Bitcoin’s Correlation with Traditional Markets and Gold Diminishes: Here’s Why

zycryptoPubblicato 2023-07-10Pubblicato ultima volta 2023-07-10

Introduzione

The correlation between Bitcoin (BTC) and gold, as well as the traditional market continues to be a burning issue. z

The correlation between Bitcoin (BTC) and gold, as well as the traditional market continues to be a burning issue.

According to IntoTheBlock, a shift is being witnessed because the connection between BTC and the traditional market continues to decline.

The market insight provider stated, “Bitcoin Correlation Shift: A month ago, BTC demonstrated an inverse correlation with the stock market and a minor positive link with Gold. Fast forward to today, it’s intriguing to see BTC showing no connection with traditional markets & a negative correlation with gold.”

Source:IntoTheBlock

Glassnode, a leading on-chain metrics provider, shared similar sentiments and acknowledged that Bitcoin’s price action was decoupling from both gold and silver. This was because its 30-day correlation with gold stood at lows of -0.78, whereas that of silver hit -0.9.

Source: Glassnode

What Does the Declining Correlation Mean?

The decoupling of BTC from the stock and traditional market, as well as its negative connection with gold is a welcome move because the leading cryptocurrency is showcasing itself as a different asset class. This might be the case as more big players continue penetrating the Bitcoin market.

Notably, correlation illustrates the tendency of two items to move in a similar or opposite direction after a given period of time.

The comparison between gold and BTC has gained steam over the years, especially when it comes to the issue of being a hedge against inflation or store of value. Bitcoin’s status as an alternative to gold continues to be tested based on its decentralized nature and finite supply.

Previously, Bitcoin showed a strong correlation with the stock market. This was because whenever the stock market experienced a sharp sell-off, BTC followed suit, especially during periods of economic uncertainty, as showcased during the peak of the pandemic in 2020.

Meanwhile, a research report by Bernstein acknowledged that BTC was a ‘faster horse’ than gold. This was after the top cryptocurrency breached the psychological price of $30K for the first time in April since June 2022.

Letture associate

When Real Estate Ownership Goes Digital: What Happens to Your Rights, Risks, and Liquidity?

"Tokenizing Real Estate: Rights, Risks, and the Path to Liquidity" While tokenizing real-world assets (RWA) gains traction, real estate presents unique complexities. Beyond technical token issuance, critical challenges remain: enforcing legal rights, managing the underlying physical asset, and creating genuine secondary market liquidity. This article explores these issues through OneAsset, a Dubai-based commercial real estate (CRE) tokenization platform. OneAsset moves away from simply offering asset fragmentation. Instead, it focuses on institutional-grade infrastructure, prioritizing asset quality, legal enforceability, and operational fundamentals. Each property is held in an independent, single-asset vault, backed by a legally separate Special Purpose Vehicle (SPV) for bankruptcy remoteness. Investors acquire tokens representing the economic rights to a specific property, with precise legal claims defined by the underlying SPV structure. OneAsset emphasizes that tokenization cannot transform a poor-quality asset. Its initial focus is on institutional investors and quality Dubai-based CRE, selected for stable tenant cash flows and a clear regulatory environment. The platform integrates compliance by design, aiming to embed investor qualification and transfer rules directly into the token architecture. A core insight is that asset fragmentation does not automatically create liquidity. True liquidity depends on the asset's inherent quality—its location, cash flow, and valuation—as well as sufficient buyer demand. The goal is not just tradability, but making real estate rights more easily priced, verified, and reallocated. Looking ahead, the article discusses the potential for "AiFi" (AI-powered finance). For AI agents to autonomously allocate capital, investment assets like real estate tokens must become truly "machine-readable." This requires a high degree of standardization in legal rights, valuations, cash flows, and compliance data—a direction OneAsset is pursuing through its structured data reporting. In conclusion, real estate tokenization is shifting from a technology narrative to a focus on asset fundamentals. Blockchain can enhance efficiency and programmability, but it cannot replace sound underwriting, property management, or legal execution. The real work begins after the asset is on-chain.

marsbit22 min fa

When Real Estate Ownership Goes Digital: What Happens to Your Rights, Risks, and Liquidity?

marsbit22 min fa

After Affecting Two Generations, Meta Ordered to Pay $18 Billion in Damages

After more than two decades, a legal parallel has emerged. In 1998, major U.S. tobacco companies settled for $206 billion, leading to strict advertising bans and warning labels that significantly reduced smoking rates. On August 26, 2026, Meta reached a landmark settlement with U.S. attorneys general, agreeing to pay up to approximately $18 billion and implement mandatory changes to Facebook and Instagram. This historic settlement, one of the largest against a tech company, stems from allegations that Meta deliberately designed addictive features like infinite scroll and push notifications, harming youth mental health and violating child privacy laws. Facing a potential $1.4 trillion lawsuit and a series of unfavorable jury verdicts, Meta chose to settle on the eighth day of trial to avoid a catastrophic ruling. The core of the agreement is not just the financial penalty, which Meta will pay over 10 years, but a series of strict, 10-year product mandates for young users. These include a hard two-hour daily time limit (combined across apps), a default "nighttime block" from midnight to 6 AM, restricted notifications during school hours, hidden "like" counts, an optional non-algorithmic feed, and stronger age verification. An independent auditor will monitor compliance. Crucially, roughly 30% ($5.3 billion) of Meta's payment is contingent on YouTube and TikTok adopting similar measures and paying around $5 billion each. This move aims to create an industry-wide standard and prevent Meta from being competitively disadvantaged. The settlement is being likened to Big Tobacco's "tobacco moment." By legally framing addictive algorithm design as a "public nuisance," it sets a powerful precedent. Nearly 3,000 similar cases are pending against other social media giants, signaling a fundamental shift in regulatory pressure. The era where platforms could deny the addictive impact of their designs on children is effectively over.

marsbit28 min fa

After Affecting Two Generations, Meta Ordered to Pay $18 Billion in Damages

marsbit28 min fa

Trading

Spot
活动图片