【5.2-5.15 两周观察】美元危机下的 BTC, Meme 和 Worldcoin

DeFi之道Pubblicato 2023-05-16Pubblicato ultima volta 2023-05-16

Introduzione

但从事实来看,无论是加息还是银行危机,都无法支持市场萎缩的论点。从今年数据来看,美股和加密市场都出于上升趋势。今年的稳定币供应也并未出现萎缩。而所谓的加息和银行倒闭带来的也仅仅在于短期的回调,和资金在不同银行间的转移(从 Circle 到 Tether)。 真正改变的是加密市场对于 BTC 价值的重新凝练。在放弃了诸多“噪声”之后,加密行业再一次证明了自己的真正价值底层还是这个 BTC。就连一次 BTC 网络的拥堵都造成了远比加息至新高更大的市场影响,可见一斑。

最近两周加密市场下行,BTC 由 $30k 降至 $27k 上下。

前两周 BTC 行情,来源:CMC

在宏观方面,5 月 4 日美联储加息 25 个基点至 5%-5.25% 已经属于“强弩之末”。当天加密市场反应甚至还有所上扬。同时,此时的联邦利率已经为 2007 年以来新高,市场预期 6 月美联储将停止加息。

伪风险:银行危机

稍早一些的 5 月 1 日,摩根大通宣布收购已倒闭的第一共和国银行。为这一轮银行危机暂时划下休止符。但是目前来看,本年度的几次银行危机虽然导致市场的部分恐慌,但是今年总体而言,Nasdaq 上涨 20% 以上,BTC 涨幅更是将近 100%。

从稳定币的供给来看,同样不支持加密市场因银行危机“雪上加霜”的论点。以 USDC + USDT 来看(两者占据稳定币市场的绝大部分),稳定币在相当长的时间内都维持在 $110B 的水平上,唯一的变化只是资金从 Circle 向 Tether 的转移。

USDC 过去一年流通量,来源:CMC

USDT过去一年流通量,来源:CMC

真转变:加密行业的收缩

就今年来看,整个加密行业的市值向 BTC 集中确实正在发生。以 CMC 的 BTC Dominance 指数来看,今年初 BTC 市值占比整个加密市场约为 40%,目前升至47%。

再对比 BTC 的涨幅和整个加密市场今年的涨幅,结局可见:整个市场虽然正在上升,但是市场情绪却更偏向于加密行业中偏保守的避险资产 BTC。

收缩视角下的 BTC:

收缩视角其实也是一种聚光灯视角。对于 BTC 的关注也发掘出了在 BTC 网络上加载 NFT 和 Defi 的那一套愿景。但是以加密行业仅存的历史而言,BTC 代表的是整个加密行业的托底价值和最后抵押物,每一次向非支付应用层的 BTC 拓展(BTC的那些分叉)都失败了。

真正影响市场的却是 5 月 8 日,BTC 的两个矿池同时诞生两个分叉,而后在争夺最长链的过程中,失败链的交易需要重新上链,从而造成了网络拥堵。

并没有什么外部力量可以真正摧毁一个去中心化的网络,如果有,可能就是这个网络自身。

Meme币和 Altman的 WorldCoin

最近的市场中,Meme 币又很神奇地成为了趋势。虽然所有人都知道Meme 币并不能代表市场的基本面,但是 Meme 币却能从侧面反应市场情绪。

事实证明,大多数的 Meme 币都会昙花一现。但是也有例外,去年马斯克推广过的狗狗币就成为了主流。

而 OpenAI 创始人的 WorldCoin 看起来就像是新的狗狗币。支付,转账,为一个虚拟网络提供金融服务,首先提供钱包服务,并且寻求融资。

如果推行下去,WorldCoin 也很有可能成为新的主流代币。只是,马斯克没成功的事,希望Altman 能成。

总结

虽然在美联储加息和新一轮银行危机之下,加密市场前景似乎令人担忧。

但从事实来看,无论是加息还是银行危机,都无法支持市场萎缩的论点。从今年数据来看,美股和加密市场都出于上升趋势。今年的稳定币供应也并未出现萎缩。而所谓的加息和银行倒闭带来的也仅仅在于短期的回调,和资金在不同银行间的转移(从 Circle 到 Tether)。

真正改变的是加密市场对于 BTC 价值的重新凝练。在放弃了诸多“噪声”之后,加密行业再一次证明了自己的真正价值底层还是这个 BTC。就连一次 BTC 网络的拥堵都造成了远比加息至新高更大的市场影响,可见一斑。

从目前看,重视 BTC 的偏保守的市场情绪还将持续一段时间。但是市场也总不乏新的趋势,比如最近的 Meme 币,其中,最有希望的似乎是目前还处于 Meme 币阶段的 WorldCoin,希望Altman 可以带给这个行业惊喜。

毕竟加密跟 AI 一样,也是个超出当下现实的行业,希望现实可以快点赶上。

Letture associate

The Value Distribution of Stablecoins

**Summary: The Value Distribution of Stablecoins** The article argues that stablecoins are evolving from mere trading tools into broader channels for dollar access. It divides the stablecoin ecosystem into four layers to analyze how value is distributed: 1. **Issuance Layer:** Mints stablecoins, holds reserve assets, and captures the spread between reserve yield and user costs (e.g., Tether, Circle). This layer currently earns the largest profit margin. 2. **Infrastructure Layer:** Connects stablecoins to the traditional financial system, handling fiat on/off-ramps, banking integration, compliance (KYC/AML), and asset management (e.g., Bridge, BVNK). This is the "unglamorous" but critical work, building the essential bridges between crypto and real-world finance. 3. **Acquiring/Distribution Layer:** Integrates stablecoins into merchant systems, manages payment flows, and provides enterprise financial software (e.g., Stripe, Coinbase). They act as the access point for businesses. 4. **Application Layer:** The end-users and businesses that ultimately use stablecoins for payments, settlements, or as a store of value. They benefit from convenience but have little pricing power. The core thesis is that while the issuance layer currently dominates profits, the often-overlooked **infrastructure layer holds significant long-term potential**. The real challenge and barrier to mass adoption is not the on-chain transfer of stablecoins (which is simple), but the complex "last mile" integration into existing business workflows, banking systems, and regulatory frameworks across different countries. Companies in this layer are currently in a "land grab" phase, investing heavily to build networks, secure bank partnerships, and establish compliance pathways. While their position is currently pressured by the profitable issuers above and distribution platforms below, the article suggests that if stablecoins become a default financial rail for businesses, the infrastructure providers who have done the hard work of integration will ultimately gain strong pricing power and become entrenched, essential players.

marsbit1 h fa

The Value Distribution of Stablecoins

marsbit1 h fa

The Value Distribution of Stablecoins

The Value Distribution of Stablecoins The article argues that stablecoins are evolving from a mere trading tool into a broad "dollar channel." It analyzes the industry's value chain through four layers: 1. **Issuance Layer (e.g., Tether, Circle):** The top layer that mints stablecoins, holds reserve assets, and captures the thickest interest rate spread. 2. **Infrastructure Layer (e.g., Bridge, BVNK):** Connects stablecoins to the traditional financial system, handling critical but complex "dirty work" like fiat on/off-ramps, banking integration, compliance (KYC/AML), and cross-border settlement. 3. **Acquiring/Distribution Layer (e.g., Stripe, Coinbase):** Embeds stablecoins into merchant systems, manages payment flows, and integrates with enterprise software. 4. **Application Layer:** End-users and businesses that ultimately use stablecoins for payments, settlement, or storing value. The author posits that while the issuance layer currently captures the most profit, the most overlooked and potentially critical layer is infrastructure. The core challenge for stablecoin adoption isn't the on-chain transfer (which is simple), but bridging the gap between blockchain and the real-world financial system. This involves solving practical problems for businesses: fiat conversion, reconciliation, tax handling, and user onboarding. Infrastructure companies are currently in a difficult "land-grab" phase—building networks, securing banking relationships, and achieving compliance country-by-country. They face pressure from both the profitable issuance layer above and distribution platforms below. However, the author suggests this layer is building a crucial moat. Once stablecoins become a default business rail, the infrastructure players who have done the hard work of integration may gain significant, durable value and pricing power.

链捕手1 h fa

The Value Distribution of Stablecoins

链捕手1 h fa

How to Do Research Well: Deliberately Practice the Real Skills That Matter

No one truly teaches you how to do research. You're often given a desk, a pre-selected problem, and vague instructions to "create something new." Consequently, many people reverse-engineer the job based on visible outputs—papers, posts, announcements—learning only how to *appear* like a researcher rather than how to *become* one. True research capability is built from stacking small, trainable skills, nearly all of which can be developed through deliberate practice. **Pick Your Own Problem:** Most researchers absorb problems from advisors or trends, lacking the underlying reasoning. Choosing a problem you genuinely care about, as John Schulman advises, leads to original work. Develop "taste" like a muscle: predict experiment outcomes, guess paper results from methods, and track which findings remain important over time. **Upgrade Your Inputs:** Relying on shared reading lists (arXiv hot lists, filtered group chats) leads to unoriginal conclusions. Undervalued old literature often holds crucial insights (e.g., MoE, LSTM, backpropagation). Richard Sutton's "The Bitter Lesson" or Claude Shannon's 1952 talk on creative thinking are more predictive than lengthy modern surveys. Breadth matters as much as depth: draw from neuroscience, mechanism design, hardware knowledge, and honest statistics. Read papers directly, especially appendices and limitations sections. **Write Everything Down:** As Paul Graham noted, writing exposes flaws in seemingly mature ideas. Writing is the cheapest defense against self-deception. Following Feynman's principle, Darwin programmatically wrote down facts contradicting his theory to combat memory bias. Maintain a detailed log of hypotheses, setups, predictions, results, and updated understandings. Reviewing past logs fosters essential humility.

marsbit4 h fa

How to Do Research Well: Deliberately Practice the Real Skills That Matter

marsbit4 h fa

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片