertisement
Advertisement

The RBI and the banking sector often collaborate on promoting what they consider best practices but it isn't clear whether banks have previously gone this far.

The RBI didn't immediately respond to a CoinDesk request for comment.

Edited by Nikhilesh De.

Letture associate

Never expected that the first tangible application of AI x Crypto is in security auditing

Unexpectedly, the initial major application of AI in the Crypto sphere has turned out to be security auditing. In 2026, DeFi has faced significant security challenges, with 121 hacking incidents resulting in approximately $942 million in losses. While AI was expected to first impact areas like quantitative trading, its initial breakthrough has instead transformed security auditing by drastically lowering the cost and skill barrier for finding smart contract vulnerabilities. The traditional audit model is facing obsolescence. Advanced AI models, such as Claude Mythos, enable attackers to scan thousands of contracts and identify vulnerability patterns at scale, compressing the time from discovery to execution to mere minutes. This renders the month-long validity of traditional audit reports ineffective. Notably, attacks now frequently target well-audited, established protocols by exploiting business logic flaws, operational security weaknesses, and even years-old historical contracts, demonstrating that old audit reports offer zero protection. This pressure is forcing a fundamental shift in the industry. In the short term, a wave of defensive re-auditing is occurring, driven by projects seeking to meet new AI-era security standards and regulatory requirements. In the long run, audit firms' business models are diverging. The one-time report delivery model is declining in value, as evidenced by platforms like Code4rena shutting down. Leading firms are now pivoting towards AI-powered defense, integrating continuous monitoring, real-time on-chain risk detection, and embedding security directly into the development phase, as seen with tools like OpenZeppelin's Skills system. Ultimately, the era of "audit once, secure forever" is over. Security must become a continuous, embedded infrastructure investment for projects. For audit companies, survival depends on proactively transforming from traditional service providers into platforms offering AI-native, ongoing security solutions.

链捕手5 min fa

Never expected that the first tangible application of AI x Crypto is in security auditing

链捕手5 min fa

Who's Paying for the $64 Billion Paper Feast?

"The Illusion of Wealth: Who Bears the Burden of the $64 Billion Paper Bonanza?" Bitcoin recently broke below the critical $60,000 support level, triggering significant selling by major holders. While the price drop itself is concerning, a deeper issue lies with publicly traded companies that have bet their entire balance sheets on Bitcoin, creating a precarious financial link between their stock prices and crypto valuations. Leading the pack is Strategy (formerly MicroStrategy), holding 847,000 BTC at an average cost of ~$75,600, now facing over 20% unrealized losses. Its stock trades at a deep discount to its Bitcoin holdings. Other companies like Japan's Metaplanet (nearly 40% unrealized loss) and Solmate (which fully pivoted to Solana and saw its stock collapse 98%) illustrate the risks of this model without underlying business operations. A key misconception is that these firms face immediate, forced liquidation. Their debt structures provide a buffer. However, the core "financial flywheel" is stalling. Strategy's CEO has even hinted at potentially selling Bitcoin to cover obligations—a reversal of his long-standing "never sell" doctrine. New accounting rules (ASU 2023-08) exacerbate the problem, requiring quarterly mark-to-market adjustments. Bull markets create paper profits, attracting capital. In bear markets, they generate massive paper losses, potentially triggering index exclusions and forced selling by passive funds. The true crisis point is not the current price, but a looming debt reckoning. If Bitcoin fails to recover above key cost bases within 12-24 months, convertible note redemption windows opening in Fall 2027 could force companies to sell massive Bitcoin holdings for cash, potentially triggering a severe liquidity crisis. The model hasn't eliminated risk; it has merely transformed instant, price-triggered liquidation into a slow-burning, time-triggered debt crisis.

marsbit16 min fa

Who's Paying for the $64 Billion Paper Feast?

marsbit16 min fa

Base Halts for Two Hours: A Single Invalid Block Reveals the Centralized Reality of L2s

Base, an Ethereum Layer-2 Rollup, experienced a two-hour network outage starting around 00:03 UTC on June 26. The halt was caused by a consensus issue that led to an invalid block being sequenced, which prevented the generation of new blocks after block 47806542. The team identified the problem, restored block sequencing by 01:51 UTC, and confirmed full recovery of ecosystem infrastructure synchronization shortly after. This incident highlights the operational reality for many L2s: while they leverage Ethereum for security and data availability, their day-to-day usability heavily depends on their sequencer and internal systems. Base employs a high-availability sequencer system with one active leader, but this setup did not prevent the outage when a consensus-level problem arose. This follows a previous 33-minute outage in August 2025 related to a faulty sequencer handover process. The downtime occurred near the scheduled activation window for the "Beryl" network upgrade, which has since been postponed. Beryl introduces the native B20 token standard, among other improvements. The incident has sparked renewed discussion about Base potentially launching its own network token in the future, shifting the conversation from mere speculation to questions about how a token might relate to sequencer decentralization, governance, and accountability in such failure scenarios.

Foresight News36 min fa

Base Halts for Two Hours: A Single Invalid Block Reveals the Centralized Reality of L2s

Foresight News36 min fa

Trading

Spot
活动图片