硬币模因热潮又回来了——查看前 3 名硬币模因

Tap Chi BitcoinPubblicato 2023-05-23Pubblicato ultima volta 2023-05-23

Introduzione

对于那些在过去几周一直关注加密货币市场新闻的人来说,肯定不可能不听说代币模因及其快速增长,以建立一个支持这一巨大潜力的生态系统。 我们邀请您一起阅读,找出以下四种病毒式硬币模因,它们对希望在短时间内将资本翻倍的加密货币投资者具有巨大的潜在预测。

对于那些在过去几周一直关注加密货币市场新闻的人来说,肯定不可能不听说代币模因及其快速增长,以建立一个支持这一巨大潜力的生态系统。

这些项目主要侧重于宣传正面和幽默的信息。 Sui 在严峻的全球金融格局中并没有带来太大的价值,Meme Coin病毒式传播,导致许多私人投资者获利数千倍。

我们邀请您一起阅读,找出以下四种病毒式硬币模因,它们对希望在短时间内将资本翻倍的加密货币投资者具有巨大的潜在预测。

位居潜在大规模病毒Meme Coin列表榜首的是 $COPIUM。

Token $COPIUM 是一种 meme 资产,旨在帮助用户应对早期投资者抛售时突然出现的加密货币修正。

加密货币投资者不必抱怨损失,而是可以轻松地转向 $COPIUM 来享受热闹的笑话。最重要的是,将加密货币投资错误转化为利润。

许多分析师认为, $COPIUM将成为下一个 Chad 和 Pepe 代币模因,因为它在发布后不到五分钟的时间内就达到了 800 万美元的市值。

$COPIUM 以一个秃头男子的形象为特色,脸上带着悲伤的表情,代表了市场上大多数新兴加密货币投资者的命运。

这给了该项目必要的公信力,许多投资者也参与了 Copium 的 NFT 的买卖。

迄今为止,Copium 协议得到了加密社区中的几个关键人物的支持,例如@MattInWeb3 和许多其他人。

随着越来越受欢迎,Copium 团队计划在不久的将来在 CoinMarketCap 上市。

$AI 是另一种让许多投资者焦急等待的硬币模因。

虽然数百种其他硬币模因并没有带来太多实际价值,但硬币 $AI 正在为加密和模因生态系统贡献有意义的价值。

属性 $AI 是创建模因的加密货币项目 AIDoge 的实用硬币这一事实表明了这一点。

在这个平台上,用户可以使用人工智能 (AI) 创建关于他们最喜欢的话题的表情包。

可以说,AiDoge 是加密货币和模因的 ChatGPT,其工作方式类似。

一个特别之处在于,爱狗狗采用了独特的文字提示界面,与AI软件的核心功能相匹配。有了这个,用户可以写一个提示,AiDoge 将在短短几秒钟内显示一组 meme 图片。

为确保模因满足每个用户的文化和人口统计需求,AiDoge 使用来自不同文化和历史背景的数百万组模因数据进行训练。

用户可以创建反映他们对某个主题的感受的模因,甚至可以用来以视觉上合适的方式与他人交流。

这个项目最好的一点是它的模因总是最新的,这意味着用户总是可以得到满足他们特定需求的模因照片。

$AI除了支持用户在购买 Credits 以使用AiDoge meme 生成器时获得流畅的交易体验外,还充当激励机制。

用户在公共留言板上投票选出最佳表情包照片后,热情贡献的优秀表情包艺术家将获得$AI的奖励。

因此,用户可以在创建高质量的模因和解决各种问题的同时赚取被动收入。

自大约两个月前推出以来,$AI 已成为最具病毒性的模因资产之一。

目前在第 13 次预售中,该项目硬币已经超越了市场,越来越多的投资者加入了该协议。

截至目前,$AI的收入已高达1010万美元,而且还在以分钟递增。

目前以 0.0000316 美元的折扣价出售,未来几周内在前 5 大加密货币交易所之一上市时,早期投资者可以将投资增加 20 倍。

一个可以触及大众的话题是他们最喜欢的名人。

这是用$SPONGE演示的,它是为加密货币项目 SpongeBob Square Pants 开发的。

随着这部动画系列的巨大成功,$SPONGE 已成为竞争激烈的硬币模因市场中脱颖而出的“外国人”之一。

这种 ERC-20 代币在一个交易期内增长了 1,800% 以上,帮助它在 Gate.io 等几个中心化交易所上市。

它还在推出仅一个月后就征服了 BitMart 交易所,成为新兴加密空间中交易所上市速度最快的表情包硬币。

$SPONGE 计划在 OKX 交易所上市。

目前,$SPONGE 正在参与 OKX 上币投票,并与其他风靡行业的顶级币模因竞争。

看看它的价格表现,我们可以很容易地看出为什么$SPONGE 是最受投资者欢迎的产品之一。

在比特币和以太坊等主要参与者苦苦挣扎的加密货币市场中,$SPONGE 在过去 24 小时内上涨了 7.19%,交易价格为 0.0048 美元。

这令人印象深刻,因为该项目没有计划在未来几个月制定任何路线图或开发。

Letture associate

Summary of Kevin Warsh's Past Remarks: How Will This Prospective 'New Head' Upend the Fed?

Kevin Warsh, nominated by President Trump to replace Fed Chair Powell, is poised to introduce sweeping reforms at the Federal Reserve. His agenda includes structural changes, advocating for lower policy rates, a fundamentally new approach to inflation, a significantly smaller balance sheet, safeguarding Fed independence, narrowing the Fed’s mandate, improving coordination with the Treasury, and reducing communication “noise” from policymakers. Warsh has criticized current monetary policy as “broken” and called for “fundamental regime change,” arguing that continuity is meaningless when the Fed has lost credibility. He believes interest rates should be lower and that a smaller balance sheet would help achieve that, describing the current one as “multiple trillions of dollars larger than necessary.” On inflation, he attributes its rise to cognitive errors at the Fed—including overreliance on flawed models, neglect of money supply, and blaming external factors rather than excessive government spending. He also suggests AI could lead to a structural decline in prices. He strongly defends Fed independence as its “most important asset” and warns against mission creep, which he says risks its core objectives and increases political vulnerability. He proposes closer coordination with the Treasury to align balance sheet and debt issuance plans, clarifying expectations for markets. Regarding communication, Warsh supports transparency but criticizes the current “cacophony of voices” and “forward guidance” that creates ambiguity. He has urged Fed officials to speak less frequently to avoid market confusion.

marsbit34 min fa

Summary of Kevin Warsh's Past Remarks: How Will This Prospective 'New Head' Upend the Fed?

marsbit34 min fa

Arbitrum Pretends to Be the Hacker, 'Steals' Back the Money Lost by KelpDAO

Title: Arbitrum Poses as Hacker to Recover Stolen Funds from KelpDAO Last week, KelpDAO suffered a hack resulting in nearly $300 million in losses, marking the largest DeFi security incident this year. Approximately 30,765 ETH (worth over $70 million) remained on an Arbitrum address controlled by the attacker. In an unprecedented move, Arbitrum’s Security Council utilized its emergency authority to upgrade the Inbox bridge contract, adding a function that allowed them to impersonate the hacker’s address and initiate a transfer without access to its private key. The council’s action, approved by 9 of its 12 members, moved the stolen ETH to a frozen address in a single transaction before reverting the contract to its original state. The operation was coordinated with law enforcement, which attributed the attack to North Korea’s Lazarus Group. Community reactions are divided: some praise the recovery of funds, while others question the centralization of power, as the council can upgrade core contracts without governance votes. However, such emergency mechanisms are common among major L2s. Despite the partial recovery, over $292 million was stolen in total, with more than $100 million in bad debt on Aave and remaining funds scattered across other chains. The incident highlights escalating security challenges in DeFi, with state-sponsored hackers employing advanced tactics and L2s responding with elevated countermeasures.

marsbit44 min fa

Arbitrum Pretends to Be the Hacker, 'Steals' Back the Money Lost by KelpDAO

marsbit44 min fa

iQiyi Is Too Impatient

The article "iQiyi Is Too Impatient" discusses the controversy surrounding the Chinese streaming platform IQiyi's recent announcement of an "AI Actor Library" during its 2026 World Conference. IQiyi claimed over 100 actors, including well-known names like Zhang Ruoyun and Yu Hewei, had joined the initiative. CEO Gong Yu suggested AI could enable actors to "star in 14 dramas a year instead of 4" and that "live-action filming might become a world cultural heritage." The announcement quickly sparked backlash. Multiple actors named in the list issued urgent statements denying they had signed any AI-related authorization agreements. This forced IQiyi to clarify that inclusion in the library only indicated a willingness to *consider* AI projects, with separate negotiations required for any specific role. The incident, which trended on social media with hashtags like "IQiyi is crazy," is presented as a sign of the company's growing desperation. Facing intense competition from short-video platforms like Douyin and Kuaishou, as well as Bilibili and Xiaohongshu, IQiyi's financial performance has weakened, with revenues declining for two consecutive years. The author argues that IQiyi is "too impatient" to tell a compelling AI story to reassure the market, especially as it pursues a listing on the Hong Kong stock exchange. The piece concludes by outlining three key "AI questions" IQiyi must answer: defining its role as a tool provider versus a content creator, balancing the "coldness" of AI with the human element audiences desire, and properly managing the interests of platforms, actors, and viewers. The core dilemma is that while AI can reduce costs and increase efficiency, it risks creating homogenized, formulaic content and devaluing human performers.

marsbit1 h fa

iQiyi Is Too Impatient

marsbit1 h fa

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片