SignalPlus波动率专栏(20231221):蝶式,蝶式

Odaily星球日报Pubblicato 2023-12-21Pubblicato ultima volta 2023-12-21

Introduzione

数字货币币价今日持续上行,BTC有再度向45000阻力位发起挑战的趋势,但从期权的角度看,其隐含波动率曲线并未有太大变化,反观ETH IV则是在滞后一天后下行与BTC靠拢,前端IV与BTC的差值逆转成负数。

SignalPlus波动率专栏(20231221):蝶式,蝶式

SignalPlus波动率专栏(20231221):蝶式,蝶式

昨日(20 Dec)美债收益率持续下跌,亚盘开市后逐渐收复部分失地,两年期/十年期收益率现报 4.377% /3.886% 。美三大股指尾盘走低,道指和纳指的九日连涨遭到终结,分别下跌 1.27% /1.5% ,标普收跌 1.47% 。另一方面,因美国上周原油库存意外增加,燃料库存增幅超过预期以及石油产量创新纪录等影响,国际油价有所回调,WTI 和布伦特原油分别收跌 0.53% /0.24% 。

SignalPlus波动率专栏(20231221):蝶式,蝶式

Source: SignalPlus, Economic Calendar

SignalPlus波动率专栏(20231221):蝶式,蝶式

Source: Binance & TradingView

数字货币币价今日持续上行,BTC 有再度向 45000 阻力位发起挑战的趋势,但从期权的角度看,其隐含波动率曲线并未有太大变化,反观 ETH IV 则是在滞后一天后下行与 BTC 靠拢,前端 IV 与 BTC 的差值逆转成负数。

交易方面,BTC 的成交量罕见地被大宗蝶式策略占领,具体来看,明年六月的 Short 40000-55000-80000 Fly 是在平仓获利 40000-C 的同时继续建仓了一对看涨价差,而十二月底的 Long 45000-47500-50000 Fly 则是由买入 45000-C 作为起点同时向上卖出 47500-C,并买下 50000-C 作为极端行情保护。ETH 成交热点主要集中在 5 Jan 2100/2050-P vs 26 Jan 1600-P 的三角看跌策略博弈,其中卖出短期 Put 这个方向的交易总量大约是另一边的两倍。

SignalPlus波动率专栏(20231221):蝶式,蝶式

Source: Deribit (截至 21 DEC 16: 00 UTC+ 8)

SignalPlus波动率专栏(20231221):蝶式,蝶式

Source: SignalPlus

SignalPlus波动率专栏(20231221):蝶式,蝶式

Source: Deribit Block Trade

SignalPlus波动率专栏(20231221):蝶式,蝶式

Source: Deribit Block Trade

SignalPlus波动率专栏(20231221):蝶式,蝶式

您可在 ChatGPT 4.0 的 Plugin Store 搜索 SignalPlus ,获取实时加密资讯。如果想即时收到我们的更新,欢迎关注我们的推特账号@SignalPlus_Web3 ,或者加入我们的微信群(添加小助手微信:xdengalin)、Telegram 群以及 Discord 社群,和更多朋友一起交流互动。

SignalPlus Official Website:https://www.signalplus.com

Letture associate

If the AI Bubble Is Already Bursting, Who Will Truly Remain?

**Summary: If the AI Bubble is Bursting, What Will Remain?** The debate around an AI bubble is intensifying, with figures like Ray Dalio warning of high valuations while Jensen Huang sees immense opportunity. This echoes the dot-com bubble, which saw massive wealth destruction but ultimately left behind critical infrastructure like undersea cables and broadband, enabling future giants like Amazon and Netflix. Similarly, today's AI boom involves trillions invested in data centers, power, cooling, and GPUs, while application-layer revenue remains comparatively modest. This investment-disparity signals a bubble. However, the core technological progress is real and accelerating. AI inference costs have plummeted by over 99.7% since 2023, making intelligence increasingly cheap and accessible. This cost collapse is unlocking vast new demand. Instead of reducing spending, enterprises are tripling their AI cloud expenditure. Cheap "tokens" enable AI to move beyond simple chatbots into complex workflows—automating code writing, legal document review, financial analysis, and scientific research. This follows "Jevons's paradox": improved efficiency leads to greater total consumption. The market is now undergoing a necessary purification, weeding out "API-wrapper" startups with no real moat. The deeper evolution involves a shift from capital expenditure (CapEx) on infrastructure to operational expenditure (OpEx) on value-creation in applications. While hardware vendors currently profit most, long-term value will migrate to AI-native firms solving vertical industry problems. Ultimately, a market correction will cleanse speculative excess but will not reverse the AI+ trend. The massive physical and algorithmic infrastructure being built will endure, becoming a cheap, utility-like foundation. Just as the internet became indispensable to all industries post-2000, AI is poised to empower and redefine every sector, moving society irreversibly toward an intelligence-augmented era. The bubble may burst, but the underlying productive momentum is solid.

链捕手3 min fa

If the AI Bubble Is Already Bursting, Who Will Truly Remain?

链捕手3 min fa

Microsoft CEO: In the AI Era, How Do You Define a Company's Moat?

Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella argues that in the AI era, a company's true competitive edge, or "moat," is not determined by choosing the single most powerful model, but by its ability to build a continuous "learning loop." This system integrates and evolves by connecting human workflows, domain expertise, organizational judgment, and employee experience. He posits that future companies will accumulate two types of capital: Human Capital (employee knowledge, judgment, creativity) and "Token Capital" (a firm's own built and owned AI capabilities). Importantly, AI amplifies rather than devalues human capital. Human direction is essential to guide progress, as computational power alone is aimless. The core opportunity lies in creating a closed-loop system where human and token capital reinforce each other in a compound, self-improving cycle. A company must be able to preserve its unique institutional knowledge—its "company veteran" expertise—even if it switches underlying general-purpose AI models. This requires private evaluation benchmarks, reinforcement learning environments based on internal data, and queryable knowledge bases. Nadella warns against a future where economic value is concentrated by a few dominant models that commoditize entire industries' knowledge. Instead, the priority should be building a broad "frontier ecosystem" where every company, industry, and nation can own its learning loop. This allows organizations to retain control of their intellectual property, amplify employee capabilities, and ensure the economic value created by AI is captured within their own businesses and communities. True corporate sovereignty in the AI age comes from turning organizational knowledge into a compounding system that creates enduring, defensible value.

marsbit38 min fa

Microsoft CEO: In the AI Era, How Do You Define a Company's Moat?

marsbit38 min fa

ETFs Are Just the Ticket: The True Institutionalization of Bitcoin Is Happening Where You Can't See It

Beyond the Bitcoin ETF spotlight, a deeper institutionalization is underway, leveraging Bitcoin as a foundational financial primitive. Institutions are using Bitcoin for purposes long reserved for assets like U.S. Treasuries and gold: as collateral for loans, insurance reserves, and the backbone of rated bonds. Examples include a Barbados-based insurer capitalizing with $40M in Bitcoin reserves and Ledn's $188M securitization of Bitcoin-backed loans, which received the first-ever investment-grade rating (BBB-) from S&P for a digital asset-backed security. This structure was stress-tested during a 27% price drop in early 2026, triggering automatic liquidations that functioned as designed but revealed the systemic risk of synchronized selling across leveraged positions. Infrastructure is evolving to support this, with platforms like Anchorage Digital's Atlas network enabling secure, institutional-grade settlement and collateral management. Strategies like basis trades and corporate treasuries (exemplified by companies like MicroStrategy issuing billions in equity and debt to fund Bitcoin acquisitions) further integrate Bitcoin into financial mechanics. While ETFs solved "how to own" Bitcoin, these developments answer "what to do with it," embedding the asset into the working machinery of finance—as collateral upon which loans, derivatives, and structured products are built. The real, enduring institutional shift is happening in these largely invisible plumbing and financing systems.

marsbit44 min fa

ETFs Are Just the Ticket: The True Institutionalization of Bitcoin Is Happening Where You Can't See It

marsbit44 min fa

ZEC Co-Founder Responds to Orchard Vulnerability: No Signs of Theft, Orchard Pool to Be Sealed

ZEC Co-Founder Addresses Orchard Vulnerability: No Signs of Theft, Plans to Sunset Orchard Pool A security vulnerability was recently discovered in Zcash's Orchard shielded pool, raising key concerns. The primary questions are whether the flaw was exploited, if user funds are safe, whether users can verify the total ZEC supply, and if other similar vulnerabilities exist. Analysis suggests the vulnerability was likely not exploited prior to its discovery. It was found proactively by a researcher using specialized tools, not due to an active breach. The development team and mining pools acted quickly to contain the issue. Typical financially-motivated attacks would likely have left visible on-chain evidence, which has not been observed. User funds in Orchard are considered safe and should be recoverable, assuming no prior exploitation. If the flaw was never used, all legitimate funds can be withdrawn. The article outlines risks associated with moving funds to transparent addresses or other pools, but concludes that leaving assets in place is a reasonable option. Currently, users cannot independently verify that the total ZEC supply hasn't been inflated due to this bug. However, the planned Ironwood network upgrade is designed to resolve this. It will permanently close the Orchard pool to new deposits and internal transfers, allowing only withdrawals. This mechanism will cap total withdrawals at the amount of legitimately deposited funds, enabling anyone to cryptographically verify the supply post-upgrade. Multiple teams, including Shielded Labs, have conducted extensive audits focused on counterfeiting vulnerabilities, assisted by advanced AI tools. No additional flaws of this type have been found so far, increasing confidence that no other similar undisclosed vulnerabilities exist. In summary, evidence indicates the Orchard bug was probably not used, user funds are secure, and no other counterfeiting flaws are currently known. The upcoming Ironwood upgrade will restore users' ability to independently verify the total ZEC supply, closing this chapter.

Foresight News49 min fa

ZEC Co-Founder Responds to Orchard Vulnerability: No Signs of Theft, Orchard Pool to Be Sealed

Foresight News49 min fa

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片