Mina Price Prediction: Potential Reversal Could Descend The MINA Price By 20%

CoingapePubblicato 2022-04-05Pubblicato ultima volta 2022-04-05

Introduzione

The MINA/USDT pair showcased a choppy price action wavering within the $2.8 and $2.47 mark during the last two weeks. Anyhow, the buyers managed to escape this consolidation with long…

The MINA/USDT pair showcased a choppy price action wavering within the $2.8 and $2.47 mark during the last two weeks. Anyhow, the buyers managed to escape this consolidation with long bullish, hitting the $3 physiological level. However, the sudden selling pressure in the crypto market has formed a higher price rejection candle at this level.
Key Points:

  • The MACD indicator near is a bearish crossover
  • The potential reversal could descend the coin by 20%
  • The 24-hour trading volume in the Mina coin is $243 Million, indicating a 203% gain
TradingView Chart

Source-Tradingview
A falling wedge pattern governed the last three months in the MINA/USD pair, bolstering traders to sell on lower high rallies. However, on March 17th, the buyers gave a bullish breakout from the descending trendline of the price pattern, indicating a positive turn in traders’ sentiment.
The post-retest rally drove the altcoin by $38%, reaching the $2.8 mark. However, amidst the uncertainty in the crypto market, the MINA price fluctuated in a narrow range for the last two weeks.
Anyhow, the buyers took the initiative and breached the mentioned resistance with a long bullish candle. The coin price retested $3 resistance earlier today, teasing a follow-up breakout. However, a long-wick rejection attached to the daily candle suggests weakness to the bullish momentum.
However, if bears sustain the MINA price below the $3 resistance, the selling pressure would eventually rise and pull the price back to $2.2 support.
Alternatively, a bullish breakout from $3 resistance would continue the bull run to the $4 mark.
Technical Indicator
The 50-and-100-day SMA moving flat suggests a sideways rally for the Mina coin. However, the coin price trading above these SMAs bolsters the recovery rally.
The MACD indicator shows that the fast and slow lines moving close could trigger a bearish crossover anytime. This bearish signal may encourage additional a\selling among traders.

  • Resistance levels– $3 and $4
  • Support levels– $2.8 and $2.45

Letture associate

UBS: The Crowdedness of A-Share Tech Stocks Is Far From Reaching Historical Peaks

UBS: A-share tech stocks still far from peak crowding levels A-shares' technology sector has seen a strong rebound, with trading activity hitting record highs, raising concerns about market crowding. However, UBS Securities argues that a key indicator of institutional positioning suggests the current crowding level remains well below historical peaks. While the large-cap tech sector's share of total A-share trading volume and market capitalization have reached historical highs, the overweight ratio of domestic mutual funds in this sector stood at 9.9% in Q1 2026. This is down from 11.6% in Q3 2025 and significantly lower than the historical peak of 14.1% in Q4 2015. It also pales in comparison to the historical peak overweight of 18.7% for the consumer sector. UBS notes that typical cycles from a low to a peak in fund overweighting last about three years, and the current outperformance of the tech/growth style has lasted less than two years since the policy pivot in September 2024. UBS expects A-share earnings recovery to accelerate, providing fundamental support. It forecasts 2026 A-share profit growth to rise to 11% from 3.9% in 2025. Non-financial A-share profits grew 11.8% YoY in Q1 2026, with gross and net profit margins at their highest since 2023. Persistent fund inflows, the expansion of thematic ETFs, and a recovery in private fund issuance are supporting market liquidity. In tactical allocation, UBS favors growth and cyclical styles under its "slow bull" base case, with overweight ratings on six sectors: Electronics (benefiting from semiconductor inventory recovery and AI innovation), Communications (driven by AI computing demand), Machinery (aided by domestic capex recovery), Non-ferrous Metals (due to rising copper/aluminum prices), Chemicals (supported by anti-involution policies), and Electrical Equipment (driven by policy support and AI data center power demand).

marsbit7 min fa

UBS: The Crowdedness of A-Share Tech Stocks Is Far From Reaching Historical Peaks

marsbit7 min fa

Should You Buy SpaceX Stock at $1.7 Trillion? Here's What the Market Is Worried About

SpaceX is preparing for a massive IPO aiming to raise around $75 billion at a valuation of approximately $1.75 trillion. While its achievements in reusable rockets and the profitable Starlink satellite internet service are clear, the market is concerned about the aggressive valuation. Key issues include: the current $1.75 trillion valuation, which is about 94 times 2025 revenue, seems to price in not just existing businesses but also unproven future ventures like AI infrastructure and orbital data centers. Financially, while Starlink is profitable, the AI division, bolstered by the acquisition of xAI, is incurring massive losses and consuming the majority of capital expenditures. This acquisition also introduced complex related-party financing arrangements and debt onto SpaceX's balance sheet. Furthermore, corporate governance poses a challenge. SpaceX's dual-class share structure ensures founder Elon Musk retains absolute control, limiting ordinary shareholders' influence over high-risk, long-term strategic decisions. The future success of ambitious projects like the Starship rocket—critical for lowering costs and enabling new services—remains a significant variable for the valuation. In summary, the market's apprehension (FUD) centers not on doubting SpaceX's past technological triumphs but on questioning how much premium public investors should pay for a future that combines proven profits with highly speculative and capital-intensive new ventures, all under a governance structure that offers limited shareholder oversight.

marsbit1 h fa

Should You Buy SpaceX Stock at $1.7 Trillion? Here's What the Market Is Worried About

marsbit1 h fa

Breaking the DeFi Cascading Liquidation Curse: Vitalik Proposes a New Solution

Vitalik Buterin has proposed a new DeFi design to eliminate the automatic liquidation mechanism that causes market instability during sharp downturns. The current system, used by protocols like Aave, triggers forced sales when collateral value falls below a threshold, often exacerbating price drops and creating systemic selling pressure. Buterin's alternative model is based on splitting an asset like ETH into two synthetic option-like tokens, P and N, pegged to a price index. Their combined value always equals one ETH. Instead of sudden liquidation, a position's value gradually drifts from its target peg if the market moves. Users must proactively rebalance their holdings to maintain their desired exposure, transferring the management burden from the protocol to the user or automated tools. A key advantage is the reduced reliance on real-time oracles. Pricing decisions are deferred until contract expiry, allowing for more robust, fault-tolerant oracle designs. This removes a clear liquidation threshold that speculators can target for manipulation or MEV extraction. However, significant challenges remain. Frequent rebalancing could incur high slippage and transaction costs, necessitating new liquidity provider models. The design is better suited for hedging instruments than for stablecoins requiring a rigid 1:1 peg. While not an immediate replacement for existing systems, the proposal challenges the foundational assumption that instantaneous forced liquidation is an unavoidable necessity in DeFi, opening the door for fundamentally different risk management architectures.

marsbit1 h fa

Breaking the DeFi Cascading Liquidation Curse: Vitalik Proposes a New Solution

marsbit1 h fa

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片