The Week You Wish You Sold

insights.glassnodeDipublikasikan tanggal 2025-10-21Terakhir diperbarui pada 2025-10-22

Excerpt

Bitcoin trades below key cost basis levels, signalling demand exhaustion and fading momentum. Long-term holders are selling into strength, while the options market turns defensive, with rising put demand and elevated volatility, marking a cautious phase before any sustainable recovery.

Executive Summary

  • Bitcoin trades below the short-term holders’ cost basis and the 0.85 quantile, signalling fading momentum and growing market fatigue. Repeated failures to reclaim these levels raise the risk of a longer consolidation phase.
  • Long-term holders have ramped up spending since July, now exceeding 22K BTC/day, marking sustained profit-taking that continues to pressure market stability.
  • Open interest hit a new ATH, but sentiment leans bearish as traders favour puts over calls. Short-term rallies are being met with hedging rather than renewed optimism.
  • Implied volatility remains elevated, while realized volatility has caught up, ending the calm, low-volatility regime. Dealers’ short gamma positioning amplifies selloffs and tempers rallies.
  • Both on-chain and options data suggest a cautious, transitional phase. Market recovery is likely to hinge on renewed spot demand and easing volatility.

Bitcoin has gradually drifted away from its recent all-time high, stabilizing below the short-term holders’ cost basis of around $113.1k. Historically, this structure often precedes the onset of a mid-term bearish phase, as weaker hands begin to capitulate.

In this edition, we assess the market’s current profitability, examine the scale and persistence of long-term holder spending, and conclude by evaluating sentiment in the options market to gauge whether the correction reflects a healthy consolidation or signals deeper exhaustion ahead.

On-chain Insights

Testing Conviction

Trading around the short-term holders’ cost basis marks a pivotal phase where the market tests the conviction of investors who bought near recent highs. Historically, a breakdown below this level following a new ATH has driven the Percent of Supply in Profit down to roughly 85%, implying that over 15% of supply sits at a loss.

We are now witnessing this pattern for the third time in the current cycle. If Bitcoin fails to recover above the ~113.1k, a deeper contraction could push a larger share of supply into loss, amplifying stress among recent buyers and potentially setting the stage for broader capitulation across the market.

Live Chart

Critical Thresholds

To further contextualize this structure, it’s essential to understand why reclaiming the short-term holders’ cost basis is pivotal for sustaining a bullish phase. The Supply Quantile Cost Basis model provides a clear framework by mapping the 0.95, 0.85, and 0.75 quantiles, indicating levels where 5%, 15%, and 25% of the supply is held at a loss.

Currently, Bitcoin trades not only below the short-term holder cost basis ($113.1k) but is also struggling to stay above the 0.85 quantile at $108.6k. Historically, failure to hold this threshold has signalled structural market weakness and often preceded deeper corrections toward the 0.75 quantile, which now aligns near $97.5k.

Live Chart

Exhausted Demand

Contracting below both the short-term holders’ cost basis and the 0.85 quantile for the third time this cycle raises structural concerns. From a macro perspective, repeated demand exhaustion suggests the market may require a longer consolidation phase to rebuild strength.

This exhaustion becomes clearer when examining Long-Term Holder Spend Volume. Since the market peak in July 2025, long-term holders have steadily increased their spending, with the 30D-SMA rising from the 10K BTC (baseline) to over 22K BTC per day. Such persistent distribution indicates profit-taking pressure from seasoned investors, which has been a key factor behind the market’s current fragility.

Live Chart

After evaluating the risk of a prolonged bearish phase from demand exhaustion, we now turn to the options market to gauge short-term sentiment and see how speculators are positioning amid rising uncertainty.

Off-chain Insights

Open Interest Rising

Bitcoin options open interest has reached a new all-time high and continues to expand, marking a structural evolution in market behaviour.
Rather than selling spot, investors are increasingly using options to hedge exposure or speculate on volatility. This shift reduces direct sell pressure in the spot market, but amplifies short-term volatility driven by dealer hedging activity.

As open interest grows, price swings are more likely to originate from delta- and gamma-driven flows in futures and perpetual markets. Understanding these dynamics is becoming crucial, as options positioning now plays a dominant role in shaping short-term market movements and amplifying reactions to macro and on-chain catalysts.

Live Chart

Volatility Regime Shift

Since the liquidation event on the 10th, Bitcoin’s volatility landscape has shifted notably. Implied volatility (IV) now hovers around 48 across maturities, up from 36–43 two weeks earlier. Market makers remain cautious, keeping volatility pricing elevated as they avoid selling it cheaply.

Meanwhile, realized volatility has cooled, with the 30-day at 44.1% and 10-day at 27.9%, suggesting the market is gradually stabilizing. Unless new shocks emerge, IV is likely to normalize in the coming weeks. For now, volatility remains elevated but reflects a short-term repricing rather than the onset of a sustained high-vol regime.

Live Chart

Put Skew Builds

Following the same theme, the skew toward puts has increased steadily over the past two weeks. The big liquidation spike pushed the put skew sharply higher, and although it briefly reset, the curve has since stabilized at structurally higher levels, meaning puts remain richer than calls.

Over the past week, the 1-week maturity has been choppy but stayed in the high-uncertainty zone, while all other maturities have moved 2–3 vol points further toward puts. This broadening across maturities (also referred to as tenors) indicates that caution is spreading along the curve.

This structure reflects a market willing to pay up for downside protection while maintaining limited upside exposure, balancing short-term fear within a still-confident long-term outlook. Tuesday’s small rally (Oct 21) illustrated that sensitivity, as put premiums were cut in half within hours, showing how jumpy sentiment remains.

Live Chart

Risk Premium Turns

The 1-Month Volatility Risk Premium—the gap between implied and realized volatility—has turned negative. For months, implied volatility stayed elevated while realized moves remained muted, rewarding short-vol traders with steady carry.

Now, realized volatility has surged to match implied, erasing that advantage. This marks the end of the calm regime: volatility sellers can no longer rely on passive income and are instead forced to hedge actively in choppier conditions.
The market has shifted from quiet complacency to a more dynamic, reactive environment where short-gamma positions face mounting pressure as real price swings return.

Live Chart

Flows Stay Defensive

To bring the analysis to the very short term, we zoom into the past 24 hours to observe how option positioning has reacted to the latest bounce.
Despite a 6% rally from $107.5K to $113.9K, there was little confirmation from call buying. Instead, traders added to their put exposure, effectively locking in higher price levels.

This positioning leaves dealers short gamma on the downside and long gamma on the upside, a setup that typically causes them to fade rallies and accelerate selloff, a dynamic that will continue to act as a headwind until positioning resets.

Premiums Tell the Story

Glassnode’s aggregated premium data reinforces this view when analyzed by strike. At the $120K call, sold premiums have increased alongside price, showing traders are fading the rally and selling volatility into strength they view as temporary. Short-term yield seekers are capitalizing on spikes in implied volatility by selling calls into rallies rather than chasing upside.

Live Chart

Moreover, at the $105K put, the pattern flips, reinforcing the same conclusion. As spot price climbed, net premiums on this strike rose, showing traders were more eager to pay for downside protection than for upside exposure. In essence, the latest rally was met with hedging, not conviction — the market is willing to insure risk rather than embrace belief.

Live Chart

Conclusion

Bitcoin’s recent correction below the short-term holders’ cost basis ($113.1k) and the 0.85 quantile ($108.6k) highlights growing demand exhaustion, as the market struggles to attract new inflows while long-term holders continue to distribute. This structural fatigue suggests that the network may need a longer consolidation phase to rebuild confidence and absorb the spent supply.

Meanwhile, the options market reflects this same cautious tone. Despite record-high open interest, positioning leans defensive; put skew remains elevated, volatility sellers are under pressure, and short-term rallies are met with hedging rather than optimism. Together, these signals indicate a market in transition: one where exuberance has waned, structural risk-taking is subdued, and recovery will likely depend on restoring spot demand and mitigating volatility-driven flows.

Bacaan Terkait

Serenity, 'Pemimpin Komunitas' Ritel vs Leopold, Dewa Saham Baru: Bagaimana Dua Pemburu Top Ini Menggali Kekayaan dari 'Batas Fisik' AI?

Penulis: Jae, PANews Setelah logika investasi sederhana seperti membeli Nvidia kehilangan daya tariknya, uang cerdas kini beralih ke fondasi fisik di balik operasi AI. Dua figur dengan gaya berbeda menjadi sorotan: **Serenity**, trader anonim dengan avatar anime di platform X yang mengklaim pernah menolak tawaran kerja dari Nvidia dan menerbitkan makalah di Nature, serta **Leopold Aschenbrenner**, mantan peneliti OpenAI berusia 24 tahun yang kini mengelola dana lindung nilai senilai miliaran dolar. **Strategi Serenity: Teori "Daun Shiso" dan Pencarian "Titik Sumbatan"** Serenity, dengan akun @aleabitoreddit, terkenal berkat analisis mendalamnya tentang rantai pasokan AI level terendah. Ia menggunakan analogi "Daun Shiso" – komponen kecil yang tak tergantikan dalam hidangan mewah – untuk mengidentifikasi perusahaan mikro dengan monopoli teknologi di titik kritis tertentu, seperti bahan substrat untuk modul optik. Metodenya melibatkan studi mendalam makalah ilmiah, pemetaan rantai pasokan, dan pengujian dengan AI. Fokusnya adalah pada teknologi CPO dan material tingkat molekuler, menghasilkan rekomendasi saham seperti AXTI (naik 6x) dan perusahaan bahan kimia Jepang NCI. **Strategi Leopold: Arbitrase Infrastruktur dan Batasan Fisik** Leopold, melalui dana Situational Awareness LP, menerapkan strategi **arbitrase infrastruktur**. Ia yakin hambatan utama menuju AGI adalah sumber daya fisik seperti listrik, lahan, dan pusat data, bukan hanya chip. Portofolionya sangat terkonsentrasi: **posisi panjang besar** pada penyedia penyimpanan (SanDisk) dan cloud komputasi (CoreWeave), serta **posisi pendek masif** (melalui opsi put) terhadap raksasa semikonduktor seperti Nvidia, TSMC, dan ASML. Ia berargumen valuasi chip telah melampaui kecepatan pembangunan infrastruktur pendukungnya. Ia juga berinvestasi besar pada perusahaan penambangan Bitcoin, yang dilihatnya sebagai alternatif pusat daya komputasi AI yang terdiskonto. **Inti Bersama dan Tantangan** Kedua strategi berbagi inti yang sama: **meninggalkan lapisan perangkat lunak dan berfokus pada perangkat keras yang dibatasi oleh hukum fisik**. Baik material langka Serenity maupun infrastruktur Leopold memegang kekuatan untuk menarik "pajak" di era AI. Namun, keduanya menghadapi risiko: - **Serenity**: Risiko **likuiditas** pada saham mikro. Rekomendasinya dapat mendorong harga, tetapi koreksi bisa tajam. Latar belakang dan rekam jejaknya yang tidak terverifikasi juga menambah risiko bagi pengikut. - **Leopold**: Risiko **ketidaksesuaian waktu** antara logika fundamental dan pasar. Valuasi tinggi chip bisa bertahan lebih lama dari perkiraan, menyebabkan kerugian besar pada posisi opsi put-nya. Keduanya menandai pergeseran logika investasi AI, dari semikonduktor itu sendiri menuju **material, peralatan, daya, dan lahan** yang mendasarinya. Titik kritis dengan kelangkaan dan hambatan teknologi tinggi di rantai pasokan fisik AI mungkin akan menarik perhatian pasar lebih besar ke depan.

marsbit4j yang lalu

Serenity, 'Pemimpin Komunitas' Ritel vs Leopold, Dewa Saham Baru: Bagaimana Dua Pemburu Top Ini Menggali Kekayaan dari 'Batas Fisik' AI?

marsbit4j yang lalu

Nocera Berganti Nama Menjadi Nocera Holdings, Melangkah Penuh ke AI, Pusat Data, Robotika, Biotek, dan Aset Digital

Nocera, Inc. (Nasdaq: NCRA) mengumumkan transformasi korporat besar dan perubahan merek menjadi **Nocera Holdings**, sebuah perusahaan induk yang akan berfokus pada bidang teknologi beragam dan pertumbuhan tinggi. Perusahaan memperluas syarat perjanjian pembiayaan hingga $300 juta untuk mendanai akuisisi, investasi strategis, dan peluang ekspansi. Nocera Holdings akan mengejar peluang di berbagai sektor teknologi utama: * **AI & Infrastruktur AI:** Mencari akuisisi dan kemitraan di platform infrastruktur AI, aplikasi tingkat perusahaan, dan solusi operasional terkait AI. * **Pusat Data:** Mengevaluasi peluang di Asia dan Eropa Timur untuk pusat data dan proyek infrastruktur pendukung, didorong oleh permintaan komputasi awan dan AI. * **Bioteknologi & AI Medis:** Menjelajahi investasi dalam diagnostik, otomatisasi, teknologi medis, dan platform operasional yang digerakkan oleh AI. * **Robotika & "AI Fisik":** Fokus pada otomatisasi industri, robotika, dan aplikasi AI dunia nyata, khususnya di pasar Asia yang berkembang pesat. * **Blockchain & Aset Digital:** Terus mengembangkan strategi blockchain, tokenisasi, dan infrastruktur aset digital sebagai bagian dari portofolio jangka panjang. Transformasi ini didukung oleh pembaruan merek dan strategi komunikasi internasional. Perusahaan juga tetap berkomitmen untuk memperkuat neraca keuangan dan mematuhi peraturan pencatatan Nasdaq. Dengan hubungan dan kehadiran pasar di Asia, Nocera Holdings bertujuan menciptakan nilai jangka panjang bagi pemegang saham melalui teknologi generasi berikutnya.

marsbit4j yang lalu

Nocera Berganti Nama Menjadi Nocera Holdings, Melangkah Penuh ke AI, Pusat Data, Robotika, Biotek, dan Aset Digital

marsbit4j yang lalu

Siapa yang Bisa Menghasilkan Uang di Era Agents?

Banyak yang memperkirakan pengguna blockchain berikutnya akan didominasi oleh Agen (Agents). Namun, di dunia seperti itu, siapa yang sebenarnya akan mendapatkan nilai? Teori lama dalam kripto, seperti "Protokol Gemuk" (Fat Protocols) yang berfokus pada manusia, dan teori "Aplikasi Gemuk" (Fat Apps) yang berfokus pada hubungan dengan pengguna, mungkin tidak lagi berlaku ketika pengguna adalah Agen. Agen bersifat rasional, tanpa loyalitas merek, dan dapat beralih antar platform dengan mudah. Mereka tidak peduli pada antarmuka pengguna (UX) atau kemudahan. Ini mengikis keunggulan aplikasi yang menguasai hubungan dengan pengguna. Lalu, siapa yang menangkap nilai? Artikel ini menjelaskan beberapa kemungkinan skenario: 1. **Aplikasi Menjadi "Tanpa Kepala" (Headless):** Pemenang di lapisan aplikasi saat ini (seperti dompet, agregator) dapat membuka infrastruktur mereka sebagai API untuk Agen, beralih menjadi penyedia backend murni. 2. **Kebangkitan Kembali Protokol:** Jika integrasi menjadi sangat mudah, Agen mungkin melewati perantara dan berinteraksi langsung dengan protokol dasar, memberi napas baru pada teori Protokol Gemuk. 3. **Runtuhnya Daya Tarif Harga di Seluruh Lapisan Teknologi:** Agen yang selalu mencari harga terbaik dapat memicu perang harga ekstrem, memaksa margin semua lapisan mendekati biaya marjinal. Kripto menjadi utilitas dengan keuntungan tipis. 4. **Agen Menciptakan Aktivitas Ekonomi Baru:** Agen memungkinkan aktivitas yang tidak layak bagi manusia (misalnya, rebalancing portofolio berbiaya sangat rendah, perdagangan mesin-ke-mesin), memperbesar total kue ekonomi secara signifikan. 5. **Model Bisnis Baru yang Belum Terbayangkan:** Seperti pergeseran ke ekonomi perhatian di era internet, mungkin muncul model bisnis dominan baru di dunia Agen yang saat ini belum terpikirkan. Kemungkinan besar, manusia dan Agen akan tetap hidup berdampingan. Untuk transaksi manusia, teori Aplikasi Gemuk masih relevan. Sedangkan untuk transaksi Agen, pertanyaan kuncinya adalah: apa yang membuat sebuah Agen memilih Anda, bukan hanya harga termurah? Faktor seperti likuiditas, latensi rendah, atau jaminan penyelesaian mungkin menjadi jawabannya.

marsbit5j yang lalu

Siapa yang Bisa Menghasilkan Uang di Era Agents?

marsbit5j yang lalu

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片