抄底逃顶指南:CEX的流入流出情况

区块律动Pubblicato 2023-06-05Pubblicato ultima volta 2023-06-05

Introduzione

当某个代币大量流入中心化交易所,大概率是卖出行为,提现则相反。很多时候有着巨大的威力。

原文标题:《 抄底逃顶指标 2:cex 的流入流出情况 》
原文作者:日月小楚


当某个代币大量流入中心化交易所,大概率是卖出行为,提现则相反。很多时候有着巨大的威力,逻辑和原理看着也简单,但是必须注意:


1)该数据最需要结合市场的大环境以及币的涨跌。如果单单看到大额流入,就觉得会跌,这样的错误率比较高。


2)特定情况下的使用,威力比较大。比如某个币已经很高涨幅,市场 fomo 情绪高,但是交易所出现持续的大额流入,那么顶部的概率非常大了。


3)要提防有时候主力故意放出烟雾弹。例如一个币已经跌的比较多,在底部震荡,这时候出现大量流入交易所,有可能是庄家拉盘前,提前冲入交易所。


1、cex 的交易量占比分析


如果要想使用该指标,cex 的交易量的占比是前提。如果一个币的交易都在链上,那研究中心化交易所的数据就没有意义。从一般来说


1)比较新的币,往往 dex 上的交易占比比较多


2)上了币安后,交易量基本上币安占很大比例


3)在不知道的情况,可以在 coinmarketcap 上查看交易占比,






比如说 PEPE,在上币安之前,uniswap 是最主要的交易量。但是上币安后,主要在币安。


4)如果没有币安,也需要小心一些二线交易所,会机器人刷量,造成占比「假」高。


2、案例分析 


2.1 ssv






SSV 在今年经历过一次暴涨,在红色的数字框


1)交易所大量提现,对应币价在底部,震荡一段时间后,开启了这次的暴涨


2)交易所大量充值,ssv 从 21 刀调整到 16 刀


3)交易所大量充值,ssv33 刀调整到 27 刀。


4)交易所大量充值,币价开始一路下跌


为何红框 2 只是调整呢,所以要结合大环境。当时 btc 开启上涨行情,山寨都在轮流爆拉。然后 LSD 又是热门赛道。


而红框 3 已经到达顶部区域了,简单来看涨幅已经比较大。说实话,当时是没办法确定。ssv 在最高点没有大量流入交易所,说明庄家并不在最高点冲入(因为这样无疑是名牌告诉市场)但是经历了 2)3)大量充值后,明显进入了顶部区域了。


如果在顶部没有卖出。那么在红框 4,40 刀左右肯定是要离场了。因为再一次出现大量流入交易所,并且时间已经临近上海升级,利好马上兑现。并且当时其他山寨也都是砸下跌。


2.2 magic






上面的 Magic 冲入交易所的情况,其中红框 1 3 4,对于着绿色币价的下跌。


红框 2 是特殊情况,对于着 magic 一次巨量的解锁。而当时的其它情况是,整体市场行情很好,山寨都在暴涨。Magic 没有很大涨幅。所以这次并没有出现大跌。


2.3 PEPE






上面是 watechers 的交易所流入流出情况,绿色代表流入,绿色柱子高于红色,代表净流入


PEPE 的见顶信号也非常明显,在 5 月 6 日达到币价达到最高点。而之前几天,基本都是净流入。并且随后的几天,大部分都是净流入。所以可以判断 PEPE 的币价到顶,并不是深度调整。币价之后也是一路下跌。


2.4 STG






对币安 14 的代币余额发现,在一路下跌中,交易所的 STG 余额是在一路下跌的,说明在 STG 的下跌中,有资金在不断的买入。直到 12 月 17 日,币安钱包内 STG 达到最低,同期 STG 的币价也是局部最低的,并且经过几天调整后,开始了上涨。


3、数据来源


最后,给大家推荐几个可以查看交易所流入流出情况的网站。


1、watchers



https://watchers.pro/user/referral?referralcode=fLjhuIHL


查看某个币的流入流出。免费版可以使用。现在用钱包登录+推特认证后,可以获得 14 天的会员版。建议大家尝试下其它功能。


2、glassnode



glassnode.com  必须是付费会员。而且代币大部分是老币。已经是会员的可以用用,新人不建议付费使用。


3、区块链浏览器



https://blockscan.com/


优点是:各个公链都支持,并且是免费。


缺点是:只能看一个个单独的地址(例如币安的钱包 14 等)。


4、Jiedata



https://jiedata.com/


Jiedata 是从交易所的角度查看流入流出,并且可以用来设置报警提醒。现在 jiedata 处于免费阶段。





原文链接



Letture associate

After Marvell's 32% Surge, the Chinese Chip Family Behind It Emerges

The stock price of Marvell Technology surged 32.5% on June 2nd, driven by NVIDIA CEO Jensen Huang highlighting its custom ASICs and optical interconnects as core to AI data center architecture. This event brought attention to the Chinese semiconductor family behind Marvell: the Dai siblings. The story centers on three siblings, all UC Berkeley graduates, whose three-decade entrepreneurial journey aligns with major semiconductor industry shifts. In 1995, youngest sister Dai Wei Li co-founded Marvell with her husband Sehat Sutardja and his brother, focusing on storage controllers. Eldest brother Dai Wei Min founded EDA company Ultima, later sold to Cadence, and later founded VeriSilicon (芯原) in China, becoming a leading semiconductor IP provider. Second brother Dai Wei Jin co-founded EDA firm Silicon Perspective (sold to Cadence) and GPU IP company Vivante, later acquired by VeriSilicon. The combined "Dai-Sutardja" family network extends beyond Marvell. Their ventures and investments form a comprehensive ecosystem for the post-Moore's Law, chiplet era. Key holdings include: Dream Big Semiconductor (AI SuperNICs, acquired by Arm), Alphawave (high-speed SerDes IP, acquired by Qualcomm), and Silicon Box (a chiplet advanced packaging foundry). VeriSilicon itself thrives on the AI ASIC and IP boom in China. Collectively, the family's AI infrastructure-related portfolio is estimated at over $22 billion. Their strategy represents a distinct path: building critical components for open standards and key manufacturing capacity in the chiplet era, rather than pursuing standalone AI chip dominance. While this path may not create the next NVIDIA, it has enabled repeated successful exits and sustained influence within the global semiconductor industry.

marsbit1 h fa

After Marvell's 32% Surge, the Chinese Chip Family Behind It Emerges

marsbit1 h fa

Microsoft is Afraid of Being Marginalized by AI Giants

Microsoft, once the defining force of the PC era, now faces a familiar challenge in the AI age: the risk of being relegated to a profitable but invisible infrastructure provider. This anxiety was laid bare at Build 2026, where CEO Satya Nadella unveiled a major strategic pivot. The catalyst was a quiet April agreement that dissolved Microsoft's exclusive licensing and cloud-hosting deal with OpenAI, its once-vital partner. This erased Microsoft's key AI moat. With OpenAI and Anthropic defining AI applications and gaining enterprise traction—even within Microsoft's own ranks—Nadella had to answer: without exclusivity, what is Microsoft's role? The answer was a suite of seven in-house AI models, a developer-focused AI workstation (Surface RTX Spark Dev Box), and, most crucially, the Agent 365 platform for enterprise AI governance. The models, notably targeting Anthropic's strengths in coding and enterprise, signal a defensive move. However, the broader strategy is to make the models themselves less decisive. Financially, Microsoft's AI revenue is strong, driven largely by Azure running others' models. Yet its user-facing products like Copilot show weak penetration and engagement. Microsoft earns infrastructure money but lacks direct user mindshare. Nadella's core fear is being "hollowed out." As OpenAI and Anthropic prepare for IPOs and gain financial independence, they may build their own infrastructure, threatening Azure's lucrative AI revenue stream. Microsoft's window is to entrench itself deeper: not as the model creator, but as the indispensable platform for securely deploying, managing, and governing all AI models within the enterprise through Agent 365. Build 2026 revealed Microsoft's bet: in the AI era, the ultimate power lies not in any single model, but in the enterprise "operating system" that controls them. Nadella is determined to ensure Microsoft is the driver of this new era, not just a passenger.

marsbit1 h fa

Microsoft is Afraid of Being Marginalized by AI Giants

marsbit1 h fa

CPU, Quietly Returning to the Center of the AI Computing Power Stage

Over the past three years, AI computing power narratives have been dominated by GPUs. However, starting in 2026, this story began to shift. While training large models remains GPU-intensive, the rapid growth of inference and AI agent workloads, which require high levels of task orchestration, concurrency, and data flow management, has highlighted a renewed critical role for CPUs. These are tasks GPUs are not designed to handle. Intel's recent launch of the Xeon 6+ processor, built on its Intel 18A process and featuring up to 288 efficiency cores (E-cores), exemplifies this strategic pivot. It is positioned not as a mere companion to GPUs but as the essential "control plane" for AI infrastructure, optimized for high-density, energy-efficient, and high-throughput workloads characteristic of AI agents and inference. This "CPU resurgence" is not about CPUs outperforming GPUs in raw computation. It reflects a systemic bottleneck: as AI scales from training single models to deploying countless intelligent agents, the demand for coordination and data handling surges. Major cloud providers are also developing their own high-density ARM-based server CPUs for similar workloads. However, Intel's success with this strategy faces significant challenges. Competition includes NVIDIA's integrated CPU-GPU solutions, the expanding adoption of cloud vendors' in-house ARM CPUs, and the crucial market test of Intel's 18A manufacturing process against rivals like TSMC's N2. In conclusion, CPUs are indeed reclaiming a central, though redefined, role in AI compute—managing the complex orchestration that enables massive-scale AI deployment. While the trend is clear, which company will ultimately lead this CPU resurgence remains an open question to be decided in the data centers of 2027 and beyond.

marsbit1 h fa

CPU, Quietly Returning to the Center of the AI Computing Power Stage

marsbit1 h fa

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片