Arbitrum的时机:把握历史机遇,有可能成为L2的王者

蓝狐笔记Pubblicato 2023-02-24Pubblicato ultima volta 2023-02-24

Introduzione

过去Arbitrum绝对主导的格局,如今变成了Arbitrum和Optimism两强格局。

有不少小伙伴们都说 Arbitrum 一直利用空投预期来吸引更多用户是很聪明的做法。从战术层面或许这样解读是可以的,看上去也合理。

不过,如果从更大的格局和生态发展角度,这样做会错过最好的战略期。

Aribtrum 有过一次最好的时机

在 Optimism 推出 Token 经济的半年内,Arbitrum 拥有推出Token经济的最佳时期,很遗憾错过了。在 Optimism 推出 Token 经济之前,Arbitrum 拥有超过 55% 以上的 TVL 比例,而 Optimism5% 左右,大概是 Arbitrum 的十分之一左右的比例。

在 Optimism 推出 Token 经济激励后,按照目前 l2beats 的统计,目前 Optimism 的 TVL 达到 Arbitrum 的 57%,发展迅猛。此外,其生态项目也开始逐步发展起来。比如 SNX 和 Perp 已经将其重心从以太坊 L1 迁移至 Optimism,还有一些原生的项目,如 velodrome 等也逐步有了一些用户。

从历史总交易次数、活跃用户等多个数据来看,Optimism 也在缩小跟 Arbitrum 的距离。

(optimism 上最近 30 天交互次数较多的项目)

如果 Arbitrum 在过去半年内,推出 Token 经济机制,它有可能将其生态内的项目提升更大,也有有机会极大提升其 TVL,且会具有黑洞般的吸引力。假设出现这种情况,会对 Optimism 的崛起造成极大压制。

Optimism 获得了超过半年的机会窗口期,且这个窗口如今继续存在,由过去 Arbitrum 绝对主导的格局(类似于之前 Opensea 在 NFT 市场和 Uniswap 在 DEX 上的位置),如今变成了 Arbitrum 和 Optimism 两强格局。

Arbitrum 的优势并不是永远的

目前 Arbitrum 上有一些不错的原生项目,比如大家熟知的 GMX 和 MAGIC 生态。此外,还有 GNS 和 RDNT 等也逐渐发展了起来。整体用户体验也不错。不过这些都并不是永远的优势。

Arbitrum 采用链下执行多轮欺诈证明技术,它比 Optimism 的链上执行单轮欺诈证明确实有它的独到之处,此外以太坊 L1 项目迁移至 Arbitrum 更容易些。不过这些技术的门槛都不算非常高的护城河。当 EIP4844 在年底落地之后,这些优势可能会越来越不明显。

此外,Optimism 的 bedrock 要来了,Optimism 的模块化 L2 网络未来会逐步推出。目前 coinbase 也已经加入它的阵营。Coinbase 推出基于 OP Stack 的以太坊 L2 网络 Base 测试网。随着 Optimism 模块化的 L2 逐步推出,它也会吸引更多的项目玩家。从未来的格局看,Optimism 占据了一个好的位置。

Optimism 也在积极研究 zk-Rollup 技术,当 zk-Rollup 技术成熟后,它也可能会基于现有生态顺势升级。

此外,Optimism 通过精巧的空投机制,将一些玩家从撸毛用户转化为生态内用户。从这个机制设计看,其团队内有非常懂社区、懂经济机制设计的高手。Optimism 并不能小视。

如果 Optimism 的模块化 L2 出彩以及其他的技术迭代,那么,Arbitrum 的可持续比较优势在哪里?要知道 Layer2 赛道还在早期,还没有绝对的王者。

Opensea 的前车之鉴

Opensea 长期不推出 Token 经济机制,且一开始市场份额并没有受到大的影响,高峰期曾超过 90% 的市场份额。其主导性的位置甚至比 DEX 领域的 Uniswap 还要强。一切看上去都很美好,不推出 Token 激励机制,貌似也一样可以赢。

但 Blur 的到来,打破了这一切。Blur 的出价机制+ Token 经济机制的结合对 Opensea 形成极大冲击。Opensea 如果后续再不推出 Token 经济,那么,铁王座旁落会成为事实。当然,某种程度上,Blur 也吸取了同行的不少经验教训,也算是站在前人努力的基础上的一个创新迭代。

Arbitrum 今天风光无限,一切看上去都很美好,有不断的项目和用户进入。不过,任何事情的变化都不是一天就发生的。危机往往诞生于风光之之时,居安思危。

Arbitrum 需要为其生态内项目考虑

Arbitrum 能够发展起来,GMX 和 MAGIC 两大原生项目功不可没。现在到了 Arbitrum 给这些项目提供更多流量、生态激励的时候了。只有这样,才能继续相互增益,才能形成更大更可持续的生态网络。

如果 Arbitrum 还是原地踏步,未来 GMX 和 MAGIC 在 Optimsim 上推出专属的 L2 链,也不必惊讶。未来一切皆有可能。

Abitrum 的历史性机遇

关于 L2,蓝狐笔记从三年前开始关注,一直相信它是加密领域最大的机遇之一。在这个领域有可能诞生出加密领域最大的王者之一。Arbitrum 占据了绝佳的位置,如果能把握住这次机遇,有可能在众多 L2 种脱颖而出,成为王者之一。

即便未来 Zk EVM 技术逐步成熟,它也有机会将其生态迁移过去。技术门槛重要,不过生态网络和韧性尤其难得。

真心期望 Arbitrum 能把握历史机遇,成为 L2 的王者。在真正社区化之前,一切都取决于 Arbitrum 团队的一念。一念决定未来的 L2 历史格局。

风险警示:以上所有分析仅是对技术和市场的片面观察,不一定对,请务必保持自己的判断并做好风险控制。

Letture associate

HYPE Spot ETF Continuously Accumulates 1% in 14 Days: Is the $75 New High Just the Starting Point?

Hyperliquid (HYPE) has surged to a new all-time high of $75 amid strong institutional and ETF-driven buying pressure. The article highlights several key bullish factors. First, the HYPE spot ETFs from 21Shares and Bitwise have seen 14 consecutive days of net inflows, totaling over $136 million and absorbing nearly 1% of HYPE's market cap—a faster initial pace than BTC or ETH ETFs. This ETF demand provides a solid price floor. Second, the protocol's own Assistance Fund (AF) mechanism, which uses 99% of fees to buy back and burn HYPE, has already removed over $1.1 billion worth of tokens, creating a dual support system alongside ETF inflows. This combined buying power is expected to counter potential selling pressure from upcoming team token unlocks. Institutionally, venture firm a16z is now considered one of the largest external holders of HYPE, with multiple addresses accumulating millions of tokens. Galaxy Digital is also actively buying. Analysts and firms like Bitwise and Grayscale are framing HYPE not as a mere meme coin but as a "second-generation" crypto with real value capture and infrastructure potential. Furthermore, Hyperliquid Strategies (PURR), a publicly traded company holding a large HYPE treasury, is set to join the Russell 3000 Index, potentially unlocking further passive investment flows. The ongoing feud between prominent backers like Arthur Hayes (pro-HYPE) and Kyle Samani (pro-SOL) underscores the intense market debate, with Hayes famously betting HYPE will outperform all top-ten crypto assets this year.

Odaily星球日报4 min fa

HYPE Spot ETF Continuously Accumulates 1% in 14 Days: Is the $75 New High Just the Starting Point?

Odaily星球日报4 min fa

ETH Bull and Bear Views Compilation: Can Ethereum's Value Flow Back to ETH?

Titled "ETH Bull and Bear Views: Can Ethereum's Value Flow Back to ETH?", this article synthesizes the current heated debate around Ethereum's native token, ETH, following Bankless co-founder David Hoffman's decision to sell his entire ETH holdings. The **bullish case**, represented by figures like Tom Lee (BitMine CEO) and Raoul Pal, argues that ETH's core thesis remains intact. They contend Ethereum is the essential, secure, and neutral foundational layer for future finance—encompassing stablecoins, RWA, DeFi, L2s, and Agentic AI. Bulls bet on ETH's long-term revaluation as institutional adoption of on-chain finance grows, with significant buying activity from entities like BitMine and Consensys cited as evidence. Conversely, the **bearish perspective**, led by Hoffman and analysts like Markus Thielen, questions ETH's value capture mechanism. They acknowledge Ethereum's network success but argue that the value created by L2s, DeFi, and applications does not sufficiently accrue to the ETH token itself. Bears point to ETH's prolonged underperformance versus the broader crypto market, lack of traditional cash flows, weakening "ultrasound money" narrative, and apparent institutional retreat (e.g., Harvard Management Company exiting its ETH ETF position) as key concerns. The debate highlights a pivotal shift: ETH is no longer just a community belief asset. The central question is whether ETH can transition from being a "**used infrastructure**" to a "**continuously bought and held core asset**" as more value enters the Ethereum ecosystem. The market is now critically examining the direct link between network growth and ETH's value.

marsbit51 min fa

ETH Bull and Bear Views Compilation: Can Ethereum's Value Flow Back to ETH?

marsbit51 min fa

Crypto is dead, Perps are forever

The crypto industry is shifting from a focus on creating native assets (like altcoins and protocol tokens) to becoming a "global asset pipeline." Native cryptocurrencies, except for Bitcoin, are seen as failing in their value storage and utility promises, with demand driven largely by speculation. Attention and liquidity are now moving toward real-world assets (RWAs) like U.S. stocks, bonds, gold, and oil traded on-chain via perpetual contracts (Perps). Stablecoins like USDT and USDC set the precedent, proving blockchain's core strength is efficient global settlement and transfer, not inventing new monetary systems. Meanwhile, assets like Ethereum and many DeFi tokens struggle as their narratives weaken against tangible traditional assets and the rapid real-world progress of AI. Perpetual contracts have emerged as a pivotal innovation. They simplify trading by offering pure price exposure to any asset, bypassing complexities of ownership, custody, and traditional market hours. Projects like Hyperliquid gained traction by combining CEX-like efficiency with on-chain transparency, capitalizing on post-FTX distrust, macroeconomic volatility, and the surge in demand for 24/7 stock trading. In conclusion, while the era of speculative native "crypto assets" may be over, perpetual contracts persist as the industry's most potent financial instrument—transforming all assets into globally accessible, constantly tradable instruments centered on price speculation.

marsbit56 min fa

Crypto is dead, Perps are forever

marsbit56 min fa

Tencent, Alibaba, ByteDance in a Battle for the Skill Store

Skill is becoming a key concept in the AI field, essentially serving as a structured "instruction manual" for AI Agents that specifies tool calls, decision logic, and output standards. This allows Agents to execute predefined tasks. As the number of Skills grows, distribution platforms have emerged. Major tech companies are swiftly entering this space. In March, Tencent, Alibaba, and ByteDance launched Skill stores within their respective Agent platforms. Subsequently, players like Zhipu AI, Meituan, and Xiaohongshu joined the fray. This competition for the "Skill store" is fundamentally a battle for the AI-era user entry point; whoever controls distribution controls the users. While ByteDance's Coze has experimented with paid Skills, most platforms offer them for free. The real value lies not in the stores themselves but in using them to attract and retain users within an ecosystem, driving revenue from services like cloud computing, model calls, or advertising. The landscape features three main player types: 1) **Internet giants** (e.g., Alibaba, ByteDance, Tencent, Meituan), leveraging Skills to drive traffic and monetize through their broader ecosystems (cloud services, transactions, ads). 2) **Large model companies** (e.g., Zhipu AI, Moonshot AI), using Skill stores to increase user engagement and monetize model API calls. 3) **Content platforms** (e.g., Xiaohongshu), treating Skills as a new content format to generate traffic and ad revenue. However, transforming Skill stores into a sustainable business faces significant hurdles. Key challenges include: the **difficulty in pricing Skills** due to inconsistent outputs across different models and contexts; **lack of cost transparency** (varying token consumption); **security risks** like Skill poisoning; and the **absence of standardized protocols** for development and evaluation. Unlike standardized mobile apps, Skills are often personalized workflows resistant to uniformity, which hinders the establishment of a reliable review and monetization system akin to the App Store. While there is genuine user demand for paid Skills—particularly in enterprise (e.g., contract review) and certain personal productivity scenarios—current platforms offer developers limited and unpredictable distribution. The future of Skill stores depends on overcoming these standardization, evaluation, and safety challenges to make acquiring a Skill as straightforward as downloading an app. For now, the stores function more as display shelves than robust marketplaces.

marsbit56 min fa

Tencent, Alibaba, ByteDance in a Battle for the Skill Store

marsbit56 min fa

Trading

Spot
Futures

Articoli Popolari

Come comprare UNI

Benvenuto in HTX.com! Abbiamo reso l'acquisto di Uniswap (UNI) semplice e conveniente. Segui la nostra guida passo passo per intraprendere il tuo viaggio nel mondo delle criptovalute.Step 1: Crea il tuo Account HTXUsa la tua email o numero di telefono per registrarti il tuo account gratuito su HTX. Vivi un'esperienza facile e sblocca tutte le funzionalità,Crea il mio accountStep 2: Vai in Acquista crypto e seleziona il tuo metodo di pagamentoCarta di credito/debito: utilizza la tua Visa o Mastercard per acquistare immediatamente UniswapUNI.Bilancio: Usa i fondi dal bilancio del tuo account HTX per fare trading senza problemi.Terze parti: abbiamo aggiunto metodi di pagamento molto utilizzati come Google Pay e Apple Pay per maggiore comodità.P2P: Fai trading direttamente con altri utenti HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): Offriamo servizi su misura e tassi di cambio competitivi per i trader.Step 3: Conserva Uniswap (UNI)Dopo aver acquistato Uniswap (UNI), conserva nel tuo account HTX. In alternativa, puoi inviare tramite trasferimento blockchain o scambiare per altre criptovalute.Step 4: Scambia Uniswap (UNI)Scambia facilmente Uniswap (UNI) nel mercato spot di HTX. Accedi al tuo account, seleziona la tua coppia di trading, esegui le tue operazioni e monitora in tempo reale. Offriamo un'esperienza user-friendly sia per chi ha appena iniziato che per i trader più esperti.

467 Totale visualizzazioniPubblicato il 2024.12.12Aggiornato il 2026.06.02

Come comprare UNI

Discussioni

Benvenuto nella Community HTX. Qui puoi rimanere informato sugli ultimi sviluppi della piattaforma e accedere ad approfondimenti esperti sul mercato. Le opinioni degli utenti sul prezzo di UNI UNI sono presentate come di seguito.

活动图片