SocialFi赛道新项目T2T2,能否接棒Friend.tech引领新浪潮 ?

Odaily星球日报Pubblicato 2023-11-02Pubblicato ultima volta 2023-11-02

Introduzione

随着牛市呼声越来越强烈,SocialFi无疑将成为最热门的趋势之一。

原文作者:马丁 Talk

Friend.tech 的出现,在 SocialFi 领域掀起了新一轮的热潮。凭借基于 Key 的权益、联合曲线的社交裂变机制以及 FOMO 效应,Friend.tech 在短期内吸引了大量关注,该协议上线当天就产生了超过 13 万笔交易。在 Friend.tech 取得亮眼的成绩的后,SocialFi 应用如 Words.art,Stars Arena,Post.tech 等纷纷涌现,其中也包括即将在Bitget 新一期 LaunchPad 上线的新项目 T2T2 。

T2T2 与上述 SocialFi 应用存在显著差异,显示出强劲的增长潜力。今天,我们将深入探讨这个项目。

1. 功能层面

与 Friend.tech 一样,T2T2 也采用了联合曲线模型。Friend.tech 规模性吸引用户的关键就在于此,但其功能抓手较为单一,并没有为进一步建立新的延伸场景而作过多的设计,这也让注意力仅仅能够在小范围内转化为价值,发展上限存在一定的瓶颈。

T2T2在 Friend.tech 的买卖 Keys 模式上,新引入了聊天室为用户提供了更为丰富的在线社交机会。通过与推特的连接,用户可以实时获取到 New Posts 榜单的信息,进一步增强了社交体验。

其次,T2T2 正在构建一个全民参与的粉丝经济体系,它激励用户通过交易朋友房间的 Key,将 Key 视为一种全新的社交关系资产,创造新的社交关系,实现社交关系和经济价值的紧密结合。T2T2 推出的“Learn to Earn”玩法允许用户学习特定知识并获得$T−Point 积分;而“Task to Earn”玩法使 T2T2 具备了Web3任务平台的应用前景。Web3项目方发布特定任务后,用户完成任务即可获得包括$T-Point 积分、代币、NFT、TAT 和白名单特权等在内的多种奖励。

2. 社交属性

深入研究会发现,Friend.tech 等 SocialFi 产品实现用户留存的关键因素在于联合曲线带来的收益预期以及 KOL 自身的影响力。然而,当房间内的 Key 价值不断攀升时,新用户进入房间的成本会变得极高,而早期用户更倾向于套现离场,长期来看,这种模式容易陷入死亡螺旋。因此,这种简单的纽带难以让应用与用户建立长期粘性关系。

相比之下,T2T2 的定位更偏向于社交化,即成为好友、家庭亲友等群体建立社交联系的工具。用户可以通过Web2社交图谱来建立以家庭、爱好喜好等为纽带的小规模房间进行特定范围的社交交流(类似于微信上的聊天群)。未来,T2T2 中可能会涌现大量零散的小规模房间,其他用户加入其中的成本相对较低,并且持有者因更为具象化的社交关系而更倾向于长期持有 Key。这样可以让用户回归到社交的乐趣中,而投机将不再是用户加入房间的主要目的。

3. 裂变效应

T2T2 的另一个独特之处在于,它既兼顾了基于联合曲线的 SocialFi 裂变效应,同时新引入的“Task to Earn”、“Learn to Earn”等新玩法使其生态更加多元化。这使得 Web3 营销与全新的 SocialFi 模型相结合成为可能,并促进私域流量转化为公域流量。这不仅能够提高用户的粘性和留存率,作为全新的 Web3 项目营销工具,T2T2 在帮助 Web3 项目与用户进一步绑定的同时,也能通过与 Web3 项目的长期合作中,捕获 Web3 项目的用户。

结语

SocialFi 一直被认为是加密行业的热门方向之一,也被视为开启下一轮牛市的重要推动力。

随着 Friend.tech 引发的 SocialFi 热潮,越来越多的项目涌现,为用户带来更丰富的功能和更流畅的社交体验。在这些项目中,T2T2 脱颖而出,它通过融合多个领域和赛道来构建一个社交属性更强的生态。正因如此,Bitget 选择 T2T2 作为新一期的 LaunchPad。

随着牛市呼声越来越强烈,SocialFi 无疑将成为最热门的趋势之一,也期待 T2T2 接下来的发展和表现。

Letture associate

Near Returns to the AI Stage: Transformation into a Public Chain Due to 'Payroll Difficulties,' Agent and Privacy Emerge as New Growth Narratives

NEAR Returns to AI Origins: From Payroll Struggles to Blockchain, Now Focusing on AI Agents and Privacy NEAR Protocol's journey began not with grand blockchain ambitions, but from a practical hurdle: its AI startup founders, including Transformer paper co-author Illia Polosukhin, couldn't efficiently pay international developers in 2017. This led them to pivot and build a high-performance, scalable blockchain. After years navigating various crypto narratives like sharding and cross-chain interoperability, NEAR is now leveraging its AI roots to re-enter the AI arena. A key driver is its "NEAR Intents" layer, which abstracts complex cross-chain transactions. Users simply state their goal (e.g., swap BTC for ETH), and a solver network finds the optimal route. This system has processed over $20B in cross-chain volume, generating significant fee revenue. A major growth area is private transactions via "Confidential Intents/Swaps," which hide trade details until settlement to protect against MEV and front-running. Remarkably, private swaps recently accounted for over 40% of NEAR's transaction volume, highlighting strong demand but also potential regulatory scrutiny. With its AI-founder pedigree, NEAR is positioning itself at the intersection of blockchain, AI agents, and privacy, aiming to become infrastructure for the emerging agent economy while navigating the challenges of its rapid adoption.

marsbit1 h fa

Near Returns to the AI Stage: Transformation into a Public Chain Due to 'Payroll Difficulties,' Agent and Privacy Emerge as New Growth Narratives

marsbit1 h fa

From Ethereum to AI's 'CROPS': What Exactly is This Set of 'Slow Variables' That Vitalik Repeatedly Emphasizes?

In recent discussions, Vitalik Buterin has frequently emphasized the concept of "CROPS," a framework defining core values for Ethereum's development. CROPS stands for Censorship Resistance, Capture Resistance, Open Source, Privacy, and Security. Initially outlined in the Ethereum Foundation's "EF Mandate," it represents a commitment to user sovereignty, ensuring that the network resists external control, remains open, protects privacy, and prioritizes security. The relevance of CROPS extends beyond Ethereum's foundational principles, becoming crucial in the context of AI integration. As AI agents begin handling wallet operations and automated transactions, the risk increases that users may cede control over their digital assets, privacy, and intentions to centralized AI service providers. A "CROPS AI" would therefore emphasize local execution where possible, privacy-preserving remote model calls (e.g., using zero-knowledge proofs), and transparent, verifiable processes to maintain user agency. Vitalik highlights a significant convergence between "CROPS Ethereum access layer" and "CROPS AI." Both address the same fundamental challenge: how users can access powerful services—be it blockchain data via RPCs or AI models—without exposing sensitive information or relinquishing ultimate control. This intersection points toward a future digital entry point that is more private, secure, and user-controlled. Ultimately, CROPS is not merely an abstract ideal but a practical guidepost. It steers development—from protocol resilience and wallet design to AI agent safety—towards a future where users retain self-sovereignty even as digital systems grow more complex and powerful. In an era of accelerating AI adoption, these "slow variables" of censorship resistance, openness, privacy, and security may define Ethereum's enduring value.

marsbit1 h fa

From Ethereum to AI's 'CROPS': What Exactly is This Set of 'Slow Variables' That Vitalik Repeatedly Emphasizes?

marsbit1 h fa

Silicon Valley 'Startup Guru' Steve Hoffman: Web3 + AI Could Be a Trap

Silicon Valley investor and "Godfather of Startups" Steve Hoffman warns that combining Web3 with AI is likely a trap, not a promising venture. In an interview, Hoffman argues that while AI is a foundational technology touching all industries, Web3 adds complexity, friction, and regulatory risk without solving mainstream consumer or business needs. He advises founders to focus on deep, specialized applications where startups can out-iterate giants, rather than on generic features easily replicated by large tech companies. Hoffman observes that Silicon Valley will lead foundational AI research, while China excels at rapid, large-scale application and commercialization, particularly in robotics. He stresses that AI-driven autonomous agents capable of collaborative, multi-step tasks are 2-4 years away, which will cause significant job displacement. The solution is not to slow AI but to redesign business models around human-AI collaboration and reform social systems like education and retraining. For startups, Hoffman recommends focusing on vertical, expertise-heavy domains to build defensibility. He sees major opportunities in AI fraud detection and cybersecurity. Key founder mindsets include systemic thinking over feature-focus, relentless customer centricity, building adaptive teams, and deeply understanding AI's capabilities and limits. Hoffman is also leading a non-profit initiative to establish university centers aimed at training future leaders in responsible, human-value-aligned AI innovation.

marsbit2 h fa

Silicon Valley 'Startup Guru' Steve Hoffman: Web3 + AI Could Be a Trap

marsbit2 h fa

Token Inefficient, Economy Tokenless

The article "Tokens Aren't Economical, Economics Aren't Tokenized" analyzes a pivotal shift in the AI industry from a technology-driven narrative to one dominated by capital efficiency. It highlights two concurrent trends: a severe capital shortage due to the exorbitant and recurring costs of compute (e.g., OpenAI's high burn rate) and a wave of corporate spin-offs where major tech companies are separating their AI units (like Kuaishou's Kling and Baidu's Kunlunxin). The core argument is that AI's "anti-internet" business model, where user growth increases costs rather than profits, has created a disconnect between high valuations and actual cash flow. Spin-offs address this by allowing AI assets to be valued independently. Within a parent company, they are seen as cost centers, but as standalone entities, they are priced based on their growth potential and scarcity in the primary market, leading to massive valuation premiums (e.g., Kling's estimated value tripling post-spin-off). The industry is at an inflection point, moving from "model worship" to "value realization." The competition is evolving from a pure compute (GPU) race to a broader focus on systemic efficiency and full-stack engineering (involving CPUs and orchestration) to achieve viable commercialization. The year 2026 is framed as a critical moment where the industry must definitively answer how to economically translate AI capability into tangible business value, reshaping the sector's future power structure.

marsbit2 h fa

Token Inefficient, Economy Tokenless

marsbit2 h fa

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片