Is Crypto Over? Don't Give Up, Liquidity Relief Is Coming

Odaily星球日报Publié le 2026-02-02Dernière mise à jour le 2026-02-02

Résumé

The article "False Narratives....and Other Thoughts" by Raoul Pal addresses the current downturn in the crypto market, arguing against the mainstream narrative that the crypto cycle is over. Pal explains that the recent price decline in Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies is not an isolated event but is correlated with a similar drop in SaaS stocks, as shown by comparative charts. He identifies the root cause as a temporary liquidity squeeze in the U.S. financial system, exacerbated by government shutdowns, TGA (Treasury General Account) rebuilding without monetary offset, and gold absorbing marginal liquidity that would otherwise support risk assets like crypto. Pal emphasizes that this liquidity crunch is temporary. He anticipates a resolution to the government shutdown soon, which will remove the last major obstacle to liquidity recovery. Following this, he expects a return of liquidity through measures such as eSLR adjustments, TGA drawdowns, fiscal stimulus, and eventual rate cuts. He advises investors to be patient, stressing that in a full market cycle, time is more critical than price movements. The article also corrects a misperception about potential Fed Chair Kevin Warsh, arguing he is not a hawk and would likely support rate cuts aligned with strategies to boost economic growth. Despite current market conditions, Pal remains highly optimistic about the crypto market's prospects through 2026, driven by anticipated pro-growth policies.

Original Author:Raoul Pal, CEO of Real Vision and GMI

Compiled by:CryptoLeo(@LeoAndCrypto)

This morning, Raoul Pal, CEO of Real Vision and GMI (Raoul Pal's investment bible), published an article titled "False Narratives....and Other Thoughts". Through data comparison and macro analysis, he explained the recent downturn and crisis in the crypto industry, indicating that the industry winter will soon pass, and everyone needs to be patient and not lose confidence in the industry. Odaily Planet Daily translates it as follows:

These were the insights I wrote for GMI over the weekend, hoping to bring you some confidence. I would have kept this content for GMI and Pro Macro discussions, but I know you all need this to ease your tense nerves.

Mainstream Narrative: Is Crypto Over?

The mainstream view is that Bitcoin and cryptocurrencies have crashed, this cycle is over, everything is finished, and it can't be like before. Cryptocurrencies have decoupled from other assets, this is CZ's fault, it's BlackRock's fault, etc. This is undoubtedly an attractive narrative trap, especially when mainstream coin prices are plummeting every day.

But yesterday, a GMI hedge fund client sent me a message asking if they should buy the dip in SaaS stocks, or, as everyone is saying, if Claude Code has already killed the SaaS industry.

So I started researching SaaS, and in the process, I found conclusions that debunk both the mainstream narrative about Bitcoin and the narrative about the SaaS industry. The charts for SaaS and BTC look exactly the same?

UBS SaaS Index vs. Bitcoin Trend

Indicating there is another factor that everyone is ignoring affecting this trend.

This factor is: Due to two shutdowns and issues with the US financial system's infrastructure (the reverse repo mechanism's liquidity was only fully replenished in 2024), US liquidity has been constrained. Therefore, the TGA (Treasury General Account) rebuilding in July and August had no corresponding monetary offset measures, leading to a reduction in liquidity.

So far, the low liquidity is the reason the ISM Manufacturing Index has remained low.

We usually use the Global Total Liquidity indicator because it has the highest long-term correlation with BTC and the Nasdaq, but at this stage, US Total Liquidity seems more important because the US is the main provider of global liquidity.

In this cycle, the GMI Global Total Liquidity Index leads the US Total Liquidity Index and is about to rebound (thus also driving the ISM index).

This is exactly what is affecting SaaS and BTC. Both assets are among the longest-duration assets in existence and have fallen due to the temporary withdrawal of liquidity.

Gold's rise has essentially sucked out the marginal liquidity from the system that might have flowed into the Bitcoin and SaaS markets. There isn't enough liquidity to support these assets, so high-risk assets are getting hit and falling. There's really no way around it.

Now, the US government is happening again, and the Treasury Department has taken preventive measures: after the last government shutdown, no TGA funds were used, and instead, the asset scale was increased (i.e., further loss of liquidity). This is the crisis we are facing now. It has caused violent price fluctuations, and our beloved cryptocurrency still lacks liquidity.

However,种种迹象表明,this government shutdown will be resolved this week, which will clear the last liquidity obstacle.

Odaily Note: US House Speaker Johnson said in an interview on NBC News' "Meet the Press" on Sunday that he believes he has secured Republican support votes to ensure the shutdown of some government agencies ends by Tuesday.

I have mentioned the risks of this government shutdown many times before, but it will soon be over, and then we can continue to deal with the upcoming liquidity injection, which includes measures from eSLR, partial TGA回流 (TGA回流 likely means TGA runoff or drawdown, context suggests funds returning to system), fiscal stimulus, interest rate cuts, etc., all related to the mid-term elections.

Odaily Note: US regulators' bill to relax leverage ratio requirements to ease capital pressure on several major banks like Bank of America (BAC.US).

In a full trading cycle, time is often more important than price. Price can be hit hard, but as time passes and the cycle evolves, everything will be resolved and eventually settle.

This is why I have always emphasized "patience". Events need to develop. Focusing solely on profit and loss ratios will only affect your mental health, not your investment portfolio.

The Fed's False Narrative

Regarding interest rate cuts, another false narrative is that Kevin Warsh is a hawk. This is complete nonsense; these statements are mainly from over 18 years ago.

Warsh's job and mission were to execute the strategies of the Greenspan era. Both Trump and Besant have said (details not discussed here, but the main direction is rate cuts) to keep the economy hot and assume that the productivity gains from AI will suppress core CPI increases (just like the 1995-2000 era).

Odaily Note: Greenspan is one of the longest-serving chairs in Fed history. His advocated monetary policy (controlling inflation + promoting maximum employment) was highly flexible but practically more anti-inflation prioritized, while also actively injecting liquidity during crises.

He doesn't like the balance sheet, but the system is reserve-constrained, so he likely won't change its current practices, otherwise it would destroy the credit market.

Warsh will cut rates and do nothing else. He will not interfere with Trump and Besant's actions to manage liquidity through banks. Fed Governor Milan will likely forcefully push for a full eSLR cut to accelerate this process.

If you don't believe me, believe Druck ↓

The above shows "investment guru" Stanley Druckenmiller's content on Warsh's monetary policy philosophy and his agreement with Besant upon becoming Fed Chair.

I know how difficult it is to hear optimistic narratives when the crypto market looks so dark. My SUI holdings are terrible, we don't know what or who to believe anymore. First, we have been through this many times before. When BTC falls 30%, altcoins can fall even 70%. But if they are high-quality alts, their rebound is also faster.

Mea Culpa (My Mistake)

GMI's mistake was not considering US liquidity as the current driving factor; usually, Global Total Liquidity dominates the entire cycle. But now the situation is clear, anything is possible.

The two are not unrelated. We just couldn't predict the combination punch of a series of events (reverse repo draining liquidity > TGA rebuilding > government shutdown > gold rising > another shutdown), or we failed to anticipate its impact.

It's almost over, and soon we can get back to normal work.

We cannot guarantee that every link is error-free (now with a deeper understanding), and we are still very bullish on the 2026 outlook because we understand the Trump/Besant/Warsh strategy. These three have repeatedly told us: we just need to listen and be patient. In full-cycle investing, time is more important than price.

If you are not a cycle investor and don't have such strong risk tolerance, that's completely fine. Everyone has their own style, but Julien (GMI Head of Macro Research) and I are not good at swing trading (we don't care about intra-cycle fluctuations), but we are proven and have a verifiable track record in full-cycle investing, leading the industry for the past 21 years. (Warning: We also make mistakes, like in 2009). Now is not the time to give up. Good luck, and let's achieve greater results in 2026.

Liquidity relief is on the way!

Questions liées

QWhat is the main reason for the recent downturn in the crypto market according to Raoul Pal?

AThe main reason is the suppression of U.S. liquidity due to two government shutdowns and issues with the U.S. financial plumbing system, which was not fully offset by monetary measures, leading to a reduction in liquidity available for risk assets like crypto and SaaS stocks.

QWhat specific event does Raoul Pal point to as the catalyst that will soon resolve the liquidity crisis?

AHe points to the resolution of the current U.S. government shutdown, which is expected to be resolved imminently, as the event that will clear the final liquidity hurdle.

QHow does Raoul Pal characterize the relationship between time and price in a full market cycle?

AHe states that in a full cycle, time is more important than price. Price can be hit hard, but as time passes and the cycle plays out, things get resolved and eventually work themselves out.

QWhat was the key mistake that GMI made in its analysis, as admitted in the article?

AThe key mistake was not identifying U.S. liquidity as the current driving factor, as it is now more dominant than global aggregate liquidity in this part of the cycle, and failing to predict the combined impact of a series of events (RRP drain, TGA rebuild, shutdown, gold rally, another shutdown).

QWhat is the overall outlook for the crypto market in 2026 according to the author's conclusion?

AThe overall outlook for 2026 is very bullish, based on an understanding of the anticipated strategies of Trump, Besant, and a potential Fed Chair Warsh, which are expected to involve liquidity injections, fiscal stimulus, and rate cuts.

Lectures associées

Envoyer un message pour transférer des fonds ? Telegram prévoit d'intégrer un portefeuille crypto à ses 1 milliard d'utilisateurs cet été

L'été prochain, Telegram intégrera nativement un portefeuille crypto non-custodial, baptisé Gram, directement dans son application, accessible à plus d'un milliard d'utilisateurs. L'annonce faite par le fondateur Pavel Durov promet des transferts instantanés et sans frais de cryptomonnaies. Contrairement au bot @wallet existant, qui est géré par un tiers, ce nouveau portefeuille sera développé et contrôlé par Telegram, les utilisateurs conservant la maîtrise de leurs clés privées. La nouvelle a entraîné une hausse d'environ 8% du cours de GRAM (anciennement Toncoin). Toutefois, des questions techniques et un calendrier précis manquent, notamment sur la gestion des actifs au-delà du Gram et la mise en œuvre de la promesse de transactions sans frais. Cette initiative s'inscrit dans la stratégie "Make TON Great Again" de Durov, marquant le retour de Telegram sur le projet TON après son règlement avec la SEC en 2020. Cette stratégie contraste avec celles d'autres super-applications comme X Money de Musk (approche monétaire traditionnelle) ou Meta (exploration des stablecoins). Telegram parie ainsi sur la voie crypto-native, avec pour atouts sa base d'utilisateurs massive et son affinité avec la communauté blockchain, mais devra relever les défis de l'éducation des utilisateurs et de la régulation.

marsbitIl y a 27 mins

Envoyer un message pour transférer des fonds ? Telegram prévoit d'intégrer un portefeuille crypto à ses 1 milliard d'utilisateurs cet été

marsbitIl y a 27 mins

Finit le bon vieux temps ? Que traversent réellement les VC crypto ?

Le paysage du capital-risque (VC) spécialisé dans la cryptographie est en train de subir une transformation fondamentale. Des fonds majeurs comme Paradigm, qui a levé 1,2 milliard de dollars, et Framework Ventures élargissent désormais leurs investissements à l'IA, à la robotique et à d'autres technologies, éloignant la cryptographie du centre de leur stratégie. Ce changement reflète un schéma historique où les fonds spécialisés, ayant bâti un avantage informationnel initial, voient cet avantage disparaître une fois que la technologie se banalise et que les grands capitaux traditionnels entrent sur le marché. Le secteur évolue vers une structure en « haltère » : d'un côté, les grandes plates-formes de capital-risque généralistes (comme a16z, Sequoia) qui peuvent intégrer la cryptographie comme un segment vertical ; de l'autre, de petits fonds spécialisés nichés sur des fronts d'innovation très spécifiques. Les fonds de taille moyenne, purement axés sur la cryptographie, sont coincés dans une « zone de mort », leur taille ne leur permettant ni de générer des rendements suffisants uniquement avec des investissements en phase initiale, ni de rivaliser avec les géants pour les tours de table de croissance. Même les fonds qui affirment rester dans la cryptographie redéfinissent leur périmètre, se concentrant désormais sur l'infrastructure financière (stablecoins, marchés de prédiction) plutôt que sur une vision plus large. Cette évolution est également poussée par les investisseurs (LP) qui, après des pertes dans la cryptomonnaie, réorientent massivement leurs capitaux vers l'IA, forçant les gestionnaires de fonds à suivre cette tendance. Pour les startups cryptographiques, cela signifie qu'elles devront désormais rivaliser avec des projets d'autres secteurs, notamment l'IA, pour attirer l'attention des grands fonds généralistes. Parallèlement, les investissements à long terme dans les infrastructures de base, autrefois portés par des fonds spécialisés, pourraient se raréfier. À l'avenir, la cryptographie ne sera plus considérée comme une classe d'actifs à part entière mais comme une infrastructure sous-jacente, intégrée à divers produits financiers. Les fonds spécialisés survivront probablement dans des niches de pointe, tandis que le financement de croissance sera dominé par les acteurs généralistes.

Foresight NewsIl y a 58 mins

Finit le bon vieux temps ? Que traversent réellement les VC crypto ?

Foresight NewsIl y a 58 mins

À mesure que le consensus s'accélère, sur quoi parient les jeunes investisseurs ?

Dans le paysage actuel des investissements technologiques, la rapidité d’évolution des consensus oblige les jeunes investisseurs à s’adapter. L’IA quitte désormais l’écran pour s’intégrer au monde physique, avec un accent croissant sur l’intelligence embarquée, les robots et les systèmes industriels. Le défi n’est plus seulement de démontrer des capacités techniques, mais d’assurer une livraison fiable et scalable dans des environnements réels. Parallèlement, la valeur des grands modèles linguistiques ne se limite pas à leur performance initiale ; elle réside dans leur capacité à s’insérer durablement dans les flux de travail, créant ainsi une « roue de l’intelligence » auto-renforçante grâce aux données et retours utilisateurs. Face aux limites des données humaines, des approches comme l’apprentissage par renforcement et les modèles scientifiques fondamentaux émergent comme des pistes pour dépasser ces contraintes. Enfin, dans les domaines de pointe comme l’aérospatiale commerciale, l’informatique quantique ou l’énergie avancée, le capital doit faire preuve de patience. Ces secteurs requièrent des cycles de validation longs, une maîtrise des chaînes d’approvisionnement et une résilience face à l’incertitude. Les investisseurs doivent donc anticiper les besoins futurs et soutenir des équipes capables de naviguer dans ces écosystèmes complexes, en misant sur le long terme plutôt que sur des rendements immédiats.

marsbitIl y a 1 h

À mesure que le consensus s'accélère, sur quoi parient les jeunes investisseurs ?

marsbitIl y a 1 h

Trading

Spot
活动图片