ETF审批关口临近,BTC一夜大涨突破4.5万美元

Odaily星球日报Pubblicato 2024-01-02Pubblicato ultima volta 2024-01-02

Introduzione

牛回,速归。

原创 | Odaily星球日报

作者 | Azuma

ETF审批关口临近,BTC一夜大涨突破4.5万美元

随着比特币现货 ETF 的审批关口临近,加密市场情绪继续升温。

昨晚至今晨,市场再次迎来大幅上涨。欧易 OKX 行情显示,BTC 短时突破 45000 USDT,最高一度触及 45406.7 USDT, 24 小时涨幅 5.66% ;ETH 则一路逼近 2400 USDT,最高一度触及 2397.76 USDT, 24 小时涨幅 2.7% 。

除 BTC、ETH 外,部分近期势头强劲的 Alt-coin 也延续了亮眼的表现,截至发文,SOL 暂报 111.57 USDT, 24 小时涨幅 7.4% ;ARB 暂报  1.74 USDT, 24 小时涨幅 9.8% ;TIA 暂报 13.85 USDT, 24 小时涨幅 14.8% ;SEI 暂报 0.7879 USDT, 24 小时涨幅 35.19% 。

受整体行情上行影响,加密货币总市值也迅猛增长。CoinGecko 数据显示,目前加密总市值突破 1.81 万亿美元, 24 小时上涨 4.8% 。加密用户交易热情亦明显上升,今日恐慌与贪婪指数已达 71 ,等级为“贪婪”。

衍生品交易方面,Coinglass 数据显示,过去 12 小时全网爆仓 1.11 亿美元,其中绝大部分为空单爆仓,数额达 9292.59 万美元。从币种来看,其中 BTC 爆仓 5705 万美元,ETH 爆仓 1440 万美元。

ETF 审批关口临近

环顾消息面,当下对于市场走势影响最为显著的莫过于比特币现货 ETF 的审批动态。

截至上周五,包括贝莱德、VanEckValkyrieBitwiseFidelityWisdomTreeArk、 21 Shares 在内的多家 ETF 发行申请方均已向监管机构提交了最新的申请文件,完善说明了关于授权参与商(Authorized Participant,即承销商)的细节安排,以确保 ETF 上线之后的交易流动性。

根据申请规定,美国证券交易委员会(SEC)对于上述多支 ETF 申请的最终审批截止日为 1 月 10 日,这也意味着 SEC 必须在 1 月 10 日之前就“批准”或“拒绝”作出抉择。

此前,多位 ETF 专家均曾预测过 SEC 做出最终审批的时间窗口。The ETF Store 总裁 Nate Geraci 认为 SEC 最早可能在 1 月 2 日(今天!)便做出决定;彭博分析师 James Seyffart 则认为 SEC 可能在 1 月 5 日到 1 月 10 日期间发布公告;Swan Bitcoin 首席执行官 Cory Klippsten 预测的时间窗口则是 1 月 8 日至 1 月 10 日。

不过,根据今日早间 FOX 记者 Eleanor Terrett 的最新报道,由于 SEC 仍需时间来审查上周四、周五各大 ETF 申请方所提交的关于授权参与商的更新文件,且需要对此发表评论,同时考虑到自上周五以来 SEC 一直在休新年假期,因此不太可能在本周初(周二、周三)返工之后立即作出关于 ETF 的决定。

ETF审批关口临近,BTC一夜大涨突破4.5万美元

  • Odaily 星球日报注:有消息称“贝莱德透露 SEC 可能会在周末做出决定”,该消息实为误报,另一位 FOX 记者 Charles Gasparino 确认贝莱德已被 SEC 下发了静默令,不会就此事发表评论。

从期权市场的结构来看,市场似乎也更加倾向于 Eleanor 的说法,Greeks.live 宏观研究员 Adam 在 X 平台发文表示:“尽管市场有传言本周 BTC 现货 ETF 可能通过,但是期权市场数据显示 IV 最高的仍然是 1 月 12 日到期的期权。目前 1 月 12 日到期的平值期权 IV 接近 70% ,明显高于假期前,且显著高于中远期 IV 60% 的平均水平,机构投资者仍认为第二周(即更接近 1 月 10 日)会是 ETF 消息落地的时间点。

ETF审批关口临近,BTC一夜大涨突破4.5万美元

yes or no?仍是未知数

尽管从当下的投资情绪来看,市场似乎对于比特币现货 ETF 的获批普遍抱以积极态度,但正如 Eleanor 所强调的:“SEC 是不可预测的。”

在 SEC 做出最终决策之前,没有人知道审批的结果是 yes 还是 no。

上周,SEC 互联网执法办公室前主任 John Reed Stark 结合其个人在 SEC 长达 20 年的工作经验就此事的结果进行了评论。John 表示,尽管其个人持反对态度,但如果过去一段时间关于 SEC 和所有 ETF 申请方之间会面讨论的报道都是真实的,那么根据其个人经验,SEC 批准现货比特币 ETF 似乎是可能的。

但与此同时,市面之上也有一些声音认为 SEC 暂时仍不会打开绿灯,比如 LD Capital 联合创始人 Joy Lou 就表示:“我认为不会过,BTC 价格也不会有很大波动。”

最终的结果究竟如何?八天之内,分晓立见。

Letture associate

Why Is the World Nervous About Japan Raising Interest Rates?

In June 2026, the Bank of Japan raised its policy rate to 1%, marking its first hike to this level since 1995. While this rate remains low compared to global peers like the US and Europe, the move signals a profound shift for a nation that has been a global source of ultra-cheap funding for decades. Japan's long-standing near-zero or negative interest rates had facilitated massive "yen carry trades," where international investors borrowed low-cost yen to invest in higher-yielding assets worldwide, such as US tech stocks and emerging market bonds. This made Japan a critical, often overlooked, source of global liquidity. Japan's ultra-loose policy stemmed from structural challenges post-1990s asset bubble: aging demographics, chronic low inflation/deflation, and high public debt. Recent shifts, including sustained wage growth (exceeding 5% in recent years) and inflation consistently above the 2% target, have created a "wage-price spiral" possibility, prompting the policy normalization. The global market's concern lies not in the absolute rate but in the potential unwinding of the yen carry trade. As Japanese borrowing costs rise, the economics of these leveraged global investments change, potentially triggering deleveraging and capital outflows from risk assets. Market anxiety focuses on the end of a thirty-year consensus that Japan would perpetually provide cheap funding. Ultimately, the global impact will depend on the interplay with US monetary policy. While Japan is tightening, the significant interest rate differential with the US remains. The key future dynamic is whether simultaneous Japanese hikes and eventual US rate cuts will narrow this gap, forcing a major recalibration of global capital flows and asset pricing built on an era of abundant, cheap yen liquidity.

marsbit2 h fa

Why Is the World Nervous About Japan Raising Interest Rates?

marsbit2 h fa

Research Report Analysis: MRVL's Optical AI Booming, Why High Valuation Keeps Morgan Stanley's Star Analyst Sidelined?

Report Recap: MRVL Optical AI Boom - Why High Valuation Led Morgan Stanley's Star Analyst to Stay Neutral? Morgan Stanley analyst Joseph Moore maintained an "Equal-weight" (Neutral) rating on Marvell Technology (MRVL) on May 28, raising the price target from $172 to $195, below the trading price. This stance comes despite Marvell reporting a record quarter and significantly raising its full-year outlook (FY27 revenue ~$11.5B, up ~40%). Moore's neutral view is based on valuation. The $195 target implies ~40x CY2027 P/E. He contrasts MRVL with NVDA: both trade near ~$200, but Nvidia's forward EPS is more than double Marvell's. For MRVL's valuation to hold, it needs consistent earnings upgrades, proof of networking market share gains, or certainty on large-scale custom AI chip shipments—none of which are confirmed yet. Growth is driven by two pillars: **1) Optical Interconnect** (the faster runner): Moore raised FY27 growth expectations to >70%, with the optical module product line nearing a $1B annualized run rate. **2) Custom AI Chips** (the climber): Confidence in FY28 is growing, but a major new customer project only ramps in FY28, with no current revenue visibility. Key risks are the underperforming Storage, Enterprise, and legacy Networking segments. Moore acknowledges the real AI opportunity but believes the current price already reflects it. For the stock to work from here, investors need to see the optical business hit its targets, custom chips ramp as planned, and a recovery in the weaker business units.

marsbit3 h fa

Research Report Analysis: MRVL's Optical AI Booming, Why High Valuation Keeps Morgan Stanley's Star Analyst Sidelined?

marsbit3 h fa

qinbaFrank: Review and Outlook of the AI Computing Power Wave — From the Three Debates on NVIDIA to Optical Interconnect and SpaceX IPO, How is Capital Rotating?

**Summary: Retrospective and Outlook on the AI Computing Wave - A Framework for Capital Rotation** Based on a presentation by investor qinbaFrank, this analysis reviews the AI computing market trajectory since 2023 and outlines a forward-looking framework. **Key Phases and Market Debates:** The AI bull market progressed through three major debates: 1) The necessity of massive capital expenditure (late 2023). 2) The sustainability of tech giants' spending (early 2024-early 2025). 3) Potential overestimation of compute needs (early 2025). Consensus solidified in late 2025 as model capabilities and utility demonstrably improved. **Core Thesis: Penetration Rate Drives Commercialization.** Unlike the 2000 dot-com bubble, the current AI wave benefits from mature digital infrastructure, enabling faster adoption. The critical threshold is 10% penetration; surpassing it (with recent enterprise intent surveys showing ~18%) indicates entry into a rapid growth "golden period" where user scale and willingness to pay increase simultaneously. **AI vs. Internet: A Fundamental Difference.** While the internet enhanced connection efficiency, AI directly substitutes human cognition and labor. Once AI performance exceeds the "societal average" human level, its commercial value scales exponentially as payment shifts from human labor costs to AI service fees. **Investment Logic Evolution in the Compute Chain.** The focus has expanded from GPUs to a systemic re-rating of the entire hardware stack: storage/HBM, CPUs, interconnects, power, and advanced packaging. The framework is: **short-term "scarcity pricing," mid-term "upgrade pricing" (e.g., optical interconnects, power networks), and long-term "Physical AI" pricing** (edge computing, robotics). **Market Focus Shift and Adjustment Framework.** The market is transitioning from "hardware scarcity" to "commercialization validation." The ultimate anchor for the narrative is sustained high growth in model providers' Annual Recurring Revenue (ARR) and cloud business revenue, which justifies continued capital expenditure. Adjustments are categorized into three levels: * **L1 (Minor):** Driven by valuation compression or macro noise (e.g., single CPI print). Fundamentals intact. * **L2 (Moderate):** Triggered by significant macro events requiring risk repricing. Requires new data for confidence restoration. * **L3 (Major):** Involves a reset of the core industrial narrative or macro regime (e.g., AI commercialization growth stalling). The **crucial dividing line** is whether AI commercialization growth slows. Without a slowdown, pullbacks are likely L1/L2 "repricing" events. A genuine growth deceleration would signal an L2/L3 narrative reset. **Conclusion: A Foundational Civilizational Leap.** AI represents a foundational upgrade to "intelligence" itself—akin to humanity mastering fire—rather than a single-point industrial revolution. This底层能力跃迁 (underlying capability leap) will spawn successive waves of innovation (Agent, robotics, industry workflow重构). The journey will be波浪式的 (wavelike), driven by cycles of scarcity, technological upgrades, and远期兑现 (long-term realization).

marsbit3 h fa

qinbaFrank: Review and Outlook of the AI Computing Power Wave — From the Three Debates on NVIDIA to Optical Interconnect and SpaceX IPO, How is Capital Rotating?

marsbit3 h fa

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片