Beyond the Stadium: The Profitable Games Surrounding the World Cup

marsbitPublicado a 2026-06-21Actualizado a 2026-06-21

Resumen

"Beyond the Pitch: The Profit Game Around the World Cup" The FIFA World Cup transcends being a sporting spectacle, evolving into a massive global arena for speculation and profit-seeking. The 2026 tournament has amplified this dynamic, creating a multi-layered ecosystem of financial opportunism alongside the football. **Prediction markets** have surged into the mainstream. Platforms like Polymarket and Kalshi saw trading volumes for World Cup contracts soar, attracting new users with their financial trading model and high-profile, chain-based wealth stories that overshadow traditional sports betting in terms of growth and narrative. However, **traditional sportsbooks** remain the dominant force, leveraging established user habits, legal markets, and comprehensive product offerings to handle the vast majority of speculative wagers, with projections suggesting record-breaking betting volumes. Capital markets also react. **"Concept stocks"** in countries like South Korea and Japan experience volatile price swings based on team performance and anticipated fan spending on items like chicken, beer, and viewing parties, effectively becoming a stock market reflecting fan sentiment. The **ticket resale market** has become a sophisticated arena for arbitrage. Prices fluctuate wildly based on team draws and star power, with sellers sometimes listing tickets they don't yet own in a practice akin to short-selling, while FIFA's own "Right to Buy" tokens add another layer of speculative ...

Author:Zen, PANews

The World Cup is more than just a fan festival; it is also a rare global window for speculation.

48 teams, 104 matches, and a schedule spanning the United States, Canada, and Mexico concentrate attention, emotions, identity, information asymmetry, and scarce resources within a little over a month. Thus, what forms around the World Cup is not just football consumption, but also an entire speculative ecosystem. Some bet on scores, some trade on probabilities, some buy concept stocks, some hoard jerseys and tickets, and others provide information and tools.

This World Cup coincides with an era of high integration between prediction markets, sports betting, social media, and digital assets. As more capital seeks opportunities from the World Cup, the world's biggest football event has also turned into a weeks-long experiment in speculation.

I. The Rise of Prediction Markets

In 2022, during the Qatar World Cup, prediction markets were still a fringe activity for the crypto community and niche traders. Today, they have truly entered the mainstream narrative of sports events, becoming one of the most notable new speculative scenarios for this World Cup.

After the World Cup kicked off, the trading volume of event contracts predicting the "World Cup Champion" on the Polymarket platform quickly exceeded $20 billion. As of June 18, the volume of the champion market on the platform had reached $26 billion, with liquidity of approximately $436 million. Another prediction market giant, Kalshi, also benefited greatly from the massive traffic, recording $51 billion in trading volume during the opening week of the 2026 FIFA World Cup, a record high for the platform.

From a user growth perspective, prediction markets are overshadowing traditional sports betting. U.S. media cited Apptopia data stating that between June 1 and 15, Kalshi and Polymarket accounted for nearly 75% of new activity in betting apps. During a sports cycle overlapping the World Cup, NBA Finals, and NHL Finals, the growth rate of prediction markets clearly outpaced traditional betting platforms like DraftKings, FanDuel, and BetMGM.

Compared to traditional sports betting, the on-chain wealth stories of prediction markets are also more viral. After Spain drew 0-0 with Cape Verde, the relevant match market on Polymarket saw about $64 million in trades. Among them, a new wallet trader who bet on Spain not winning and Cape Verde receiving points succeeded, earning about $9 million in profit; meanwhile, another conservative trader who bet on Spain winning ultimately lost his entire $1 million principal.

II. Traditional Sports Betting

Prior to this World Cup, the betting industry had already viewed it as a historic window. According to FT, the total betting volume related to the 2026 World Cup is expected to exceed $50 billion, a 43% increase from the 2022 Qatar World Cup.

Now, the U.S. legal sports betting market has also far surpassed the level during the 2022 World Cup. Platforms like DraftKings, FanDuel, and BetMGM have long replaced their homepages with World Cup content, fully embracing this fusion of sports and gambling.

While prediction markets have captured much of the buzz, traditional sports betting remains the largest fundamental base for World Cup speculation. Compared to the new narratives and trading methods of prediction markets, traditional sports betting controls more established user habits, a larger legal market, and a more comprehensive product system. For most casual fans, betting on match outcomes, spreads, over/under totals, and scores—the traditional wagering methods—are still the first choice.

Eilers & Krejcik Gaming estimates that U.S. legal sports betting platforms will handle about $2.8 billion in bets during this World Cup. If the U.S. team advances further, this number could rise to $4.3-$4.4 billion. According to Sports Business Journal predictions, this would increase soccer's share of U.S. sports betting from typically less than 5%, a niche sport, to a core category exceeding 25% from June to July.

Thus, in the story of the "old king fighting the new challenger," the financial transaction-oriented prediction markets offer more novelty and social virality, while traditional bookmakers still hold onto the most mature, stable, and scalable speculative business.

III. Stock Market

The World Cup also creates "concept stocks" in capital markets. Often, a schedule, a victory, or even just anticipation of increased fan consumption is enough to drive stock prices up.

The South Korean market is the most typical example. On the eve of the opening of the 2026 North American World Cup, the South Korean team was about to face the Czech Republic in their first group stage match. As the match approached, investors bet that consumption of fried chicken, ready-to-eat food, and in-home viewing would increase. Subsequently, on June 11, poultry processor Maniker closed up 29.97%, Maniker F&G rose 29.83%, and Foodnamu gained 18.85%.

Such trading did not first appear in 2026. Before the 2022 Qatar World Cup, South Korean "fried chicken and beer" concept stocks were already being hyped. South Korean media statistics showed that in the month before the opening of the 2022 World Cup, Kyochon F&B's stock price rose 46%, Maniker rose 49%, and Jeju Beer surged 64%.

During the Qatar World Cup, football-related concept stocks in the Japanese market also fluctuated wildly with the team's performance. When Japan lost 0-1 to Costa Rica, market sentiment for their qualification prospects cooled rapidly. Subsequently, shares of live-streaming platform Abema's parent company CyberAgent, sportswear brand Mizuno, and British pub chain Hub all fell to varying degrees. When Japan then defeated Spain 2-1 and advanced as group leaders, market sentiment reversed again, and these companies' stocks began to rise accordingly.

The logic behind these companies varies: CyberAgent benefited from the traffic surge from free World Cup broadcasts, Hub from offline pub viewing consumption, and Mizuno from national team equipment and football boot sales.

Clearly, with each win or loss, traders repriced fan enthusiasm. This makes World Cup concept stocks more like an emotional market that constantly fluctuates around match results, consumption scenarios, and fan psychology.

IV. Ticket Resale Arbitrage

World Cup tickets are passes for fans to enter stadiums, but in the 2026 World Cup, they have been played with as speculative items. Some snatch official tickets for resale, some purchase "Right to Buy" (RTB) tickets on FIFA Collect, and some even list tickets for sale on third-party platforms before actually obtaining them. This transforms the World Cup ticket market from just a consumer market into an arbitrage market centered on scarce seats.

World Cup ticket prices heavily depend on the teams, star players, geographical location, and fan travel willingness, making arbitrage a game of profit and risk. After this World Cup's schedule was announced, Houston was confirmed to host Portugal's matches. The expectation of Cristiano Ronaldo's participation immediately ignited the resale market. Before the schedule announcement, secondary market prices for Houston World Cup matches ranged from about $390 to $2,497; just four hours after the announcement, some prices were pushed to between $487 and $11,150.

Before the World Cup began, according to FT, there were still about 180,000 tickets for sale on FIFA's official resale platform, with about 176,000 concentrated in the group stage. The median price on the official resale platform had dropped about 20% within a month, and after deducting FIFA's resale platform fees, many scalpers actually incurred losses. On the other hand, demand remained strong for teams with large fan bases like Mexico and Colombia, with some resale prices reaching four to six times face value. Tickets for Scotland's matches also commanded high premiums due to their long-awaited return to the World Cup.

On third-party platforms, ticket buying and selling is even more complex. On secondary markets like StubHub, SeatGeek, and Vivid Seats, some sellers list tickets for sale before actually obtaining them. These speculative sellers gamble that ticket prices will drop closer to the match date, allowing them to buy later at a lower price. If prices surge, these sellers are forced to either buy tickets at high prices to fulfill orders or cancel orders and accept fines from the resale platforms. To some extent, this operation resembles short selling in financial markets.

It is worth noting that FIFA itself has further amplified the speculative nature of "admission rights" this World Cup. The Right to Buy (RTB) launched by FIFA is a right to purchase tickets for specific matches in the future. RTBs do not include the actual tickets and can be resold on the official FIFA Collect marketplace. This created a "second-order speculation" in the World Cup ticket market: the first layer is the resale of purchase rights, and the second layer is the resale of the tickets themselves.

V. Collectibles and Merchandise

World Cup merchandise has always been an important area of fan consumption, with long-standing phenomena of collection, resale, and speculation. Items easily hyped by the market are typically those combining scarcity, emotional value, and liquidity.

The most classic example remains Panini stickers. After the 2026 World Cup expanded to 48 teams, the official Panini sticker album also ballooned. This World Cup's Panini album has 112 pages, requiring 980 different stickers to complete, including 68 special stickers. In the UK market, a pack of 7 stickers costs £1.25. Since duplicates are constantly pulled in reality, completing the entire album may require buying over 1,000 packs, resulting in expenses nearing £1,000.

Panini's speculative nature is already proven in the old sticker market. These World Cup stickers can completely transform from low-cost consumer goods into high-priced collectibles. In 2021, a 1979 Diego Maradona Panini sticker sold for £470,000 at auction. While most stickers cannot replicate such prices, it shows that the value of World Cup stickers comes not just from the paper itself, but from the collecting narrative created jointly by the player, era, scarcity, and collective memory.

Jerseys with status symbolism or scarcity are also hot commodities in the secondary market. During the 2026 World Cup, New York City released a locally-themed World Cup jersey, originally priced at just $50 with a limited run of 1,500 pieces. Being significantly cheaper than official World Cup jerseys and carrying local New York identity symbolism, these jerseys sold out quickly. Subsequently, on platforms like eBay, prices for these jerseys skyrocketed to around $400, with some listings as high as $999.

Before the Portugal vs. DR Congo match in Houston, numerous vendors outside the stadium sold Cristiano Ronaldo number 7 Portugal jerseys for about $60, while the retail price for similar official jerseys was about $130. Many fans, knowing these jerseys were likely fake, were still willing to buy them. Under the pressure of high ticket prices, travel costs, and overall consumption, a $60 jersey that "looks real enough" already satisfied the need for identity expression at the live event.

After all, for fans, as long as the jersey fulfills its expressive purpose outside the stadium, in the stands, and in social media photos, it already holds consumption value. For vendors and counterfeit supply chains, this represents demand that can be harvested.

VI. Cryptocurrency

The World Cup also spawns an even more fringe, more volatile layer of crypto speculation. The most frenzied part comes from unofficial World Cup meme coins.

Two months before the opening of the 2026 World Cup, over 16,000 World Cup-themed tokens appeared on Solana, with 11,184 newly issued in May alone, an increase of about 531% from April. Related statistics also showed that the trading volume of football meme coins on Solana in May was about 650 times that of similar tokens on Ethereum. The vast majority of these tokens have no team authorization, practical utility, or stable liquidity; they merely use World Cup names, national team logos, and player images to attract short-term traders.

The most typical is WORLDCUP, launched on Pump.fun. The token went live on May 11 with an initial market cap below $40,000, but surged to about $6 million within two days, peaking at $12.2 million on May 21. One trader invested $341 through 5 transactions shortly after launch and sold in batches during three rounds of price increases, eventually realizing a profit of about $48,000—a return of over 140x.

However, such wealth stories often only showcase the few addresses that entered early and exited successfully. More common are investors who suffered heavy losses in sudden crashes. After the World Cup began, a non-official Solana token named JUDE, borrowing the name of English star Jude Bellingham, plunged 98%. This coin had no involvement from Bellingham nor authorization from the English Football Association; it merely used the player's name and World Cup hype to attract buyers.

Blockchain analytics firm TRM Labs also specifically warned before the World Cup that so-called "World Cup commemorative coins" have become potential pump-and-dump channels.

VII. Content and Information Services

The final layer of the World Cup speculative ecosystem revolves around providing information and tools to speculators. Facing the massive number of fans paying attention to the World Cup, those selling the shovels also make money.

A Chicago fan named Luke found it difficult to compare ticket availability and prices for all 104 matches simultaneously on FIFA's official platform. Using Claude Code, he developed a ticket tracking website called SeatSidekick in just 5 days. The website scrapes data from FIFA's ticketing backend, displaying inventory, lowest prices, and price trends for different matches in one place. The platform launched on April 18 and gained 178,000 unique users and over 1 million pageviews within a month.

SeatSidekick started as a free tool and later added price alert services. Users can set target matches and prices to receive notifications when tickets meeting their criteria appear on the FIFA platform. A Reddit user claimed he had bought tickets beyond his budget during the lottery phase. Later, using SeatSidekick to monitor inventory and competitive prices for the same matches, he adjusted his listing to appear on the platform's "Best Deals" page and successfully sold tickets for 3 matches within a few days.

Another more direct information business is selling World Cup betting advice. Many individuals and teams have launched paid 2026 World Cup Telegram groups, membership subscriptions, and one-time purchases for betting recommendations covering the entire tournament, including daily match picks and live betting opportunities.

The peculiarity of the tipping business is that revenue is not directly tied to the accuracy of the recommendations. As long as enough users believe the tipster has a data edge, the operator can collect membership fees upfront. If recommendations succeed, the operator can then use the results as promotional material to attract new members.

Some speculate on ticket prices, some on match outcomes, and this group "selling shovels" speculates on the information demand itself. They don't need to know who will win; they only need to know that the more people trying to make money from the World Cup, the more are willing to pay for a feeling of being faster, earlier, and closer to the answer.

The real winners may not be those who guess the champion, but those who first understand how this attention flows. After the World Cup ends, the scores will be written into history, but outside the stadiums, another vast trading network has long been quietly settling across global markets.

Criptos en tendencia

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat are the main speculative activities surrounding the 2026 FIFA World Cup as described in the article?

AThe main speculative activities described are: 1) The rise of prediction markets like Polymarket and Kalshi. 2) Traditional sports betting. 3) Trading World Cup 'concept stocks' in equity markets. 4) Ticket scalping and arbitrage on resale platforms. 5) Collecting and speculating on memorabilia like Panini stickers and team jerseys. 6) Speculating on unofficial cryptocurrency World Cup meme coins. 7) Providing informational services and tools for speculators.

QHow does the growth of prediction markets for the 2026 World Cup compare to traditional sports betting platforms according to the article?

AAccording to the article, prediction markets are growing faster than traditional sports betting platforms in terms of user acquisition. Data from Apptopia cited in the article indicates that from June 1 to 15, Kalshi and Polymarket together accounted for nearly 75% of new user activity in betting-type apps, outperforming platforms like DraftKings, FanDuel, and BetMGM during the major sports cycle.

QWhat is an example of a 'World Cup concept stock' and how did it react to team performance?

AAn example is the Japanese company CyberAgent, the parent company of the live-streaming platform Abema. During the 2022 Qatar World Cup, its stock price was highly sensitive to the Japanese national team's results. After Japan lost to Costa Rica, the stock price fell as market sentiment cooled. However, when Japan later beat Spain and advanced as group leader, the stock price surged again. The speculation was based on the increased traffic to its free World Cup broadcasts.

QWhat new dimension did FIFA introduce to the ticket market for the 2026 World Cup that increased its speculative nature?

AFIFA introduced 'Right to Buy' (RTB) tokens on its FIFA Collect marketplace. An RTB is a future right to purchase a ticket for a specific match, but it is not the ticket itself. These RTBs can be traded on the official marketplace, creating a two-layer speculative market: the first layer involves trading the future purchase rights (RTBs), and the second layer involves the actual resale of the physical or digital tickets later.

QWhat are the key characteristics that make certain World Cup memorabilia, like Panini stickers or special jerseys, attractive for speculation?

AThe key characteristics are scarcity, emotional value (connection to players, teams, and collective memory), and liquidity/resale potential. For example, limited edition items like the New York City-themed World Cup jersey (only 1500 units) saw prices skyrocket on secondary markets. Panini stickers gain long-term value from their role in creating a shared cultural memory, with rare vintage stickers (like a 1979 Maradona sticker) achieving auction prices of hundreds of thousands of pounds.

Lecturas Relacionadas

GPT-5.6 Countdown: Abandon the Illusion of a Single API, Computational Iteration Can't Outpace a Single Page of Compliance

In mid-June, three seemingly independent industry events—the compliance-driven throttling of Fable 5, the open-sourcing of GLM-5.2, and the leaked release timeline for GPT-5.6—are pushing the global AI industry toward a watershed moment. These shifts signal a fundamental restructuring of the industry's underlying logic. First, **"usability" has substantially overtaken "advanced capabilities"** as the primary weight, pushing the global large language model (LLM) supply chain into a "dual-track" phase of controlled closed-source and local open-source coexistence. Second, **the competitive moats of closed-source giants are shifting**. Their technical focus is moving from "language intelligence" toward "spatial intelligence (world models)"—a domain heavily reliant on computing power. Third, faced with常态化 transnational compliance risks, **a "model-agnostic" decoupled design has become a survival necessity for application-layer developers to maintain business continuity.** The article details how Anthropic's Fable 5, despite its advanced engineering feats, was restricted for non-U.S. citizens within 72 hours of launch, highlighting how geopolitical compliance can instantly limit even the most advanced models. In response, the open-source camp, exemplified by Zhipu AI's MIT-licensed GLM-5.2, is gaining market share by offering stable performance improvements and significant cost advantages (up to 70% savings for enterprises), while achieving full adaptation with domestic semiconductor platforms. Meanwhile, closed-source leaders like OpenAI are pivoting. The anticipated GPT-5.6 reportedly shifts focus from language to spatial intelligence and world models, aiming to rebuild a generational gap in areas like 3D understanding, simulation, and industrial design that demand immense compute. The core conclusion is that the LLM supply chain's logic has changed. Enterprises must now evaluate infrastructure based on a composite of technical performance and policy compliance. For developers, complete reliance on a single closed-source API poses unacceptable risk. Implementing a truly model-agnostic architecture—enabling swift switches to compliant, locally deployable open-source alternatives—is no longer just good practice but a fundamental baseline for business continuity.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

GPT-5.6 Countdown: Abandon the Illusion of a Single API, Computational Iteration Can't Outpace a Single Page of Compliance

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Is the 'Token Subsidy War' Among AI Giants Almost Over?

The article discusses the ongoing "token subsidy war" among AI giants like OpenAI and Anthropic, questioning whether it's nearing its end. It reveals that current AI subscription prices are heavily subsidized, with some plans offering tokens at up to 70 times the actual cost to attract and retain heavy users, especially developers and enterprises. This strategy mirrors past internet-era subsidy battles, but with a key difference: AI tokens lack "lock-in" effects. Unlike ride-hailing or food delivery apps, users can easily switch between AI providers as APIs become standardized, making it difficult for companies to raise prices post-subsidy. The piece highlights a structural asymmetry in the competition. Giants like Google, with massive advertising revenue, can afford to subsidize tokens indefinitely, akin to using "tokens as a weapon." In contrast, venture-backed companies like OpenAI and Anthropic face pressure to become profitable, especially as they approach IPO. The article cites Google Ventures founder Bill Maris, who suggests Google could slash token prices by 80%, putting immense pressure on competitors. Two potential endgames are presented: the "internet service" model (subsidize, monopolize, then raise prices) and the "utility" model (tokens become a standardized, low-margin commodity like electricity). Given the low switching costs, the latter seems more likely. The competition may not have a single winner but could instead accelerate AI's evolution into a foundational, infrastructure-level technology, akin to a public utility. For now, users continue to benefit from heavily subsidized token costs.

marsbitHace 2 hora(s)

Is the 'Token Subsidy War' Among AI Giants Almost Over?

marsbitHace 2 hora(s)

How Does Codex Use a Computer? Three Entry Points and Permission Boundaries

This article explains the three primary methods for Codex to interact with a computer, each with distinct use cases, permission boundaries, and trust levels. **1. Computer Use:** This offers the broadest access, allowing Codex to visually control and interact with the graphical user interface of authorized macOS/Windows apps, system settings, and even iOS simulators. It's ideal for tasks lacking APIs or structured tools, such as operating legacy software or multi-app workflows. However, it's the slowest method and has the widest permission scope, requiring careful supervision for sensitive actions. **2. Chrome Extension:** This grants Codex access to the user's logged-in Chrome browser state, including cookies, profiles, and open tabs. It's best for tasks requiring user identity across websites like Gmail, LinkedIn, Salesforce, or internal dashboards. Its key advantage is multi-tab control for complex workflows. While more powerful for browser-based tasks than Computer Use, it carries higher sensitivity as actions are performed under the user's identity. **3. In-App Browser:** This is a browser isolated within the Codex thread, separate from the user's personal browsing data. It excels in web development and debugging scenarios—previewing local servers, testing responsive layouts, or annotating designs directly on the page. Its isolation is a strength for development but a limitation for tasks requiring login sessions. The core principle is to choose the narrowest, safest, and most structured interface for the task. Use plugins or MCPs first, resort to visual control (Computer Use) only for GUI-dependent tasks, employ the Chrome extension for identity-reliant browser work, and prefer the In-App Browser for isolated development. **Appshots** are clarified as a fourth, complementary tool for *inputting* context—capturing a screenshot of a window to point Codex to something—rather than a method for Codex to *act*. Together, this layered approach highlights a key to AI agent productization: not granting unlimited permissions, but constraining them within clear boundaries for specific tasks while preserving user oversight.

marsbitHace 4 hora(s)

How Does Codex Use a Computer? Three Entry Points and Permission Boundaries

marsbitHace 4 hora(s)

Trading

Spot
Futuros

Artículos destacados

Cómo comprar ZEN

¡Bienvenido a HTX.com! Hemos hecho que comprar Horizen (ZEN) sea simple y conveniente. Sigue nuestra guía paso a paso para iniciar tu viaje de criptos.Paso 1: crea tu cuenta HTXUtiliza tu correo electrónico o número de teléfono para registrarte y obtener una cuenta gratuita en HTX. Experimenta un proceso de registro sin complicaciones y desbloquea todas las funciones.Obtener mi cuentaPaso 2: ve a Comprar cripto y elige tu método de pagoTarjeta de crédito/débito: usa tu Visa o Mastercard para comprar Horizen (ZEN) al instante.Saldo: utiliza fondos del saldo de tu cuenta HTX para tradear sin problemas.Terceros: hemos agregado métodos de pago populares como Google Pay y Apple Pay para mejorar la comodidad.P2P: tradear directamente con otros usuarios en HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): ofrecemos servicios personalizados y tipos de cambio competitivos para los traders.Paso 3: guarda tu Horizen (ZEN)Después de comprar tu Horizen (ZEN), guárdalo en tu cuenta HTX. Alternativamente, puedes enviarlo a otro lugar mediante transferencia blockchain o utilizarlo para tradear otras criptomonedas.Paso 4: tradear Horizen (ZEN)Tradear fácilmente con Horizen (ZEN) en HTX's mercado spot. Simplemente accede a tu cuenta, selecciona tu par de trading, ejecuta tus trades y monitorea en tiempo real. Ofrecemos una experiencia fácil de usar tanto para principiantes como para traders experimentados.

235 Vistas totalesPublicado en 2024.12.12Actualizado en 2026.06.02

Cómo comprar ZEN

Discusiones

Bienvenido a la comunidad de HTX. Aquí puedes mantenerte informado sobre los últimos desarrollos de la plataforma y acceder a análisis profesionales del mercado. A continuación se presentan las opiniones de los usuarios sobre el precio de ZEN (ZEN).

活动图片