币安内嵌Web3钱包开测,新旧网络界限已打破

Odaily星球日报Pubblicato 2023-11-06Pubblicato ultima volta 2023-11-06

Introduzione

CEX抢占Web3流量入口。

原创 | Odaily星球日报

作者 | 夫如何

币安内嵌Web3钱包开测,新旧网络界限已打破

代表中心化的 CEX 以及代表去中心化的 Web3 钱包,是大多数人参与加密市场必不可少的工具。单近些年,两者的边界逐渐模糊。

以 OKX 为首的交易所打造内置的 Web3 钱包,用户在入金之后,无需转账到其他链上钱包,即可参与链上活动;以 MetaMask 为代表的钱包,将出入金通道集成到自身钱包中,为用户打通全流程业务模式。

当然也有一部分中心化交易所,采用收购或自研 Web3 钱包的方式来布局,比如币安在 2018 年收购 Trust WalletBitget 今年 3 月份收购 BitKeepCoinbase 推出 Coinbase Wallet。

上述项目无论采用哪种方式布局,都是在抢占未来 Web3 的流量阵地。

近期,作为中心化交易所龙头的币安,为交易所内置的 Web3 钱包开启了灰度测试,测试的情况如何?Odaily星球日报对此进行了探究。

币安Web3钱包反响平平,TWT 反而突破新高?

11 月 3 日,根据加密社区反馈,币安 App 内置的 Web3 钱包邀请了一部分用户开启了灰度测试。(Odaily 注:灰度测试是指在某项应用正式发布前,选择特定人群试用,逐步扩大其试用者数量,以便及时发现和纠正其中的问题))

币安 Web3 钱包,是币安 App 中的自托管加密钱包,旨在降低用户进入去中心化金融领域(DeFi)世界的门槛。作为基于区块链的应用程序(dApp)的数字网关,它为用户提供了一个安全和简化的方法来管理他们的加密货币,跨链执行代币交易,赚取收益,并与各种链上生态平台进行交互。

币安 Web3 钱包采用 MPC(多方安全计算)技术管理每一个事务,降低了单点故障的可能性。并且,币安 Web3 钱包采用复杂的安全机制,将产生三个独立的密钥共享,单独存储在包括您的个人云和设备的位置;要访问币安钱包,至少需要两个密钥共享。另外还有其他增强的安全功能,例如错误地址保护和恶意合同检测等,会在交易时通知用户代币和链路是否存在安全风险。

那么,早期测试用户的对此次灰度测试的反馈怎么样呢?

Odaily星球日报搜索发现,社区对于币安 Web3 钱包的反馈较为平淡,有测试过的人在社媒表达,无法导出私钥。但经笔者测试,目前币安 Web3 钱包功能一切正常,用户只需要下载 Google Drive 即可创建钱包密钥。由于币安 Web3 钱包尚处于早期测试阶段,相关配套尚不完善,作者无法做更多的测评体验分享。

币安测试内置 Web3 钱包消息影响,与币安有关的另一个钱包项目——Trust Wallet 在过去几天成为炒作的焦点,价格大幅上升。该项目于 2018 年被币安收购,上涨原因可能与社区所传的「Trust Wallet 帮助币安开发 Web3 钱包」的情绪面有关。

Bitget 行情显示,Trust Wallet 代币 TWT 从 11 月 3 日的 1.1 USDT 一度飙升至最高 1.55 USDT,创今年 2 月中旬以来新高;暂报 1.46 USDT, 24 小时涨幅为 9.4% 。

币安内嵌Web3钱包开测,新旧网络界限已打破

Web2与Web3的界限逐渐模糊

中心化与去中心化的界限在如今的发展中逐渐变得模糊,中心化交易所布局 Web3 钱包,Web3 钱包打通与现实的界限。两者的最终目的,都是为了将用户流量留存到自身体系中。

币安凭借自身交易所的庞大流量,外加上 Trust Wallet、App 内置钱包,将用户 Web3 活动的覆盖面拉满。

不过,币安的内置钱包毕竟刚刚诞生,规模较小,反观 OKX Web3 钱包目前已经发展较为成熟,特别是在比特币生态方面抢占先发优势——OKX CEO Star 还表示未来 OKX Web3钱包可能会成为独立的应用程序。

总而言之,无论是币安和 OKX 为首的中心化交易所,还是 MetaMask 为首的Web3钱包,都在努力打破新旧网络的界限,让新用户更加便捷的进入 Web3。

Letture associate

Near Returns to the AI Stage: Transformation into a Public Chain Due to 'Payroll Difficulties,' Agent and Privacy Emerge as New Growth Narratives

NEAR Returns to AI Origins: From Payroll Struggles to Blockchain, Now Focusing on AI Agents and Privacy NEAR Protocol's journey began not with grand blockchain ambitions, but from a practical hurdle: its AI startup founders, including Transformer paper co-author Illia Polosukhin, couldn't efficiently pay international developers in 2017. This led them to pivot and build a high-performance, scalable blockchain. After years navigating various crypto narratives like sharding and cross-chain interoperability, NEAR is now leveraging its AI roots to re-enter the AI arena. A key driver is its "NEAR Intents" layer, which abstracts complex cross-chain transactions. Users simply state their goal (e.g., swap BTC for ETH), and a solver network finds the optimal route. This system has processed over $20B in cross-chain volume, generating significant fee revenue. A major growth area is private transactions via "Confidential Intents/Swaps," which hide trade details until settlement to protect against MEV and front-running. Remarkably, private swaps recently accounted for over 40% of NEAR's transaction volume, highlighting strong demand but also potential regulatory scrutiny. With its AI-founder pedigree, NEAR is positioning itself at the intersection of blockchain, AI agents, and privacy, aiming to become infrastructure for the emerging agent economy while navigating the challenges of its rapid adoption.

marsbit1 h fa

Near Returns to the AI Stage: Transformation into a Public Chain Due to 'Payroll Difficulties,' Agent and Privacy Emerge as New Growth Narratives

marsbit1 h fa

From Ethereum to AI's 'CROPS': What Exactly is This Set of 'Slow Variables' That Vitalik Repeatedly Emphasizes?

In recent discussions, Vitalik Buterin has frequently emphasized the concept of "CROPS," a framework defining core values for Ethereum's development. CROPS stands for Censorship Resistance, Capture Resistance, Open Source, Privacy, and Security. Initially outlined in the Ethereum Foundation's "EF Mandate," it represents a commitment to user sovereignty, ensuring that the network resists external control, remains open, protects privacy, and prioritizes security. The relevance of CROPS extends beyond Ethereum's foundational principles, becoming crucial in the context of AI integration. As AI agents begin handling wallet operations and automated transactions, the risk increases that users may cede control over their digital assets, privacy, and intentions to centralized AI service providers. A "CROPS AI" would therefore emphasize local execution where possible, privacy-preserving remote model calls (e.g., using zero-knowledge proofs), and transparent, verifiable processes to maintain user agency. Vitalik highlights a significant convergence between "CROPS Ethereum access layer" and "CROPS AI." Both address the same fundamental challenge: how users can access powerful services—be it blockchain data via RPCs or AI models—without exposing sensitive information or relinquishing ultimate control. This intersection points toward a future digital entry point that is more private, secure, and user-controlled. Ultimately, CROPS is not merely an abstract ideal but a practical guidepost. It steers development—from protocol resilience and wallet design to AI agent safety—towards a future where users retain self-sovereignty even as digital systems grow more complex and powerful. In an era of accelerating AI adoption, these "slow variables" of censorship resistance, openness, privacy, and security may define Ethereum's enduring value.

marsbit2 h fa

From Ethereum to AI's 'CROPS': What Exactly is This Set of 'Slow Variables' That Vitalik Repeatedly Emphasizes?

marsbit2 h fa

Silicon Valley 'Startup Guru' Steve Hoffman: Web3 + AI Could Be a Trap

Silicon Valley investor and "Godfather of Startups" Steve Hoffman warns that combining Web3 with AI is likely a trap, not a promising venture. In an interview, Hoffman argues that while AI is a foundational technology touching all industries, Web3 adds complexity, friction, and regulatory risk without solving mainstream consumer or business needs. He advises founders to focus on deep, specialized applications where startups can out-iterate giants, rather than on generic features easily replicated by large tech companies. Hoffman observes that Silicon Valley will lead foundational AI research, while China excels at rapid, large-scale application and commercialization, particularly in robotics. He stresses that AI-driven autonomous agents capable of collaborative, multi-step tasks are 2-4 years away, which will cause significant job displacement. The solution is not to slow AI but to redesign business models around human-AI collaboration and reform social systems like education and retraining. For startups, Hoffman recommends focusing on vertical, expertise-heavy domains to build defensibility. He sees major opportunities in AI fraud detection and cybersecurity. Key founder mindsets include systemic thinking over feature-focus, relentless customer centricity, building adaptive teams, and deeply understanding AI's capabilities and limits. Hoffman is also leading a non-profit initiative to establish university centers aimed at training future leaders in responsible, human-value-aligned AI innovation.

marsbit3 h fa

Silicon Valley 'Startup Guru' Steve Hoffman: Web3 + AI Could Be a Trap

marsbit3 h fa

Token Inefficient, Economy Tokenless

The article "Tokens Aren't Economical, Economics Aren't Tokenized" analyzes a pivotal shift in the AI industry from a technology-driven narrative to one dominated by capital efficiency. It highlights two concurrent trends: a severe capital shortage due to the exorbitant and recurring costs of compute (e.g., OpenAI's high burn rate) and a wave of corporate spin-offs where major tech companies are separating their AI units (like Kuaishou's Kling and Baidu's Kunlunxin). The core argument is that AI's "anti-internet" business model, where user growth increases costs rather than profits, has created a disconnect between high valuations and actual cash flow. Spin-offs address this by allowing AI assets to be valued independently. Within a parent company, they are seen as cost centers, but as standalone entities, they are priced based on their growth potential and scarcity in the primary market, leading to massive valuation premiums (e.g., Kling's estimated value tripling post-spin-off). The industry is at an inflection point, moving from "model worship" to "value realization." The competition is evolving from a pure compute (GPU) race to a broader focus on systemic efficiency and full-stack engineering (involving CPUs and orchestration) to achieve viable commercialization. The year 2026 is framed as a critical moment where the industry must definitively answer how to economically translate AI capability into tangible business value, reshaping the sector's future power structure.

marsbit3 h fa

Token Inefficient, Economy Tokenless

marsbit3 h fa

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片