ZachXBT Calls Canada the World's Most Dangerous Region in Terms of Cryptocurrency Fraud

cryptonews.ruPublicado a 2026-08-22Actualizado a 2026-08-22

Resumen

Blockchain investigator ZackXBT has ranked Canada as the worst jurisdiction globally for victims of cryptocurrency crimes, placing it above countries like the UK, India, Nigeria, and Algeria. He criticized Canadian law enforcement for routinely refusing to act even when presented with substantial evidence of crimes, such as complete dossiers on ransomware operators or home invasion robberies. ZackXBT highlighted Toronto as a global hub for fraud and cited instances where authorities seized assets from innocent users on platforms like Tradeogre. Due to this perceived inaction, he has stopped assisting Canadian victims and plans to block access to his support services for low-quality jurisdictions on his upcoming website. He also criticized Indian authorities as "incompetent" and noted the UK's second-place ranking in his list of poor-performing regions.

ZackXBT, a blockchain 'detective' who has helped victims of cryptocurrency fraud recover millions, has published a ranking of the worst jurisdictions for combating cryptocurrency crimes, naming an unexpected 'first world' country as the worst.

The list includes countries such as Nigeria and Algeria. Nevertheless, Canada, a first-world economy, ranks number one on the list of worst jurisdictions for victims of cryptocurrency crimes, with the UK and India coming in second and third place respectively.

ZackXBT explained that Indian law enforcement is 'incompetent,' citing several cases where official institutions sought help in recovering stolen funds linked to the Lazarus Group—a well-known North Korean hacking group. He noted that local police once arrested the founders of a cryptocurrency exchange due to confusion with a phishing website.

However, he placed Canada even lower because local law enforcement often refused to take action even after receiving evidence of crimes being committed.

"Canada is the country that receives a full report on the perpetrators from The Com, on ransomware programs or home invasion robberies, complete with evidence used to file cases in several jurisdictions, and still does not assist victims, all while claiming to be a first-world country," he stated.

"Toronto is currently one of the global hubs for fraud," he emphasized, also reporting that law enforcement confiscated Tradeogre's assets from innocent users because they failed to separate illegal operations from legitimate activity.

In June, ZackXBT reported that he is refusing to work with all victims from Canada, citing instances where local law enforcement ignored reports about a phishing scammer who is now conducting million-dollar ransomware operations.

Another case involved a lack of investigation into an Iranian over-the-counter exchange after it was used to launder funds obtained from a home invasion robbery.

"When my website launches soon, we will block access to my support service for all low-quality countries," the researcher announced on his Telegram channel, accusing one of the mentioned countries of using bots to respond to his post.

Preguntas relacionadas

QAccording to ZackXBT, which country is ranked as the worst jurisdiction for crypto crime victims?

ACanada

QWhat reason did ZackXBT give for Canada's low ranking in handling crypto crime?

ALocal law enforcement often refuses to take action even after receiving evidence of crimes being committed.

QWhich two countries were named as following Canada in the ranking of worst jurisdictions for crypto crime?

AThe United Kingdom and India.

QWhat specific issue did ZackXBT highlight about law enforcement in India?

AHe described them as 'incompetent,' citing examples like arresting crypto exchange founders due to confusion with a phishing site.

QWhat action did ZackXBT announce he would take regarding victims from low-quality jurisdictions?

AHe announced that when his website launches, he will block access to his support service for all countries with low-quality enforcement.

Lecturas Relacionadas

Mysterious "Whale" Sells $576 Million Worth of Bitcoin Amid BTC Price Approach to $80,000

An unidentified crypto "whale" sold 2,700 BTC (worth approximately $211.8 million) in a single transaction, bringing its total sales over three days to 7,700 BTC for roughly $576.6 million. This selling pressure occurs as Bitcoin trades near the $80,000 mark, having recently retreated from nearly reaching that level. While large holders often sell to realize profits during sharp rallies, on-chain data only confirms the movement of coins, not the motive. So far, these sales have had little impact on Bitcoin's upward momentum, with the asset posting double-digit gains recently and its strongest weekly increase since 2024. The rally was fueled by a U.S. Treasury Department announcement to at least double its long-term bond buyback operations starting September 9th, which lowered bond yields and pushed investors toward riskier assets like Bitcoin. This week's selling marks a reversal from a recent accumulation trend, where large holders had added about 43,000 BTC (worth ~$2.75B) over a 60-day period ending in mid-August, helping set the stage for the current price surge. As Bitcoin hovers around $80,000, traders are watching key factors: whether other major holders will follow suit and sell into strength, and if renewed institutional demand from ETFs can absorb the selling pressure. The outcome will likely determine Bitcoin's next major price move.

cryptonews.ruHace 44 min(s)

Mysterious "Whale" Sells $576 Million Worth of Bitcoin Amid BTC Price Approach to $80,000

cryptonews.ruHace 44 min(s)

Illinois' 0.2% Cryptocurrency Tax Sparks Major Legal Battle

Blockchain Association and Crypto Council for Innovation filed a lawsuit on August 21 in an Illinois district court against state officials, seeking to declare the state's Digital Asset Tax Act unlawful and block its implementation. The lawsuit centers on Illinois' plan to impose a 0.2% tax on the value of a digital asset for certain transactions through a digital asset broker, effective January 1. Plaintiffs argue the tax applies even to non-sales activities like transferring assets between wallets or paying for custody services, which is unlike the treatment of traditional assets like stocks or gold. They contend this discriminates against digital assets, taxing the mechanism of storage or transfer rather than an economic gain. The complaint highlights multiple ambiguities: a single crypto purchase involving exchange, deposit, and custody could trigger multiple taxable events; the law doesn't define how to value the asset or determine a customer's residency for tax purposes, leaving brokers guessing. Businesses face potential civil and criminal penalties for non-compliance, possibly leading them to avoid Illinois customers. The groups also challenge the legislative process, noting the tax was added as a small part of a massive 1,624-page bill passed hastily, violating constitutional requirements. They claim the tax violates federal laws like the Internet Tax Freedom Act and the dormant Commerce Clause. The immediate goal is to obtain an injunction before the January 1 enforcement date, testing whether a state can single out digital asset transactions for such a tax.

cryptonews.ruHace 46 min(s)

Illinois' 0.2% Cryptocurrency Tax Sparks Major Legal Battle

cryptonews.ruHace 46 min(s)

Musk Awaits $50 Trillion: Is There a Limit to the U.S. National Debt and What Comes Next?

Elon Musk reacted to a projection of US national debt reaching $50 trillion by 2030, labeling it a "precise timeline" with a laughing emoji. The debt has recently passed the $40 trillion mark. Skeptics note that specific debt thresholds have been breached before without immediate collapse. However, analysts warn the focus should shift from the nominal debt amount to its affordability. A key metric is when the average interest rate on the debt exceeds the economy's growth rate, a point the US Congressional Budget Office projects for 2031. Once this "debt spiral" begins, interest costs grow self-reinforcing. Currently, interest payments have already surpassed defense spending, exceeding $1 trillion annually. Ray Dalio warns a debt crisis could occur within "three years, plus or minus two," advising portfolio diversification into gold and some Bitcoin. Potential outcomes if debt becomes unmanageable include: 1) Financial repression and monetization (the "Japanese path" of controlled yields and inflation), seen as the most likely; 2) Severe austerity (the "Greek path" of spending cuts/tax hikes), considered politically unlikely; or 3) Technical default/restructuring, which would cause global financial shock. The most probable path is a hybrid of moderate financial repression and gradual inflation, leading not to a sudden crash but to long-term economic stagnation and a declining standard of living. By 2056, debt could reach 175% of GDP. Ultimately, the limit for US debt is not a fixed number but a function of market confidence in the dollar.

cryptonews.ruHace 2 hora(s)

Musk Awaits $50 Trillion: Is There a Limit to the U.S. National Debt and What Comes Next?

cryptonews.ruHace 2 hora(s)

Trading

Spot
活动图片