Is BTC price about to retest $20K? 5 things to know in Bitcoin this week

CointelegraphPublié le 2023-02-06Dernière mise à jour le 2023-02-06

Résumé

Bitcoin looks like it is treading on thin ice as February fails to match the gains of last month.

Bitcoin (BTC) starts the second week of February in a newly bearish mood as multi-month highs fail to hold.


In what may yet bring vindication to those predicting a major BTC price comedown, BTC/USD is back under $23,000 and making lower lows on hourly timeframes.


Feb. 6 trading may not yet be underway in Europe or the United States, but Asian markets are already falling and the U.S. dollar gaining — potential further hurdles for Bitcoin bulls to overcome.


With some macroeconomic data to come from the Federal Reserve this week, attention is mostly focused on next week’s inflation check in the form of the Consumer Price Index (CPI) for January.


In the build-up to this event, the results of which are already hotly contested, volatility may gain a fresh foothold across risk assets.


Add to that those aforementioned concerns that Bitcoin is long overdue a more significant retracement than those seen in recent weeks, and the recipe is there for difficult, but potentially lucrative trading conditions.


Cointelegraph takes a look at the state of play on Bitcoin this week and considers the factors at play in moving the markets.


BTC price disappoints with weekly close


It is very much a tale of two Bitcoins when it comes to analyzing BTC price action this week.


BTC/USD has managed to retain the majority of its stunning January gains, these totaling almost 40%. At the same time, signs of a comedown on the cards are increasingly making themselves known.


The weekly close, while comparatively strong at just under $23,000, still failed to beat the previous one, and also represented a rejection at a key resistance level from mid-2022.


“BTC is failing its retest of ~$23400 for the time being,” popular trader and analyst Rekt Capital summarized about the topic on Feb. 5.


An accompanying weekly chart highlighted the support and resistance zones in play.


“Important BTC can Weekly Close above this level for a chance at upside. August 2022 shows that a failed retest could see BTC drop deeper in the blue-blue range,” he continued.


“Technically, retest still in progress.”

BTC/USD annotated chart. Source: Rekt Capital/ Twitter

""

As Cointelegraph reported over the weekend, traders are already betting on where a potential pullback may end up — and which levels could act as definitive support to buoy Bitcoin’s newfound bullish momentum further.


These currently center around $20,000, a psychologically significant number and also the site of Bitcoin’s old all-time high from 2017.


BTC/USD traded at around $22,700 at the time of writing, data from Cointelegraph Markets Pro and TradingView showed, continuing to push lower during Asia trading hours.


“Some bids were filled on this recent push down (green box) but most of the remaining bids below have been pulled (red box),” trader Credible Crypto wrote about order book activity on Feb. 5.


“If we continue lower here eyes still on 19-21k region as a logical bounce zone.”


For a quietly confident Il Capo of Crypto, meanwhile, it is already crunch time when it comes to the trend reversal. A supporter of new macro lows throughout the January gains, the trader and social media pundit argued that breaking below $22,500 would be “bearish confirmation.”


“Current bear market rally has created the perfect environment for people to keep buying all the dips when the current trend reverses,” he wrote during a Twitter debate.


“Perfect scenario for a capitulation event in the next few weeks.”

BTC/USD 1-day candle chart (Bitstamp). Source: TradingView

""

Fed officials to speak as market eyes CPI


The week in macro looks decidedly calm compared to the start of February, with less in the way of data and more by way of commentary set to define the mood.


That commentary will come courtesy of Fed officials, including Chair Jerome Powell, and any hint of policy change contained within their language has the potential to shift markets.


The week prior saw just such a phenomenon play out, as Powell used the word “disinflation” no fewer than fifteen times during a speech and Q&A session accompanying the Fed’s move to enact a 0.25% interest rate hike.


Ahead of fresh key data next week, talk in analytics circles is on how the Fed might transition from a restrictive to accommodative economic policy and when.


As Cointelegraph reported, not everyone believes that the U.S. will pull off the “soft landing” when it comes to lowering inflation and will instead experience a recession.


“DON't be surprised if the term "soft-landing" remains around for a while before the rug being pulled in Q3 or Q4 this year,” investor Andy West, co-founder of Longlead Capital Partners and HedgQuarters, concluded in a dedicated Twitter thread at the weekend.


In the meantime, it may be a case of business as usual, however, with smaller rate hikes after Powell’s “mini victory lap” over declining inflation, further analysis argues.


“Personally, my belief is that the Fed will most likely raise by +0.25% in the upcoming two meetings (March & May),” Caleb Franzen, senior market analyst at CubicAnalytics, wrote in a blog post on Feb. 4.


“Of course, all future actions by the Fed will be dependent on the continued evolution of inflation data & broader macroeconomic conditions.”


Franzen acknowledged that while recession was not currently an apt description of the U.S. economy, conditions could still worsen going forward, referencing three such cases in past years.


Closer to home, next week’s CPI release is already on the radar for many. The extent to which January’s data supports the waning inflation narrative should be key.


“Post-FOMC, we have a heap of 2nd tier data releases including the important ISM services and NFP,” trading firm QCP Capital wrote in forward guidance mailed to Telegram channel subscribers last week.


“However the decider will be the Valentine's Day CPI - and we think there are upside risks to that release.”

U.S. Consumer Price Index (CPI) chart. Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics

""

Miner "relief" contrasts with BTC sales


Turning to Bitcoin, it is network fundamentals currently offering some stability amid a turbulent environment.


According to current estimates from BTC.com, difficulty is stable at all-time highs, with only a modest negative readjustment forecast in six days’ time.


This could well end up positive depending on Bitcoin price action, however, and a look at hash rate data suggests that miners remain in fierce competition.

Bitcoin miner net position change chart. Source: Glassnode

""

A countertrend comes in the form of miners’ economic behavior. The latest data from on-chain analytics firm Glassnode shows that sales of BTC by miners continue to increase, with their reserves dropping faster over 30-day periods.


Reserves correspondingly totaled their lowest in a month on Feb. 6, with miners’ balance at 1,822,605.594 BTC.

Overall, however, current price action has provided “relief” for miners, Philip Swift, co-founder of trading suite Decentrader says.


In a tweet last week, Swift referenced the Puell Multiple, a measure of relative value of BTC mined, which has left its “capitulation zone” to reflect better profitability.


“After 191 days in capitulation zone, the Puell Multiple has rallied. Showing relief for miners via increased revenue and likely reduced sell pressure,” he commented.

Bitcoin Puell Multiple annotated chart. Source: Philip Swift/ Twitter

""

NVT suggests volatility will kick in


Some on-chain data is still surging ahead despite the slowdown in BTC price gains.


Of interest this week is Bitcoin’s network value to transaction (NVT) signal, which is now at levels not seen in nearly two years.


NVT signal measures the value of BTC transferred on-chain against the Bitcoin market cap. It is an adaption of the NVT ratio indicator, but uses a 90-day moving average of transaction volume instead of raw data.


NVT at multi-year highs may be cause for concern — network valuation is relatively high compared to value transferred, a scenario which may prove “unsustainable,” in the words of its creator, Willy Woo.

Bitcoin NVT signal chart. Source: Glassnode/ Twitter

""

As Cointelegraph reported late last year, however, there are multiple nuances to NVT which make its various incarnations diverge from one another to provide a complex picture of on-chain value at a given price.


“Bitcoin's NVT is showing indications of value normalization and the start of a new market regime,” Charles Edwards, CEO of crypto investment firm Capriole, commented about a further tweak of NVT, dubbed dynamic range NVT, on Feb. 6.


“The message is the same further through history and more often than not it is good news in the mid- to long-term. In the short-term, this is a place we typically see volatility.”

Bitcoin dynamic range NVT ratio chart. Source: Charles Edwards/ Twitter

""

Small Bitcoin wallet show "trader optimism"


In a glimmer of hope, on-chain research firm Santiment notes that the number of smaller Bitcoin wallets has ballooned this year.

Since BTC/USD crossed the $20,000 mark once more on Jan. 13, 620,000 wallets with a maximum of 0.1 BTC have reappeared.


That event, Santiment says, marks the moment when “FOMO returned” to the market, and the subsequent growth in wallet numbers means that these are at their highest since Nov. 19.


“There have been ~620k small Bitcoin addresses that have popped back up on the network since FOMO returned on January 13th when price regained $20k,” Twitter commentary confirmed on Feb. 6.


“These 0.1 BTC or less addresses grew slowly in 2022, but 2023 is showing a return of trader optimism.”

Bitcoin wallet addresses vs. BTC/USD annotated chart. Source: Santiment/ Twitter

""

A look at the Crypto Fear & Greed Index meanwhile shows “greed” still being the primary description of market sentiment.


On Jan. 30, the Index hit its “greediest” since Bitcoin’s November 2021 all-time highs.

Crypto Fear & Greed Index (screenshot). Source: Alternative.me

Lectures associées

Des groupes catholiques et de l'application de la loi mettent en garde contre la loi CLARITY qui pourrait affaiblir les garde-fous contre la criminalité liée aux crypto-actifs

Une coalition de dirigeants catholiques, de groupes liés à l'application de la loi et de défenseurs de la lutte contre la traite des êtres humains met en garde contre le projet de loi CLARITY Act. Ils estiment qu'il pourrait affaiblir les garde-fous utilisés pour lutter contre la criminalité facilitée par les crypto-monnaies. Leurs critiques portent principalement sur des dispositions qui protégeraient les développeurs de logiciels non-custodiaux d'être assimilés à des transmetteurs de fonds. Ce débat soulève une question centrale de la régulation des crypto-actifs : comment distinguer un logiciel neutre d'une intermédiation financière ? Les partisans des crypto-monnaies soutiennent que les développeurs publiant du code non-custodial ne devraient pas être régulés comme des plateformes d'échange. Les critiques, quant à eux, craignent que des exemptions trop larges ne rendent plus difficile le suivi des financements illicites. Le logiciel non-custodial est au cœur de la finance décentralisée (DeFi), permettant des transactions sans qu'une entreprise ne contrôle les fonds. Si cette architecture est un pilier de la valeur des crypto-actifs, elle pose aussi des défis pour les autorités lorsque des acteurs malveillants l'utilisent. L'opposition rencontrée par le CLARITY Act signifie que ses partisans devront répondre aux préoccupations concernant d'éventuelles lacunes favorisant la finance illicite. Cela pourrait conduire à des amendements, des protections plus limitées ou des obligations de déclaration supplémentaires. Pour l'industrie, l'enjeu est de taille : des règles plus claires pourraient stimuler les investissements, mais si le projet est perçu comme affaiblissant la lutte contre le crime, son adoption politique deviendra plus difficile.

bitcoinistIl y a 1 h

Des groupes catholiques et de l'application de la loi mettent en garde contre la loi CLARITY qui pourrait affaiblir les garde-fous contre la criminalité liée aux crypto-actifs

bitcoinistIl y a 1 h

L'histoire complète de Blockstream, la licorne de la cryptographie, profondément impliquée dans de graves fraudes

Depuis le début de l'année, Blockstream, la société cofondée par le pionnier du Bitcoin Adam Back, est sous le feu des critiques. Une enquête publiée début juin par NatInfoSec accuse la société d'avoir potentiellement levé des milliards de dollars via des billets de mine (BMN) liés à des revenus miniers, mais soulève des doutes sur la réalité des fermes de minage et de la puissance de calcul sous-jacente, évoquant des caractéristiques de type schéma de Ponzi. Les principaux points d'accusation sont les suivants : 1. **Capacité de minage et de paiement douteuses** : Pour honorer ses obligations, Blockstream aurait besoin d'une puissance de calcul bien supérieure (20-45 EH/s) à celle affichée sur son tableau de bord (15 EH/s). Aucune preuve publique (connexions électriques, importations de matériel, parts de pool minier) ne corrobore l'existence d'une infrastructure à cette échelle. Les clauses contractuelles permettraient de plus d'utiliser des bitcoins provenant de sources non divulguées pour les paiements. 2. **Rendements élevés et risque** : Les billets offriraient des rendements fixes allant jusqu'à environ 20% par an, ce qui est considéré comme très élevé et difficile à justifier dans le secteur cyclique du minage de Bitcoin. 3. **Antécédents et divulgation concernant Chris Cook** : Christopher William Cook, ancien responsable des opérations minières de Blockstream et actuel PDG d'Exacore (une entité scindée), a été condamné en 2008 pour fraude postale. Ce passé judiciaire n'aurait pas été divulgué dans les documents d'offre des BMN. Des allégations portent également sur des déclarations trompeuses concernant son expérience professionnelle. 4. **Implications potentielles pour BSTR** : L'enquête soulève des questions sur l'entreprise Bitcoin Standard Treasury (BSTR), liée à Adam Back, qui prévoit une introduction en bourse via SPAC, s'interrogeant sur la divulgation des risques liés aux BMN et sur d'éventuels conflits d'intérêts dans sa structure. La recherche BitMEX a apporté des nuances, confirmant probablement les antécédents de Cook et s'interrogeant sur les rendements, mais estimant que d'autres accusations manquaient de preuves ou étaient trompeuses, notamment concernant la séparation juridique entre les BMN et BSTR. Le débat dans la communauté s'est concentré sur la **vérifiabilité** : les investisseurs et observateurs peuvent-ils indépendamment vérifier la puissance de calcul, les revenus miniers réels et la source des paiements ? Malgré les prises de position divergentes, des questions cruciales sur les BMN demeurent sans réponse claire : leur taille réelle et leurs limites de responsabilité, l'adéquation entre la puissance minière et les obligations, l'origine des rendements élevés, la traçabilité des paiements en BTC, et le rôle exact de Chris Cook. Blockstream n'a pas encore publié de réponse systématique à ces allégations.

marsbitIl y a 4 h

L'histoire complète de Blockstream, la licorne de la cryptographie, profondément impliquée dans de graves fraudes

marsbitIl y a 4 h

Le collectif Reddit qui avait "short-squeezé" Wall Street a-t-il trouvé le prochain GME ?

En juin 2024, l'action de Wendy's (WEN) a connu une hausse significative après la diffusion d'un post populaire sur le forum Reddit r/wallstreetbets intitulé "We need to save Wendy's". Cette dynamique rappelle le phénomène des meme stocks, comme celui de GameStop (GME) en 2021. Le post, jouant sur un running gag de la communauté (le fait de devoir travailler chez Wendy's après de mauvais trades), a généré un fort engouement retail, se traduisant par un volume d'échanges anormalement élevé et une hausse de prix. WEN présente certains ingrédients classiques d'un "short squeeze" potentiel : un taux de ventes à découvert élevé (environ 32% des actions en circulation) et une attention communautaire soutenue. Cependant, l'article nuance fortement la comparaison avec le squeeze historique de GME. La structure est jugée moins extrême : le taux de découvert est significatif mais loin des niveaux de GME (qui avait dépassé 100%), et il manque pour l'instant des preuves solides d'un "gamma squeeze" auto-entrenenu via les options. L'élan actuel semble davantage être un "meme pop" à court terme, alimenté par l'attention et un faible prix de l'action, plutôt qu'un mouvement de fond structurel. L'histoire montre que Wendy's, par sa notoriété et son lien avec la culture WSB, est propice à ce genre de vague, mais que la volatilité qui en découle est souvent temporaire. La durabilité de la hausse dépendra de la persistance de la discussion en ligne, des volumes d'échanges sur plusieurs jours et surtout de l'activité sur le marché des options, qui pourrait, ou non, amplifier mécaniquement la tendance.

marsbitIl y a 5 h

Le collectif Reddit qui avait "short-squeezé" Wall Street a-t-il trouvé le prochain GME ?

marsbitIl y a 5 h

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片