$16.4M flows into XRP, yet price stalls near $2 – Why?

ambcryptoPubblicato 2025-12-13Pubblicato ultima volta 2025-12-13

Introduzione

Despite $16.4 million in net inflows over a 19-day streak and expanding fundamentals, XRP’s price remains compressed near $2.02, trading within a tight ascending triangle. Technical indicators like RSI near 42 and a compressing MACD suggest consolidation rather than a breakdown. Key developments—such as the launch of a spot XRP ETF and Ripple’s acquisition of Rail—strengthen its infrastructure and adoption, including a European bank using Ripple Payments. However, the market has yet to reprice these gains, indicating a potential delayed bullish reaction as positioning builds beneath the surface.

When capital, adoption, and infrastructure grow together, price compression rarely lasts.

Ripple [XRP] remained under pressure despite strengthening underlying signals. Capital continued rotating into the asset while the price stayed muted, keeping XRP at the center of attention as fundamentals expanded faster than market reaction.

The disconnect between growth and price action framed the broader setup that traders monitored closely.

Why does price remain compressed?

At press time, XRP continued trading within the 50% Fibonacci retracement near $2.02, with volatility tightening into an ascending triangle structure.

RSI hovered near 42, reflecting hesitation rather than exhaustion, while MACD compressed and moved closer to a bullish crossover.

Price failed to follow inflows immediately, suggesting absorption instead of distribution, even as some analysts openly floated long-term projections as high as $27 for XRP.

Liquidity stayed concentrated within the current range, suggesting the market was testing patience rather than conviction. If inflows continue without strong follow‐through, the price may eventually be forced to react.

Momentum indicators remained muted but did not signal a breakdown. The RSI held steady in the low 40s, consistent with consolidation rather than trend failure.

Overall, this setup supports the view that XRP is coiling, with positioning quietly building beneath the surface.

Net inflows built without follow-through

XRP recorded $16.42 million in Net Inflows, as of writing, extending a 19-day streak, yet the price response stayed limited.

The launch of the 21Shares’ spot XRP ETF under ticker $TOXR expanded regulated exposure, adding to the flow narrative without triggering immediate repricing.

Historically, XRP has shown periods where capital and access expand first, while price reacts later once positioning completes.

Fundamentals accelerated as price lagged

Ripple’s infrastructure expansion added weight to the setup. The company confirmed completion of the Rail acquisition, strengthening its end-to-end stablecoin and payments stack.

Earlier expansions across custody, treasury intelligence, and prime brokerage continued shaping Ripple into a unified digital asset infrastructure provider.

Ripple also announced the first European bank adoption of Ripple Payments through AMINA Bank, extending real-time cross-border settlement across regulated markets.

These developments widened the gap between XRP’s growing utility footprint and its compressed price behavior.

What’s next for prices

XRP’s structure reflected a familiar sequence where fundamentals and capital flows build first, followed by a delayed price response.

At the time of writing, the focus shifted from growth to timing, as compression persisted while utility and adoption continued advancing.


Final Thoughts

  • Sustained inflows and expanding utility continue to outpace short-term XRP price reaction
  • Ongoing compression reflects timing and positioning as fundamentals build beneath the surface

Letture associate

The Silver Crisis: When the Paper System Begins to Fail

Silver Crisis: When the Paper System Begins to Fail In December, silver became the most volatile asset in the precious metals market, surging from $40 to over $64 per ounce—a year-to-date increase of nearly 110%, far outpacing gold. While the rally appears fundamentally justified—driven by Fed rate cut expectations, industrial demand from solar/EV/AI sectors, and declining global inventories—it masks deeper structural risks. Unlike gold, which is backed by central bank purchases, silver lacks institutional support and has minimal official reserves. Its market is shallow, with a daily trading volume of only $5 billion (vs. gold’s $150 billion), dominated by paper derivatives like futures and ETFs. This makes it vulnerable to volatility and manipulation. The real driver of the rally is a futures squeeze. The market has entered a persistent “backwardation” (futures prices exceeding spot prices), indicating either extreme bullishness or deliberate market manipulation. Physical delivery demands have surged, with COMEX and Shanghai exchange inventories dropping sharply. The system—where paper claims vastly exceed physical silver—is under stress. JPMorgan, a historically dominant player in silver markets, controls ~43% of COMEX silver inventory and acts as custodian for major silver ETFs. Its influence over physical supply and delivery eligibility adds to market fragility. The silver crisis reflects a broader shift: investors are losing faith in financialized paper assets and moving toward physical holdings. This “physicalization” trend, also seen in gold, signals declining trust in traditional financial intermediaries and a reevaluation of monetary security in a deglobalizing world. As the paper system strains, those holding physical silver—and gold—may hold the ultimate advantage.

深潮3 min fa

The Silver Crisis: When the Paper System Begins to Fail

深潮3 min fa

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片