The Hottest 00s Generation on Wall Street

marsbitPublié le 2026-05-31Dernière mise à jour le 2026-05-31

Résumé

"Wall Street's Hottest '00s Phenom: The 25-Year-Old Fund Manager Who Bet on AI's 'Boring' Backbone" At just 25, Leopold Aschenbrenner, once fired by OpenAI, now runs a hedge fund worth $13.7 billion. His strategy? Betting against the consensus. While others chased AI chips, he invested early in the physical infrastructure powering the AI boom: electricity, data centers, and energy. Expelled from OpenAI's safety team in 2024, Aschenbrenner foresaw the coming bottleneck. He argued that AI progress would be limited not by algorithms, but by power, chip capacity, and space. Acting on this, he founded Situational Awareness LP to go long on these "old economy" assets. His bets have paid off spectacularly. His fund's assets soared from $255 million in late 2024 to $13.7 billion by Q1 2026. His portfolio is a direct reflection of his thesis: major long positions in fuel cell company Bloom Energy and data center/bitcoin mining firms like CleanSpark and Riot Platforms, which control critical land and power resources. Conversely, he holds massive put options against overheated semiconductor giants like NVIDIA and AMD. A notable exception was his bullish bet on storage company SanDisk, which surged ~160% in Q2. Aschenbrenner's vision is materializing. Tech giants like Amazon, Alphabet, and Meta are ramping up colossal capital expenditure on data centers. Global data center power consumption is projected to skyrocket, with AI accounting for over half by 2030. The demand for enabling t...

"I was early, but I wasn't wrong."

The protagonist in the movie "The Big Short" would surely resonate deeply with these words, much like the youngest hedge fund manager on Wall Street today.

In 2024, a notice from OpenAI sent 23-year-old Leopold Aschenbrenner packing. Soon after, he turned around and founded a hedge fund, positioning himself against the prevailing consensus—he didn't go all-in on the then-sizzling hot AI chips and semiconductors, but instead went long on electricity, data centers, computing power infrastructure, and energy infrastructure. These were seen as slow, clunky "old-school" assets at the time.

His early calculation soon proved prophetic. Today, tech giants are pouring huge investments into AI infrastructure, and the capital markets have enthusiastically crowned new AI kings in areas like storage and optical modules. Leopold won. His fund's portfolio value had already reached $13.7 billion (approx. RMB 90 billion) by the end of Q1 this year, and his personal wealth has skyrocketed.

And he's only 25. In the AI era, the genius narrative is simply too compelling.

Graduated from University at 19

Fired by OpenAI Two Years Ago

His youth shouldn't be too surprising, considering he started university at 15.

This German teenager from a family of doctors showed exceptional academic talent. In 2021, at age 19, Leopold earned three degrees in Mathematics, Statistics, and Economics, graduating as the valedictorian from Columbia University, and subsequently worked at two funds.

Not long after, he joined OpenAI's Superalignment team. This was a star-studded team, co-led by OpenAI co-founder Ilya Sutskever, with the goal of solving the superintelligence alignment problem within four years—essentially ensuring highly intelligent AI remains under human control.

The drama came when Leopold was very publicly fired by OpenAI.

The trigger was an internal memo written by the OpenAI board warning of insufficient safety measures at the company. This memo, however, sparked tensions between management and the board. In April 2024, OpenAI dismissed Leopold, citing information leaks.

Experiences shape choices and hone foresight.

Shortly after being fired, Leopold published a profound, lengthy essay that almost predicted the current direction of AI development and investment trends. In it, he mentioned that by 2027, large models would be capable of doing the work of AI researchers or engineers.

To achieve this, the key constraints wouldn't be at the algorithmic level, but in electricity, chip manufacturing capacity, and physical space. The power consumption of a single training cluster would leap from megawatt scale to gigawatt scale, approaching the output of a large nuclear power plant.

Based on this prediction, at the end of 2024, Leopold chose to start a business—founding the hedge fund Situational Awareness LP, dedicating himself to going long on the energy and computing power infrastructure needed for AI development, while avoiding the crowded bubbles in chips and the application layer.

Shorting Nvidia

But Buying Into the High-Flier SanDisk

Thus, Wall Street's new genius trader was born.

In May 2026, as Leopold's hedge fund disclosed its latest U.S. stock holdings (13F filing) for the first quarter of the year, the astonishing expansion of this 00s-generation manager's wealth came into view:

The total market value of his portfolio had skyrocketed from $5.52 billion at the end of 2025 to $13.7 billion. At the end of 2024, the fund's size was merely $255 million. This speed is nothing short of meteoric.

Beyond his resume and genius stories, global onlookers were more interested in what he bought.

Looking at his latest holdings, Leopold maintained his long positions in AI infrastructure while establishing new short option positions worth $8.45 billion as a hedge against tech and semiconductors. As of the end of Q1, his top five holdings were all put options. These included put options on the VanEck Semiconductor ETF valued at around $2 billion, put options on Nvidia valued at around $1.6 billion, as well as put options on Oracle, Broadcom, and Advanced Micro Devices (AMD).

This portfolio clearly signaled wariness towards overheated chip stocks. An exception was that by the end of Q1, he had exclusively increased his holdings of SanDisk by 86,000 shares and established call options on SanDisk worth $390 million. SanDisk's subsequent performance undoubtedly became the envy of many; since the start of Q2 alone, SanDisk has risen approximately 160%.

The main action was on the long side, where Leopold heavily invested in critical infrastructure assets for the AGI era.

His top long holding was the fuel cell company Bloom Energy. Leopold holds nearly 6.5 million shares of the company, with a position value of about $879 million. More precisely, Bloom Energy makes fuel cells, which can efficiently convert natural gas directly into electricity.

Simultaneously, in Q1, Leopold also increased his holdings in companies like CleanSpark, Riot Platforms, Applied Digital, and IREN—firms involved in data centers or crypto mining, possessing land, power resources, data center capabilities, or grid permits.

"The speed of AI development is determined by physical bottlenecks, so you should invest in the bottlenecks themselves." Looking across these trades, they precisely correspond to the underlying logic Leopold had when founding the fund.

Of course, for ordinary investors, copying these moves comes a bit late. Holdings reports typically have a 45-day delay, and by the time the public sees what the big players have bought, the most lucrative part of the rally has often already passed.

The End Point of the AI World

"The whole world is starting to value AI infrastructure assets."

In just the past few months of this year, the sectors Leopold bet on—power supply, data center computing power, semiconductor optics—have fully demonstrated their potential and immense demand.

Take electricity, for example. IEA data shows that in 2025, global data centers consumed 485 TWh of electricity, with AI accounting for 170 TWh (35%). It's projected that by 2030, total global data center electricity consumption will reach 950 TWh, with AI consuming 510 TWh (54%), exceeding Japan's total national electricity consumption. China's figures are equally staggering: in 2025, AI electricity consumption reached 450 billion kWh (3.8% of total societal electricity use), and it's expected to reach 600 billion kWh (5%) in 2026, nearly matching the annual electricity consumption of China's entire steel industry.

Then look at "light." As AI competition rapidly evolves from a battle of computing power to one of connectivity, traditional copper wire connections are long overburdened, leading to explosive growth in demand for "optical links."

According to data from UK-based commodity research firm CRU, global data center fiber optic cable usage reached 69.6 million core kilometers in 2025 and is expected to exceed 100 million core kilometers in 2026. Their estimates suggest that by 2027, AI-driven fiber demand will account for 35% of total data center fiber demand. For optical modules, Goldman Sachs has significantly raised its 2026 sales forecast for 800G optical modules from an initial 25 million units to 33.5 million units, a 58% increase.

Unsurprisingly, tech giants have already begun building their AI infrastructure moats.

In 2026, capital expenditure plans from Amazon, Alphabet (Google's parent), Meta, and others have grown substantially, with massive funds directed towards building new data centers and a long list of equipment including AI chips, network cables, and backup generators. Domestically, the latest development is rumors that ByteDance is discussing a spending plan of up to $70 billion (approx. RMB 474.7 billion) this year, primarily for building data centers and other AI infrastructure.

This wave of AI infrastructure frenzy is even more directly and violently reflected in the capital markets.

Looking domestically, the "Yi-Zhong-Tian" trio of optical module giants have seen their stock prices double since last year, especially InnoLight Technology, which soared from a low of 66 yuan per share in April last year to over 1,000 yuan, with a market cap now nearing 1.3 trillion yuan.

Similarly, since the memory cycle rally began in the second half of last year, stocks like Longsys, Deming Li, and Biwin Storage have surged in sync. Dapu Micro, which just went public in April, multiplied its IPO price nearly 20-fold in just one month.

In contrast, one can't help but reflect: the internet was once imagined as a weightless world, yet it gave rise to server rooms, fiber optic cables, and undersea cables. Now AI might seem even lighter, but when it comes to actual implementation, it equally relies on electricity, land, chips, networks, and cooling systems.

A grand future always grows from those silent assets.

This article is from the WeChat public account "Investment Community" (ID: pedaily2012), author: Feng Yuchen

Questions liées

QWhat was the core investment thesis behind Leopold Aschenbrenner's hedge fund, Situational Awareness LP, when he founded it?

AThe core investment thesis was to go long on the physical infrastructure necessary for AI development—such as power, data centers, compute capacity, and energy infrastructure—while avoiding the crowded and potentially overvalued bets on AI chips and semiconductors. He believed that the speed of AI advancement would be limited by these physical bottlenecks, so investors should own the bottlenecks themselves.

QWhat major positions did Leopold Aschenbrenner's fund hold in Q1 2026 according to the 13F filing, and what did they indicate about his market view?

AIn Q1 2026, his fund's largest holdings were put options (bearish bets), primarily on semiconductor and tech companies like the VanEck Semiconductor ETF, NVIDIA, Oracle, Broadcom, and AMD, indicating a strong caution towards overheated valuations in the chip sector. Conversely, he held significant long positions in companies like Bloom Energy (fuel cells), CleanSpark, and other data center/crypto mining firms with energy and infrastructure assets, reflecting his bullish thesis on AI infrastructure.

QWhy was Leopold Aschenbrenner fired from OpenAI, and how did that experience influence his subsequent career path?

AHe was fired from OpenAI in 2024 for allegedly leaking an internal memorandum where the board warned of insufficient safety measures, which heightened tensions between management and the board. This experience, coupled with his work on superintelligence alignment, helped shape his foresight. He later published an essay predicting AI's physical infrastructure needs, which directly led him to found a hedge fund focused on investing in that very sector.

QWhat does the article suggest are the key physical constraints on the rapid development of AI, based on data cited?

AThe article identifies electricity/power and optical connectivity ('light') as key physical constraints. It cites IEA data showing AI's massive and growing share of global data center electricity consumption. It also references forecasts for surging demand in fiber optics and optical modules within data centers, driven by AI's need for high-speed connections that copper wires cannot support.

QAccording to the article, how have capital markets and tech giants responded to the growing demand for AI infrastructure?

ACapital markets have responded by dramatically driving up the stock prices of companies in relevant sectors, such as Chinese optical module manufacturers ('Yizhongtian') and memory chip makers, with some seeing multi-fold increases. Tech giants like Amazon, Alphabet, Meta, and reportedly ByteDance are making massive capital expenditure plans, significantly increasing investments in building new data centers and purchasing related equipment like AI chips and network cables to secure their AI infrastructure moats.

Lectures associées

Trois ans plus tard : un retour sur mes prédictions de 2023 concernant ChatGPT

Trois ans après ses prédictions sur le ChatGPT en mars 2023, Wang Jianshuo revient sur ses 20 affirmations initiales. Évaluées en mai 2026 par des agents IA, la plupart de ses intuitions sur les grandes tendances se sont révélées justes : le RAG est devenu l'architecture standard pour intégrer des connaissances, l'Interface Utilisateur en Langage Naturel (LUI) a créé un nouvel écosystème, et les modèles chinois ont presque rattrapé les leaders mondiaux. Des concepts comme les réseaux d'agents et la nature limitée du test de Turing se sont également matérialisés. Cependant, les prévisions quantitatives et les affirmations trop absolues ont souvent échoué. Le paramétrage supposé du GPT-4 (100T) était inexact, et les coûts de développement des modèles ont dépassé les estimations. Il a sous-estimé la vitesse de personnalisation des IA et l'impact distribué sur l'emploi des jeunes. La capture de valeur a surtout bénéficié à la couche matérielle (comme Nvidia), et non aux seules applications. Les leçons clés sont que les mécanismes et les directions sont plus fiables que les chiffres précis, que l'optimisme à court terme doit être tempéré, et que les nuances ("peut-être", "pour l'instant") rendent les prédictions plus robustes. Cette rétrospective souligne l'importance de distinguer les tendances confirmées des questions toujours ouvertes.

链捕手Il y a 1 h

Trois ans plus tard : un retour sur mes prédictions de 2023 concernant ChatGPT

链捕手Il y a 1 h

Du Token à la main-d'œuvre machine : l'IA passe d'outil à « travailleur »

Alors que l'IA écrit du code, traite des tickets clients et révise des documents juridiques, elle ne se contente plus d'être un outil mais devient une source directe de travail. La commercialisation de l'IA évolue ainsi d'un marché de « jetons » (tokens) ou d'heures de GPU vers un nouveau marché : celui de la « main-d'œuvre machine ». Dans ce marché, le jeton n'est qu'une unité de mesure, le GPU un intrant, et le modèle un outil de production. L'objet véritablement tarifé et échangé est le travail économique accompli directement par le logiciel. Le mécanisme de prix de l'IA devrait évoluer des jetons bruts vers des capacités de modèles standardisées, puis vers une main-d'œuvre sectorielle, et enfin vers un marché de résultats programmables. À l'avenir, les entreprises pourraient ne plus se soucier du modèle ou du GPU spécifique utilisé, mais uniquement du fait que la tâche soit livrée dans des délais, avec un taux de précision, une fiabilité et un coût conformes aux standards. Ce changement ne signifie pas un simple remplacement du travail humain. Alors que la machine assume des tâches standardisées et vérifiables, le rôle humain pourrait se déplacer vers la supervision, la responsabilité finale, la gestion du contexte et les jugements critiques. Dans certains cas, les 1% de jugement humain final pourraient gagner en valeur, car ils permettent de débloquer les 99% d'automatisation à grande échelle. Le marché évolue donc vers une couche où le « travail » lui-même devient l'unité stable, standardisée, vérifiable et négociable. La prochaine phase de concurrence ne portera pas seulement sur la puissance des modèles ou le prix du calcul, mais sur la capacité à standardiser, vérifier et tarifer le « travail » accompli, faisant de la main-d'œuvre machine une nouvelle ressource productive que l'on peut acheter, facturer et échanger.

marsbitIl y a 2 h

Du Token à la main-d'œuvre machine : l'IA passe d'outil à « travailleur »

marsbitIl y a 2 h

La réduction de 99% du prix de Xiaomi MiMo n'est pas un coup marketing ! Luo Fuli répond aux détracteurs sur X

Dans un article intitulé "La réduction de 99% du prix de MiMo de Xiaomi n'est pas du marketing ! Luo Fuli répond aux détracteurs sur X", Luo Fuli, responsable de MiMo, a publié un billet de blog technique de 5000 mots pour expliquer la baisse drastique des prix de l'API MiMo-V2.5. Contrairement aux interprétations initiales d'une guerre des prix ou d'une stratégie de perte, cette réduction de 99% concerne spécifiquement le coût des entrées en cache ("Input Cache Hit"), c'est-à-dire la relecture du contexte historique dans les conversations longues. Le billet détaille six piliers d'ingénierie ayant permis cette réduction : 1. **Architecture Hybride SWA** : Réduction du volume de la mémoire cache (KVCache) à 1/7 grâce à une attention par fenêtre glissante sur 60 des 70 couches du modèle. 2. **Gestion en double pool** : Allocation efficace de la mémoire pour matérialiser les gains théoriques du SWA, multipliant par 5 le nombre d'utilisateurs simultanés par GPU. 3. **Cache de préfixe optimisé** : Augmentation du taux de réussite du cache à 93-95% en moyenne, évitant de recalculer les contextes répétés. 4. **Système de cache distribué GCache** : Stockage des données sur les SSD des machines GPU existantes, réduisant les coûts de stockage additionnels à zéro. 5. **Système de routage LLM-Router** : Optimisation de l'acheminement des requêtes pour maximiser l'utilisation du cache et améliorer les performances. 6. **Prédiction Multi-Token (MTP)** : Accélération de la génération des réponses du modèle, réduisant également les coûts de sortie. Cette chaîne d'optimisations systémiques a réduit le temps GPU par requête d'un ordre de grandeur, permettant une baisse de prix de 99% tout en maintenant une marge positive. Luo Fuli souligne qu'il s'agit d'un accomplissement d'ingénierie validé en production, et non d'une simple manœuvre marketing, offrant une référence pour réduire les coûts dans le secteur de l'IA.

marsbitIl y a 4 h

La réduction de 99% du prix de Xiaomi MiMo n'est pas un coup marketing ! Luo Fuli répond aux détracteurs sur X

marsbitIl y a 4 h

Analyse rétrospective des opérations magistrales de Cathie Wood sur Circle

Cathy Wood (ARK) a réalisé une opération exemplaire sur l'action Circle, démontrant une maîtrise des mouvements de marché à court terme malgré son approche d'investissement habituellement tournée vers le très long terme. Elle a d'abord acquis près de 4,5 millions d'actions au prix d'introduction de 31 dollars, profitant ainsi de l'envolée initiale due à une faible offre flottante et une forte demande. Lorsque le titre a été propulsé à près de 300 dollars en juin 2025, porté par l'adoption du projet de loi sur les stablecoins (GENIUS Act), Wood a systématiquement vendu par tranches environ 1,7 million d'actions à un prix moyen d'environ 210 dollars, réalisant ainsi des plus-values substantielles. Cette décision était motivée à la fois par des règles internes de rééquilibrage de portefeuille et par l'anticipation de l'augmentation future de l'offre d'actions. Par la suite, face à la chute de l'action (jusqu'à -83% depuis son pic), Wood a racheté progressivement sa position initiale à des prix bien inférieurs (entre environ 50 et 130 dollars), portant son portefeuille à nouveau à environ 4,5 millions d'actions fin mars 2026. L'opération illustre trois principes clés : une conviction forte sur le modèle économique à long terme de Circle (stablecoin USDC), une exécution disciplinée par tranches sans chercher à prédire les sommets ou les creux, et le respect strict de règles de gestion des risques limitant le poids d'un titre dans le portefeuille.

marsbitIl y a 8 h

Analyse rétrospective des opérations magistrales de Cathie Wood sur Circle

marsbitIl y a 8 h

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片