The Richest Fed Chair in History, Blocked by an Absurd Political Farce

marsbitDipublikasikan tanggal 2026-04-15Terakhir diperbarui pada 2026-04-15

Abstrak

The nomination of Kevin Warsh, a former Federal Reserve governor with a personal wealth estimated between $131 million and $209 million, to become the next Fed Chair is stalled by a political standoff. Republican Senator Thom Tillis vows to block the confirmation in the Senate Banking Committee to protest a Justice Department investigation into current Chair Jerome Powell over misleading testimony about a $2.5 billion building renovation. Powell claims the probe is political retaliation for not cutting rates faster. With Powell's term ending on May 15, he has stated he will remain as acting chair if Warsh is not confirmed, creating an unprecedented leadership crisis. Warsh's extensive financial disclosures reveal significant investments, including in crypto entities like Polymarket, Solana, and Bitcoin Lightning Network firms, though he has pledged to divest if confirmed. His potential leadership is seen as favorable for crypto and rate cuts, unlike Powell's cautious stance. The outcome hinges on whether the DOJ investigation is resolved in the next 30 days, a period critical for global markets and crypto regulation.

Written by: Xiaobing, Deep Tide TechFlow

Introduction: With a net worth exceeding $200 million and an investment in Polymarket, Kevin Warsh is just 30 days and one crucial vote away from leading the Federal Reserve.

Next Monday, April 21, at 10 AM, Washington D.C.

Kevin Warsh will sit in the hearing room of the Senate Banking Committee, facing questioning. If all goes smoothly, he will become the first Fed Chair in history to have publicly invested in Polymarket, Solana, and a Bitcoin Lightning Network startup.

But things will not go smoothly.

Because in this hearing room, one of the 13 Republican committee members has already publicly declared: no matter what Warsh says, he will vote no. This person is Thom Tillis, the Republican Senator from North Carolina.

His reason for opposition has nothing to do with Warsh himself. He opposes because the Department of Justice is still investigating the current Fed Chair, Jerome Powell.

The cause of this investigation is the renovation cost of a building.

The $2.5 Billion Renovation Case: A Precision Strike Against the Fed's Independence

The story begins in 2025.

The renovation project for the Federal Reserve headquarters building severely exceeded its budget, ultimately costing around $2.5 billion. Powell had testified about this before the Senate Banking Committee. Washington D.C. Federal Prosecutor Jeanine Pirro subsequently initiated a criminal investigation, issuing a grand jury subpoena to the Fed, on the grounds that Powell may have made misleading statements during his congressional testimony.

Powell's reaction was unusually fierce. He publicly stated that the true purpose of this investigation was not the cost overrun, but retaliation from Trump for his refusal to cut interest rates faster.

Tillis sided with Powell. This Republican senator, who is set to retire in 2027 and faces no re-election pressure, made a resounding statement: "There is no room for compromise in protecting the Federal Reserve's independence from political interference or legal intimidation."

His stance is clear: until the DOJ concludes its investigation into Powell, he will not vote to approve any Fed nominees, including Warsh.

The Republicans hold only a slim 13-to-11 seat majority on the Senate Banking Committee. Losing Tillis's vote, coupled with near-certain unanimous opposition from Democrats, means Warsh's nomination cannot pass at the committee level.

On the other end of the investigation, Prosecutor Pirro is not backing down. Federal Judge James Boasberg has already dismissed her subpoena, stating bluntly in his ruling that "the government has not submitted any evidence of fraud," and that the primary purpose of the investigation appears to be to pressure Powell. Pirro announced she would appeal and publicly dismissed Tillis's obstruction as "white noise."

"I don't know, and I don't care. I'm following the legal channels, I don't care what they say."

A three-way stalemate. Warsh is caught in the middle.

After May 15th, Who Sits in the Fed Chair's Seat?

Powell's term as Chair expires on May 15th. This is a hard deadline.

But his term as a Fed Governor doesn't end until January 2028. This means that even after his chairmanship ends, he will legally remain a member of the Federal Reserve Board of Governors.

Powell has made it clear: if Warsh is not confirmed by May 15th, he will continue to lead the Fed as "Acting Chair." New York Fed President John Williams publicly supported this stance, saying the Federal Open Market Committee can "operate as usual" without a separate vote.

This creates an unprecedented situation: Trump has nominated a new Chair, but the old Chair refuses to leave, with both sides simultaneously claiming the right to sit in that chair.

The White House clearly does not want to see this scenario. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said last week to reporters: "We want Warsh in place as soon as possible." National Economic Council Director Kevin Hassett was more optimistic, saying he is "highly confident" Warsh will be in place before Powell's term ends. Senate Banking Committee Chairman Tim Scott predicted that "the DOJ will conclude its investigation in the coming weeks, and Tillis will ultimately vote yes."

But these are hopes, not facts. The fact is: from the April 21st hearing to May 15th, there are only 24 days. In these 24 days, the hearing, committee vote, and full Senate vote must be completed. Normally, this process takes weeks to months.

And what Tillis said to CNN today leaves no room for ambiguity: "I won't spend five minutes asking Warsh about his qualifications, because he is qualified. I will spend five minutes talking about that sham investigation, and until it's over, I will vote no."

$192 Million in 69 Pages: The Wealth Map of the Next Fed Chair

As the political battle intensified, Warsh submitted a 69-page OGE 278e financial disclosure form on April 14th. This document is not only a necessary prerequisite for the confirmation process but also a mirror, reflecting what kind of person this potential next Fed Chair truly is.

First, the scale. Warsh's personally named assets are approximately between $131 million and $209 million. His wife, Jane Lauder (a member of the Estée Lauder founding family, Forbes estimates her net worth at around $1.9 billion), has additional assets worth hundreds of millions. If confirmed, he would become the wealthiest Fed Chair in history, far surpassing the previously deemed "richest Fed Chair" Powell (assets estimated between $19.7 million and $75 million). Core holdings include two investments in Juggernaut Fund LP, each over $50 million, related to the legendary hedge fund manager Stanley Druckenmiller's Duquesne Family Office. Warsh received $10.2 million in consulting fees from Duquesne, $1.55 million from GoldenTree Asset Management, $750,000 from Cerberus Capital, and $750,000 from Brevan Howard—all institutions with deep involvement in crypto and macro trading.

Then comes the more intriguing part: through DCM Investments 10 LLC and the AVF series of funds, Warsh holds equity in a string of crypto and blockchain companies. Ethereum L2 network Blast, decentralized prediction market Polymarket, Bitcoin Lightning Network payment company Flashnet, Ethereum development platform Tenderly, DeFi investment platform SkyLink, blockchain social networks Arena and DeSo, crypto-focused investment firm Polychain. He has also previously invested in Bitwise, which manages a spot Bitcoin ETF.

Under OGE rules, these unvalued positions mean each is worth less than $1,000. The volume is tiny. But the signal is powerful.

This is not someone who passively bought a bit of a Bitcoin spot ETF in a brokerage account. His holdings actively span the entire crypto ecosystem, from L1 to L2, from DeFi to prediction markets, from payment infrastructure to developer tools, systematically positioning in over a dozen cutting-edge projects. Every sector he has touched is precisely the area most directly influenced by the Fed's regulatory and monetary policy decisions.

Warsh has pledged to divest all assets that could pose a conflict of interest upon confirmation. OGE certifying official Heather Jones confirmed that after completing the divestitures, he will comply with the requirements of the Ethics in Government Act.

But the issue is not whether he will sell these positions. The issue is: what does it mean for someone with such a deep understanding of crypto infrastructure to sit in the Fed Chair's seat?

Two Paths, Two Worlds

The market now faces a classic binary game.

Path A: Pirro withdraws the investigation, Tillis switches to a yes vote, Warsh takes office in mid-May.

This is the scenario the White House is betting on. Scott Bessent publicly said "let the new Chair Warsh lead the next rate-cutting cycle," hinting that Warsh might quickly push for rate cuts upon taking office. Although historically a hawk (he warned about inflation risks even during the 2008 financial recession), recent signals show Warsh leaning towards supporting rate cuts. For the crypto market, a Fed Chair who simultaneously understands the crypto ecosystem and favors looser liquidity is the most favorable combination imaginable.

Path B: Pirro insists on appealing, Tillis doesn't budge, Powell continues to lead as Acting Chair.

This is a scenario full of uncertainty. Powell has clearly stated he will not leave the Fed Board before the investigation concludes. If he continues to chair FOMC meetings and set interest rate policy in an acting capacity, Trump will face a Fed Chair who is "nominally departed but effectively still in power." This constitutional-level debate about Fed independence could be decided in the Supreme Court, which has yet to rule on whether Trump has the authority to fire Fed Governor Lisa Cook.

For the market, Path B means persistent uncertainty. The direction of monetary policy will depend on the outcome of a legal tug-of-war, and the timeline for that legal battle is unpredictable.

What Does This Have to Do with Bitcoin? Everything.

On the surface, this is a Washington drama about Fed personnel. But for those in the crypto market, every variable points directly to asset prices.

Interest Rate Path. Warsh taking office implies升温的降息预期 (warming rate cut expectations). Bessent is already publicly urging "let Warsh lead the next cycle." Rate cuts are a definite positive for risk assets. If Powell continues acting, he will likely maintain a "pause" stance given inflation risks from the US-Iran war, potentially delaying cuts until the second half of the year or later.

Regulatory Signals. A Fed Chair who has invested in Polymarket, Tenderly, and Polychain, versus a Jerome Powell who once publicly said "if I were the government, I'd shut down cryptocurrency," have vastly different impacts on the crypto regulatory environment. Warsh has called Bitcoin a "good cop for policy," believing its price can tell policymakers when they are right and when they are wrong. This cognitive framework suggests he is unlikely to support hostile regulation of the crypto industry.

Stablecoin Legislation. Warsh's confirmation timeline highly overlaps with the window for stablecoin legislation advancing in Congress. A pro-crypto Fed Chair could significantly accelerate this process.

At next Monday's hearing, Tillis will likely spend his five minutes of questioning not asking Warsh a single question about monetary policy, but using all the time to lambast Pirro's investigation. This scene itself will become a headline for global financial media.

The real suspense is not in the hearing room. It lies in: Will Pirro withdraw the investigation before May 15th? What is Tillis's bottom line? If neither gives in, will Trump directly intervene with the DOJ?

There are 30 days left until Powell's term expires. Who sits in the Fed Chair's seat 30 days from now will redefine the rules of the game for the global capital markets in the second half of 2026.

For the crypto market, the weight of these 30 days may be heavier than that of any FOMC meeting.

Pertanyaan Terkait

QWho is Kevin Warsh and what is his significance in the context of the Federal Reserve?

AKevin Warsh is a nominee for the position of Federal Reserve Chair, known for his extensive wealth (estimated between $131 million to $209 million) and investments in crypto and blockchain companies like Polymarket, Solana, and Bitcoin Lightning Network startups. If confirmed, he would be the first Fed Chair with such公开 investments.

QWhy is Thom Tillis opposing Kevin Warsh's nomination to the Federal Reserve?

AThom Tillis, a Republican senator, opposes Warsh's nomination because he insists on protecting the Federal Reserve's independence from political interference. He refuses to vote for any Fed nominee until the Justice Department's investigation into current Chair Jerome Powell over the Fed headquarters renovation cost overrun is concluded.

QWhat is the controversy surrounding Jerome Powell and the Justice Department?

AThe Justice Department, led by prosecutor Jeanine Pirro, is investigating Jerome Powell for potentially misleading Congress about the $2.5 billion cost overrun in the Fed headquarters renovation. Powell claims the investigation is retaliation from Trump for not cutting interest rates faster.

QWhat happens if Kevin Warsh is not confirmed by May 15th, when Powell's term expires?

AIf Warsh is not confirmed by May 15th, Jerome Powell has stated he will continue as 'Acting Chair' of the Federal Reserve, leveraging his ongoing role as a Fed governor until 2028. This could lead to a unprecedented situation with both Powell and Warsh claiming authority.

QHow might Kevin Warsh's potential leadership impact cryptocurrency markets and policy?

AWarsh's leadership could positively impact crypto markets due to his inclination towards rate cuts and deep understanding of crypto infrastructure. He has referred to Bitcoin as a 'good cop for policy,' suggesting a more favorable regulatory approach compared to Powell, who has expressed hostility towards cryptocurrencies.

Bacaan Terkait

OpenAI Tidak Lagi Mengandalkan Model Termahal untuk Menghasilkan Uang

OpenAI tidak lagi mengandalkan model termahal untuk menghasilkan uang. Pada 30 Juli, perusahaan mengumumkan penyesuaian harga, menurunkan harga model GPT-5.6 Luna sebesar 80% dan Terra sebesar 20%. Yang lebih penting dari angka penurunan harga adalah pesan intinya: untuk banyak tugas, model terkuat (seperti Sol) tidak selalu diperlukan. OpenAI secara eksplisit merekomendasikan strategi di mana model mahal (Sol) menangani perencanaan dan analisis kompleks, sementara model yang lebih terjangkau (Luna) mengeksekusi tugas, menulis kode, dan menjalankan pengujian. Pergeseran ini mencerminkan perubahan industri AI dari hanya mengejar kecerdasan tertinggi menuju optimisasi biaya dan efisiensi untuk penggunaan skala besar. Anthropic juga mengikuti pola serupa dengan meluncurkan Claude Opus 5 dengan harga setengah dari model andalannya, Fable 5. Kedua raksasa Silicon Valley ini menunjukkan bahwa model flagship kini berfungsi lebih untuk nilai merek dan pembuktian teknologi, sementara model "kendaraan massal" yang lebih murah (seperti Luna, Terra, Opus) yang akan mendorong adopsi komersial luas dan menghasilkan pendapatan utama. OpenAI mengungkapkan bahwa penurunan biaya ini sebagian didorong oleh model AI (Sol) yang mengoptimalkan kode produksi dan alur kerjanya sendiri, menciptakan siklus peningkatan efisiensi yang dapat mempercepat penurunan biaya di masa depan. Intinya, kompetisi AI bergeser dari "siapa yang paling pintar" menjadi "mana yang paling bernilai". Perusahaan tidak lagi membeli satu model tunggal, tetapi merancang sistem dengan beberapa model yang cocok untuk tugas yang berbeda—mirip dengan arsitektur komputasi awan. Tujuan akhir OpenAI adalah membangun ekosistem yang mengunci alur kerja pengembang melalui volume panggilan API yang sangat besar dan biaya yang sangat rendah, sehingga menciptakan daya tarik yang kuat. Ketika AI menjadi murah dan tersebar luas seperti listrik, tertanam dalam setiap proses tanpa diperdebatkan, era sesungguhnya baru dimulai.

marsbit54m yang lalu

OpenAI Tidak Lagi Mengandalkan Model Termahal untuk Menghasilkan Uang

marsbit54m yang lalu

Gaji Puluhan Miliar untuk Rebut Tukang Listrik, Meta Buru-buru Buka Sekolah Kejuruan Sendiri

Perlombaan AI kini menghadapi hambatan baru: **kelangkaan tenaga ahli teknik**, terutama tukang listrik. Proyek data center raksasa seperti "Stargate" OpenAI membutuhkan ratusan pekerja konstruksi yang bekerja hingga 7 hari seminggu. Menurut prediksi, AS membutuhkan **130.000 tukang listrik tambahan** hingga 2030, namun puluhan ribu lowongan per tahun tetap tak terisi. Gaji yang ditawarkan sangat tinggi, mencapai **$240.000-$280.000 per tahun** untuk tukang listrik andal. Namun, kelambatan proyek karena kekurangan tenaga kerja bisa menyebabkan kerugian **$14,2 juta per bulan**. Presiden Microsoft menyebut kelangkaan tukang listrik sebagai **hambatan utama** ekspansi data center. Kompleksitas data center AI sangat tinggi karena kebutuhan daya besar (setara puluhan ribu rumah), sistem distribusi listrik rumit, dan tantangan pendinginan yang membutuhkan ahli pipa dan HVAC. Akibatnya, perusahaan seperti Meta dan Alphabet berinvestasi besar dalam pelatihan. Meta mengalokasikan **$115 juta** untuk mendirikan sekolah pelatihan konstruksi, menawarkan program gratis dengan tunjangan hidup. Upaya ini menarik minat generasi Z, dengan lonjakan pendaftaran sekolah kejuruan. Namun, tantangan berlanjut: konsumsi listrik data center AI melonjak **84,2% per tahun**, mendorong harga listrik naik. Selain itu, pekerjaan konstruksi bersifat proyek - setelah data center selesai, ribuan pekerja terlatih harus mencari pekerjaan baru, berpotensi membanjiri sektor lain dan menekan upah. Masa depan pasar tenaga kerja teknik pasca-boom AI masih belum pasti.

marsbit54m yang lalu

Gaji Puluhan Miliar untuk Rebut Tukang Listrik, Meta Buru-buru Buka Sekolah Kejuruan Sendiri

marsbit54m yang lalu

The Fed Harus Naikkan Suku Bunga di September? Bagaimana Tekanannya pada Crypto dan Saham AS?

Pasar telah meningkatkan perkiraan suku bunga Federal Reserve (The Fed) pada September menjadi lebih dari 73%, meningkat pesat dari kurang dari 53% sepekan sebelumnya. Lonjakan ini dipicu oleh perbedaan suara dalam rapat The Fed Juli (9-3) dan kekhawatiran inflasi akibat kenaikan harga minyak, yang didorong oleh ketegangan geopolitik di dekat Selat Hormuz. Kunci penentu berikutnya adalah data CPI bulan Juli pada 12 Agustus. Jika inflasi menunjukkan kenaikan berlanjut, probabilitas kenaikan suku bunga September akan semakin kuat. Untuk aset kripto seperti Bitcoin, ekspektasi kenaikan suku bunga biasanya menekan harga karena meningkatkan biaya peluang memegang aset tidak menghasilkan dan menarik aliran modal ke aset yang lebih aman. Namun, dampaknya mungkin terbatas jika pasar memandang kenaikan ini sebagai akhir dari siklus pengetatan. Saham AS terkait kripto (seperti Coinbase, MicroStrategy) cenderung bereaksi lebih volatil. Kenaikan suku bunga meningkatkan tingkat diskonto dalam valuasi, memberi tekanan lebih besar pada saham pertumbuhan dan teknologi. Hal ini bertepatan dengan musim laporan keuangan dimana investor kini lebih kritis, menilai apakah pengeluaran modal besar-besaran untuk AI dapat benar-benar menghasilkan pendapatan dan arus kas. Perusahaan dengan cerita pertumbuhan lemah dan arus kas negatif mungkin menghadapi volatilitas lebih tinggi jika The Fed benar-benar menaikkan suku bunga.

marsbit1j yang lalu

The Fed Harus Naikkan Suku Bunga di September? Bagaimana Tekanannya pada Crypto dan Saham AS?

marsbit1j yang lalu

Penambang Bitcoin Mulai Menyerah, Tapi Saham Mereka Malah Meroket

Penambang Bitcoin Menyerah, Namun Saham Mereka Melonjak. Hashrate Bitcoin telah menurun selama berbulan-bulan, dan kesulitan penambangan juga baru saja mencatat salah satu penurunan terbesar. Biasanya, ini adalah cerita sederhana: penambang mematikan mesin karena tidak menguntungkan. Namun, kali ini, saham perusahaan penambang publik justru mengalami salah satu performa terkuat dalam beberapa tahun terakhir, sementara harga BTC sendiri tertekan. Setiap penurunan hashrate yang lebih lama dari ini dalam sejarah Bitcoin dapat dihitung dengan jari. Kesulitan penambangan telah turun 19.9% dari puncaknya, salah satu penurunan terdalam sejak dominasi ASIC. Alasan di balik kenaikan saham perusahaan tambang adalah narasi AI. Aset-aset ini kini lebih banyak bergerak seiring dengan sektor AI daripada dengan Bitcoin itu sendiri. Sementara itu, pendapatan penambang dari blok reward (subsidi) dalam denominasi BTC mencapai rekor terendah baru. Subsidi blok berkurang setengah setiap empat tahun, dan logika bahwa kenaikan harga akan mengimbangi pengurangan ini masih bertahan sejauh ini, dengan metrik Puell Multiple saat ini sekitar 0.75. Jawaban jangka panjang selalu adalah biaya transaksi (fee), yang suatu hari nanti harus sepenuhnya mendanai keamanan jaringan. Namun, realitanya masih sangat jauh. Rata-rata harian fee selama 28 hari terakhir bahkan tidak cukup untuk menutupi subsidi satu blok, sementara jaringan menghasilkan sekitar 144 blok per hari. Bentuk "penyerahan diri" penambang kali ini berbeda dari siklus sebelumnya. Penambang telah menemukan penggunaan perangkat keras yang lebih menguntungkan, sementara harga BTC turun, subsidi menyusut, dan pendapatan dari fee stagnan. Masalah yang perlu diselesaikan seringkali baru ditangani secara serius selama pasar bearish.

marsbit1j yang lalu

Penambang Bitcoin Mulai Menyerah, Tapi Saham Mereka Malah Meroket

marsbit1j yang lalu

Trading

Spot
活动图片