比特币7月迎开门红,分析师乐观预测4万美元”势在必行”

MarsBitPubblicato 2023-07-04Pubblicato ultima volta 2023-07-04

Introduzione

进一步反弹至4万美元"势在必行"?

比推终端数据显示,比特币价格在周一美股交易时段突破 31,000 美元,触发了投资者和分析师的看涨情绪。

ETF


过去一周,有关现货比特币 ETF 申请以及是否会被美国证券交易委员会(SEC)批准的猜测占领了市场头条,尽管上周五华尔街日报报道称SEC 告知几份 ETF 备案文件信息不全,导致比特币瞬时跳水,但芝加哥期权交易所 (Cboe) 当天晚间迅速重新提交了表格,周一纳斯达克也代表贝莱德更新了申请表格,他们都将 Coinbase 指定为监督共享协议的合作伙伴。
投资公司 CoinShares周一表示,机构投资者正在继续将资金投入加密产品,过去一周资金流入价值 1.25 亿美元,大部分资金都集中在比特币相关的基金中。
进一步反弹至4万美元"势在必行"?
一些分析师认为,考虑到当前的市场情绪,比特币可能很快就会达到 4 万美元大关。
Fairlead Strategies 创始人兼执行合伙人Katie Stockton 在CNBC 的“Squawk Box”节目中预测,比特币可能从目前的交易价格升至 36,000 美元,然后达到40,000 美元。
Ambire Wallet 首席执行官 Ivo Georgiev 对 The Block 表示,尽管人们担心进一步的整体风险,但冲向 40,000 美元的势头应该“很容易达到”。
与此同时,Nexo 联合创始人 Antoni Trenchev 认为 32,000 美元是下一个阻力位,之后比特币可能会进一步飙升。他指出,七月通常是数字资产的好月份。他在推文中表示:“人们很容易忘记,自 FTX 崩溃后,比特币一直在遭受重创,但 7 月初,我们看到它的涨幅达到了 80% 以上。”
Trenchev 将比特币的表现与大多数山寨币市场进行了对比,他认为山寨币仍然面临着被归为证券监管的风险,这个问题至少会持续到今年年底。
他说:“比特币已经超过了 4 月份的高点,而山寨币市场则比 4 月份的水平低了 20%,比 2021 年的高点低了 70%。比特币不必担心监管这类问题,在新的月份和季度开始时,它的韧性和影响力使其与众不同。”
Antoni Trenchev 补充道:“如果 SEC 不抽出时间批准其中一款现货比特币 ETF,这无疑会对加密市场造成不小的影响”。
加密技术分析师 Michael Nauss 指出,自 2021 年历史高点以来,BTC/USD 月度收盘价首次收于调整后成交量加权平均价格 (AVWAP) 以上。
AVWAP 根据交易者的行为来考察重要的支撑位和阻力位,6月收盘价突破 30,000 美元标志着两年来未见的复苏。

ETF


Cubic Analytics 首席执行官 Caleb Franzen 转发了 Nauss 的推文,呼吁市场观察者延长他们的时间偏好。他指出,“当贝莱德 ETF 申请宣布时,比特币的价格约为 2.6 万美元,并升至 3.1 万美元以上的年初至今新高,当前的交易价格仍然高于 3 万美元,是人们失去了理智?并不是,我预测将出现更高的高点和更高的低点。”
比特币的弹性可以应对宏观逆风
不确定的宏观经济和通胀状况,加上美联储看似鹰派,可能会造成短期阻力。
经通胀调整后的美国政府债券收益率正在上升,这让一些观察人士担心股票和更广泛的金融市场潜在的风险厌恶情绪。然而加密分析师预计,比特币和数字资产总体上将保持弹性。

ETF


根据TradingView追踪的数据,上周5年期国债实际收益率升至近2%,突破2022年9月高点1.92%,创2008年底以来最高水平。10 年期国债收益率为 1.6%,已经十分接近 2009 年的数据。同时,两年期国债实际收益率已达到 3%,为至少十年来的最高水平。
美债收益率上升可能会抑制经济增长,并降低投资比特币和黄金等风险资产的吸引力。比特币和华尔街以科技股为主的纳斯达克指数历来与美债收益率走势相反。
加密银行 BCB Group 场外交易主管 Richard Usher认为,最近美债收益率的飙升对股票来说是个问题,而非数字资产。
大多数对美债收益率变化敏感的宏观交易者在去年的暴跌期间离开了加密货币市场,让“长期持有者”掌控了市场。Usher在其文章中写道:“美债收益率现在是股票风险市场的真正替代品。要问的问题是这种回报对哪类投资者有吸引力,加密货币或科技股的典型投资者正在寻求更高的潜在回报,或者正在对该行业或资产类别的增长进行长期投资。因此,我认为美债收益率的上升对蓝筹股来说比科技或加密货币等市场更令人头疼,并且不会扰乱中期增长叙事”。
Jarvis Labs 加密经济研究员Ben Lilly 对Coindesk 表示,从长远来看,不断增加的成本实际上可能会为区块链等生产部门带来更多资本。Lilly 说:“这只是说明了资本成本的正常走向。当传统市场变得坎坷时,许多人倾向于关注加密行业,将加密视为提高生产力的一种方式。我预计这将为智能合约、可编程货币和 DeFi 等创新领域带来更多资金,这些领域有望提高生产力“。

Letture associate

AI PC Battle: Bet on the Toll Booth, Not the Camp

**Title:** The AI PC Battle: Don't Bet on Sides, Bet on the Tollbooth **Summary:** The AI PC competition is moving beyond simple "x86 vs. Arm" narratives. The core investment thesis should focus on identifying which players can sustain margins, cash flow, and pricing power throughout the upgrade cycle, rather than backing a particular architecture. The opportunity is analyzed in three layers: 1. **The Advanced Foundry Tollbooth:** TSMC is positioned to collect "tolls" regardless of which chip designer wins, due to its dominant ~70% share in advanced semiconductor manufacturing, which is essential for high-end AI PC chips. 2. **Compute & Platform Spillover:** AMD represents an offensive in the x86 CPU+GPU space, while NVIDIA leverages its GPU and CUDA software stack dominance. Both benefit from the demand for increased local AI compute. 3. **Architecture Diffusion & Turnaround Plays:** ARM and Intel offer potential for significant upside (elasticity), but investments here require stricter discipline due to higher execution risks and competitive challenges. The industry is transitioning from concept to shipment validation. While short-term forecasts for AI PC adoption have been revised down slightly due to tariffs and procurement delays, the long-term trend towards AI becoming a standard PC feature remains intact. The key driver for upgrade cycles will be whether compelling enterprise applications (e.g., privacy-sensitive computing, low-latency inference) emerge beyond consumer-focused features like meeting summarization. Investment strategy should prioritize companies with platform-level advantages and recurring revenue streams. TSMC offers high certainty as the foundational tollbooth. AMD presents a strong offensive play within the established ecosystem. ARM and Intel are higher-risk, higher-potential-reward turnaround bets. The report cautions against chasing short-term hype and emphasizes a disciplined, long-term approach focused on buying ecosystem strength and cash-flow certainty after market enthusiasm subsides. **Key Risks:** Underwhelming AI PC applications slowing upgrade cycles; slow improvement in Windows on Arm compatibility; macro/tariff impacts on PC demand; potential advanced node supply-demand mismatches affecting TSMC; high overall AI sector valuations making stocks vulnerable to a risk-off shift in markets.

marsbit16 min fa

AI PC Battle: Bet on the Toll Booth, Not the Camp

marsbit16 min fa

Ten-Thousand-Word Analysis: From $10 to $290, MRVL Wins the Entire AI Era by 'Not Making GPUs'

Marvell Technology's stock price surged from under $10 in 2016 to a record $290 in June 2026, fueled not by making GPUs, but by dominating AI infrastructure connectivity. This analysis argues the market misvalues MRVL as merely a smaller Broadcom in custom AI chips, overlooking its true, unique position. Marvell's core strength lies in enabling high-speed data flow for AI clusters through three interconnected businesses. First, it holds a commanding ~70% market share in high-speed optical DSPs (essential for data center light modules), a deep-moat business with accelerating growth. Second, its custom AI chip design business serves hyperscalers like AWS, Microsoft, and Google, with a significant revenue pipeline despite lower margins. Third, stable cash flows come from Ethernet switch chips and enterprise storage controllers. Together, they form a full-stack "AI data movement" platform. CEO Matt Murphy's transformative leadership since 2016, involving strategic divestments, key acquisitions (like Inphi for optical DSPs), and securing long-term agreements with major cloud providers, repositioned the company. A pivotal $2 billion strategic investment from NVIDIA in 2026 underscored Marvell's critical role in the AI ecosystem, particularly through collaborations like NVLink Fusion. While Marvell faces risks—including client concentration (losing the Amazon Trainium3 design), lower-margin business mix, competitive threats, insider selling, and complex supply chains—its fundamentals remain strong. The optical interconnect moat is widening with the acquisition of Celestial AI (photonics fabric), and financial metrics show accelerating revenue growth and operating leverage. With a PEG ratio suggesting undervaluation relative to its growth, the thesis is that the market undervalues Marvell's monopolistic position in AI "plumbing" while overemphasizing its competitive custom chip segment. The story transcends investing, symbolizing how in any complex system—from the internet to AI—the value of "connection" ultimately surpasses that of individual "nodes."

marsbit45 min fa

Ten-Thousand-Word Analysis: From $10 to $290, MRVL Wins the Entire AI Era by 'Not Making GPUs'

marsbit45 min fa

AI Relay Stations Spark Heated Debate on Zhihu: Behind Cheap Tokens, What Are Users Really Worried About?

A discussion on Zhihu about "AI relay stations" shifted the niche developer topic of "cheap tokens" into broader user awareness. Users moved beyond simply questioning the legitimacy of these services to focus on practical concerns: Where do cheap tokens truly come from? Is the model being accessed the real one? Can relay stations see prompts, code, and API keys? For occasional users, are the risks worth it? The core debate centered less on price and more on trust. A primary worry is model authenticity—the risk of "model swapping," where users paying for a premium model might be routed to a cheaper one, creating an information asymmetry. Others argued that cost comparisons matter; while cheaper than official pay-as-you-go APIs, relay stations may not be the lowest-cost option versus subscriptions, domestic models, or free tiers, making user needs assessment crucial. Speculation about token sources ranged from legitimate bulk discounts to gray-area methods like account sharing or exploiting regional pricing. This opacity makes risk assessment difficult for users. Data security emerged as a critical concern, especially for enterprise use. When processing sensitive information like code, contracts, or client data, the inability to verify a relay station's data handling, retention, or access policies poses significant compliance and confidentiality risks. The evolving consensus suggests relay stations can be used cautiously for low-sensitivity, disposable tasks (e.g., summarizing public info, simple translation). However, they should not be the default for sensitive, professional, or production workflows involving proprietary data, Agents, or automated systems. Recommendations include avoiding large prepayments, not relying on a single service, using test prompts to monitor quality, anonymizing data where possible, and keeping official channels as backups. Ultimately, the discussion framed tokens not just as a billing unit but as a measure of real cost encompassing price, model integrity, data security, and service stability. The popularity of relay stations highlights user demand for affordable access, but the debate underscores a key trade-off: the savings from cheap tokens may come at the price of trust, transparency, and control over one's data and AI experience.

marsbit1 h fa

AI Relay Stations Spark Heated Debate on Zhihu: Behind Cheap Tokens, What Are Users Really Worried About?

marsbit1 h fa

In-Depth Research Report on TradFi: The Convergence Wave of Crypto and Traditional Finance

In 2026, the crypto industry is undergoing a profound infrastructure-level transformation—TradFi assets are migrating on-chain at an unprecedented pace. According to CoinGecko's Q1 2026 report, the total value locked (TVL) of tokenized real-world assets (RWA) has surpassed $31 billion, a nearly 4x increase from $7.8 billion at the beginning of 2025, with the sector’s aggregate market capitalization reaching $19.3 billion. Among these, the market cap of tokenized stocks surged from $2 million to $486 million, with Q1 spot trading volume reaching $15.1 billion—a single quarter already surpassing the entire second half of 2025. RWA perpetual contract Q1 trading volume reached a staggering $524.8 billion, far exceeding the $313 billion for all of 2025. Meanwhile, BlackRock's BUIDL fund has reached $2.3 billion in scale and has filed for two new tokenized funds, signaling that the world's largest asset manager's tokenization strategy is evolving from pilot to product suite expansion. HTX, as a core participant in the crypto exchange sector, officially launched TradFi perpetual futures products including NVDA, AAPL, MSFT, META, and SPY in 2026, enabling crypto users to gain 24/7 trading access to core U.S. equities. Boston Consulting Group predicts that global tokenized asset scale could reach $16 trillion by 2030, while McKinsey offers a conservative estimate of approximately $2 trillion. The on-chain migration of TradFi assets is no longer a "future narrative" but a structural transformation unfolding in real time, as crypto exchanges evolve from single crypto asset trading platforms toward "multi-asset-class trading infrastructure."

HTX Learn1 h fa

In-Depth Research Report on TradFi: The Convergence Wave of Crypto and Traditional Finance

HTX Learn1 h fa

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片