FTX审判做结案陈词,SBF或面临115年监禁

Odaily星球日报Pubblicato 2023-11-02Pubblicato ultima volta 2023-11-02

Introduzione

检方:这明显是欺诈;辩方:SBF不是故意的

北京时间 11 月 1 日晚 21 时许,在旷日持久的 FTX 创始人 SBF 刑事欺诈案件审判中,检方与辩方终于进行了结案陈词。结案陈词是庭审过程的关键部分,对于法院的决定具有重大影响,因此律师通常会精心准备并努力说服陪审团或法官支持他们的立场。在双方结案陈词后,法院和陪审团需要耗费几天的时间来做出决定。

从 10 月 3 日正式开启审判以来,SBF 在法庭上多次使用「不清楚」「没记得说过」等说法。而检方也展示出各项证据及证人,以说服法官和 12 人的陪审团对 SBF 定罪。

相关阅读:《SBF 再次出庭为自己作证,审判案迈向终局》

SBF 试图强调,虽然他担任 FTX 首席执行官,但他并不总是了解公司运作方式。他将 Alamede 在 FTX 有几乎无限信贷额度的事归咎于前同事 Nishad Singh 和 Gary Wang。检方结案陈词:「这就是欺诈,简单明了」

11 月 1 日,检察官在结案陈词中声称 SBF 有欺诈和串谋犯欺诈的罪行。检察官 Nicolas Roos 指出:「这就是欺诈,简单明了。在 FTX 之前,就有 Alameda。」

Nicolas 表示,「被告推销清算引擎,称 FTX 是安全的。他告诉国会,抵押品必须放在平台本身上,而不仅仅是质押。但秘密规则允许 Alameda 借入数十亿美元而不存在被清算的风险。」

在检方陈述结案陈词的过程中,同时指出 SBF「失忆 140 次」,同时对核心问题撒谎、躲避。

相关阅读:《SBF 庭审现场:缺席的陪审团,以及「失忆」的主角》

SBF 说的最多的是「我不记得了」。据 WSJ 报道,SBF 在法庭作证表示,他不记得 2022 年曾通过 Signal 消息应用程序与他的高级副手讨论过关闭 Alameda Research 的事宜。当被问及他是否记得关于公司 130 亿美元如何失踪的对话时,他表示「我不记得了。」辩方律师一度「泪流满面」

辩方这边,则试图将 SBF 描绘成一位善意犯下「可怕错误」的企业家,否认他指导核心圈子进行政治捐款和风险投资,以及用客户资金购买豪华房地产的指控。在结案陈词的过程中,辩方律师还因情绪激动,一度「泪流满面」。

据 Cointelegraph 报道,SBF 辩护律师在说服陪审员相信 SBF 是无辜的一事方面面临着严峻的挑战,因为政府提供了大量证据,包括参与该案的官员和执法人员的证词。

FTX审判做结案陈词,SBF或面临115年监禁

在 SBF 代理律师 Mark S. Cohen 的结案陈词中,其要求法庭及陪审团认定 SBF 在经营 FTX 和 Alameda Research 期间始终「善意」行事,因此不能认定其犯有诈骗罪。

是「现实世界的沟通不畅」、「错误」和「延误」伤害了 FTX 和 Bankman-Fried 的加密帝国的其他成员,而不是故意欺诈。萨姆竭尽全力在新市场创办和经营两项价值数十亿美元的企业,有些决定结果很好,有些决定结果很糟糕。

值得注意的是,或许由于检方在辩方之前发表结案陈词,陪审团在检方发表结案陈词的环节「专注聆听」,而在辩方发表结案陈词的时候则「打哈欠」同时显得十分「疲惫」。

SBF 或面临 115 年监禁,最终结果将在数日内公布

本次审判,SBF 面临七项欺诈和共谋欺诈的指控,由 12 人组成的陪审团将在未来几天内决定他的命运。如果罪名成立,SBF 将在监狱服刑 115 年。

BlockBeats此前报道, 12 月 14 日,美国检察官发言人 Nicholas Biase 就已发言称,长达 13 页的起诉书中列出的指控可能会让 SBF 在监狱里待上几十年,SBF 最高将面临 115 年的监禁。

FTX 及 Alameda 相关地址近期共转出 1.7 亿美元

在法庭之外,FTX 的交易记录变得越发频繁。据 BlockBeats 统计,目前 FTX 相关的地址已转出总计价值约 1.7 亿美元的加密资产。 最近一笔转账发生在今日上午,据 Spot On Chain 监测,FTX/Alameda 在过去 7 小时内将价值 4600 万美元的 9 项资产转移到 KrakenBinanceCoinbase

相关阅读:《近7天,FTX卖了哪些币?》

继 25、 26、 27 日,FTX 及 Alameda 相关地址转出 5900 万美元资产之后,刚刚过去的几天中,FTX/Alameda 似乎又加快了操作步伐,至今已转出总计价值约 1.275 亿美元的加密资产。

FTX审判做结案陈词,SBF或面临115年监禁

Letture associate

Anthropic's IPO Launch: Commercial Miracle or Valuation Bubble?

Anthropic has confidentially filed for an IPO, led by Morgan Stanley and Goldman Sachs, potentially going public by October. Following its latest $650 billion funding round, its pre-IPO valuation stands at $965 billion, with projections reaching up to $2 trillion at listing, which would make it the highest-valued private company ever. The article, written by Fu Sheng, addresses skepticism that this represents an AI bubble akin to the 2000 dot-com crash. It argues the current situation differs fundamentally. Unlike the internet bubble era, which relied on speculative narratives with little revenue, Anthropic's valuation is backed by unprecedented, measurable financial performance. Key data points include: * **Revenue Growth:** ARR skyrocketed from $10 billion in early 2025 to $470 billion by May 2026, targeting $100 billion by year-end—a growth curve unmatched in business history. * **Profitability:** It achieved operating profitability in Q2 2026 with an estimated $5.6 billion profit. * **Efficiency:** With ~3,000 employees and ~$470 billion ARR, its revenue per employee exceeds $10 million. Products like Claude Code, launched less than a year ago, already generate $25 billion in annualized revenue. * **Enterprise Adoption:** It boasts a strong enterprise client base, with 8 of the Fortune 10 and over 1,000 large firms spending over $1 million annually on Claude. The valuation is framed using a traditional SaaS model (e.g., a 10x Price-to-Sales multiple on $100 billion revenue). The author contends the core question for analysts has shifted from "How big could this be?" to "How much is it earning and will earn next quarter?" The discussion extends beyond Anthropic to a broader paradigm shift: the transition from a "carbon-based" to a "silicon-based" economy. Companies are increasingly prioritizing investment in compute and AI capabilities over human resources, as these directly scale productivity and competitive advantage. Anthropic's IPO is thus positioned not just as a corporate milestone, but as a price anchor for this new economic era.

链捕手1 h fa

Anthropic's IPO Launch: Commercial Miracle or Valuation Bubble?

链捕手1 h fa

Near Returns to the AI Stage: Transformation into a Public Chain Due to 'Payroll Difficulties,' Agent and Privacy Emerge as New Growth Narratives

NEAR Returns to AI Origins: From Payroll Struggles to Blockchain, Now Focusing on AI Agents and Privacy NEAR Protocol's journey began not with grand blockchain ambitions, but from a practical hurdle: its AI startup founders, including Transformer paper co-author Illia Polosukhin, couldn't efficiently pay international developers in 2017. This led them to pivot and build a high-performance, scalable blockchain. After years navigating various crypto narratives like sharding and cross-chain interoperability, NEAR is now leveraging its AI roots to re-enter the AI arena. A key driver is its "NEAR Intents" layer, which abstracts complex cross-chain transactions. Users simply state their goal (e.g., swap BTC for ETH), and a solver network finds the optimal route. This system has processed over $20B in cross-chain volume, generating significant fee revenue. A major growth area is private transactions via "Confidential Intents/Swaps," which hide trade details until settlement to protect against MEV and front-running. Remarkably, private swaps recently accounted for over 40% of NEAR's transaction volume, highlighting strong demand but also potential regulatory scrutiny. With its AI-founder pedigree, NEAR is positioning itself at the intersection of blockchain, AI agents, and privacy, aiming to become infrastructure for the emerging agent economy while navigating the challenges of its rapid adoption.

marsbit3 h fa

Near Returns to the AI Stage: Transformation into a Public Chain Due to 'Payroll Difficulties,' Agent and Privacy Emerge as New Growth Narratives

marsbit3 h fa

From Ethereum to AI's 'CROPS': What Exactly is This Set of 'Slow Variables' That Vitalik Repeatedly Emphasizes?

In recent discussions, Vitalik Buterin has frequently emphasized the concept of "CROPS," a framework defining core values for Ethereum's development. CROPS stands for Censorship Resistance, Capture Resistance, Open Source, Privacy, and Security. Initially outlined in the Ethereum Foundation's "EF Mandate," it represents a commitment to user sovereignty, ensuring that the network resists external control, remains open, protects privacy, and prioritizes security. The relevance of CROPS extends beyond Ethereum's foundational principles, becoming crucial in the context of AI integration. As AI agents begin handling wallet operations and automated transactions, the risk increases that users may cede control over their digital assets, privacy, and intentions to centralized AI service providers. A "CROPS AI" would therefore emphasize local execution where possible, privacy-preserving remote model calls (e.g., using zero-knowledge proofs), and transparent, verifiable processes to maintain user agency. Vitalik highlights a significant convergence between "CROPS Ethereum access layer" and "CROPS AI." Both address the same fundamental challenge: how users can access powerful services—be it blockchain data via RPCs or AI models—without exposing sensitive information or relinquishing ultimate control. This intersection points toward a future digital entry point that is more private, secure, and user-controlled. Ultimately, CROPS is not merely an abstract ideal but a practical guidepost. It steers development—from protocol resilience and wallet design to AI agent safety—towards a future where users retain self-sovereignty even as digital systems grow more complex and powerful. In an era of accelerating AI adoption, these "slow variables" of censorship resistance, openness, privacy, and security may define Ethereum's enduring value.

marsbit4 h fa

From Ethereum to AI's 'CROPS': What Exactly is This Set of 'Slow Variables' That Vitalik Repeatedly Emphasizes?

marsbit4 h fa

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片