Cross-chain communication protocol Bridge Network raises $3.8M with backing from FTX Ventures

zycryptoPubblicato 2022-04-07Pubblicato ultima volta 2022-04-07

Introduzione

Bridge Network, a cross-chain communication protocol has closed its funding round that successfully raised $3.8 million to better user cross-chain experiences.

Bridge Network, a cross-chain communication protocol has closed its funding round that successfully raised $3.8 million to better user cross-chain experiences.

The funding round saw the participation of numerous investors including FTX Ventures, MEXC Global, Blockfinex, Master Ventures, Croc Capita, and others. According to the Bridge Network team, the new funding will help them revolutionize the way users transact in the multichain. Specifically, Bridge intends to focus on user security, experiences, and scalability.

While commenting on the project, Kimberly Adams, co-founder of Bridge Network, explained:

“The cross-chain space is still relatively new, which means we have a long way left to go — from better security design to more optimized user experiences. Bridge Network intends to introduce a more comprehensive, secure, and friendly experience for both the end-user as well as token issuers looking to go multichain. The elephant in the room is, of course, security. Most of the recent hacks were due to failure to follow basic security practices, as existing cross-chain protocols compromised security for meeting market demand.“

The Bridge protocol has been in development for more than a year aiming to provide users will all the tools they might need to transact cross-chain without the need to switch between platforms. Notably, Bridge Network comprises bridging infrastructures that allow token issuers to go multichain. The protocol bridges to implement a double validator system. The protocol also has other standard security measures and has partnered with different security companies to provide users with maximum security.

Favour Uzoaru, the co-founder of Bridge Network, added:

“While this is simple in context, the ability for tokens to go multichain solves the builders’ dilemma easily. Builders can continue to develop their project on whichever blockchain they see fit while having their assets lay on any blockchain that their user demands. I’m especially excited to see this in the GameFi space, as games may opt to build on their own blockchains while users leverage the in-game assets of its ecosystem to be more productive on other blockchains.”

The funding will go a long way in helping the project with its upcoming token launch. Note, Bridge Network intends to launch its mainnet in the second quarter of 2022. Initially, the protocol will support Ethereum Virtual Machine (EVM) blockchains and will however later support non EVM chains.

Letture associate

From 'Old Dogs' to 'New Darlings': How AI is Revaluing Old Infrastructure, from Dell to Nokia

"Old Dogs" Become AI's New Darlings: Revaluing Legacy Infrastructure The AI investment narrative is shifting. Beyond the spotlight on core chipmakers like Nvidia, a new wave of interest is rising for legacy tech companies—Dell, HPE, Nokia, Cisco, Corning, Western Digital—once labeled as slow-growth, outdated stories. This resurgence stems from AI's evolution from model development to real-world deployment, creating massive demand for physical infrastructure. As AI moves into data center construction and enterprise adoption, the focus turns to who can actually build and deliver complex systems. These established players hold decades of experience in supply chains, integration, networking, and enterprise delivery—assets now critical for scaling AI. The revaluation can be grouped into three key infrastructure areas: 1. **Servers & Integration (e.g., Dell, HPE):** They are becoming essential system integrators, transforming GPUs into full-scale AI servers with networking, power, and cooling, then delivering them to clients. Strong recent earnings and AI-specific revenue/order growth for Dell and HPE underscore this shift. 2. **Networking & Connectivity (e.g., Corning, Nokia, Cisco):** As AI clusters grow, high-speed data transfer becomes paramount. Corning benefits from fiber demand for data center links, Nokia is exploring AI-integrated wireless networks (AI-RAN), and Cisco sees surging orders for data center switches—all critical for efficient AI operations. 3. **Storage (e.g., Western Digital, Seagate):** The AI data explosion requires vast capacity. Beyond high-speed memory (HBM), there's growing need for high-capacity HDDs to store training data, logs, video, and cold/archival data cost-effectively. This revaluation, however, is not a blanket endorsement. True reassessment requires concrete proof: AI-driven orders and revenue growth, upward revisions to company guidance, and sustainable improvements in profit quality, not just top-line sales. In essence, AI is not turning all old tech firms into high-growth stocks; it is selectively re-pricing the "old assets" of companies that are mission-critical for building the new AI infrastructure, transforming their legacy capabilities into renewed growth engines.

marsbit1 min fa

From 'Old Dogs' to 'New Darlings': How AI is Revaluing Old Infrastructure, from Dell to Nokia

marsbit1 min fa

Probability in the Price: How World Cup Odds Are Calculated

**The Probability in the Price: How World Cup Odds Are Calculated** Two major systems released their "championship probabilities" before the 2026 World Cup, and they disagreed on the favorite. Prediction market aggregators listed France at around **17%**, while the Opta supercomputer gave European champion Spain **16.1%**. These numbers look similar, but their production methods are fundamentally different. The market's **17%** is the **price** that clears after hundreds of millions of dollars in trading across platforms like Polymarket and Kalshi, where contracts trade between 0 and 100 cents, directly representing implied probability. This liquidity is provided by crypto-native market makers like Wintermute, though the market still has "the liquidity profile of an early-stage" asset class. In contrast, Opta's **16.1%** is a **simulated frequency**. Its model uses team data (including betting market odds as an input) to estimate match probabilities, then runs **10,000 full tournament simulations**, counting how often each team wins. Which is more accurate? There is **no rigorous, cross-tournament academic study** directly comparing their track records. However, a persistent **longshot bias**—where low-probability outcomes are systematically overvalued—observed in traditional betting for nearly a century, has also been found in modern crypto prediction markets. Research shows low-price contracts on Kalshi/Polymer less likely to pay out than their implied odds suggest. Unlike traditional bookmakers, prediction markets operate on **public blockchain ledgers**, making every transaction auditable and enabling such research. However, price formation is also influenced by **regulatory uncertainty**, as seen in recent US state-level bans and legal battles over jurisdiction. In summary, the "probability" you see is either a **market-clearing price** subject to behavioral biases and liquidity constraints, or a **model-simulated frequency** that partially incorporates market data. The question of which method is more reliable remains open, highlighting the importance of asking: **How was this number produced?**

marsbit30 min fa

Probability in the Price: How World Cup Odds Are Calculated

marsbit30 min fa

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片