Wintermute EthCC Observations: DeFi Shifts Entirely to Vault Track, Founders No Longer Rush to Issue Tokens

marsbitPublicado a 2026-04-08Actualizado a 2026-04-08

Resumen

Wintermute Ventures investment manager Joscha Kupferberg attended EthCC in Cannes and shared key observations: VCs are more cautious but still investing, founders are prioritizing token launches and focusing on product development first, and DeFi builders are heavily shifting toward the Vault sector. Other trends include the rise of on-chain forex, privacy-focused DeFi, and prediction markets. Neobanking features are becoming standard rather than differentiators, and most crypto AI applications have reverted to trading bots. The overall atmosphere was positive, with fewer hype-driven projects and more substantive development.

Author: Wintermute Ventures

Compiled by: Deep Tide TechFlow

Deep Tide Introduction: Wintermute Ventures investment manager Joscha Kupferberg attended the EthCC conference in Cannes and brought back firsthand observations: VCs are more cautious but still investing, founders generally are not rushing to issue tokens but focus on building products first, DeFi builders are collectively flocking to the Vault track, neobanking features are becoming standard rather than a differentiator, and AI Agent applications in the crypto space have almost entirely retreated to trading bots.

@wmt_ventures tweet:

What are crypto builders actually doing now?

"Vaults are the new Perps." This was a phrase heard repeatedly at the EthCC conference in Cannes. The conference reflected a broader industry shift: less noise, more institutional presence, founders working quietly rather than chasing release schedules. Our investment manager @joschakup spent a full week immersed in these conversations. Here are his observations.

EthCC Atmosphere

Contrary to some pessimistic views, the overall atmosphere was positive. A healthy mix of early builders, VCs, and active family offices was present. The only obvious shadow was layoffs—still happening widely and realistically across the industry.

How Crypto VCs Are Investing Now

VCs are more cautious but still active. The focus has shifted to later seed rounds and beyond, where there is traction and product-market fit to evaluate. The era of placing moonshot bets purely on vibes appears to be over.

Founders No Longer Chase Token Issuance

The vast majority of early founders Joscha spoke with did not prioritize token issuance. The focus is on building an economically viable product first. Token optionality is a topic for later—if at all.

Themes Worth Tracking

Several heating trends:

On-chain foreign exchange is quietly becoming a serious topic
Privacy-oriented DeFi is emerging as a legitimate track, with more projects exploring institutional-grade use cases
Prediction markets are gaining substantial traction, with increasing competition in liquidity infrastructure and incentive design

Vaults Are the New Perps

DeFi builders are working hard, increasingly focusing on institutional use cases and RWA. If there is one unavoidable theme, it's Vaults. From Vault infrastructure and yield products to rehypothecation, strategy discoverers, and ratings, the entire track has highly converged on this category, closely followed by stablecoins and neobanking.

Neobanking Is No Longer a Differentiator

Many DeFi projects with significant TVL are integrating third-party services to provide neobanking features: on/off ramps, cards, yield vaults. This is a reasonable approach for user retention, but the logical conclusion is: neobanking alone is no longer a differentiator.

AI Agents Have Almost Entirely Retreated to Trading Bots

Most AI Agent use cases in crypto seem to have made a 180-degree turn back to trading bots. Joscha had hoped to bring back some new ideas, but did not. This is currently the only area that hasn't surprised him.

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat was the overall atmosphere at EthCC according to Wintermute Ventures?

AThe overall atmosphere was positive, with a healthy mix of early builders, VCs, and active family offices, though the shadow of widespread industry layoffs was still present.

QHow has the investment strategy of crypto VCs changed recently?

AVCs have become more cautious but remain active, shifting their focus towards later seed rounds and beyond where traction and product-market fit can be evaluated, moving away from moonshot bets based purely on vibes.

QWhat is the current trend among founders regarding token launches?

AMost early-stage founders are not prioritizing token launches; instead, they are focusing first on building economically viable products, with token issuance being an optional consideration for the future.

QWhat is the dominant theme in DeFi that the article highlights?

AThe dominant theme in DeFi is the collective shift towards the Vault sector, encompassing Vault infrastructure, yield products, rehypothecation, strategy discoverers, and ratings, followed by stablecoins and neobanking features.

QWhat observation did the article make about AI Agent applications in crypto?

AMost AI Agent use cases in crypto have reverted to trading bots, with no significant new ideas or surprises emerging in this area during EthCC.

Lecturas Relacionadas

Peter Thiel Behind Palantir: Why Is He Preparing an Exit in Argentina?

Peter Thiel, chairman and ideological core of Palantir (a company that builds predictive surveillance systems for US agencies), has reportedly moved his family to Argentina and purchased property there. While framed by associates as a hedge against potential tax increases or geopolitical risk, the article argues the move is highly significant given Thiel's unique position. His wealth is built on the promise that data can predict the future, and his company's systems are deeply embedded in US government enforcement. Therefore, his act of securing an exit route—in a country with a historical reputation as a haven for those fleeing accountability, like Nazi war criminals—is interpreted as a damning signal. The author suggests Thiel may be acting on superior data indicating one of several unfavorable futures: a MAGA political decline, impending legal accountability for Palantir's role, systemic American collapse, or simply personal doomsday beliefs. The juxtaposition of Palantir's recent manifesto praising America with Thiel's Argentine "backdoor" is seen as revealing. The conclusion is that such an exit strategy, from a man whose product is foresight, indicates a loss of confidence in the very system he helped build.

marsbitHace 32 min(s)

Peter Thiel Behind Palantir: Why Is He Preparing an Exit in Argentina?

marsbitHace 32 min(s)

"Water Scarcity": The Hidden Fatal Flaw of AI Infrastructure

“Water Scarcity: The Hidden Vulnerability of AI Infrastructure” In June 2026, SpaceX revised its IPO prospectus to highlight a core resource constraint alongside power and processors: water. This move signals a pivotal shift where water scarcity has transformed from an operational cost to a major, uncontrollable investment risk, directly threatening AI data center expansion. The scale of the problem is immense. U.S. data centers consumed an estimated 17 billion gallons of water for direct cooling in 2023, with indirect water use for power generation exceeding 211 billion gallons. Giants like Google alone use billions of gallons annually, with single sites consuming volumes equivalent to a medium-sized city. This water is largely “consumptive,” evaporated into the atmosphere and lost. This massive demand is colliding with scarcity. Tech companies are building “water tigers” in arid regions, sparking community protests in places like Mexico and Arizona, where data centers can legally use millions of gallons daily—enough for tens of thousands of residents. These conflicts are not about illegality, but about a mismatch between historic water allocation frameworks and new, colossal demand. The consequences are real. Community opposition, largely centered on water, has reportedly stalled or canceled $64 billion in U.S. data center projects over two years. Simultaneously, investors are pressuring companies for greater water footprint transparency, viewing it as a financial risk, not just an ESG metric. Technological solutions like air or liquid cooling involve trade-offs between water and electricity use, with final choices dictated by local constraints. The irony is stark: while industry leaders envision AI as a utility “like water,” its physical infrastructure is straining real-world water supplies. The race for AI supremacy may ultimately be governed not by the fastest chip, but by the slowest water meter.

marsbitHace 36 min(s)

"Water Scarcity": The Hidden Fatal Flaw of AI Infrastructure

marsbitHace 36 min(s)

Zhou Hang: How Much is SpaceX Really Worth?

Summary: Author Zhou Hang argues that while SpaceX is arguably one of the greatest industrial companies of the past 50 years, its anticipated IPO valuation of approximately $1.75 trillion is likely overvalued by about $1.25 trillion. The analysis acknowledges SpaceX's monumental success in slashing launch costs, achieving near-monopoly in commercial launches, and building the Starlink satellite internet constellation. However, using a projected 2030 revenue of $50-80 billion and applying a generous tech company valuation multiple yields a "reasonable" valuation range of only $500 billion to $1.2 trillion. The $1.25 trillion gap stems from premiums for its long-term vision (e.g., Starship, space-based computing), its status as a U.S. strategic national asset, and retail investor enthusiasm driven by the Elon Musk narrative. The article outlines three post-IPO scenarios: valuation solidification (25% probability), sideways consolidation (50%), or a correction to fundamental value (25%). The probability-weighted expected valuation is $1.3-1.5 trillion, suggesting negative expected returns for buyers at the IPO price. The conclusion cautions investors to separate the company's undeniable greatness from the stock's price, advising against chasing the IPO and to wait for key milestones or a lower entry point.

marsbitHace 43 min(s)

Zhou Hang: How Much is SpaceX Really Worth?

marsbitHace 43 min(s)

Global Card Issuance Enters a Compliance-Driven Era: WasabiCard is Building the Next-Generation Payment Infrastructure

Global card issuance is entering a compliance-driven era, with WasabiCard building next-generation payment infrastructure. The platform asserts that as stablecoins increasingly enter cross-border payments, corporate settlements, and global commerce, the industry is shifting focus from "availability" and "growth-driven" models to long-term, compliant operation under global frameworks. Competition will center on sustainable compliance and global infrastructure capabilities. Stablecoins are evolving from on-chain assets into key payment tools in global business, with card issuance acting as critical infrastructure connecting digital assets to traditional payment networks like Visa and Mastercard. This expansion has revealed structural issues, including cross-regional issuance, BIN resource management, and insufficient AML and risk controls. In response, the industry is moving away from reliance on "grey efficiency" towards prioritizing compliance, risk management, and long-term operational stability. WasabiCard outlines its strategy: collaborating with licensed principals and local partners for localized operations, building robust KYC/AML systems, strictly separating commercial and consumer BIN usage, and enhancing global issuance, payment, and cross-border fund flow infrastructure. The goal is to build stable, scalable payment infrastructure amid evolving global regulations, shifting industry competition from scale to infrastructure capability. As stablecoins integrate further with global commerce, payment infrastructure will become a fundamental, embedded component of internet business. WasabiCard will continue to develop capabilities in global card issuance, stablecoin payments, cross-border fund flows, and API-driven financial workflows.

marsbitHace 47 min(s)

Global Card Issuance Enters a Compliance-Driven Era: WasabiCard is Building the Next-Generation Payment Infrastructure

marsbitHace 47 min(s)

Zhou Hang: How Much Is SpaceX Really Worth?

**Zhou Hang: How Much is SpaceX Really Worth?** SpaceX, arguably one of the greatest industrial companies of the past 50 years, is reportedly targeting a staggering $1.75 trillion valuation in its potential IPO. However, the author argues this figure is inflated by approximately $1.25 trillion when assessed through standard financial metrics. The analysis begins by acknowledging SpaceX's undeniable success: drastically reducing launch costs, achieving near-monopoly in commercial launches, and building the strategic Starlink network. Its achievement surpasses even Tesla's, given it disrupted a state-monopolized industry. Despite this greatness, a $1.75 trillion valuation places SpaceX above the combined market cap of Boeing, Lockheed Martin, Northrop Grumman, RTX, and General Dynamics. Projecting optimistic 2030 revenues of $50-80 billion and applying generous tech-sector multiples yields a "reasonable" valuation range of $500 billion to $1.2 trillion. The $1.25 trillion gap is attributed to three non-financial premiums: 1. **Long-term vision premium** for future Starship-enabled markets (e.g., space-based computing). 2. **Sovereign asset/strategic premium**, as SpaceX is deeply integrated into U.S. national security. 3. **Retail narrative/Musk cult premium**, driven by a heroic story and personal following. Post-IPO, three scenarios are outlined: valuation solidifying (25% probability), sideways volatility as narrative outpaces reality (50%), or a re-rating down to $800B-$1.2T if execution falters or Musk-related risks emerge (25%). The probability-weighted expected value is $1.3-1.5 trillion, suggesting negative expected returns for those buying at the IPO price. The conclusion advises investors to separate the company's excellence from its stock price. Buying at the IPO likely prices in excessive optimism. A more prudent strategy would be to wait for key milestones (e.g., Starship V3 stability) or a significant price correction before investing, or to treat an early purchase as a long-term, high-conviction hold with limited position size, not a short-term bet.

链捕手Hace 51 min(s)

Trading

Spot

Futuros