XRP Vs. Traditional Banks: Ripple CEO Sends Strong Message To Established Leaders

bitcoinistPublicado a 2026-03-03Actualizado a 2026-03-03

Resumen

Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse has urged traditional banks to act in good faith amid ongoing stablecoin regulation negotiations. The call follows a contentious White House meeting where banking groups, including the ABA and ICBA, disputed a source's claim that talks would fail without Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong's involvement. White House adviser David Sacks stated the crypto industry has made significant concessions on allowing stablecoin yields and called for banks to reciprocate. Garlinghouse emphasized that a path to a deal remains open, advocating for collaborative legislation. He also predicted the stalled CLARITY Act, aimed at digital asset market structure, would pass by April.

Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse recently commented on ongoing tensions between the crypto industry and traditional banking groups following public comments surrounding stablecoin yield negotiations at the White House.

His response came after a series of posts on X involving journalist Eleanor Terrett and White House adviser David Sacks, ultimately resulting in Garlinghouse sending a message to banks, urging them to act in good faith.

Stablecoin Yield Talks Spark Online Debate

The latest chapter in the crypto-vs-banks saga unfolded on social media platform X, where journalist Eleanor Terrett reported on the fallout from a contentious White House meeting over stablecoin yield regulations. Interestingly, Patrick Witt, the White House digital asset advisor, was aiming to pass the legislation by March 1, but that timeline has not been met.

According to Terrett, an unnamed source who claimed direct involvement in the talks painted a bleak picture of the negotiations, a characterization that led to pushback from the banking side.

Terrett reported that bank trade representatives from the American Bankers Association (ABA), the Independent Community Bankers of America (ICBA), and the Bank Policy Institute, all of whom attended the White House meeting, were “perplexed” by the unnamed source’s framing and did not share those views. These views are related to claims by the source that there’s a very real likelihood that negotiations will fall apart unless Ripple CEO Brian Armstrong comes to the table.

David Sacks, Chair of the President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology and the White House’s crypto czar, responded to Terrett. Praising crypto policy broker Patrick Witt, Sacks wrote that the crypto industry had already made major concessions on stablecoin yield and called on banks to reciprocate. The issue is around stablecoin yield: whether digital dollar issuers should be permitted to offer interest-like returns to holders.

Ripple CEO Says Banks Should Act In Good Faith

There is still an issue with brokering a compromise between the banks and the crypto industry. Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong had raised concerns about the crypto bill, saying that banking interests in the bill draft were attempting to suppress competition. However, Armstrong later commented that there’s now a path forward for a “win‐win” outcome for the crypto industry, the banking sector, and American consumers.

According to comments from Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse, the ball is now in the court of the banks, who need to act in good faith. “The door to a deal is wide open. The banks just need to act in good faith and walk through it,” Garlinghouse said.

This posture is consistent with Garlinghouse’s support for collaborative and pro-crypto legislation. The Ripple CEO recently predicted that the long-stalled CLARITY Act will pass by the end of April. The bill is designed to define digital asset market structure and reduce uncertainty over jurisdiction between regulators.

XRP trading at $1.34 on the 1D chart | Source: XRPUSDT on Tradingview.com

Criptos en tendencia

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat was the main trigger for the online debate involving Ripple's CEO and traditional banks?

AThe online debate was triggered by reports about a contentious White House meeting over stablecoin yield regulations, where an unnamed source claimed negotiations might fall apart without Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong's involvement, leading to pushback from banking representatives.

QWhich banking groups were mentioned as being perplexed by the characterization of the stablecoin yield negotiations?

AThe American Bankers Association (ABA), the Independent Community Bankers of America (ICBA), and the Bank Policy Institute were the banking groups that attended the White House meeting and expressed perplexity over the unnamed source's framing of the negotiations.

QWhat specific issue is at the heart of the stablecoin yield discussions between crypto and traditional banks?

AThe core issue is whether digital dollar issuers should be permitted to offer interest-like returns (yield) to stablecoin holders, a point of contention between the crypto industry and traditional banking groups.

QWhat message did Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse send to traditional banks regarding the negotiations?

ABrad Garlinghouse urged traditional banks to act in good faith, stating that 'The door to a deal is wide open. The banks just need to act in good faith and walk through it.'

QWhat legislation did Brad Garlinghouse predict would pass by the end of April, and what is its purpose?

ABrad Garlinghouse predicted the long-stalled CLARITY Act would pass by the end of April. This bill is designed to define the digital asset market structure and reduce uncertainty over jurisdiction between regulators.

Lecturas Relacionadas

GPT-5.6 Countdown: Abandon the Illusion of a Single API, Computational Iteration Can't Outpace a Single Page of Compliance

In mid-June, three seemingly independent industry events—the compliance-driven throttling of Fable 5, the open-sourcing of GLM-5.2, and the leaked release timeline for GPT-5.6—are pushing the global AI industry toward a watershed moment. These shifts signal a fundamental restructuring of the industry's underlying logic. First, **"usability" has substantially overtaken "advanced capabilities"** as the primary weight, pushing the global large language model (LLM) supply chain into a "dual-track" phase of controlled closed-source and local open-source coexistence. Second, **the competitive moats of closed-source giants are shifting**. Their technical focus is moving from "language intelligence" toward "spatial intelligence (world models)"—a domain heavily reliant on computing power. Third, faced with常态化 transnational compliance risks, **a "model-agnostic" decoupled design has become a survival necessity for application-layer developers to maintain business continuity.** The article details how Anthropic's Fable 5, despite its advanced engineering feats, was restricted for non-U.S. citizens within 72 hours of launch, highlighting how geopolitical compliance can instantly limit even the most advanced models. In response, the open-source camp, exemplified by Zhipu AI's MIT-licensed GLM-5.2, is gaining market share by offering stable performance improvements and significant cost advantages (up to 70% savings for enterprises), while achieving full adaptation with domestic semiconductor platforms. Meanwhile, closed-source leaders like OpenAI are pivoting. The anticipated GPT-5.6 reportedly shifts focus from language to spatial intelligence and world models, aiming to rebuild a generational gap in areas like 3D understanding, simulation, and industrial design that demand immense compute. The core conclusion is that the LLM supply chain's logic has changed. Enterprises must now evaluate infrastructure based on a composite of technical performance and policy compliance. For developers, complete reliance on a single closed-source API poses unacceptable risk. Implementing a truly model-agnostic architecture—enabling swift switches to compliant, locally deployable open-source alternatives—is no longer just good practice but a fundamental baseline for business continuity.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

GPT-5.6 Countdown: Abandon the Illusion of a Single API, Computational Iteration Can't Outpace a Single Page of Compliance

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Is the 'Token Subsidy War' Among AI Giants Almost Over?

The article discusses the ongoing "token subsidy war" among AI giants like OpenAI and Anthropic, questioning whether it's nearing its end. It reveals that current AI subscription prices are heavily subsidized, with some plans offering tokens at up to 70 times the actual cost to attract and retain heavy users, especially developers and enterprises. This strategy mirrors past internet-era subsidy battles, but with a key difference: AI tokens lack "lock-in" effects. Unlike ride-hailing or food delivery apps, users can easily switch between AI providers as APIs become standardized, making it difficult for companies to raise prices post-subsidy. The piece highlights a structural asymmetry in the competition. Giants like Google, with massive advertising revenue, can afford to subsidize tokens indefinitely, akin to using "tokens as a weapon." In contrast, venture-backed companies like OpenAI and Anthropic face pressure to become profitable, especially as they approach IPO. The article cites Google Ventures founder Bill Maris, who suggests Google could slash token prices by 80%, putting immense pressure on competitors. Two potential endgames are presented: the "internet service" model (subsidize, monopolize, then raise prices) and the "utility" model (tokens become a standardized, low-margin commodity like electricity). Given the low switching costs, the latter seems more likely. The competition may not have a single winner but could instead accelerate AI's evolution into a foundational, infrastructure-level technology, akin to a public utility. For now, users continue to benefit from heavily subsidized token costs.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Is the 'Token Subsidy War' Among AI Giants Almost Over?

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Beyond the Stadium: The Profitable Games Surrounding the World Cup

"Beyond the Pitch: The Profit Game Around the World Cup" The FIFA World Cup transcends being a sporting spectacle, evolving into a massive global arena for speculation and profit-seeking. The 2026 tournament has amplified this dynamic, creating a multi-layered ecosystem of financial opportunism alongside the football. **Prediction markets** have surged into the mainstream. Platforms like Polymarket and Kalshi saw trading volumes for World Cup contracts soar, attracting new users with their financial trading model and high-profile, chain-based wealth stories that overshadow traditional sports betting in terms of growth and narrative. However, **traditional sportsbooks** remain the dominant force, leveraging established user habits, legal markets, and comprehensive product offerings to handle the vast majority of speculative wagers, with projections suggesting record-breaking betting volumes. Capital markets also react. **"Concept stocks"** in countries like South Korea and Japan experience volatile price swings based on team performance and anticipated fan spending on items like chicken, beer, and viewing parties, effectively becoming a stock market reflecting fan sentiment. The **ticket resale market** has become a sophisticated arena for arbitrage. Prices fluctuate wildly based on team draws and star power, with sellers sometimes listing tickets they don't yet own in a practice akin to short-selling, while FIFA's own "Right to Buy" tokens add another layer of speculative trading. **Collectibles and merchandise** offer another avenue. Panini sticker albums, with their inherent scarcity and nostalgic value, can become high-value collectibles. Limited-edition or locally themed jerseys command significant premiums on secondary markets, and even counterfeit vendors profit from fans' desire for affordable match-day identity. The **cryptocurrency** space has seen a frenzy of speculative, unauthorized World Cup-themed meme coins on chains like Solana. These tokens, often exploiting team names and player imagery, experience extreme pump-and-dump cycles, creating stories of massive gains for a few early entrants and steep losses for many others. Finally, an entire industry thrives on **providing information and tools** to other speculators. Developers create platforms like SeatSidekick to track ticket inventory and prices, while paid Telegram groups and subscriptions sell betting tips and predictions, monetizing the widespread desire for an informational edge. In essence, the World Cup has become a compressed, global laboratory for speculation. While the games determine champions on the field, a parallel, complex network of financial transactions—spanning prediction contracts, bets, stocks, tickets, collectibles, crypto, and information services—settles its own scores in the global market.

marsbitHace 2 hora(s)

Beyond the Stadium: The Profitable Games Surrounding the World Cup

marsbitHace 2 hora(s)

How Does Codex Use a Computer? Three Entry Points and Permission Boundaries

This article explains the three primary methods for Codex to interact with a computer, each with distinct use cases, permission boundaries, and trust levels. **1. Computer Use:** This offers the broadest access, allowing Codex to visually control and interact with the graphical user interface of authorized macOS/Windows apps, system settings, and even iOS simulators. It's ideal for tasks lacking APIs or structured tools, such as operating legacy software or multi-app workflows. However, it's the slowest method and has the widest permission scope, requiring careful supervision for sensitive actions. **2. Chrome Extension:** This grants Codex access to the user's logged-in Chrome browser state, including cookies, profiles, and open tabs. It's best for tasks requiring user identity across websites like Gmail, LinkedIn, Salesforce, or internal dashboards. Its key advantage is multi-tab control for complex workflows. While more powerful for browser-based tasks than Computer Use, it carries higher sensitivity as actions are performed under the user's identity. **3. In-App Browser:** This is a browser isolated within the Codex thread, separate from the user's personal browsing data. It excels in web development and debugging scenarios—previewing local servers, testing responsive layouts, or annotating designs directly on the page. Its isolation is a strength for development but a limitation for tasks requiring login sessions. The core principle is to choose the narrowest, safest, and most structured interface for the task. Use plugins or MCPs first, resort to visual control (Computer Use) only for GUI-dependent tasks, employ the Chrome extension for identity-reliant browser work, and prefer the In-App Browser for isolated development. **Appshots** are clarified as a fourth, complementary tool for *inputting* context—capturing a screenshot of a window to point Codex to something—rather than a method for Codex to *act*. Together, this layered approach highlights a key to AI agent productization: not granting unlimited permissions, but constraining them within clear boundaries for specific tasks while preserving user oversight.

marsbitHace 3 hora(s)

How Does Codex Use a Computer? Three Entry Points and Permission Boundaries

marsbitHace 3 hora(s)

Trading

Spot
Futuros

Artículos destacados

Qué es XRP 2.0

XRP 2.0: Una Nueva Frontera en el Panorama de las Criptomonedas Introducción a XRP 2.0 En el siempre cambiante ámbito de las criptomonedas, nuevos proyectos surgen continuamente, compitiendo por atención y adopción. Una de estas iniciativas prometedoras es XRP 2.0, un nuevo proyecto de criptomoneda diseñado para aprovechar la tecnología blockchain avanzada y metodologías de encriptación robustas. Aunque el nombre establece paralelismos con el XRP de Ripple, es crucial señalar que XRP 2.0 opera de manera independiente, enfocándose en mejorar la seguridad de las transacciones, la privacidad y la escalabilidad. A medida que el panorama financiero digital abraza cada vez más soluciones descentralizadas, XRP 2.0 busca contribuir de manera significativa a web3 y a la expansión general de los proyectos de criptomonedas. ¿Qué es XRP 2.0? En esencia, XRP 2.0 es un proyecto de criptomoneda que busca crear un ecosistema de moneda digital seguro y descentralizado. Su tecnología fundamental integra principios avanzados de blockchain con técnicas de encriptación de vanguardia. El objetivo principal de XRP 2.0 es establecerse como una plataforma confiable y eficiente que permita la ejecución rápida de transacciones mientras prioriza la protección de la privacidad de sus usuarios. El proyecto se promociona como una solución a muchas limitaciones enfrentadas por las criptomonedas existentes, proponiendo un sistema que puede manejar un mayor volumen de transacciones con mejor velocidad y privacidad. Esta versatilidad posiciona a XRP 2.0 como un competidor significativo en un mercado plagado de diversas monedas digitales. ¿Quién es el Creador de XRP 2.0? La identidad del creador detrás de XRP 2.0 ha sido señalada como 'Wilbur.' Sin embargo, los detalles completos sobre Wilbur o su entidad asociada siguen siendo elusivos. La anonimidad de muchos creadores de criptomonedas no es un fenómeno poco común en la industria, a menudo diseñado para mantener un grado de privacidad y seguridad. ¿Quiénes son los Inversores de XRP 2.0? Hasta ahora, la información específica relacionada con las fundaciones o organizaciones de inversión que apoyan a XRP 2.0 no está disponible públicamente. En el sector de las criptomonedas, el respaldo de inversores respetables puede influir significativamente en la credibilidad y el éxito de un proyecto, sin embargo, la transparencia sobre los patrocinadores financieros de XRP 2.0 no se ha establecido. ¿Cómo Funciona XRP 2.0? XRP 2.0 se destaca al emplear una combinación de tecnología blockchain y algoritmos de encriptación avanzados que aseguran transacciones seguras y descentralizadas. Su estructura innovadora incluye características únicas diseñadas para fomentar el compromiso del usuario y ampliar las funcionalidades más allá de las transacciones convencionales de criptomonedas. Entre estas características, XRP 2.0 incorpora capacidades impulsadas por IA, como funcionalidades de texto a imagen y de texto a voz. Estas adiciones están diseñadas para mejorar la experiencia interactiva de los usuarios, promoviendo una mayor aplicabilidad en diversos sectores. Al unir avances tecnológicos con un diseño centrado en el usuario, XRP 2.0 busca captar la atención de una amplia gama de individuos y empresas que buscan integrar soluciones de criptomonedas en sus marcos operativos. Cronología de XRP 2.0 Entender XRP 2.0 requiere examinar los hitos que han definido su viaje hasta ahora: 23 de julio de 2023: Se presenta XRP 2.0 como un nuevo proyecto de criptomonedas, con el objetivo de revolucionar las capacidades de transacciones seguras y descentralizadas en el ámbito de blockchain. 8 de septiembre de 2023: Se lanza otro proyecto, XRP20, marcando la aparición de un token ERC-20 en la blockchain de Ethereum que no guarda relación con XRP 2.0. 13 de noviembre de 2023: El Libro Mayor de XRP experimenta una actualización significativa con el lanzamiento de la versión 2.0.0 del software del servidor rippled. Es esencial señalar que este desarrollo está desconectado del proyecto de criptomonedas XRP 2.0. Puntos Clave sobre XRP 2.0 Para destilar la esencia de XRP 2.0, surgen varios factores críticos: Características Únicas: La inclusión de características como texto a imagen y texto a voz impulsadas por IA diversifica aún más las aplicaciones potenciales de XRP 2.0. Tecnología Blockchain: El marco utiliza mecanismos avanzados de blockchain y protocolos de encriptación, asegurando un entorno seguro y descentralizado para las transacciones. Escalabilidad y Privacidad: XRP 2.0 prioriza la protección mejorada de la privacidad en los procesos de transacción y la escalabilidad necesaria para acomodar una base de usuarios creciente. No Afiliación con Ripple: Es importante destacar que, a pesar de su nombre, XRP 2.0 no tiene ninguna lealtad ni colaboración con el XRP de Ripple, diferenciando su marco operativo y objetivos dentro del ecosistema de criptomonedas. Conclusión XRP 2.0 representa una ambiciosa aventura en la esfera de las criptomonedas, buscando ofrecer una combinación de seguridad, privacidad y eficiencia en las transacciones digitales. Al integrar tecnologías sofisticadas y características amigables para el usuario, el proyecto se propone ampliar los horizontes de lo que la criptomoneda puede lograr en la economía digital de hoy. Si bien la anonimidad de su creador y la falta de inversores revelados pueden generar cuestionamientos para algunos, el enfoque de XRP 2.0 en funcionalidades avanzadas y descentralización realza su atractivo en un mercado de criptomonedas cada vez más abarrotado. A medida que el paisaje de las criptomonedas sigue evolucionando, XRP 2.0 podría emerger como un jugador crucial en la expansión de soluciones blockchain seguras y escalables.

182 Vistas totalesPublicado en 2024.04.05Actualizado en 2024.12.03

Qué es XRP 2.0

Cómo comprar XRP

¡Bienvenido a HTX.com! Hemos hecho que comprar XRP (XRP) sea simple y conveniente. Sigue nuestra guía paso a paso para iniciar tu viaje de criptos.Paso 1: crea tu cuenta HTXUtiliza tu correo electrónico o número de teléfono para registrarte y obtener una cuenta gratuita en HTX. Experimenta un proceso de registro sin complicaciones y desbloquea todas las funciones.Obtener mi cuentaPaso 2: ve a Comprar cripto y elige tu método de pagoTarjeta de crédito/débito: usa tu Visa o Mastercard para comprar XRP (XRP) al instante.Saldo: utiliza fondos del saldo de tu cuenta HTX para tradear sin problemas.Terceros: hemos agregado métodos de pago populares como Google Pay y Apple Pay para mejorar la comodidad.P2P: tradear directamente con otros usuarios en HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): ofrecemos servicios personalizados y tipos de cambio competitivos para los traders.Paso 3: guarda tu XRP (XRP)Después de comprar tu XRP (XRP), guárdalo en tu cuenta HTX. Alternativamente, puedes enviarlo a otro lugar mediante transferencia blockchain o utilizarlo para tradear otras criptomonedas.Paso 4: tradear XRP (XRP)Tradear fácilmente con XRP (XRP) en HTX's mercado spot. Simplemente accede a tu cuenta, selecciona tu par de trading, ejecuta tus trades y monitorea en tiempo real. Ofrecemos una experiencia fácil de usar tanto para principiantes como para traders experimentados.

1.4k Vistas totalesPublicado en 2024.12.10Actualizado en 2026.06.02

Cómo comprar XRP

Discusiones

Bienvenido a la comunidad de HTX. Aquí puedes mantenerte informado sobre los últimos desarrollos de la plataforma y acceder a análisis profesionales del mercado. A continuación se presentan las opiniones de los usuarios sobre el precio de XRP (XRP).

活动图片