解析加密货币的燃烧和回购机制,是否会提高加密货币的价格?

老雅痞Pubblicato 2023-01-30Pubblicato ultima volta 2023-01-30

Introduzione

加密货币市场在很大程度上是由于从传统市场迁移和采用金融策略以满足去中心化资产的需求而增长的。因此,我们有必要了解加密货币回购和销毁。

在项目白皮书里,我们经常会看到Crypto Burn和Crypto Buyback,每次做分析的时候我也会格外关注Burn部分。

在传统的金融市场中,自我投资一直是公司稳定价格的主要工具。加密货币市场在很大程度上是由于从传统市场迁移和采用金融策略以满足去中心化资产的需求而增长的。因此,我们有必要了解加密货币回购和销毁。

加密货币经历了价格动态的动荡,以及与市场上流通的其他代币日益激烈的竞争。这是基于区块链的项目开始应用两种类型的方法来刺激价格和控制发行的原因之一——回购和代币销毁。虽然这两个概念服务于相同的目的,但就价格影响而言,它们的机制和目标有所不同。

什么是加密货币回购和加密货币销毁?

加密货币回购和加密货币销毁的概念是指公司从市场上回购代币,然后销毁它们的做法。这样做是为了减少流通中的代币总数,并对代币的价格产生积极影响。换句话说,这种做法是提高特定代币价值的一种方式。代币持有者可以看到他们的代币价值增加,这意味着这对所有相关方都是有利的。

最早采用这种策略的是币安,它用近20%的利润回购和销毁了币安币(BNB)代币。这导致了BNB代币价格和公司整体价值的上涨。

此后,其他交易所也采用了这一做法。所有这些公司在实施了自己的回购和销毁计划后,都取得了积极的结果。

回购和销毁过程是如何运作的?

区块链网络用于验证交易的几个共识机制之一是Proof-of-burn。这是一种不浪费能源的工作证明协议,允许矿工燃烧虚拟货币的代币。然后,该协议按照烧毁的代币的比例授予采矿权。

然后,矿工将这些代币传输到一个燃烧器地址,并销毁它们。除了在燃烧之前用于挖矿的能量外,这个过程使用的资源较少,使得网络可以保持活跃和灵活。根据该过程的实施方式,你可以烧掉原生货币或BTC等属于替代链的代币。作为交换,你会得到原生货币的回报。

然而,由于资源和竞争较少,vproof-of-burn协议也减少了矿工的数量和代币供应。这可能会给大型矿工带来过多的产能,允许他们一次性销毁大量代币,从而影响价格和供应。

为了解决这个集中化问题,经常会使用衰减率。这有效地降低了单个矿工验证交易的总能力。proof-of-burn类似于权益证明,因为在这两种情况下,矿工都需要锁定他们的资产。然而,在使用权益证明挖矿后,质押者可以拿回他们的代币,这在proof-of-burn中是不可能的。

在加密货币的背景下,回购的方式是一样的。它涉及到从社区购买代币,并把它们放在开发者的钱包里。与燃烧代币不同,它不会永久地消除代币。

加密货币回购和销毁的优势

加密货币市场比传统市场经历了更高的价格波动,至少在当前的市场环境下是这样。加密市场仍处于起步阶段,导致投资者信心下降。因此,发行人需要制定一个清晰、实用、盈利和稳定的价值主张来吸引投资者。

加密货币回购和销毁如何影响加密价格?

一旦可用于二级交易,这些计划就可以支持代币价值的增长和价格稳定。

它们使代币对投资者更具吸引力。

回购和销毁计划会增加流动性,因为二级市场的需求总是更高。这导致代币的价格波动降低。

回购和销毁计划鼓励长期成长型投资者持有代币,使其价格更加稳定。

与回购和销毁相关的风险

加密货币回购和加密货币销毁策略会带来一些风险。一个风险是,进行回购的发行公司会从流通中移除过多的代币。因此,任何依赖于特定代币的加密DApp可能会“耗尽燃料”。

在回购之后,代币的价值也始终存在下跌的风险。如果发生这种情况,投资者持有的价值就会少于以前。这通常发生在团队执行的回购金额低于预期的情况下。

然而,与这种策略所产生的回报相比,上述两种风险都相对较低。

回购和销毁作为加密货币的事实标准

加密货币回购与股票回购或股息回购之间的主要区别在于前者是有保证且自动的。在购买传统股票的情况下,投资者不知道该公司未来是否会支付股息或回购股票。这个决定取决于公司决策者。然而,在回购和销毁的情况下,预定义的编码智能合约会执行这一过程。这意味着发行人别无选择,只能兑现承诺。所有这些都表明,回购和销毁策略将成为未来数字货币的事实标准。

总结

通过回购和销毁策略,企业无法篡改规则。投资者还可以要求提供代币销毁的证据。因此,这一过程消除了投资者方面的不确定性,并为价格稳定和长期价值增长创造了奇迹。

Letture associate

Should You Buy SpaceX Stock at $1.7 Trillion? Here's What the Market Is Worried About

SpaceX is preparing for a massive IPO aiming to raise around $75 billion at a valuation of approximately $1.75 trillion. While its achievements in reusable rockets and the profitable Starlink satellite internet service are clear, the market is concerned about the aggressive valuation. Key issues include: the current $1.75 trillion valuation, which is about 94 times 2025 revenue, seems to price in not just existing businesses but also unproven future ventures like AI infrastructure and orbital data centers. Financially, while Starlink is profitable, the AI division, bolstered by the acquisition of xAI, is incurring massive losses and consuming the majority of capital expenditures. This acquisition also introduced complex related-party financing arrangements and debt onto SpaceX's balance sheet. Furthermore, corporate governance poses a challenge. SpaceX's dual-class share structure ensures founder Elon Musk retains absolute control, limiting ordinary shareholders' influence over high-risk, long-term strategic decisions. The future success of ambitious projects like the Starship rocket—critical for lowering costs and enabling new services—remains a significant variable for the valuation. In summary, the market's apprehension (FUD) centers not on doubting SpaceX's past technological triumphs but on questioning how much premium public investors should pay for a future that combines proven profits with highly speculative and capital-intensive new ventures, all under a governance structure that offers limited shareholder oversight.

marsbit43 min fa

Should You Buy SpaceX Stock at $1.7 Trillion? Here's What the Market Is Worried About

marsbit43 min fa

Breaking the DeFi Cascading Liquidation Curse: Vitalik Proposes a New Solution

Vitalik Buterin has proposed a new DeFi design to eliminate the automatic liquidation mechanism that causes market instability during sharp downturns. The current system, used by protocols like Aave, triggers forced sales when collateral value falls below a threshold, often exacerbating price drops and creating systemic selling pressure. Buterin's alternative model is based on splitting an asset like ETH into two synthetic option-like tokens, P and N, pegged to a price index. Their combined value always equals one ETH. Instead of sudden liquidation, a position's value gradually drifts from its target peg if the market moves. Users must proactively rebalance their holdings to maintain their desired exposure, transferring the management burden from the protocol to the user or automated tools. A key advantage is the reduced reliance on real-time oracles. Pricing decisions are deferred until contract expiry, allowing for more robust, fault-tolerant oracle designs. This removes a clear liquidation threshold that speculators can target for manipulation or MEV extraction. However, significant challenges remain. Frequent rebalancing could incur high slippage and transaction costs, necessitating new liquidity provider models. The design is better suited for hedging instruments than for stablecoins requiring a rigid 1:1 peg. While not an immediate replacement for existing systems, the proposal challenges the foundational assumption that instantaneous forced liquidation is an unavoidable necessity in DeFi, opening the door for fundamentally different risk management architectures.

marsbit48 min fa

Breaking the DeFi Cascading Liquidation Curse: Vitalik Proposes a New Solution

marsbit48 min fa

The End of Single-Factor Cryptography

The article "The End of Single-Factor Crypto" posits a fundamental shift in the cryptocurrency ecosystem. It argues the era where crypto asset valuations were predominantly driven by, and correlated with, Bitcoin's price is ending. The space is bifurcating into two distinct economies: endogenous and exogenous. The endogenous economy represents traditional crypto, where token and project values are directly tied to crypto market prices. The emerging exogenous economy comprises projects and businesses that may utilize blockchain technology or tokens but derive their fundamental value from external, non-crypto factors like consumer demand, subscription revenue, or real-world utility. Examples include AI inference platforms like Venice, fintech lenders using blockchain for efficiency, and stablecoin/payment infrastructure companies acquired by giants like Mastercard and Stripe. This shift means investment analysis must change. For exogenous assets, evaluating traditional business fundamentals—such as revenue streams, unit economics, and competitive moats—becomes more critical than tracking Bitcoin charts. While endogenous assets like Bitcoin remain relevant, the growth of the exogenous category is driven by measurable demand independent of crypto price cycles, paving the way for a new, more diversified market phase. Consequently, crypto is evolving from a single-factor, reflexive asset class into a multifaceted ecosystem with varied drivers and investment theses.

marsbit48 min fa

The End of Single-Factor Cryptography

marsbit48 min fa

Morning Post | Bitmine Plans to Raise $300 Million Through Preferred Stock Issuance; Polymarket Accuses Kalshi of Commercial Espionage

ChainCatcher's Daily Crypto Brief: Key developments from the past 24 hours include significant funding moves, regulatory actions, and market predictions. Bitmine announced a $300 million preferred stock fundraising. Polymarket accused rival prediction platform Kalshi of corporate espionage, citing numerous suspicious coincidences in product launches, a claim Kalshi strongly denied. The U.S. Department of Justice, in a joint "Disruption Week" anti-fraud operation with companies like Coinbase and Meta, froze over $3.8 million in cryptocurrency linked to scams. In infrastructure news, Macau completed its integration with the multi-central bank digital currency bridge, mBridge, aiming to build efficient cross-border payment channels. Cosmos Labs acquired the block explorer Mintscan. Market-wise, Geoffrey Kendrick, Standard Chartered's Head of Digital Assets Research, stated Bitcoin is nearing a bottom around $63,000, maintaining a year-end target of $100,000. He noted stability in U.S. spot Bitcoin ETF holdings. Ahead of SpaceX's anticipated IPO, internal insiders at Rocket Lab (RKLB) sold over $18.41 million in stock. In tokenization, Goldman Sachs partnered with Apex and Archax to launch a tokenized real estate fund. The meme token tracker GMGN reported the top trending tokens: on Ethereum, HEX, SHIB, LINK, PEPE, mUSD; on Solana, TROLL, swarms, WORLDCUP, neet, Buttcoin; and on Base, PEPE, toby, ODDS, ELSA, SKI.

链捕手1 h fa

Morning Post | Bitmine Plans to Raise $300 Million Through Preferred Stock Issuance; Polymarket Accuses Kalshi of Commercial Espionage

链捕手1 h fa

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片