XRP Ledger Holds 63% of Tokenised US Treasury Supply

TheNewsCryptoPublicado a 2026-02-17Actualizado a 2026-02-17

Resumen

The XRP Ledger (XRPL) currently holds 63% of the total tokenized US Treasury supply, with an issuance volume of 54.41 million, surpassing networks like Ethereum. Despite this dominance in issuance, transfer activity on XRPL remains minimal, with monthly TBILL transfers amounting to only $200—just 0.003% of the activity seen on other major blockchains. This highlights a significant imbalance between issuance and usage. Recent developments, including collaborations with Aviva Investors and OpenEden, aim to boost real-world asset tokenization on XRPL. The coming months are seen as critical for assessing XRPL's performance in the tokenized treasury market.

The XRP Ledger now shelters two-thirds of overall tokenised US Treasury bills. As per the recent reports, the XRP-associated blockchain platform owns around 63% of the overall treasury token supply.

The data unveils that the XRPL is heading the tokenised US Treasury bills, holding around 63% of the overall supply. This milestone is significant to note, as XRP Ledger’s treasury token issuance volume has attained 54.41 million, crossing prominent networks such as Ethereum.

Regardless of this issuance dominance, the transfer activity on the XRP Ledger is minimal when contrasted with different blockchain giants. The monthly TBILL transfer volume on XRPL attains just $200 as per the reports, at the time when Ethereum and other chains run millions of transactions.

This shows that just a marginal 0.003% activity occurs on the XRP Ledger. This imbalance highlights a prominent challenge facing XRPL. However, the platform controls the overall TBILL issuance; the treasury tokens on XRPL are hardly used.

However, some blockchains are being used as main issuance platforms; others, however, serve as the main channel for trading. It is noteworthy that this comes closely following Binance’s listing of XRPL’s RLUSD stablecoin. As per the reports, the crypto exchange publicised the listing on February 12.

What Does The Latest Report Say?

It is noteworthy that two prominent developments underscore the growth of XRPL’s tokenised treasuries. These advancements comprise Aviva Investors’ large-scale fund tokenisation and OpenEden’s TBILL token.

As per the latest report, Aviva investors collaborated with Ripple to explore tokenisation funds on XRPL. Doppler Finance publicised a collaboration with OpenEden to open up more yield opportunities for XRP and rLUSD holders on the XRP Ledger.

By amalgamating OpenEden’s tokenised real-world asset infrastructure into Doppler’s yield protocol, the platform has prominently impacted the growth of tokenised treasuries on the chain.

As per the industry experts, the upcoming one to three months are crucial to look after, as these months will indicate how XRPL performs in the tokenised treasury market.

Highlighted Crypto News Today:

Shiba Inu Tokens Left Unburned, SHIB Price Sees Daily Drops After Weekly Gains

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat percentage of the overall tokenised US Treasury supply does the XRP Ledger hold?

AThe XRP Ledger holds 63% of the overall tokenised US Treasury supply.

QHow does the monthly transfer volume of TBILL on XRPL compare to other blockchains like Ethereum?

AThe monthly TBILL transfer volume on XRPL is minimal, reaching only about $200, while blockchains like Ethereum process millions of dollars in transactions.

QWhat two recent developments are highlighted as key to the growth of XRPL's tokenised treasuries?

AThe two key developments are Aviva Investors' large-scale fund tokenisation in collaboration with Ripple, and OpenEden's TBILL token in collaboration with Doppler Finance.

QWhat recent listing by Binance is mentioned in relation to the XRP Ledger?

ABinance recently listed XRPL's RLUSD stablecoin, with the announcement made on February 12.

QWhat does the minimal transfer activity on XRPL indicate despite its high issuance volume?

AThe minimal transfer activity, which is only about 0.003%, indicates that while XRPL controls most of the TBILL issuance, the treasury tokens on its platform are hardly being used for transactions.

Lecturas Relacionadas

Public Version of Mythos Officially Launched: Analyzing the Advantages and Limitations of AI Smart Contract Auditing

Publicly available Mythos, Anthropic's AI model, has officially launched, demonstrating both significant potential and limitations in smart contract security auditing. The article analyzes its capabilities through real-world cases. AI excels in identifying subtle, low-level vulnerabilities through pattern recognition and large-scale code screening. A key example is detecting a storage slot collision between a custom rewards mapping and a third-party library's ReentrancyGuard, a vulnerability easily missed in manual audits. In the recent Zcash incident, AI also rapidly discovered a critical soundness bug that had remained hidden for years. However, AI currently struggles with complex, interconnected scenarios. When tested on the Curve LlamaLend sDOLA exploit, which involved manipulating prices across multiple protocols (Curve pools, lending markets) to trigger liquidations, Fable 5 failed to identify the core cross-protocol attack vector. These scenarios require a deep understanding of DeFi economic models and multi-contract interactions. In conclusion, while AI tools like Mythos significantly boost efficiency in finding standardized, syntactic vulnerabilities, they cannot yet replace expert analysis for complex, business-logic, and cross-protocol attacks. An effective audit workflow combines AI's speed for initial screening with human expertise for in-depth, holistic analysis.

marsbitHace 2 min(s)

Public Version of Mythos Officially Launched: Analyzing the Advantages and Limitations of AI Smart Contract Auditing

marsbitHace 2 min(s)

Trump's Reversal in Words and Deeds: The So-Called 'Deal Is Near' Is Merely a Smoke Screen for War

This article critically analyzes the Trump administration's policy reversals and use of "imminent deal" rhetoric following a military incident with Iran. After a US Apache helicopter crashed near the Strait of Hormuz, Trump initially downplayed the event. However, within 24 hours, he claimed Iran "shot down" the helicopter and ordered retaliatory strikes on Iranian coastal targets. The article argues these strikes, which reportedly disrupted water supplies for 20,000 people, triggered further Iranian missile attacks on US bases in the region. The core critique is that this military escalation contradicts a constant stream of administration claims, spanning over 100 days of conflict, that a deal to reopen the Strait of Hormuz was "very close" or "days away." The author frames these repeated "imminent deal" announcements as a "smokescreen" for political theater and military action, not genuine diplomacy. Despite the blockade and strikes, the Strait remains closed, oil prices are up, and no agreement has been reached. The conclusion urges skepticism, suggesting that when officials claim a deal is near, the rational assumption should be the opposite.

marsbitHace 5 min(s)

Trump's Reversal in Words and Deeds: The So-Called 'Deal Is Near' Is Merely a Smoke Screen for War

marsbitHace 5 min(s)

Trade.xyz's Rebase Refusal Sparks Controversy, On-Chain Pre-IPO Market Faces Major Pricing Test

The debate surrounding Trade.xyz's refusal to adjust its SPCX (SpaceX pre-IPO) perpetual contract pricing amid updated share count revelations highlights a key challenge for on-chain pre-IPO markets. While several centralized exchanges (CEXs) paused and repriced their contracts after SpaceX's filing showed a ~10% increase in total shares, Trade.xyz maintained its market-driven pricing logic, which tracks expected per-share price sentiment rather than fundamental valuation metrics like market cap. This discrepancy triggered cross-platform arbitrage and caused leveraged long positions on Trade.xyz to suffer significant losses, as the platform's HIP-3 architecture lacks a native "Rebase" mechanism to neutrally adjust all user positions following such corporate actions. The incident underscores the difficulty for decentralized perpetual exchanges (Perp DEXs) to implement Rebase—a process CEXs handle by centrally pausing markets and adjusting ledger data. On-chain, this requires complex smart contract modifications, increasing gas costs, complexity, and potential attack surfaces. While some DEXs have managed similar adjustments, Trade.xyz's current design does not natively support it, though the team is reportedly exploring solutions for future events like stock splits. Ultimately, the controversy serves as a critical case study for the nascent on-chain pre-IPO sector, raising questions about price discovery reliability, transparent rule disclosure, and the readiness of DeFi infrastructures to handle traditional corporate actions as real-world assets (RWAs) gain traction.

marsbitHace 10 min(s)

Trade.xyz's Rebase Refusal Sparks Controversy, On-Chain Pre-IPO Market Faces Major Pricing Test

marsbitHace 10 min(s)

The 'Middle Eastern Prince' Swindles a Wealthy Woman: Renting Planes and Rolls-Royces, Scamming 120 Million Over Three Years

Two brothers who posed as "Middle Eastern princes" have been sentenced in the United States to 24 and 23 years in prison, respectively, and ordered to pay over $21.2 million in restitution and back taxes. Over three years, they fraudulently obtained approximately $21 million, primarily by promoting fictitious investment projects, including a non-existent cryptocurrency mining operation in a former General Electric industrial park in East Cleveland. The brothers, aged 42 and 33, created elaborate personas: one claimed to be a wealthy royal family heir and the city's "International Economic Advisor," while the other posed as a hedge fund manager with expertise from watching the TV show *Billions*. They bolstered their image by renting luxury cars and private jets and cultivating a relationship with a local mayor's chief of staff, who provided official-looking documents and government event access. A significant portion of the victims' funds, about $18 million, came from a single Chinese investor, a woman from Sichuan with experience in Bitcoin mining. The brothers also defrauded several women, including one former girlfriend. Their scheme unraveled when the primary investor discovered her $6 million worth of mining equipment had been sold off. The case highlights a trend of impostors using fabricated "Middle Eastern royal" identities to target wealthy individuals. Similar incidents include a "Dubai prince" who recently promoted a $500 million family office in Hong Kong and a Colombian man who impersonated a Saudi prince for decades in the US before being caught and sentenced in 2019.

marsbitHace 25 min(s)

The 'Middle Eastern Prince' Swindles a Wealthy Woman: Renting Planes and Rolls-Royces, Scamming 120 Million Over Three Years

marsbitHace 25 min(s)

a16z Partner: Being in the Flow of Capital Is the True Moat

A16z Partner: Standing in the Cash Flow is the True Moat Historically, many of the strongest companies built their moats by positioning themselves within "cash flows"—facilitating value creation and transfer in a network and taking a cut. The more value flows, the larger they grow. Crypto is the first modern technology natively built for this. With open ledgers, programmable settlement, and stablecoins enabling internet-speed global value transfer, it allows startups to inherit network effects from day one. Well-designed tokens align users, developers, and the protocol towards network growth, distributing value to contributors. This model isn't new (e.g., railroads, Visa, Google, AWS) but Crypto democratizes it. It lets entrepreneurs target areas with high inefficiency and profit extraction—like traditional finance's payments, custody, FX, and settlement—to compress costs, increase speed, and redistribute value by standing in the new flow. The opportunity extends beyond finance to emerging markets like GPU/compute, AI training data, energy, and space, where new, programmable infrastructure can be built without legacy constraints. Key questions for founders: Are you already in the cash flow? Does your revenue scale 10x with network activity? Where is profit extraction highest relative to value created in your market? The strategy is clear: compress the old cost structure, position yourself in the new value stream, and let the network compound.

marsbitHace 52 min(s)

a16z Partner: Being in the Flow of Capital Is the True Moat

marsbitHace 52 min(s)

Trading

Spot

Futuros